Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric - Unit 1 - Task 1 - Introduction To Main Terms
Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric - Unit 1 - Task 1 - Introduction To Main Terms
Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric - Unit 1 - Task 1 - Introduction To Main Terms
Step 1: Checking
Step 2: Answers
1
Step 3: Questions
- Create three (3) original questions based on the video and answer them. Be
sure to share them in the forum for your e-mates to read.
Step 4: Delivery
- Send to the Evaluation environment a PDF file with Step 2 and Step 3.
- Upload a PDF file with the task’s individual evidences. Identify your file as
follows: 518017 - Task 1 - Your Full Name.pdf
2
5. APA References (Different from the ones provided in the course if you use
other sources of information for your answers)
▪ Be sure to write proper citations and references for other sources you might
use.
▪ Be sure to answer all the questions with your own words.
▪ Be sure to revise content, structure and mechanics in everything you post in
the forums and/or sent for evaluation.
▪ Before submitting the requested product, student should check that it meets
all the requirements mentioned in this activity guide.
Please keep in mind that all individual or collaborative written products must comply
with the spelling rules and presentation conditions defined in this activity guide.
Regarding the use of references, consider that the product of this activity must
comply with APA style.
In any case, make sure you comply with the rules and avoid academic plagiarism.
You can review your written products using the Turnitin tool found in the virtual
campus.
Under the Academic Code of Conduct, the actions that infringe the academic order,
among others, are the following: paragraph e) Plagiarism is to present as your own
work all or part of a written report, task or document of invention carried out by
another person. It also implies the use of citations or lack of references, or it
includes citations where there is no match between these and the reference and
paragraph f) To reproduce, or copy for profit, educational resources or results of
research products, which have rights reserved for the University. (Acuerdo 029 - 13
de diciembre de 2013, artículo 99)
3
a) In case of academic fraud demonstrated in the academic work or evaluation, the
score obtained will be zero (0.0) without any disciplinary measures being derived.
b) In case of proven plagiarism in academic work of any nature, the score obtained
will be zero (0.0), without any disciplinary measures being derived.
3. Evaluation Rubric
This criterion Average Level: The given answer partially shows that the
represents 10 student explored and analyzed the reference for unit 1. The
points of the total information partially shows that the student understood the
of 25 points of basic concepts and mastered the topics.
the activity.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 6
points and 7 points
Low level: The given answer does not show that the student
explored and analyzed the reference for unit 1. The information
does not show that the student understood the basic concepts
and mastered the topics.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 0
points and 5 points
Second evaluation High Level: The student shows assertiveness and relevance in
criterion: the creation of the questions while its answers clearly show
comprehension of basic concepts about the nature of language
Create original and linguistics.
questions derived
4
from the provided If your work is at this level, you can get between 8
material. points and 10 points
Third evaluation High level: The document meets the criteria for presentation
criterion: and references according to APA standards.
Present a PDF file If your work is at this level, you can get between 4
according to APA points and 5 points
standards.
Average level: The document partially meets the criteria for
This criterion presentation and references according to APA standards.
represents 5
points of the total If your work is at this level, you can get between 3
of 25 points of points and 3.9 points
the activity.
Low level: The document does not meet the criteria for
presentation and references according to APA standards.