Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 41 views

    Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric - Unit 1 - Task 1 - Video Discourse

    Uploaded by

    dorispaola
    The task involves: 1) Reading a required text; 2) Creating a 2-3 minute video discussing the differences between translation and interpreting without reading notes; 3) Posting a screenshot of the video discussion forum; and 4) Submitting a PDF with presentation page, index, screenshot, and public video link. Students will be evaluated on their understanding of translation vs interpretation concepts (15 points) and the quality of their discourse without reading (10 points). The submission must follow APA format and avoid plagiarism.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric - Unit 1 - Task 1 - Video Discourse

    Uploaded by

    dorispaola
    41 views5 pages
    The task involves: 1) Reading a required text; 2) Creating a 2-3 minute video discussing the differences between translation and interpreting without reading notes; 3) Posting a screenshot of the video discussion forum; and 4) Submitting a PDF with presentation page, index, screenshot, and public video link. Students will be evaluated on their understanding of translation vs interpretation concepts (15 points) and the quality of their discourse without reading (10 points). The submission must follow APA format and avoid plagiarism.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric - Unit 1- Task 1 - Video Discourse

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The task involves: 1) Reading a required text; 2) Creating a 2-3 minute video discussing the differences between translation and interpreting without reading notes; 3) Posting a screenshot of the video discussion forum; and 4) Submitting a PDF with presentation page, index, screenshot, and public video link. Students will be evaluated on their understanding of translation vs interpretation concepts (15 points) and the quality of their discourse without reading (10 points). The submission must follow APA format and avoid plagiarism.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    41 views5 pages

    Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric - Unit 1 - Task 1 - Video Discourse

    Uploaded by

    dorispaola
    The task involves: 1) Reading a required text; 2) Creating a 2-3 minute video discussing the differences between translation and interpreting without reading notes; 3) Posting a screenshot of the video discussion forum; and 4) Submitting a PDF with presentation page, index, screenshot, and public video link. Students will be evaluated on their understanding of translation vs interpretation concepts (15 points) and the quality of their discourse without reading (10 points). The submission must follow APA format and avoid plagiarism.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 5

    Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia

    Vicerrectoría Académica y de Investigación


    Course: Translation Techniques
    Code: 551037

    Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric – Task 1 Video Discourse

    1. Activity Description

    Type of Activity: Individual


    Evaluation Moment: Initial
    Highest Activity Score: 25 points
    The activity starts on: Monday, February The activity ends on: Sunday, February
    7, 2022 20, 2022
    With this activity, the following learning outcomes are expected:

    Learning Outcome 1: To apply the concepts regarding translation techniques through


    the completion of different translation tasks.
    The activity consists of:

    Step 1: Flip-Grid
    Read the required bibliography: Chirimbu, 2018 in unit 1.

    Make sure that you have access to your institutional e-mail. You are going to use it in
    the activities of this course.

    Enter the forum Task 1 – Video Discussion in the collaborative learning environment
    and check the link to the Flip-grid activity and the access code.

    Watch the flip-grid tutorial: https://youtu.be/6tfoCgQuqcw

    Enter the link and the code given by your tutor in the forum. Access the flip-grid with
    your Microsoft o Google institutional account and participate with your discourse.

    Prepare and rehearse in advance, then record yourself in a 2 to 3-minute video


    participation in flip-grid talking about the differences between translating and
    interpreting. Reading is not allowed, look at the camera at all times, and speak
    naturally.

    1
    Name the video with your group number and your full name. For example:
    551037_01 Andrés Blanco.

    Post in the forum of the activity located in the learning environment a screenshot of
    your participation in Flip-grip.

    Step 2: Submission
    In a PDF document, write a presentation page, index, screenshot of your participation
    in the forum, and public link to you flip-grid video; submit it through the evaluation
    environment. Name the PDF with your group number and your full name. For
    example: 551037_01 Andrés Blanco.PDF

    Make sure that you link is public and it works properly. One way to do this is to use
    the link in an incognito mode browser window.

    Check that you document follow the APA standards. You can check them in
    https://repository.unad.edu.co/static/pdf/Norma_APA_7_Edicion.pdf

    Read the rubric.


    Keep in mind for the development of the activity:

    In the Initial Information Environment, you must: introduce yourself in the general
    forum “social interaction”. Also, check the dates of the web conferences and the
    schedule for students’ attention trough SKYPE.

    In the Learning Environment, you must: read the course content and participate in
    the forum Task 1 – Video discourse sharing the learning process. The forum is a
    space to show your advances and receive feedback from tutors and peers. However,
    this is not a space for evaluation.

    In the Evaluation Environment, you must: submit the final document through the link
    Task 1- Video discourse. Here you upload the final document in PDF that is going to
    be reviewed. If the activity requires forum participation, add screenshots of your
    participation in the forum.

    Individual Work Evidences:


    The individual evidence to be submitted is:

    Final individual PDF posted on the link Task 1- Video discourse in the evaluation
    environment.

    2
    Collaborative Evidences:
    No collaborative evidence is required in this activity.

    2. General Guidelines for the Development of Evidences to Submit.

    For Individual evidence, consider the following:


     Share the task progress in the forum of the activity located in the learning
    environment.

     Before delivering the final document, make sure it meets all the requirements
    indicated in this activity guide.

    Please keep in mind that all individual or collaborative written products must comply
    with the spelling rules and presentation conditions defined in this activity guide.
    Regarding the use of references, consider that the product of this activity must
    comply with APA Format.
    https://repository.unad.edu.co/static/pdf/Norma_APA_7_Edicion.pdf
    In any case, make sure you comply with the rules and avoid academic plagiarism.
    You can review your written products using the Turnitin tool found on the virtual
    campus.

    Under the Academic Code of Conduct, the actions that infringe the academic order,
    among others, are the following: paragraph e) "Plagiarism is to present as your own
    work all or part of a written report, task or document of invention carried out by
    another person. It also implies the use of citations or lack of references, or it
    includes citations where there is no match between these and the reference" and
    paragraph f) "To reproduce, or copy for profit, educational resources or results of
    research products, which have rights reserved for the University ". (Acuerdo 029 -
    13 de diciembre de 2013, Artículo 99)

    The academic penalties students will face are:


    a) In case of academic fraud demonstrated in the academic work or evaluation, the
    score obtained will be zero (0.0) without any disciplinary measures being derived.
    b) In case of proven plagiarism in academic work of any nature, the score obtained
    will be zero (0.0), without any disciplinary measures being derived.

    3
    3. Evaluation Rubric

    Type of Activity: Individual


    Evaluation Moment: Initial
    Highest Activity Score: 25 points
    First Evaluation High Level: Excellent at presenting the main ideas and
    Criterion: specific information. Accurately identified the role of the
    translator and the interpreter highlighting similarities and
    Concepts differences.
    interpretation
    If your work is at this level, you can get between 15 points
    This criterion and 10 points
    represents 15
    points of the total Average Level: Good at presenting the main ideas and
    of 25 points of specific information. Partially identified the role of the
    the activity. translator and the interpreter highlighting similarities and
    differences.

    If your work is at this level, you can get between 9 points


    and 5 points

    Low level: The main ideas and specific information were not
    presented. The student did not identify the role of the translator
    and the interpreter highlighting similarities and differences.

    If your work is at this level, you can get between 4


    points and 1 point.
    Second Evaluation High Level: The student has enough range of language to give
    Criterion: clear descriptions, express viewpoints without much noticeable
    searching for words. The student shows a relatively high degree
    Discourse of language control. The student does not make relevant
    mistakes.

    4
    This criterion
    represents 10 If your work is at this level, you can get between 10 points
    points of the total and 6 points
    of 25 points of
    the activity. Average Level: The student uses basic sentence patterns with
    memorized phrases, groups of a few words, and formulates
    sentences in order to communicate limited information. The
    student can make him/herself understood in very short
    utterances, even though pauses, false starts, and reformulation
    are very evident. Some relevant mistakes cause
    misunderstanding and/or some ideas were read in the video.

    If your work is at this level, you can get between 5 points


    and 3 points

    Low level: The student read during the whole video.

    If your work is at this level, you can get between 2


    points and 1 point.

    You might also like