Comprehensive Mobility Plan Surat 2046
Comprehensive Mobility Plan Surat 2046
Comprehensive Mobility Plan Surat 2046
Page 2
What is Comprehensive Mobility Plan (CMP) ?
The Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India formulated the National Urban
Transport Policy in April, 2006
NUTP envisaged the preparation of Comprehensive Mobility plans.
CMP is a strategic document which provides the direction for the development of urban
transportation in the city. It cover all elements of urban transport under an integrated
planning process.
It is a long-term vision for desirable accessibility and mobility pattern for people and
goods in the city to provide, safe, secure, efficient, reliable and seamless connectivity that
supports and enhances economic, social and environmental sustainability.
(Preparing a Comprehensive Mobility Plan(CMP)—A Toolkit, MoUD, 2014)
Administrative Boundaries:
SMC comprises of :
326.52 Sq. km area
7 Zones
89 Wards
SUDA comprises of :
985.16 sq km area
121 Villages
Out side
Year SMC Study Area % Growth
SMC
1961
288,026
Kamrej
Katargam
Railway
Adajan
Station
Udhna Kadod
ara
Hazira Pandesar
a
Palsan
Sachin a
Terminal surveys
3 large terminals, 2 small terminals
(4000 passengers interviewed)
Willingness to Shift
2000 samples (Pvt. Vehicle users, 3Wh users)
Page 9
Vehicular Registrations in Surat-1990 to 2017
Vehicle Registrations
3300000
3000000
2700000
2400000
Total Vehicles
2100000
1800000 2W
1500000 3W
1200000
900000 4W
600000 total
300000
0
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 Sept_2017
Year
(RTO, Surat, 2017).
Source : Household survey, CEPT university 2016 Page 11 Avg. travel time by motorised mode: 13.5 minutes
Avg. Trip Length of the city(km)
3.0
5.0
7.0
9.0
11.0
13.0
Mumbai-(183 L)
Delhi-(163 L)
Bangalore-(84 L)
Hyderabad-(67 L)
Ahmedabad-(55 L)
Chennai-(46 L, City)
Kolkata-(45 L, City)
Surat-(45 L)
Pune-(31 L)
Jaipur-(30 L)
Lucknow-(28 L)
Kanpur-(27 L)
Nagpur-(24 L)
Indore-(19 L)
Page 12
Bhopal-(18 L)
Visakhapatnam-(17 L)
Patna-(17 L)
Vadodara-(16 L)
Gaziabad-(16.5 L)
Work Trip Lengths – Top 35 Indian Cities
Ludhiana-(16.2 L)
Surat Trip Length: 5.5km
Agra-(15.8 L)
Nashik-(14.8 L)
Faridabad-(14 L)
Meerut-(13 L)
Rajkot-(12.9 L)
Varanasi-(12 L)
Srinagar-(11.8 L)
Total
Aurangabad-(11.7 L)
Dhanbad-(16.2 L)
Amritsar-(11.3 L)
Male
Allahabad-(11.1 L)
Ranchi-(10.7 L)
Gwalior-(10.7 L)
Female
Jabalpur-(10.5 L)
Coimbatore-(10.5 L)
Source: Census 2011 – Travel Diary
PART 3: System Performance
25
20
Speed
15
10
0
9:00 AM 10:00 11:00 12:00 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM
AM AM PM
Time
% of Higher order
VCR Category
Network
>0.9 72 km (14%)
>0.7 64 km (12%)
Page 16
System Performance- Accidents
Accidents
Year Minor
Fatal* Serious* Total
Accidents
2011 558 240 425 1223
2012 484 225 437 1146
2013 344 213 414 971
2014 324 246 406 976
Mode 2015 266 251 386 903
Affected Mode
s
2016 NA 273 327 -
Others(JC Accident
Two Three Four Truck and B, Crain, with Street
GSRTC/ Gran Level of Service -3
Pedestrian Bicycle Private d %
Wheeler Wheeler Wheeler Eicher SMC Element/B
Bus Total
Vehicles) reakdown As per Service Level Benchmarks in Urban Transport for Indian
Cities- Round2, Centre of Excellence in Urban Transport, 2016
Two Wheeler 88 6 38 132 11%
Three Wheeler 95 3 24 3 125 11% Affected Modes:
Four Wheeler 90 10 79 7 4 190 16%
Responsible Mode
City Bus 3 1 1 5 0%
Pedestrian: 43%,
Truck and Eicher 90 10 152 17 16 7 3 1 296 25% 2Wh: 40%
Others(JCB, Crain, SMC
43 12 58 2 8 4 3 130 11%
Vehicles)
Accident with Street
72 42 10 5 2 131 11%
Responsible Modes:
Element/Breakdown
GSRTV/Private Bus 19 3 23 3 48 4%
Trucks & Eicher: 25%,
Unknown 82 2016
Source: Police Department, Surat 8 26 3 1 1 121 10% 4Wh : 16 % each
Grand Total 510 53 473 77 39 16 9 0 1 1178 100%
Page 17
% 43% 4% 40% 7% 3% 1% 1% 0% 0% 100%
System Operations and Performance Pollution levels 2016
Tons/ Day
15.00 600
Good Poor
LoS ranges
Focus areas
1 2 3 4
Public Transport Facilities ≤14 15-28 29-42 42-56
Financial Sustainability of PT ≤3 4–6 7–9 10-12
Pedestrian Infrastructure Facilities ≤4 5–8 9 – 12 13 - 16
Pedestrian Infrastructure Facilities (For hill Cities) * ≤8 9 – 16 17 – 24 25 – 32
Non-Motorized Transport Facilities ≤3 4–6 7–9 10-12
Application of ITS Facilities ≤5 6 – 10 11 – 15 16 - 20
Road Network Performance ≤7 8 – 14 15 – 21 22 - 28
Parking Management <2 3–4 5–6 7–8
Road Safety ≤3 4–6 7–9 10-12
Environment ≤4 5–8 9-12 13 - 16
Integrated Land Use-Transport System ≤6 7 – 12 13 – 18 19 - 24
Intermediate Public Transport Page 19
≤3 4–6 7–9 10-12
System Operations and Performance- Overall
Page 20
PART 4: What are the mobility challenges for future?
GHG Average
emissions Speed on the
likely to Mobility Challenges network to
increase in Surat reduce from
29 kmph to
4.5 times 20 kmph
Travel Time
Accidents to to increase
increase by Increase in 4.5 times (13
4.8 times Congestion minutes to
3.5 times 60 minutes)
(14% to 48%
network)
Page 22
PART 5: People’s Expectations from the plan
4.20
3.97
4.00 4.06
4.10
3.90 3.99
3.79 4.00
3.80 3.86
3.70 3.90
3.70 3.79
Avg. Rates
3.58 3.80
3.60
Avg. Rates
3.70
3.50 3.43 3.45
3.37 3.36 3.60
3.40
3.30 3.50
3.20 3.40
3.10 3.30
3.00 3.20
Good Walking Safety on Roads & Seamless Travel Time in
Facilities Reduction in Connectivity in all Surat to remain
accidents Public Transport below 30 minutes
Modes
Expectations
Current Issues
Page 24
Based on responses received from 388 persons
Vision for Surat 2046 by citizens
Road
Transport
Last mile
Infrastructure Integration connectivity
Policy
& Awareness
International Affordable
Air Parking public
connectivity space transport
Page 26
PART 6: Forecasts
2011 50,81,856 - - -
Pandesara
• Dream city is being proposed towards the
south of Surat as major activities generated
Dream City area.
Sachin Palsana
GIDC • DFC and High Speed Rail towards East
• Vadodara Mumbai Expressway towards East
• Logistics park near Bhatiya
Page 29 • Proposed Commercial Zone near Kadodara
Future Area Requirement
DP SUDA Proposed Area: 681 sq.km CMP 2046 -Proposed Area:832 sq.km
326 251 97,50,000 299 388 SMC 326 262 79,93,695 245 305
SMC
Study Area 1351 681 110,00,000 81 162 Study Area 1351 832 125,00,000 93 150
Page 30
PART 7: Proposals
Road Network Development
Critical junction:
Merging of 5
arms with
variation in Road Junctions with 4
widths i.e. arms, road
60m,120m,90m & widths of 60m
45m
Area Existing
SMC 3859
SUDA 1411
Rest 503
Total 5773
Built up 228
(sq km)
Road 4.3
density
(Km/sqk
m)
Page 34
Road density = Total road network / study area
Road Network Development Process– Development Plan (2035)
Page 38
Proposed Typical Cross Sections for Surat
CL
0.25 0.25
1.25 5.5 2.25 2.25 2.75 11 9.5 11 2.75 2.25 2.25 5.5 1.25
60
Median with
P/U SL UC PP CT CW Transit Ready Zone CW CT PP UC SL P/U
0.6
0.6
Page 40
Road Network along DFC - Proposed Cross sections of Underpass
CMP (2046)
Total Underpass: 16
(Major: 9 and
Other: 7)
River 11 2 7 7
Bridges
Flyover 28 4 1 1
Total 59 11 33 45
Page 42
Scenario Specification
4500
1400
0 2300
6000 13000 Yr. 2016 Yr. 2021 Yr. 2026 Yr. 2036 Yr. 2046 7800
% Average
% V/C >.9
Sr. Scenario VKT (full VHT saving travel Total Fatal
Scenario savings (length in
No. Description day) (full day) s in time Accidents Accidents
in VKT km)
VHT (mins)
DP network
1 9,93,82,597 55,10,370 57.5 465 (57%) 3825 861
Base - 2046 (Bus + BRT)
DP network
BAU - 2046
2 (Bus + BRT + Metro + 7,66,90,758 22% 32,43,250 41% 39.4 375 (46%) 2888 650
(Do minimum)
Rapid Transit Corridors)
CMP network
CMP - 2046
3 (Bus + BRT + Metro + 6,56,29,842 34% 2,405,178 56% 31.7 155 (14%) 2270 511
(Do something)
Rapid Transit Corridors)
Page 45
PART 7: Proposals
Public Transport Proposals
Major Growth
Major Growth &
&
Transport Nodes
Transport Nodes Public transport network (2017)
as per
as per DP2036
DP2036
• BRTS : 105 km
• City bus: 272 km
Total: 330 km
Page 48
Public Transport in Surat – Existing + Probable Rapid Transit Corridors
CMP
(Do Something - Bus + BRT + Rapid Transit Corridor) Proposed Metro Corridor
1. Majuragate to Karamala (via Ved): 15.8 km
2. Dream city – Kamrej/Vav (via Sarsana- Exhibition
Centre, Bhatar Char rasta and Sarsana, Majura Gate,
7000
Rly station and Sarthana): 29 km
3. Bhesan – Umbhel (via Adajan, Majura gate, Kamela
18000 Darwaja and Saroli): 26.3 km
Accessibility to transit
Page 50 in this scenario by avg. 23% w.r.t to BAU scenario
has improved
Proposed PT network
Integration of Network
71 km of metro network
Page 51
Public Transport - Proposed Interchanges
• RTC + BRT +
Regional bus +city
Level 2 bus 20
• RTC + BRT + city
bus
Total 34
Page 52
Public Transport - Interchange concept – Udhana
Basic Terminal
Facilities
Transit Supportive
Facilities
Additional Facilities
Primary Catchment
Area
5. Intelligent Transport
Management System
Transit Development Area (TDA) delineation
(ITMS)
Page 53
Proposed Terminals and Depot locations
Type Total
Depots 4
Terminals 9
Proposed Terminal &
26
Depots
Total 39
Page 54
Public Transport Proposal- Waterways
Route 1: Dumas to Causeway Bridge (22 km)
Page 57
PART 7: Proposals
Transit Oriented Development
Page 59
Requirements for TOD zoning and Regulations
Page 60
MRT and BRT TOD Zones
Total Zones: 14 (avg size – 1.8 sqkm) Total Zones: 31 (avg size – 2 sqkm) Total Zones: 37 (avg size – 2 sqkm)
Total area: 38 sqkm Total area: 66 sqkm Total area: 81 sqkm
Page 61
Existing Proposed
Transit Oriented
Zone
Improving Walkability by
Reducing Block Size
200m buffer for TOD
and 500m buffer for
walkability
Plots considered
with 50% and higher
area under TOZ
Page 62
Transit Oriented Zone – Cost of Infrastructure
Drainage
Water Supply Storm Network Proposed Road
Type of TOD LAP Area(Ha) Network Total Cost (Cr)
Amount (Cr) Amount (Cr) Cost (Cr)
Amount (Cr)
Page 63
Value capture
Awareness campaigns
Communication Demonstration projects
Page 66
NMT Infrastructure in Surat
MAP
Page 67
Walkable streets and public plazas
Page 68
Public Bicycle Sharing
PBS in Surat
a) S1 – Old City Mobility Revitalization Scheme (Old City)
• Cycles 1050
• Ports: Major – 20 & Minor – 30
• Cost : 785.7 lakhs
b) S2 – Educational Area Scheme (VNSGU – SVNIT – VR Mall)
• Cycles 480
• Ports: Major – 8 & Minor – 16
• Cost : 363.2 lakhs S1
c) IT – Integration and ITS
• Cost : 125 lakhs
S2
Major Ports 30 Capacity
Minor Ports 15 Capacity
Page 69
PART 6: Proposals
Mobility Management
2 wheelers 10 15 20 25 40
Page 72
Mobility Management: Accident Management
Total
fatalities
Serious
Sr.No Junctions Fatalities &
Injuries
Serious
Injuries
Page 73
Mobility Management: Accident Management
Design Improvements
Road infrastructure improvements:
Channelize, Raised Intersection at junction, Raised
Pedestrian Crossing
Accident Management- through Surat Urban Mobility Academy
Autonomous Electric
and Electric Personalized
Vehicles Transit Systems
Artificial
Intelligence based Deviceless
Agents for transit Account Linked
planning Ticketing
Page 75
Mobility Management: Data, Intelligence and
Automation Driven Transport System – Surat 2046
Automated Road
Quality Assessment on
Vehicle-to-Vehicle
Transit Vehicles or
communication
Autonomous Electric
network to reduce
Special Vehicles
accidents and traffic
management
Bardoli
, Vyara
Proposal for NH (Express way) and
2. Palsana
Ring Road would resolve the issue of
1. Navsari Mumbai,
Maharastra
E-E movement by providing By-Pass.
Page 78
Centre of Excellence (CoE) in Urban Transport, CEPT University
Internal – Internal Goods Veh. Movement
Activity Surveys: I-I Goods Movement
Sahara
• Predominantly LCVs used intra-city freight for
Saroli
lesser quantum and highly decentralized.
Udhna
Page 79
Light Commercial Vehicles: up to 7.5 ton
Strategic Proposals
Area requirement for relocation textile activities is approx.12 sqkm DP suggest to shift obnoxious industries
from city center.
• Time restrictions for freight vehicles (HCVs and MCVs) from 7:00 am to 10:00 pm This will reduce passenger
and goods vehicular conflicts, decrease congestion and accidents in the city.
• Planning of logistic park on proposed Textile Corridor - reduce vehicular trips by bringing textile manufacturing
stages such as weaving, dying, processing, printing, value addition, packaging and consolidation at one place
• Enforcement of vehicle technology in accordance to Bharat Stage (BS) norms - reduce emission levels. Electric
vehicles technology for goods transportation could also be explored.
• ITMS facilities by freight transporters should be initiated for efficient operations and monitoring.
• Regulating on-street parking for goods vehicle and restricting/regulating their parking in residential and
commercial areas to minimise conflicts with passenger vehicles and s.
Page 81
PART 8: Institutional Setup
Functions:
• Strategic Policy making and integration of strategies
• Multimodal Integration
• Fare policy
• State level Urban Transport Fund and its distribution
Surat Metro Bus and BRTS Surat road network and streets
To be managed by a Special Purpose Sitilink Ltd of Surat Municipal Surat Municipal Corporation, Surat
Vehicle (SPV) jointly established by the Corporation Urban Development Authority,
Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs Traffic Police
and State Government
Page 83
PART 9: Project Costing
Improve walkability ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Manage Parking ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Others Specify ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Page 86
Other Specify ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Should Surat create a Urban Transport Fund for financing transport initiatives
Yes No
Rate the mechanisms proposed to finance CMP on its relevance
Very important Important Less unimporta Don’t
important nt Know
Value capture ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Parking Charges ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Environment Improvement Tax ( as part of Property tax) ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Congestion Charging ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Grants from State and Central Government ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Page 87
Please suggest a Vision Statement for Surat CMP
Surat Trans Vision 2030-The vision is to create a system that minimizes the need for travel, provides choices for modes that are
safe, sustainable socially, economically, financially and environmentally, and provide a global image for the city.’
Ahmedabad – ‘Integrate city structure and transport system towards greater accessibility, efficient mobility and lower carbon
future
London: ‘The Mayor’s vision is to create a future London that is not only home to more people, but is a better place for all of those
people to live and work in.’
New York: ‘a safe, sustainable, equitable, and efficient transportation network: by protecting and maintaining our core assets; by
improving travel choices for underserved communities and all New Yorkers; and by managing our streets and curb space more
effectively with new technologies.’
Singapore- ‘people-centred land transport system’
Vancouver- ‘A city with a smart and efficient transportation system that supports a thriving economy while increasing affordability;
healthy citizens who are mobile in a safe, accessible, and vibrant city; and a city that enhances its natural environment to ensure a
healthy future for its citizens and the planet.’ Page 88
What are your overall expectation from the Comprehensive Mobility Plan for Surat 2046?
Page 89
Thank You
Page 91
,
;