Sah-Lab: St. Andrew Hospital
Sah-Lab: St. Andrew Hospital
Sah-Lab: St. Andrew Hospital
ANDREW HOSPITAL
I. Introduction
The Chem-7 is referred as an analyzer is a compact , high performance, 16-bit micro controller-
based biochemistry analyzer for routine Chemistries, Electrolytes, Immunoassays, Hormones, Coagulation,
and drug tests. There are 10 modes of operation, including the coagulation mode. Programming, reading,
and reporting operations are user friendly. Operation is through a soft-touch keyboard with quick shift from
one function to another without going through complex sequential operations.
The analyzer is provided with 320x240 dots backlit display with alphanumeric ang graphic
capabilities. A patient-wise collated report is obtained upon request. Exhaustive quality control data at 2
levels, for any of the tests can also be stored in the memory of the analyzer. The software is complete with
the device diagnostics self-test function capable of providing timely flag/ error messages related to test
results or analyzer malfunctioning.
The State of Art features advanced optics, versatile analytical capabilities, and economy of 18 ul
flowcell makes it the analyzer of choice for St. Andrew Hospital. This analyzer is intended to be used for in
vitro quantitative and qualitative determination of wide range of analytes in the body fluids as mentioned
above and by the trained personnel of the laboratory.
o Avoid using dangerous flammable material around the analyzer. Fire or explosion may be
caused by ignition. Avoid areas that are adversely affected by atmospheric pressure,
temperature, humidity, ventilation, sunlight, dust and air containing salt, sulfur, etc.
o Operator is responsible for taking all necessary precautions against hazard associated with
the use of clinical laboratory chemicals. Specific recommendations for each reagent used
with the analyzer are normally found on the manufacturer’s package inserts or product
information sheets for each chemical. Wipe up any reagent spillage on the analyzer
immediately.
o Pay attention not to exceed time and volume necessary for diagnosis. Keep monitoring the
behavior of whole system to detect any malfunction.
o Take immediate corrective measures including shutdown of operation when any malfunction
is detected in the analyzer.
o In the event of trouble, do not play with the analyzer and leave any repair work to an
authorized expert.
IV. Definition
Accuracy is the degree of agreement between a measured value and its ‘true/consensus’ value. On
the contrary, inaccuracy, which is represented by analytical bias, is defined as the % of the
difference between the measured value and the ‘true’ value over the true value. Therefore, good
accuracy means least analytical error.
Pre-analytical
the pre-analytical system shall take care of the following aspects , as each can have a major effect
on the accuracy of the result:
• Patient preparation
• Request forms
Analytical
The following aspects shall be monitored, evaluated, implemented, and maintained to ensure the
accuracy and precision of the test carried out:
• Quality of distilled water
• Calibration of measuring and testing instruments including balances, thermometers,
incubators, autoclaves, centrifuges and semi-automatic pipettes, and regular servicing and
maintenance of equipment.
It is essential to use a standard calibrator which is traceable to national/international reference
material. The laboratory shall obtain evidence of traceability to the reference material from the
supplier. Precision can be maintained using suitable QC material, either commercial or prepared in-
house. The QC material should be analyzed at predetermined intervals along with patient samples to
monitor systematic and random errors. Such QC material shall also be traceable to a
national/international certified reference material so that the accuracy of measurements can be
monitored. All data relating to the laboratory’s internal QC practices and performance in external
quality assessment schemes (scoring, ranks, etc.) shall be recorded, reviewed and corrective
actions implemented.
Stability of reagents
Laboratory personnel should be aware that the stability of all reagents kept at room temperature will
go down from the stated values if the temperature exceeds 35ºC.
Post-analytical
To avoid transcriptional errors in the results of the test, the reporting/signatory medical technologist
shall verify the results entered manually or through on-line instrument interfaces before the results
are reported or dispatched.
It is important to identify analytical errors and classify them as either random or systematic
errors. Towards this end, the laboratory should implement internal QC procedures. This
involves preparation of a QC pool, either human or bovine, quantification of unavoidable
laboratory errors, and construction of Levey-Jennings chart and daily analysis of QC along
with every batch of patients’ samples.
On each day when analyses are performed a fresh sample is thawed, thoroughly mixed, and
analyzed. The QC serum is analyzed for a period of 20 days or so. [Important to note: Analysis
should not be carried out by only one person; all staff should participate in this exercise to determine
the true unavoidable error in the laboratory]. From these data, mean and SD are calculated. Levey
Jennings chart is then constructed with x + 2SD as warning limits and x + 3 SD as control limits.
Calculate the %CV for each analyte to ascertain whether this is within the acceptable limit
Ideal = < 5%. Must be < 8%). If % CV is found to be high, this will indicate that between-day
laboratory precision (variation) is high, and the data cannot be used to construct a Levey Jennings
chart. It is then essential to identify the causes for this, correct these and then repeat the whole
exercise and confirm that the %CV is well within the acceptable limit.
A. According to WHO an analytical system is ‘out of control’ if one of the four criteria is met. That is:
B. Use of two different levels of QC simultaneously in every batch of analysis provided valuable
information on the type of errors – whether these are random (precision) errors or systematic
(accuracy) errors.
Warning Rule
12S One observation > x + 2 SD Rejection Rules (used if warning rule is exceeded; run rejected
if any of the following rules are violated) R= Random error; S = Systematic error
Remedial action
If the decision is taken that the method is out of control, the first action is to withhold patients’
results in that batch. Then the analyst should start by checking for the simplest and most
frequent faults, and then continue as necessary in a logical order depending on the method
and equipment involved.
It is good practice to start by excluding gross errors such as mix-up of control materials,
reagents or pipettes, misuse of measuring instruments [wrong filter or aged lamp in the
photometer], or failure to follow instructions for a step in the method.
The results obtained on a control specimen may be in error for several reasons, including
deterioration due to age, incorrect storage or contamination, wrong identification and mistake
in preparation or constitution.
Further action will depend on whether the alert is due to a change in accuracy or in precision.
If accuracy has deteriorated, attention should be focused on the possibility of systematic
sources of error such as incorrect reaction temperature, calibration errors and faulty devices.
If precision has deteriorated, steps in the analytical procedure should be checked, for
instance, deproteinization, composition of reagents and reaction mixtures, measuring
systems .
To easily differentiate between systematic and random errors, laboratories are encouraged to
construct Youden charts. These are constructed by having x + 2SD & x + 3SD of one level
QC in the x axis and that of another level QC in the y axis. If an analyst analyses both levels
of QC and plots the data in the Youden chart, a single plot will be obtained. If this falls within
the inner square, it means that the value obtained for both QC are well within the acceptable
limit, i.e., x + 2SD. On the other hand, if a plot appears outside this limit, it could mean that
the data are outside the acceptable limit and the error could be either systematic or random.
To prevent or minimize systematic errors, the laboratory should adhere to the following
points:
1. Use of proper calibration technique. Use of pure chemicals, precision balance, quality
distilled water. Proper preservative and storage
2. Regular checking of photometric filter, bulb, tubing, etc.
3. Use of recommended analytical methods
4. Calibration of pipettes at regular intervals
5. Instrument calibration – photometric check
6. Use of calibrated cuvette
7. Regular preventive maintenance of equipment – daily, weekly, and monthly. While it is
easy to identify systematic errors, it is quite difficult to pinpoint random errors. To minimize
this possibility, it is important to educate the staff on various aspects that could lead to
random errors.
Prepared by: Recommended by: Approved by:
Monalyn Marabi, M.D. Zenaida S. Mendoza, M.D. Mark Anthony S. Mendoza, M.D.
Laboratory Head Hospital Administrator Hospital Director
ST. ANDREW HOSPITAL
VIII. Calibration
1. Collect blood samples according to the blood sample collection and handling SOPs.
2.Stability during storage varies between serum parameters. If analyses are not performed on the
day of collection, store serum samples at minus 20°C.
4. Volume required: 3ml
5. Exclusion criteria: severe hemolysis, icteric sample.
X. Sample Preparation
1. Prepare the serum samples collected on the same day of the measurement by centrifuge them at
~5000 x g for 3 -5 minutes.
2. If necessary, remove fibrinogen clots using a wooden applicator.
3. Load the racks according to the work lists.
1. Each morning, all parameters are tested with control sera. Some parameters are tested with
control 1 and control serum 2, which consists of lyophilized human plasma with a normal and a
pathological concentration. Other parameters are tested with specific controls from other
suppliers.
2. . Controls are thawed and mixed before utilization and loaded according to the analyzer’s
display. Control values must lie within the acceptable range indicated by the manufacturer,
otherwise the specific tests must be recalibrated, and specific measurements repeated. Controls
can be stored in 200µl aliquots at -20°C for up to 1 week.
X. Analysing results
1. Samples that produce results that lie outside the linear range for a specific assay must be re-
tested.
2. Validate the data. (Refer to Validation of Result SOP)
3. Transfer the data to the data logbook.
XI. Instrumentation