Development Studies 1st Notes-1
Development Studies 1st Notes-1
Development Studies 1st Notes-1
SESSION 1
Definition and the concept of development
Objectives of development
Dimensions of development
Approaches to development
The term development does not have a standard definition and has remained elusive as different
people and societies have different cultures, value systems, ideologies etc (eg what is middle
class)
In Summary
Hence development can be perceived as a multidimensional process of change involving re-
organization and re-orientation of the entire economic, technological, political and social
systems.
Development is not just about economic growth but involves changes in institutional, social
and administrative structures of the society as well as popular attitudes, customs and beliefs
Development encompasses the entire spectrum of changes by which a society is able to
satisfy its diverse basic needs and desires of individuals and social group in order to move
from a condition of life perceived as unsatisfactory to satisfactory
Objectives of Development
The main objective of development is the improvement and promotion of human well-being;
however development in all societies must have at least the following three objectives;
i. To increase the availability and widen the distribution of basic life sustaining goods such as
food, shelter, health care
ii. To raise the standards of living in a society. In addition to improvements in income and
output, development must aim at providing better jobs, education and more attention to
cultural and humanistic values.
iii. To expand the range of economic, political and social choice to individuals and nations by
freeing them from servitude and dependence on other people, nations and forces of nature
and ignorance which create human misery
Capabilities
Capabilities refer to the range of things that people can do or be in life. The most basic
capabilities for human development are to lead long and healthy lives, to be knowledgeable, to
have access to the resources needed for a decent standard of living and to be able to participate in
the life of the community. Without these, many choices are simply not available, and many
opportunities in life remain inaccessible.
Human development concerns itself with the creation of an environment in which people can
develop their full potential, and lead productive, creative lives in accord with their needs and
interests. It is about creating an environment in which people can develop.
Human development shares a common vision with human rights the goal of human freedom. In
pursuing capabilities and realizing rights, this freedom is vital. People must be free to exercise
their choices and to participate in decision-making that affects their lives
Human development is about the realization of human potential. It is about what people can do
and become (their capabilities) and about the freedom they have to exercise real choices in their
lives.
As a people-cantered approach that focuses on the expansion of people's capabilities and
freedoms, the human development paradigm does not underestimate the importance of rising
incomes and outputs.
Economic growth/Rising incomes and output are deemed only as the ―means‖ and not the ―ends‖
of development. Human development concerns itself with the creation of an environment in
which people can develop their full potential, and lead productive, creative lives in accord with
their needs and interests.
The capability approach emphasizes human achievements and freedoms. It evaluates the various
―functionings‖ in human life (what people want to do and what they aspire to be) and their
capabilities to achieve these functionings‖. These include but are not limited to the ability to be
well-nourished, escape avoidable death, be knowledgeable and be equipped to participate in the
life of one‘s community.
CHARACTERISTICS OF UNDERDEVELOPMENT
1. Predominance of Agriculture:
An underdeveloped country is predominantly a primary producing economy that mainly
depends on the production of agricultural materials and minerals. Majority (70 -80%) of the
population engaged in Agriculture or related activities whose production remains low due to lack
of capital and efficient technology and yet the population pressure on agriculture is very high.
Nearly 40 per cent of the national income is derived from agriculture. Industries in such
countries are mainly agro—based.
4. Under-Utilization of Resources:
The natural resources of the underdeveloped economies are either unutilized or under-utilized.
Generally, underdeveloped countries may not be deficient in natural resources like land, water,
minerals, etc. but the resources are poorly utilized due to various reasons like inaccessibility,
lack of technical knowledge, shortage of capital and limited markets.
5. Capital Deficiency:
Capital occupies a strategic role in production and economic development of a nation.
Underdeveloped countries suffer from capital deficiency. Stock of capital is small, and is
generated at a low rate. The basic shortcoming of the underdeveloped economies is lack of
incentives to invest, low propensity and capacity to save and lack of dynamic entrepreneurship.
9. A Dualistic Economy:
Another important feature of underdevelopment is ‗Dualism‘, the presence of dualistic nature of
economic. We have fast-moving electric trains and also slow-moving country-carts. We have
capital markets and stock exchanges with many communication facilities like STD, ISD and Fax
system in cities; while we have no proper roads in the rural areas and many villages are
unconnected with the railway system. The barter system is still prevailing in many villages. This
type of dualistic feature is not conducive to economic development.
DEVELOPMENT THEORIES
A theory is a tool of explanation or a mechanism with which to make sense of complex realities.
In development studies, theories have been advanced to try and explain what development is,
how it happened in the past and how it should happen or why it fails to happen. Development
theories offer justification for policies. Different positions in development policy are based on
differences in underlying development theories. Models are based on theories and try to explain
the process of development
MODERNIZATION THEORY
Is a social economic theory that is recognised as one of the first theories of development that
emerged just after World War 2 in an effort to explain the differences in wealth between the rich
and poor countries. According to the theory, rich countries are rich because of embracing
modernity
Modernity represents conditions of development characterised by the spread of scientific
knowledge, development of technology, attainment of higher standards of material welfare and
the emergence of lawful, humane and liberal democratic systems of governance
Cultural values, social, political and economic institutions that were a precursor to the rich
country‘s development are all embodied in the notion of modernity
According to W.E Moore, the concept of modernization represent total transformation of a
traditional society into the types of technology and associated social, political and economic
organization that characterize the countries of western Countries
Development is possible if pursued through urbanization and industrialization with
technological transformation of agriculture
Attainment of a modern society is seen as the strategic goal for new nations.
Modernization theory can be seen as an analytical tool to provide a framework within which to
analyse the transition of nations from tradition to modern forms of society
Theory assumes the rate of transformation from a primitive society to a modern one is slow,
gradual and in piecemeal.
Rostow
Among the most prominent modernization theorist is WW Rostow
Identified 2 factors that play an important role in the transformation of a society from a
traditional one to a modern industrialised society;
1. Non economic factors; Attitudes, ideas, achievement, individualism, competition
2. Economic factors: capital and technology, savings and accumulation of wealth for investment
in productive sectors.
Since developing countries lack capital he proposes injecting of capital to finance new methods
of production by developed countries in form of foreign aid in order to stimulate economic
activities – economic growth and development
Rostow argued that although modernization first occurred in the west, it can occur in all societies
provided these societies meet certain preconditions.
Explains economic growth based on a theory which gives 5 stages through which all countries
must pass through to realize development
Countries can be placed in one of five categories in terms of its stage of growth:
Rostow - Stages of Growth
1. Traditional Society
It‘s the lowest in economic growth characterized by limited output /productivity because
of lack of technology and science.
Political power is centralized and the values are fatalistic
The e conomy is usually of a subsistence nature – % of the working
population is involved
in direct food production.
Traditionalism- persisting values and attitudes that represent obstacles to economic and
political development.
Labour intensive agriculture production
In this stage there are new ideas which favor economic progress, new levels of education and
entrepreneurship, institutions are also able to mobilize investment there4 there is expansion of
commerce and the economy in general
However society is limited at this stage because social structures are still traditional:
– Development of mining industries
– Increase in capital use in agriculture
– Necessity of external funding
– Some growth in savings and investment
This last stage involves the achievement of a high standard of living characterized by mass
production and consumption of material goods and services.
At this stage, a society has attained a certain level of income for everybody and nearly everybody
joins in the consumption of goods and services.
- Basic needs have been met; the emphasis is on social welfare and security.
- High output levels/productivity
- Mass consumption of consumer durables
- High proportion of employment in service sector
Criticisms
i. One of the criticisms is that the applied model of modernization has failed to produce
technological and economic development in third world countries. Despite massive
injections of foreign aid and education projects sponsored by first world countries, most third
world countries remain underdeveloped. An underdeveloped country has a low GNP (the
total value of goods and services in a country).
ii. Some critics view modernization theory as ethnocentric or Western-centric. They don‘t agree
that all societies must emulate the West to progress economically.
iii. The theory has also been criticised for citing traditional values as obstacles to technological
and economic progress in third world countries. While it lays emphasis on the internal factors
in third world countries, it neglects the factors of global economic and political power,
conflict and competition within and among societies which contribute to underdevelopment.
iv. The other problem with the theory is that it leads to the categorization of societies into three
worlds: the first world (composed of modern industrial states with predominantly capitalist
or hybrid economic systems. they became industrialized first. Second world countries
consist of industrial states with socialist economies like the countries of Eastern Europe. The
third world countries refer to pre-modern agricultural states that maintain traditionalism. It
encompasses the vast majority of people in the world including Africa, Asia, and Middle
East).
v. This categorization of countries is too simplistic today to account for the great diversity that
is found in these societies. The theory failed to recognize that the underdeveloped countries
are characterized by poorly organized commodity and money markets, communication and
transportation problems, limited skilled labour, highly inefficient bureaucratic government
and corruption
vi. It failed to take into account that third world nations are part of a highly integrated and
complex international system and therefore some external factors come into play like the
vested interests of developed world.
B) DEPENDENCY THEORY
The theory was put forward in the late 50‘s by American Scholars who are largely disillusioned
by development policies based on Modernization theory. This was so because the optimism in
the modernization theory was contradicted by the actual situation in the underdeveloped world
According to Raul Prebisch economic growth in industrialised countries did not necessarily lead
to growth in the poor countries. In fact economic activities in the developed countries often led
to serious economic problems in the poor countries
Dependence is a condition in which the economy of one group is determined by the
development of another. While dominant economies develop on their own, dependent economies
can only develop as a reflection of the development of the dominant country which has a positive
or negative effect on their immediate development.
Dependence is a historical phenomenon that resulted from the contact of poor countries and the
rich mainly European countries which resulted in patterns of relationship characterised by
domination
It has been said that dependency is of international nature and mainly resulted from colonial
domination and has ensured that poor countries have no capacity to exercise choice in external
relations and can never be self-reliant. Colonialism and the international expansion of capitalism
are two processes that have propagated development and underdevelopment. As the
underdeveloped countries are becoming poorer, the local political and economic elites in these
poor nations collaborate with international capitalism to exploit their nations.
The theorists believed the process of social change was not gradual and evolutionary as assumed
by the modernization theory but is instead characterised by conflict of interest between classes of
societies and countries in the international system i.e. class struggle as the engine of social
change and development.
Dependency theorists showed conclusively that some aspects of underdevelopment are related to
the dynamics of power, conflict, class, relations and exploitation. The dependency theory states
that the less developed countries (LDCs) are dependent on developed countries and this
dependency is the cause of underdevelopment in the LDCs
According to Andre Gunter Frank (1967), underdevelopment in the world is the result of
deliberate and systematic exploitation of poor countries by rich countries through the forces of
capitalism on a global scale. Hence capitalism is regarded as the motive force behind
dependency relationships
The international system is comprised of two sets of states which he described as dependent/
dominant, Centre/ periphery, Metropolis/ satellites. The dominant countries include the
advanced countries while the dependent countries include Latin America, Asia and Africa which
have low per capita income, GNP and rely heavily on the basic products of raw materials for
foreign exchange. They exploits the satellites through the extrapolation of economic surplus.
Real development can therefore only occur when this vicious cycle of dependency relationship is
completely removed
Criticisms
1. It is overly pessimistic. It suggests that dependency and impoverishment can be undone only
by a radical restructuring of the world economy to reallocate wealth and resources from
wealthy industrial capitalist countries to impoverished pre-capitalist countries.
Economic development however has occurred in some countries that have had extensive
contact with industrial capitalist societies. Notably Japan moved from an underdeveloped
society to a wealthy industrial capitalist position after the 1950s. In contrast, some poor
societies have had less contact with industrial capitalist society remain highly
underdeveloped.
2. Dependency theorists also neglect the internal conditions of underdeveloped countries
that may inhibit economic development.
3. The theory does not clearly spell out how LDCs are to get the capital necessary for
development instead of external sources of capital. Mobilizing the same from poor countries
is unrealistic
4. The theory uses a large and unclear unit of analysis as it lumps together countries that are at
different stages of development in the same category. E.g. Kenya and brazil which are
lumped together have different levels of capacity for economical and political devt
5. It can also be argued that capitalism is not always as bad as portrayed in the theory. Critics of
the theory have pointed out that the spread of capitalism in LCDs has led to development
rather than underdevelopment( consider the case of Tanzania which embraced socialism)
It was proposed by Emmanuel Wallerstein and pursues the line of thought of the dependency
theorist in an attempt to explain world patterns of inequality. Developed to remedy some of the
inadequacies of the Dependency theory. The theory considers development in the global
context of a single world system and maintains that the capitalist world system develops
rather than individual economies.
The position and relative strengths of an economy in the world system determines its levels of
development. Hence the development process in the low developing countries cannot be studied
in isolation from the industrialised countries. The world has to be treated as one single world
system. . According to this theory the modern capitalist economy world is made up of four
groups of economies; the core countries, the semi-periphery and the periphery.
i. Core countries
- Represent modern societies, in which economic enterprises first emerged,
- Countries with global economic power and wealth, and the associated political & military
strength and influence hence politically and economic dominant countries.
- They have strong manufacturing industries and advanced forms of Agriculture
- Feature high skill, capital intensive production
- Politically they, they collectively establish and enforce rules of the global order and
through these advantages appropriate surplus from noncore countries.
- They organize the world trade to favour their interests and export their culture and
supporting technology to support their economic and political advantage
- Core societies are the most powerful industrial nations that exercise economic domination
over other regions.
- Include USA, Japan, Canada, Australia, New Zealand
ii. Semi periphery
Wallerstein notes that between the core and peripheral countries are the semi peripheral societies
which are somewhat industrialized and have some economic autonomy but are not as advanced
as the core societies.
- The most dynamic group as members constantly move up and down from the category
- In these countries there is hope for development and joining the core countries but narrow
windows of opportunity to do so
- This category accounts for the newly industrializing countries that relatively sophisticated
that cannot fit in the periphery category like Argentina, Brazil, Latin America, China, Asian
Tiger – Malaysia, South Korea, Hong Kong, and Taiwan
iii. Periphery
Are at the lower end of the world system and are characterized by low skill production and
raw materials for industries elsewhere, poor living conditions and bleak development
prospects
Non-industrialized countries which have very little control over their own economies and are
dominated by the core societies.
Were initially unconnected to core countries but have since been drawn to world economy
through colonialism, missionary activities and the activities of large international cooperation.
As the World system evolves, it becomes more difficult for these less developed countries at the
periphery to improve their status significantly, but sometimes opportunities are created for them
to move up. These countries are disadvantaged in the world system‘s order and are often
exploited
The countries in these categories are not fixed; over-time countries are able to move in and out of
the categories depending on their economic status.
The WST rejects the notion that underdevelopment can be dealt merely through economic
growth promoted by foreign aid or investment. It sees underdevelopment as a product of world
capitalist system in which economic activities are organized in such a manner that facilitates
accumulation through exploitation. Economic power rests with those who own the means of
production. The industrialized nations prosper through economic domination and exploitation of
non- industrialized.
Note; A capitalist system entails profits maximization and use of advantage of continuous capital
accumulation and exploitation of labour
Criticisms
i. Fails to explain how development takes or should occur
ii. The theory focuses exclusively on economic factors at the expense of non economic factors
such as politics and cultural traditions. It also fails to address the question of why trade
between industrial and non industrial nations must always be exploitative. Some theorists
have noted that in certain cases, peripheral societies benefit from trade with core societies i.e.
when they need western technology to develop their economies
Although it is not a perfected model it has been more helpful in allowing for a more
comprehensive and flexible view of global economic and political interconnections.