Proletarian in Grapes of Wrath
Proletarian in Grapes of Wrath
Proletarian in Grapes of Wrath
Marx says that the proletariat is being exploited under capitalism, forced to accept meager
wages in return for operating the means of production, which belong to the class of business
owners, the bourgeoisie.
{Bourgeoisie is the social class that came to own the means of production during modern
industrialization and whose societal concerns are the value of property and the preservation of
capital to ensure the perpetuation of their economic supremacy.}
Marx argued that this oppression gives the proletariat common economic and political interests
that transcend national boundaries, impelling them to unite and take over power from the
capitalist class, and eventually to create a communist society free from class distinctions.
In the Grapes of Wrath the tenant farmers, though they have worked the land they have
inhabited for decades, don't own the property. As such, their value is deemed less than those
who do own the property. In fact, a lack of ownership plagues the tenant farmers, like the Joads,
throughout the novel. Not only do they have to leave their farms, they have no means of
purchasing a home, and though they go to California with the hopes of earning money so they
can secure a home, by the end of the novel they are still living in workers' camps. This is
especially important to a Marxist critic, as the Joads live in a camp, are homeless, while working
for wealthy landowners, such as Hooper ranch owners, who have secured wealth by paying
their workers unlivable wages. This relationship between the Joads and the owners is what a
Marxist critic would call the socioeconomic relationship between the bourgeoisie--the haves,
and the proletariat--the have-nots. So in the Grapes of Wrath the banks and land owners
represent the bourgeoisie, and the Joads represent proletariats. For Steinbeck, the bourgeoisie
are guilty of inhumanity due to their treatment of the proletariats.
Steinbeck created the work because of showing the difficulties of many Americans who had
The Great Depression and The Dust Bowl. Steinbeck's “The Grapes of Wrath '' can be
discussed by many critical theories but Marxist criticism which I will be discussing here is the
one of the most common lenses through which to read the novel. This is because Steinbeck's
narrative shows the exact problems that a capitalist society describes working class people. We
will read/discuss the work to see how the author makes a Marxist argument in his work. During
The Dust Owl in the history of America, large parts of the American Midwest, much of
Oklahoma, to be more precise, were heavily affected by a continuous span of drought and high
winds. The hope to find a land for making a living forced people out of their homes in the lower
Midwest. This novel was written in the final stage of the Great Depression.
The workers receive less money for long hours from their employers; the landowners show
dishonesty to their workers and hardly pay them. This relationship between the Joads and the
owners is what a Marxist critic would call the socioeconomic relationship between the
bourgeoisie which is the haves, and the proletariat which is the have-nots. So in the Grapes of
Wrath landowners represent the bourgeoisie and the Joads represent proletariats. For
Steinbeck, the bourgeoisie are guilty of inhumanity because of their treatment of the proletariats.
John Steinbeck works with a lot of different themes in this novel, but the issue of poverty and
how capitalism contributes to it, is by far one of the most important aspects of book.