1. The document outlines a Flexible Evaluation Mechanism to evaluate competencies developed in Understanding Culture, Society and Politics.
2. It lists skills, knowledge, attitudes to be developed and assessment activities to evaluate achievement of minimum standards.
3. Percentages are allocated to criteria like content, analysis, organization of ideas, mechanics of activities to derive an overall grade, with highest and lowest marks noted for skills development.
1. The document outlines a Flexible Evaluation Mechanism to evaluate competencies developed in Understanding Culture, Society and Politics.
2. It lists skills, knowledge, attitudes to be developed and assessment activities to evaluate achievement of minimum standards.
3. Percentages are allocated to criteria like content, analysis, organization of ideas, mechanics of activities to derive an overall grade, with highest and lowest marks noted for skills development.
1. The document outlines a Flexible Evaluation Mechanism to evaluate competencies developed in Understanding Culture, Society and Politics.
2. It lists skills, knowledge, attitudes to be developed and assessment activities to evaluate achievement of minimum standards.
3. Percentages are allocated to criteria like content, analysis, organization of ideas, mechanics of activities to derive an overall grade, with highest and lowest marks noted for skills development.
1. The document outlines a Flexible Evaluation Mechanism to evaluate competencies developed in Understanding Culture, Society and Politics.
2. It lists skills, knowledge, attitudes to be developed and assessment activities to evaluate achievement of minimum standards.
3. Percentages are allocated to criteria like content, analysis, organization of ideas, mechanics of activities to derive an overall grade, with highest and lowest marks noted for skills development.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1
Flexible Evaluation Mechanism (FEM)
Understanding Culture Society and Politics
Competencies to Develop Based on Minimum Standards Evaluation of Achieved Competencies
Implied Criteria Percentage Remarks and Percentage Allocation Standar Allocation of Criteria and of the Skills Necessary Enabling ds for a the Criteria Standards for the Highest Criteria for Final to Develop in Knowledge to Skill Assessment Successf for the Successful Achievement w/ Highest And Lowest Attitude to Develop the Grade UCSP Attain Activities (EAA) ul successful Completion of the of Learning Development Development successful Comple Completion PT Competencies in Skill ( ) in Skill ( ) Completion tion of of EAA in UCSP of the PT the EAA 1.Learners have 1.Contemplative Thinking Skills EAA 1: Content: the ability to about the The learners are Presents the identify the social consequences of tasked to give the Content information Critical Thinking 50% 40% problems in their social problems Communicatio cause and effect and clearly. community with the view of n Skills of social problems Analysis based on their developing care, in their knowledge of the responsibility and community. complex responsiveness to EAA 2: Comprehension: interrelationship people’s collective The learners are Accurately of culture, difficulties. tasked to write an answers the society and 2.Disciplined about essay on how to Organiza questions. Problem Solving politics. (MET1) using UCSP lens in 30% 30% develop care, tion of 2.Learners have understanding responsibility and Ideas the capacity to social problems responsiveness to explain why and with the view of people’s how social eliminating difficulties. problems in their uncritical biases or EAA3: Preparation and community occur social prejudices The learners are Presentation: in the context of against groups, tasked to do a Off script, changing people or Mechani project proposal completely Collaboration processes using communities. 20% 20% on how to prepared, their knowledge cs minimize social excellent eye of the key lens or problem in their contact with frames in UCSP. community creativity and (MET2) charisma. Group Communication Collaboration: 10% The whole group worked incredibly well together