Training Need Analysis in Reliance Money Synopsis
Training Need Analysis in Reliance Money Synopsis
Training Need Analysis in Reliance Money Synopsis
OBJECTIVE
The broad objective of the study of training policies in Reliance Money is to study the impact of
training on the overall skill development of workers. The specific objectives of the study are:
1. To examine the effectiveness of training in overall development of skills of workforce.
2. To examine the impact of training on the workers.
3. To study the changes in behavioral pattern due to training.
4. To measure the differential change in output due to training
5. To compare the cost effectiveness in implanting training programmes.
PROBLEM STATEMENT
1. Job design in identifying training needs: In the context, it is important to point out that it is
relatively difficult to carry out a training needs identification unless the job description are
explicit and clear. Job description requires job analysis which would give the range of task of the
various categories of jobs and skills and competencies required to complete theses jobs. Such an
inventorisation and classification of competencies would then have to be followed up by the
delineation of standard. The available level of skill/ competencies would need to be mapped as
the actual state of affairs. The standard minus the actual would lead to the identification of the
training needs.
1. RESEARCH DESIGN
Descriptive Design.
2. Sample Size:
To understand the training and development scenario at Reliance Mobile and what the trainee
really feels about the training they have undergone and further what kind of training they look
for. Do they really look for any kind of training or not? To study the above aspect we covered
almost about 40 people from almost all the department at of the company Reliance Mobile
6. Limitations
Every scientific study has certain limitations and the present study is no more exception. These
are:
1. The terminology used in the subject is highly technical in nature and creates a lot of
ambiguity.
2. All the secondary data are required were not available.
3. Respondents were found hesitant in revealing opinion about supervisors and
management.