9577
9577
Abstract
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of dual task specific training and conventional physical therapy
in ambulation of patients with chronic stroke.
Methods: The randomised controlled trial was conducted at the Habib Physiotherapy Complex,
Peshawar, Pakistan, from January to August 2017, and comprised patients with chronic stroke. The
patients were randomly assigned to two treatment groups. Group A received dual task training, while
Group B received conventional physiotherapy. Dual task training included activities such as slowly
walking backward, sideways, and forward on a smooth surface while holding a 100gm sandbag. The
conventional physiotherapy included mat activities, stretching and strengthening exercises and gait
training. Pre-test and post-test data was taken for both spatial and temporal variables for both groups
using Time Up and Go Test and 10-meter walk test. Step length, stride length, cycle time and cadence
were also calculated before and after treatment. SPSS 23 was used to analyse the data.
Results: Of the 64 patients, there were 32(50%) in each of the two groups that both had 17(53%) males
and 15(47%) females. Mean age in Group A was 58.28 ± 7.13 years, while in Group B it was 58.87 ± 6.13
years. Baseline parameters had no significant differences between the groups (p>0.05). Post-treatments
scores revealed significant improvement of spatial and temporal variable of gait, 10-meter walk,
cadence, step length, stride and cycle time in Group A compared to Group B (p<0.05 each).
Conclusion: Conventional physical therapy and dual task training effectively improved gait ability of
chronic stroke patients, and the latter showed significant improvement in all spatial and temporal gait
variables compared to former.
Keywords: Conventional, Physiotherapy, Dual task, Gait, Stroke. (JPMA 70: 7; 2020).
https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.10443
Table-2: Comparison of the gait parameter scores of Group A and Group B patients for all gait parameters between the groups except
before treatment. for TUG test. In the current study, there was significant
Variable Group A(n= 32) Group B(n= 32) p-value improvement for the same variable. This could be due to
Pre-Step Length (cm) 48.46 ±3.66 47.53±4.58 0.37 the treatment duration where the patients performed the
Pre-Stride Length (cm) 97±7.28 95.35±9.26 0.43 training for 3 times a week in the experimental group, but
Pre-10Meterwalk test(cm/sec) 84.28±10.89 82.62±12.81 0.58
in our study the patients performed the training for 4
Pre-TUG(sec) 24.90±2.305 26.37±1.87 0.429
Pre-cycle time(sec) 1.21±0.087 1.14±0.071 0.401 times a week.22
Pre-cadence(steps/min) 93.40±3.54 95.93±3.66 0.135 A study with 20 stroke patients concluded that after
TUG: Time Up and Go Test. treatment of 4 weeks of 3 times a week, patients in the
Table-3: Comparison of the gait parameter scores of Group A and Group B experimental group improved in terms of their TUG test.23
after treatment. This is similar to our findings.
Variable Group A(n= 32) Group B(n= 32) p-value
A quasi-experimental study on the effects of DTT on gait
Post-Step Length (cm) 55.15±9.67 49.00±3.81 0.001
introduced activities for a period of 40 minutes 3 times a
Post-Stride Length (cm) 107.16±8.34 98.21±7.46 0.010
Post-10MWT (cm/sec) 101.22 ± 8.72 80.34±9.41 0.001 week for 4 weeks and reported significant improvement
Post-TUG (sec) 10.81±2.37 19.18±2.96 0.001 in gait parameters of cadence while there was no statistical
Post-Cycle Time (sec) 1.02±0.038 1.11±0.068 0.001 significant improvement in terms of step length and stride
Post-Cadence (steps/min) 103.44±4.07 98.59±3.92 0.000 length.24 This may be due to the small sample size and
Independent sample T test was applied, p-value <0.05 was taken as significant. possibly because of treatment timing. In the current study
TUG: Time Up and Go Test.
the patients were doing exercise 4 times a week for 4
Mean post-intervention step length of Group A was
weeks. Only right hemiplegic patients were recruited for
55.15±9.67 cm and for group B it was 49±3.18 cm
the study24 compared to the present study as there were
(p=0.001). Mean post-intervention stride length of Group
both right and left hemiplegic patients.
A was 107.16±8.34 cm and for group B it was 98.21±7.46
cm (p0.010)(Table 3). Another study reported results similar to those of the
current study. There was a significant improvement in the
Discussion speed of Motor Dual Task group. Inter-group analysis
Results showed that under DTT, the gait speed was showed significant improvement in step length, stride
significantly improved in the current study which is length and cadence in the experimental group25 which
supported by a study on chronic stroke patients where is similar to the findings of the present study.
the objective was to improve walking ability by DTT. There was an increase of gait speed from 52 cm/s to 69
Literature suggests patients are able to safely and cm/s after 4 weeks of training in a study conducted on
effectively ambulate in the community.19 It has been stroke patients where the change in speed was similar to
reported to function as a perambulator in most social and the present study; 17 cm/s.26 TUG test was significantly
environmental contexts a walking speed of 110 to 150 improved in the experimental group of an RCT,27 and the
cms per second is considered to be enough.20 Dean et al. results match our findings
reported a gain of 12.6 cm/s in the gait of stroke survivors Large clinical trials and multicentre studies need to be
after treatment in the experimental group, while in our conducted in order to determine effectiveness of DTT in
study the gain in speed was 16 cm/s in Group A and was comparison with other treatment options available for
significantly superior.20 The mean age of patients was the rehabilitation of stroke patients.
58.57±6.604 in the present study which is similar to those
In terms of limitations, certain confounding variables,
reported in earlier studies.21
such as psychological status, use of medications,
In the current study there was a gain in walking speed
nutritional status and family support etc., may have
after treatment, as has been reported in studies.15 The
affected the results of the current study, but it was beyond
effects of DTT in improving walking ability of stroke
the scope of the work to control these confounding
patients reported in a controlled trial17 are also similar to
variables.
our findings.
A study showed there was a significant difference in stroke