IU HEALTH BLOOMINGTON

HOSPITAL PGY1 RESIDENCY ORAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION FORM

Resident: __Lauren Goeser________________________________ Start Time: ___1201_____
Topic: ___Post menopausal osteoporosis__________________ Stop Time: __1252______

For each of the sections below, circle the descriptor which most accurately corresponds to your observations about the
presentation:
EXC = Excellent (A model for this area) SAT = Satisfactory or acceptable
NI = Needs improvement or unsatisfactory NA = Not applicable
NOTE: For any “NI” response, please include specific ideas for improvement in comments.

Content/Knowledge Descriptors Comments

1. Clearly identifies and presents pertinent
EXC SAT NI NA
information relative to the topic One question from audience. You were prepared for
2. Command of subject area it and answered it correctly.
EXC SAT NI NA
3. Accuracy of answers to questions corresponds
EXC SAT NI NA
with the expected competency of the student
4. Depth of answers to questions corresponds
EXC SAT NI NA
with the expected competency of the student
Review/Application of Literature Descriptors Comments
1. Selects appropriate primary literature Good use of studies to highlight differences in
EXC SAT NI NA
therapy options.
2. Knowledge of literature related to subject area
EXC SAT NI NA
3. Accurately summarizes and applies the primary
EXC SAT NI NA
literature to the topic
4. References properly listed
EXC SAT NI NA

Objectives/Organization/Materials Descriptors Comments

1. Objectives clearly written Presentation was well organized and flowed well.
EXC SAT NI NA
2. Objectives met by the presentation Covered quite a bit of information but did not feel
EXC SAT NI NA rushed. Appropriate time for CME presentation.
3. Clear pattern of organization
EXC SAT NI NA There were a few more opportunities for graphics to
4. Utilizes time well. (__51__min) help make a point – for example, bone loss per year
EXC SAT NI NA as you explained how it varies from
5. Geared to audience's level of knowledge preperipost. The graphics you had were good…
EXC SAT NI NA I just really prefer visuals. It’s something to balance
though, so slides are too busy/full.
6. Format designed to promote understanding
EXC SAT NI NA
I liked the change to dispersing the case and
7. Appropriate material covered [disease vs.
EXC SAT NI NA questions throughout. It gets the audience’s
drug]
interest and keeps them engaged.
8. Printed materials appropriate and well
EXC SAT NI NA
prepared
9. Visual aids well prepared
EXC SAT NI NA
10. Visual aids used effectively EXC SAT NI NA

PGY1 RESIDENCY ORAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION FORM Page 1

 IU HEALTH BLOOMINGTON
HOSPITAL PGY1 RESIDENCY ORAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION FORM

Presentation Descriptors Comments

1. Direct eye contact maintained No distracting mannerisms noted. Good eye contact
EXC SAT NI NA
with your virtual audience. You did not look like you
2. Proper enunciation/pronunciation were reading the slides and that’s easy to do with a
EXC SAT NI NA virtual presentation especially! You seemed very
3. Verbal [easily heard, proper rate, pitched comfortable!
EXC SAT NI NA
varied, lack of "well", "uh", "OK”
4. Used professional phraseology Only a few stumbles over drug names/terms, but
EXC SAT NI NA improved from practice round.
5. Avoided distracting mannerisms
EXC SAT NI NA
6. Appeared comfortable and self-assured
EXC SAT NI NA
7. Demonstrates the ability to think when
questioned. May theorize if not sure of an EXC SAT NI NA
answer, but identifies response as such.
8. Overall presentation style and smoothness of
EXC SAT NI NA
delivery
Additional Comments
Your tone of delivery has improved with experience! Tends to go a little monotone when reciting
numbers/percentages, but it’s hard to jazz those up. Also, it’s easy to start to fade a bit toward the end of a long
presentation like this. You kept the audience’s attention with assessment questions and your tone perked back up at
the end.

Assessment questions were appropriate, and I really liked the way you explained the answers for each one. You were
patient and waited for responses while it would be easy to jump in and share the answer.

Evaluator’s Signature: _Charity McGannon_____________________ Date: ___1/19/22_____

PGY1 RESIDENCY ORAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION FORM Page 2

 IU HEALTH BLOOMINGTON
HOSPITAL PGY1 RESIDENCY ORAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION FORM

Resident: _Lauren Goeser______________________________________ Start Time: __12:00_____

Topic: _Postmenopausal Osteoporosis_____________________________ Stop Time: __12:52_____

For each of the sections below, circle the descriptor which most accurately corresponds to your observations about the
presentation:
EXC = Excellent (A model for this area) SAT = Satisfactory or acceptable
NI = Needs improvement or unsatisfactory NA = Not applicable
NOTE: For any “NI” response, please include specific ideas for improvement in comments.

Content/Knowledge Descriptors Comments

5. Clearly identifies and presents pertinent - Information was pertinent
EXC SAT NI NA
information relative to the topic - Lauren seemed to have a good grasp of the
6. Command of subject area information
EXC SAT NI NA - Only had one question but answered it
7. Accuracy of answers to questions corresponds correctly
EXC SAT NI NA - Answer could have been better organized
with the expected competency of the student
8. Depth of answers to questions corresponds but content was as expected
EXC SAT NI NA
with the expected competency of the student
Review/Application of Literature Descriptors Comments
5. Selects appropriate primary literature - Had primary literature on every slide
EXC SAT NI NA
- Literature was used effectively
6. Knowledge of literature related to subject area - Literature was applied appropriately
EXC SAT NI NA - References were properly listed
7. Accurately summarizes and applies the primary
EXC SAT NI NA
literature to the topic
8. References properly listed
EXC SAT NI NA

Objectives/Organization/Materials Descriptors Comments

11. Objectives clearly written - Objectives were listed at beginning of
EXC SAT NI NA
presentation
12. Objectives met by the presentation - Patient case effectively met objectives of
EXC SAT NI NA presentation
13. Clear pattern of organization - Presentation was organized
EXC SAT NI NA - Slightly over a time
- Difficult to assess audience due to being a
14. Utilizes time well. (____min)
EXC SAT NI NA virtual presentation; felt it was appropriate
for a range of healthcare professionals
15. Geared to audience's level of knowledge
EXC SAT NI NA - I really liked the use of the case spread
throughout the presentation; this promotes
16. Format designed to promote understanding and makes the presentation
understanding EXC SAT NI NA more engaging
- Both disease and drugs were covered; was
17. Appropriate material covered [disease vs. more focused on drugs
EXC SAT NI NA
drug] - Could include more diagrams and visuals to
18. Printed materials appropriate and well EXC SAT NI NA reduce the amount of words/clutter
prepared

PGY1 RESIDENCY ORAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION FORM Page 3

 IU HEALTH BLOOMINGTON
HOSPITAL PGY1 RESIDENCY ORAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION FORM
19. Visual aids well prepared
EXC SAT NI NA
20. Visual aids used effectively
EXC SAT NI NA

Presentation Descriptors Comments

9. Direct eye contact maintained - Virtual presentation so unable to assess
EXC SAT NI NA
eye contact
10. Proper enunciation/pronunciation - Stumbled on a few words but for the most
EXC SAT NI NA part had correct enunciation/pronunciation
11. Verbal [easily heard, proper rate, pitched - No filler words which is very impressive
EXC SAT NI NA - No distracting habits
varied, lack of "well", "uh", "OK”
12. Used professional phraseology - Very professional
EXC SAT NI NA - Seemed comfortable throughout the
presentation
13. Avoided distracting mannerisms
EXC SAT NI NA - Only had one question; response was
correct but wasn’t concise
14. Appeared comfortable and self-assured - Difficult to assess smoothness due to
EXC SAT NI NA
virtual presentation but it felt okay
15. Demonstrates the ability to think when
questioned. May theorize if not sure of an EXC SAT NI NA
answer, but identifies response as such.
16. Overall presentation style and smoothness of
EXC SAT NI NA
delivery
Additional Comments
Overall, the presentation was a good overview of osteoporosis treatment. I really enjoyed the case being applied
throughout the presentation. I would have added more diagrams as osteoporosis is a lot of information and it can
feel “word heavy”. I thought Lauren presented well. She had no distracting mannerisms and was professional.

Evaluator’s Signature: _Colin Frank_____________________ Date: _1/19/2022_____

PGY1 RESIDENCY ORAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION FORM Page 4