2605-20 Errata 2022

F E N E S T R A T I O N A N D G L A Z I N G
AAMA 2605-20
An FGIA Voluntary Specification
Voluntary Specification,
Performance Requirements
and Test Procedures for
Superior Performing
Organic Coatings on
Aluminum Extrusions and
Panels (with Coil Coating
Appendix)
I N D U S T R Y A L L I A N C E
Copyright by the Fenestration & Glazing Industry Alliance (FGIA). This document was purchased by Alvin Wang of Kingtom Aluminio SRL on Tue Jul 12 2022. It may not be reproduced,
republished or distributed in any format without the express written consent of FGIA.
FGIA DOCUMENT ERRATA
AMERICAN ARCHITECTURAL
MANUFACTURES ASSOCIATION
DATE: June 22, 2020
CODE: 2605-20
TITLE: Voluntary Specification, Performance Requirements and Test Procedures for
Superior Performing Organic Coatings on Aluminum Extrusions and Panels
(wilt Coil Coating Appendix)
AAMA 2605-20, published in February 2020, was found to have an editorial error in Section
8.8.2.1. This error has been corrected in AAMA 2605-20 (Errata 6/17/20) Reissued 6/20.
Section 8.8.2.1
Incorrect statement:
This test is a modified version of the salt spray corrosion method. This test typically provides
more realistic results than the continuous salt spray method and indicates relative corrosion
resistance between specimens.
Corrected statement:
This test is a modified version of the salt spray corrosion method. A standard test solution is
applied to bare or coated metallic test specimens by combining the solution and compressed
air at an atomizing spray nozzle. Unlike the salt spray method, cyclic corrosion alternates
between periods of spray and specimen dry-off from air circulation within the chamber. Many
versions of this method exist, but the one chosen here uses a dilute sodium chloride and
ammonium sulfate solution with one-hour periods of spray and dry-off. The test temperature
ranges between 35°C and laboratory ambient conditions. This test typically provides more
realistic results than the continuous salt spray method and indicates relative corrosion
resistance between specimens.
RATIONALE:
The corrected statement was approved by the Finishes Committee for inclusion with the
publication of AAMA 2605. This was not carried into the document and as a result the working
statement was not replaced in the published document. The corrected statement contains
additional information regarding the test intended to provide the user with a better
understanding of the importance of the test.
Fenestration and Glazing Industry Alliance

U.S. Headquarters: 1900 E. Golf Rd. Suite 1250, Schaumburg, IL 60173 ~ Phone: (847) 303-5859 / Fax: (847) 303-5774
Canada Office: 1769 St. Laurent Blvd. Suite 104, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1G 5X7 ~ Phone: (613) 233-1510 / Fax: (613) 482-9436
AMERICAN ARCHITECTURAL
MANUFACTURES ASSOCIATION
FGIA Document Errata
DATE: March 18, 2022
CODE: AAMA 2605-20, an FGIA standard
TITLE: Voluntary Specification, Performance Requirements and Test
Procedures for Superior Performing Organic Coatings on
Aluminum Extrusions and Panels (with Coil Coating Appendix)
This document contained an error in publication.
The previous document read:
8.9.2.3 Chalking
8.9.2.3.1 Performance
Chalk Resistance shall be greater than or equal to that represented by a No. 8 rating based on
ASTM D4214, Test Method A (Method D 659) after test site (weathering) exposure (per
Section 8.9.2.1) for 10 years. Chalking shall be measured on an exposed, unwashed painted
surface.
The document has been corrected to read:
8.9.2.3 Chalking
Chalk Resistance shall be greater than or equal to that represented by a No. 8 rating based on
ASTM D4214, Test Method A after test site (weathering) exposure (per Section 8.9.2.1) for 10
years. Chalking shall be measured on an exposed, unwashed painted surface.
RATIONALE:
ASTM D659 had been the referenced standard prior to its withdrawal by ASTM. Since ASTM
D659 is no longer an active standard and the reference has been corrected to a current
standard reference, it should not be included in the document.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
0.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 1
1.0 SCOPE ........................................................................................................ 1
2.0 SIGNIFICANCE AND USE .......................................................................... 1
3.0 REFERENCED DOCUMENTS.................................................................... 1
4.0 DEFINITIONS .............................................................................................. 3
5.0 GENERAL ................................................................................................... 3
6.0 TEST SPECIMENS ..................................................................................... 4
7.0 METAL PREPARATION, PRE-TREATMENT AND INSPECTION ............ 4
8.0 TESTS ......................................................................................................... 4
9.0 TEST REPORTS AND RESULTS ............................................................ 12
APPENDIX A: COIL COATING ..................................................................... 13

A1.0 SCOPE.................................................................................................... 13
A2.0 PURPOSE............................................................................................... 13
A3.0 GENERAL............................................................................................... 13
A4.0 METAL PREPARATION AND PRE-TREATMENT................................ 13
A5.0 TESTS..................................................................................................... 13
AAMA 2605-20, as well as other AAMA documents available from FGIA, may be
purchased from the online store.
©2020 Fenestration and Glazing Industry Alliance – These printed or electronic pages
may NOT be reproduced, republished or distributed in any format without the express
written consent of the Fenestration and Glazing Industry Alliance.
This document was developed and maintained by representative members of FGIA as

advisory information. FGIA DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES WITH REGARD TO THIS
INFORMATION, INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY
AND FITNESS. IN NO EVENT SHALL FGIA BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES
WHATSOEVER FROM THE USE, APPLICATION OR ADAPTATION OF MATERIALS
PUBLISHED HEREIN. It is the sole responsibility of the user/purchaser to evaluate the
accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information, opinion, advice or other
content published herein.
AAMA 2605-20, an FGIA Voluntary Specification

ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED: 1998
PRECEDING DOCUMENT: 2605-17A
PUBLISHED: 2/20
DEVELOPING GROUP: AMC Finishes Committee
Fenstration and Glazing Industry Alliance

U.S. Headquarters: 1900 E. Golf Rd. Suite 1250, Schaumburg, IL 60173
Phone: (847) 303-5859
Canada Office: 1769 St. Laurent Blvd. Suite 104, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1G 5X7
Phone: (613) 233-1510
0.0 INTRODUCTION
The architectural community has recognized the following standards for testing and performance of organic coatings on architectural
aluminum extrusions and panels:
AAMA 612, Voluntary Specification, Performance Requirements, and Test Procedures for Combined Coatings of Anodic Oxide and
Transparent Organic Coatings on Architectural Aluminum
AAMA 2603, Voluntary Specification, Performance Requirements and Test Procedures for Pigmented Organic Coatings on
Aluminum Extrusions and Panels
AAMA 2604, Voluntary Specification, Performance Requirements and Test Procedures for High Performance Organic Coatings on
AAMA 2605, Voluntary Specification, Performance Requirements and Test Procedures for Superior Performing Organic Coatings
on Aluminum Extrusions and Panels
1.0 SCOPE
1.1 This specification describes test procedures and performance requirements for superior performing organic coatings applied to
aluminum extrusions and panels for architectural products.
1.2 This specification covers factory-applied organic coatings only.
1.3 Terminology
In this specification, “shall” is used to express a requirement, i.e., a provision that the user is obliged to satisfy in order to comply
with the specification; “shall be permitted to be” is used to express an option or that which is permissible within the limits of the
specification; “should” is used to express a recommendation or that which is advised but not required; and “may” is used to express
possibility or capability. Notes accompanying sections do not include requirements or alternative requirements; the purpose of a note
accompanying a section is to separate explanatory or informative material from the text. Notes to tables and figures are considered
part of the table or figure and shall be permitted to be written as requirements.
Section 0.0 and any Notes not attached to figures and tables are non-mandatory.
1.4 The primary units of measure in this document are metric. The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard. The IP
values given in parentheses are for reference only.
1.5 This document was developed in an open and consensus process and is maintained by representative members of AAMA as
advisory information.
2.0 SIGNIFICANCE AND USE

This specification is intended to assist the architect, owner and contractor to specify and obtain factory-applied organic coatings,
which will provide and maintain a superior level of performance in terms of film integrity, exterior weatherability and general
appearance over a period of many years.
3.0 REFERENCED DOCUMENTS

3.1 References to the standards listed shall be to the edition indicated. Any undated reference to a code or standard appearing in the
requirements of this standard shall be interpreted as referring to the latest edition of that code or standard.
3.2 AAMA, Fenestration and Glazing Industry Alliance (FGIA) Standards
AAMA 612-20, Voluntary Specification, Performance Requirements, and Test Procedures for Combined Coatings of Anodic Oxide
and Transparent Organic Coatings on Architectural Aluminum
AAMA 800-16, Voluntary Specifications and Test Methods for Sealants
AAMA 2605-20 Page 1

AAMA 2603-20, Voluntary Specification, Performance Requirements and Test Procedures for Pigmented Organic Coatings on
AAMA 2604-20, Voluntary Specification, Performance Requirements and Test Procedures for High Performance Organic Coatings on
AAMA AG-13, AAMA Glossary
3.3 ASTM International (ASTM)
ASTM B117-18, Standard Practice for Operating Salt Spray (Fog) Apparatus
ASTM B244-09(2014), Standard Test Method for Measurement of Thickness of Anodic Coatings on Aluminum and of Other
Nonconductive Coatings on Nonmagnetic Basis Metals with Eddy-Current Instruments
ASTM C207-18, Standard Specification for Hydrated Lime for Masonry Purposes
ASTM D523-14(2018), Standard Test Method for Specular Gloss
ASTM D714-02(2017), Standard Test Method for Evaluating Degree of Blistering of Paints
ASTM D968-17, Standard Test Methods for Abrasion Resistance of Organic Coatings by Falling Abrasive
ASTM D1654-08(2016)e1, Standard Test Method for Evaluation of Painted or Coated Specimens Subjected to Corrosive Environments
ASTM D2244-16, Standard Practice for Calculation of Color Tolerances and Color Differences from Instrumentally Measured Color
Coordinates
ASTM D2247-15, Standard Practice for Testing Water Resistance of Coatings in 100% Relative Humidity
ASTM D2248-01a(2018), Standard Practice for Detergent Resistance of Organic Finishes
ASTM D3359-17, Standard Test Methods for Rating Adhesion by Tape Test
ASTM D3363-05(2011)e2, Standard Test Method for Film Hardness by Pencil Test
ASTM D4145-10(2018), Standard Test Method for Coating Flexibility of Prepainted Sheet
ASTM D4214-07(2015), Standard Test Methods for Evaluating the Degree of Chalking of Exterior Paint Films
ASTM D4585/D4585M-18, Standard Practice for Testing Water Resistance of Coatings Using Controlled Condensation
ASTM D5420-16, Standard Test Method for Impact Resistance of Flat, Rigid Plastic Specimen by Means of a Striker Impacted by a
Falling Weight (Gardner Impact)
ASTM D5723-95(2015), Standard Practice for Determination of Chromium Treatment Weight on Metal Substrates by X-Ray
Fluorescence
ASTM D7091-13, Standard Practice for Nondestructive Measurement of Dry Film Thickness of Nonmagnetic Coatings Applied to
Ferrous Metals and Nonmagnetic, Nonconductive Coatings Applied to Non-Ferrous Metals
ASTM E805-12a(2017), Standard Practice for Identification of Instrumental Methods of Color or Color-Difference Measurement of
Materials
ASTM G7/G7M-13, Standard Practice for Atmospheric Environmental Exposure Testing of Nonmetallic Materials
ASTM G85-11, Standard Practice for Modified Salt Spray (Fog) Testing
AAMA 2605-20 Page 2

4.0 DEFINITIONS
4.1 Please refer to the most current AAMA Glossary for all definitions except for those appearing in this section which apply to
this guide only.
Coil-Applied Coating: The process of applying a resinous coating onto a coil of aluminum, and curing it into a continuous film,
prior to the fabrication process.
Gouge hardness: The hardest pencil that will leave the film uncut for a stroke length of at least 3 mm (1/8 in.).
Scratch hardness: The hardest pencil that will not rupture or scratch the film.
Primary Exposed Surfaces: Surfaces visible when the coated product is installed, not including surfaces other than the main interior
or exterior faces of the product. Examples of surfaces that shall not be considered primary exposed surfaces include, but are not
limited to, a) those exposed only when an operating sash, ventilator, door or panel is in the open position, b) sides and bottom of
rectangular reveals and channels with depth equal to or greater than height, c) reveals shielded by return legs, and d) edges of
extruded legs.
4.2 The terms "film" and "coating" are used interchangeably in this specification and are defined as meaning the layer of organic
material applied to the surface of the aluminum.
5.0 GENERAL
5.1 To qualify as meeting this specification, products tested shall meet all requirements as specified herein.
5.2 Coatings shall be visibly free from flow lines, streaks, blisters or other surface imperfections in the dry-film state on exposed
surfaces when observed at a distance of 3 m (10 ft) from the metal surface and inspected at an angle of 90° to the surface.
5.3 The total dry-film thickness shall be assessed utilizing the ASTM D7091 method. Eighty percent (80%) of measurements on
primary exposed surfaces shall meet or exceed 30 microns (1.2 mil) total film thickness. Paint process capability may result in
readings below 25 microns (1.0 mil). No more than 5% of the total readings, on primary exposed surfaces, shall be below 25 microns
(1.0 mil) (or, 85% of film thickness specified), assuming appropriate color and hide. Film thickness specified may be increased to be
consistent with color selection and type of coating as recommended by the coating manufacturer.
NOTE 1: Due to the complexities of extrusion dies and limitations of application equipment, it may not be possible to achieve
minimum recommended dry film thickness on all areas of an extrusion, such as inside corners and channels. For details of these
affected areas, contact the coating applicator prior to painting.
5.4 Cleaning and metal preparation shall be in compliance with Section 7.0 of this specification.
5.5 Minor scratches and blemishes shall be repairable with the coating manufacturer's recommended product or system. Such repairs
shall match the original finish for color and gloss and shall adhere to the original finish when tested as outlined in Section 8.4.2.1,
Dry Adhesion. After application, allow the repair coating to dry for at least 72 hours at 18°C to 27°C (65°F to 80°F) before
conducting the film adhesion test.
NOTE 2: The size and number of touch-up repairs should be kept to a minimum.
5.6 Sealant used in contact with an organic coating shall be compatible with the organic coating and meet the performance
requirements of the AAMA 800 sealant specification. There shall be no evidence of deleterious effects in the organic coating such as
staining, coating separation, lifting, discoloration or loss of adhesion of the coating from the substrate.
NOTE 3: It is strongly recommended that the fabricator of the finished products consult with the sealant manufacturer in the
selection of the appropriate sealant. Peel adhesion testing as described in AAMA 800 is suggested. It is important to understand that
the AAMA 800 sealant specification does not ensure adhesion to a specific coating. The best way to ensure adhesion is to submit
panel specimens of the specific coating to the sealant manufacturer or an AAMA accredited independent laboratory for tests and
recommendations.
5.7 Instrumental color measurements shall be made according to ASTM E805 using the Hunter LH aH bH color space, CIE illuminant
D65, 8° sphere geometry with specular component included, CIE 1964 (10°) standard observer, and the color difference equation
ΔEH described in Appendix section X1.1.1 of ASTM D2244. Also see Note 6.
AAMA 2605-20 Page 3

6.0 TEST SPECIMENS
Test specimens shall consist of finished panels or extrusions representative of the production coated aluminum. A sufficient number
of specimens on which to conduct instrument measurements with flat coated surfaces of at least 150 mm (6 in) long and 75 mm (3
in) wide, shall be submitted to the testing laboratory. The coating applicator or fabricator shall indicate exposed surfaces or submit
drawings. Tests shall be performed on exposed areas as indicated on drawings or as marked on test specimens.
7.0 METAL PREPARATION AND PRE-TREATMENT

NOTE 4: A multi-stage cleaning and pre-treatment system is required to remove organic and inorganic surface soils, remove
residual oxides, and apply a chemical conversion coating to which organic coatings will firmly adhere.
7.1 The pre-treatment when used in conjunction with a baked organic coating shall produce a total finishing system capable of
meeting impact, adhesion, detergent, humidity and salt spray performance as specified in the appropriate test method.
7.2 Chemical Conversion Coating Weight
7.2.1 Procedure
Measure in accordance with the latest issue of ASTM D5723 using x-ray fluorescence or other standard methods for determining
coating weights.
7.2.2 Performance
Chromium chromate or chromium phosphate coating weights shall be a minimum of 431 mg/m2 (40 mg/ft2). Alternative chrome
and/or non-chrome conversion coating weights should be maintained according to supplier’s recommendations.
NOTE 5: Frequent in-plant testing and control of pre-treatment is required to ensure satisfactory performance of the coating
system.
8.0 TESTS
8.1 Color Uniformity
8.1.1 Principle
The purpose of this test is to provide a method to ensure colors in production match the expectations of the specifier. Although
instrumental color measurements are recommended in many applications, visual observations under controlled lighting conditions
are useful in production environments for determining significant color mismatches and uniformity throughout a profile.
8.1.2 Procedure
Check random samples visually under a uniform light source. Viewing should be done at multiple angles. In conjunction,
instrumental methods are imperative.
8.1.3 Performance
Color uniformity shall be consistent with the color range or numerical value established between the approval source and the
applicator. Suggested maximum deviation is 2 ΔEH per Section 5.7, from agreed upon color standard.
NOTE 6: Color and finish appearance may vary upon factory application due to differences in spray equipment, line conditions or
day-to-day process variations. It is strongly recommended that final color approval be made with actual production line samples or
mock-ups, not laboratory prepared color panels. Since flake orientation contributes to color uniformity, pearlescent, mica and
metallic flake colors do present the need for more stringent control in application however even with the most stringent controls,
variation may still be present at different viewing angles, therefore these paint types require additional consideration during project
design and installation. Pearlescent mica and metallic flakes reflect and scatter light in random patterns; therefore, exact color
uniformity should not be expected. Slight color shifting should also be expected when viewing from varying angles and distances.
Equipment considerations affect color and are especially critical with multiple applicators.
AAMA 2605-20 Page 4

ASTM D2244 no longer recommends the Hunter scale except for legacy users. However due to the large amount of valuable
historical color data in the Hunter scale, AAMA recommends continued use of the Hunter scale now referenced in Appendix X1.1 in
ASTM D2244. In 2016, AAMA conducted a study comparing human visual evaluations of weathered specimens with instrumental
measurements and found that the Hunter scale provided sufficient agreement to justify its continued use. No color tolerances for
measurements in other color scales are recommended in this specification.
8.2 Specular Gloss
8.2.1 Principle
Gloss represents the ability of a surface to reflect light at the same angle of incidence as the incoming source. High gloss surfaces
scatter less light than low gloss surfaces. A gloss specification can be important because visual perception of color is significantly
affected by the glossiness of the surface. Furthermore, change in gloss of a surface over time may be an early indicator of
degradation of, or physical damage to the finish.
8.2.2 Procedure
Measure in accordance with the latest issue of ASTM D523 using a 60° gloss meter. Samples must meet minimum dry film thickness
requirements.
8.2.3 Performance
Gloss values shall be within ± 5 units of the manufacturer's specification.
EXAMPLE 1: If coatings manufacturer’s specification is a range of 25-35, the ± 5 allowance would permit 20-40 off the production
line.
NOTE 7: Standard gloss range values are as follows in Table 1.
Gloss Specular Gloss Value

High 80-Over
Medium 20-79
Low 19 or less
TABLE 1: Standard Gloss Range Values
8.3 Dry Film Hardness
8.3.1 Principle
ASTM D3363 describes a procedure for determining the dry film hardness of a coating by using a series of standard pencil leads of
varying hardness to attempt to scratch or gouge the surface.
8.3.2 Procedure
Strip the wood from a Sanford Prismacolor Turquoise pencil or equivalent, grade F minimum hardness, leaving a full diameter of
lead exposed to a length of 6 mm (1/4 in) minimum to 10 mm (3/8 in) maximum. Flatten the end of the lead 90° to the pencil axis
using fine-grit sand or emery paper. Hold the pencil at a 45° angle to the film surface and push forward about 6 mm (1/4 in) using as
much downward pressure as can be applied without breaking the lead. (Reference ASTM D3363.)
8.3.3 Performance
Coating shall meet minimum F scratch hardness as defined by ASTM D3363.
8.4 Film Adhesion
8.4.1 Principle
ASTM D3359 describes test procedures to determine how well a coating film adheres to its substrate. Method B requires cutting
parallel lines with a sharp blade and adhering a specific tape to the resulting grid pattern, which is often referred to as a cross hatch.
AAMA 2605-20 Page 5

The tape is pulled off at a specified angle. Any loss of coating film within the grid is quantified and a rating made accordingly. This
method is used for coating thicknesses less than 125 micron (5.0 mils), referred to hereafter as thin coatings.
For coating thicknesses of 125 microns (5.0 mils) or greater, referred to hereafter as thick coatings, testing is performed according to
ASTM D3359, Method A. This method is similar to that used for thin coatings (Method B) except that an “X” cut is used instead of a
cross hatched grid.
8.4.2 Procedure
All tests shall be performed sequentially on the same test sample using the same set of cuts for each test. Number of cuts and spacing
shall be in accordance with ASTM D3359. Coating thickness shall be the average measured in the area to be tested per ASTM
D7091.
8.4.2.1 Dry Adhesion
Sharply pull tape off at a right angle to the plane of the surface being tested.
8.4.2.2 Boiling Water Adhesion
Immerse the sample in boiling distilled or deionized water 99°C to 100°C (210°F to 212°F) for 20 minutes. The water shall remain
boiling throughout the test. Remove the sample and wipe it dry. Repeat the test specified in Section 8.4.2.1 within five minutes.
8.4.2.3 Wet Adhesion
Immerse the sample in distilled or deionized water at 38°C (100°F) for 24 hours. Remove and wipe the sample dry. Repeat the test
specified in Section 8.4.2.1 within five minutes.
8.4.3 Performance
8.4.3.1 For Method A, a Level 4A classification per ASTM D3359 shall be achieved.
8.4.3.2 For Method B, a Level 4B classification per ASTM D3359 shall be achieved.
8.5 Impact Resistance
8.5.1 Principle
ASTM D5420 describes a method to compare relative ability of a material to resist deformation caused by physical impact on a small
area. In finishes standards, this test is useful in determining the ability of a coating or laminate to maintain adhesion to the substrate
after impact.
8.5.2 Procedure
Using a 16 mm (5/8 in) diameter round-nosed impact tester in the 18 N-m (160 in-lb) range, such as a Gardner impact tester, apply a
load directly to the coated surface of sufficient force to deform the test sample a minimum of 3 mm ± 0.3 mm (0.10 in ± 0.01 in).
Apply tape (tape specified per ASTM D3359) 20 mm (3/4 in) wide over the area of deformation by pressing down firmly against the
coating to eliminate voids and air pockets. Sharply pull tape off at a right angle to the plane of the surface being tested. Test pieces
should be at ambient temperature, approximately 18°C to 27°C (65°F to 80°F).
8.5.3 Performance
There shall be no removal of film from substrate.
NOTE 9: Minute cracking at the perimeter of the concave area of the test panel is permissible but no coating pick-off should be
apparent.
AAMA 2605-20 Page 6

8.6 Abrasion Resistance
8.6.1 Principle
This test, specified as Method A in ASTM D968, determines the relative resistance to abrasion of a coating. A silica sand is allowed
to fall from a specified height onto a coated substrate to abrade the coating until bare substrate is exposed or a maximum amount of
sand has fallen. The volume of sand (in liters) is divided by the coating thickness (in mils) to calculate the abrasion coefficient.
8.6.2 Procedure
Using the falling sand test method, ASTM D968, the abrasion procedure shall be carried out with up to 80 L of sand or until the
coating is abraded away as defined in the standard. If the coating withstands 80 L of sand, the test shall be stopped. If less than 80 L
of sand wears through the coating, the Abrasion Coefficient shall be calculated according to the formula which follows:
Abrasion Coefficient (Liters Per Mil) = V/T
where: V = volume of sand used in liters

T = thickness of coating in mils
8.6.3 Performance
The coating shall either withstand a volume of 80 L of sand or the Abrasion Coefficient value of the coating shall be calculated and
recorded.
8.7 Chemical Resistance
8.7.1 Muriatic Acid Resistance (15-Minute Spot Test)
8.7.1.1 Principle
This test is designed to ensure coatings are resistant to cleaning products containing acids used to remove mineral deposits or
construction mortars. Specimens are exposed to muriatic (hydrochloric) acid, rinsed, and evaluated for blistering and visual
appearance changes.
8.7.1.2 Procedure
Apply 10 drops of 10% (by volume) solution of muriatic acid (37% commercial grade hydrochloric acid) in tap water and cover it
with a watch glass, convex side up. The acid solution and test shall be conducted at 18°C to 27°C (65°F to 80°F). After a 15-minute
exposure, wash off with running tap water.
8.7.1.3 Performance
There shall be no blistering and no visual change in appearance when examined by the unaided eye.
8.7.2 Mortar Resistance (24-Hour Pat Test)
8.7.2.1 Principle
Because finishes may be exposed to mortar during building construction or maintenance, this method was developed to determine
how well a finish resists permanent adhesion of mortar and changes in appearance upon removal of mortar. In the test, mortar is
applied and allowed to condition at high humidity before it is removed from the surface by a damp cloth and a mild acid solution.
Then the appearance is evaluated for visual appearance changes.
8.7.2.2 Procedure
Prepare mortar by mixing 75 g (2.6 oz) of building lime (conforming to ASTM C207) and 225 g (7.9 oz) of dry sand, both passing
through a 10-mesh wire screen with sufficient water, approximately 100 g (3.5 oz), to make a soft paste. Immediately apply wet pats
of mortar about 1300 mm2 (2 in2) in area and 12 mm (1/2 in) in thickness to coated aluminum specimens, which have been aged at
least 24 hours after coating. Immediately expose test sections for 24 hours to 100% relative humidity at 38°C (100°F) in accordance
with ASTM D2247 or ASTM D4585/ D4585M.
AAMA 2605-20 Page 7

8.7.2.3 Performance
Mortar shall dislodge easily from the painted surface, and any residue shall be removable with a damp cloth. Any lime residue
should be easily removed with the 10% muriatic acid solution described in Section 8.7.1.2. There shall be no loss of film adhesion or
visual change in appearance when examined by the unaided eye.
NOTE 10: A slight staining or discoloration may be apparent on orange, yellow or metallic coatings. This should be discussed with
the specifying source prior to selection of color.
8.7.3 Nitric Acid Resistance
8.7.3.1 Principle
This test is used to determine the ability of a finish to maintain adhesion to the substrate and to resist color and gloss change when
subjected to nitric acid vapors. Nitric acid chemically reacts with polymers, and this test is designed to accelerate the effects of
localized acidic pollution in the air, such as from vehicle exhaust or industrial processes. Nitric acid vapors are produced by
evaporation of a concentrated solution inside a container and come into contact with the test specimen.
8.7.3.2 Procedure
Fill a 237 ml (8 oz) wide-mouth bottle one-half full of nitric acid, 70% ACS reagent grade 1. Place the test panel completely over the
mouth of the bottle painted side down, for 30 minutes. The acid solution and test shall be conducted at 18°C to 27°C (65°F to 80°F)
with a relative humidity of <50%. Rinse the sample with tap water, wipe it dry, and measure any color change after a one-hour
recovery period.
8.7.3.3 Performance
There shall be not more than 5 ∆EH units of color change, per Section 5.7, when comparing measurements on the acid-exposed
painted surface and the unexposed surface.
8.7.4 Detergent Resistance
8.7.4.1 Principle
This test, described in ASTM D2248, is used to determine the ability of a finish to maintain adhesion to the substrate and to resist
color and gloss change when subjected to a standardized detergent. This test is designed to accelerate the effects of repeated cleaning
of a finish.
8.7.4.2 Procedure
Prepare a 3% (by weight) solution of detergent as prescribed in Table 2, and distilled water. Immerse at least two test specimens in
the detergent solution at 38°C (100°F) for 72 hours. Remove and wipe the samples dry. Immediately apply tape (tape specified per
ASTM D3359) 20 mm (3/4 in) wide by pressing down firmly against the coating to eliminate voids and air pockets. Place the tape
longitudinally along the entire length of the test specimens. If blisters are visible, then the blistered area must be taped and rated.
Sharply pull off at a right angle to the plane of the surface being tested, per ASTM D3359. A typical solid detergent composition is
as follows in Table 2:
Technical Grade Reagent % by Weight

Tetrasodium pyrophosphate (Na4P2O7), anhydrous 53.0
Sodium sulfate (Na2SO4), anhydrous 19.0
Sodium metasilicate (Na2SiO3), anhydrous 7.0
Sodium carbonate (Na2CO3), anhydrous 1.0
Dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid, sodium salt, tech. 88% 20.0
Total 100.0
TABLE 2: Detergent Formulation
1
The assay of the nitric acid (HNO3) should be Fisher A-200 or equivalent; minimum 69.0%, maximum 71.0%.
AAMA 2605-20 Page 8

8.7.4.3 Performance
There shall be no loss of adhesion of the film to the metal, no blistering and no significant visual change in appearance when
examined by the unaided eye.
8.7.5 Window Cleaner Resistance
8.7.5.1 Principle
This test is intended to determine the ability of a coating to resist damage from window cleaning chemicals. A standardized window
cleaning solution is mixed, dripped onto a coated specimen and covered to prevent evaporation. After the exposure a tape adhesion
test is performed, and the specimen is visually evaluated for blistering or other appearance changes.
8.7.5.2 Procedure
Prepare a solution of glass cleaner. Apply 10 drops of the window cleaner to the painted surface and immediately cover it with a
watch glass, convex side up. Let the test sit for 24 hours, then rinse the specimen with running tap water. Record visual appearance.
Let the specimen sit for four hours before conducting the dry adhesion tests outlined in Sections 8.4.2 and 8.42.1.
“All-purpose” glass cleaner composition is as follows in Table 3:
Raw Materials % By Weight

Dowanol PM* 5
Propylene glycol 5
Isopropanol 35
Water 55
TABLE 3: Window Cleaner Formulation
*Dow Chemical, propylene glycol methyl ether
The solution and test should be conducted at 18°C to 27°C (65°F to 80°F).
8.7.5.3 Performance
There shall be no blistering or noticeable change in appearance when examined by the unaided eye and no removal of film under the
tape within or outside of the cross-hatched area.
8.8 Corrosion Resistance
NOTE 11: In highly corrosive and high humidity environments such as, but not limited to, seacoast or industrial environments,
performance may be diminished.
8.8.1 Humidity Resistance
8.8.1.1 Principle
The ability to resist moisture is a critical function of any finish. This test subjects specimens to condensing humidity for an extended
period before they are visually evaluated for the formation of blisters which indicate loss of adhesion.
8.8.1.2 Procedure
Expose the sample in a controlled heat-and-humidity cabinet for 4,000 hours at 38°C (100°F) and 100% RH with the cabinet
operated in accordance with ASTM D2247 or ASTM D4585/4585M.
8.8.1.3 Performance
There shall be no formation of blisters to an extent greater than "Few" blisters Size No. 8, as shown in ASTM D714, Figure No. 4.
AAMA 2605-20 Page 9

8.8.2 Cyclic Corrosion Testing
8.8.2.1 Principle
This test is a modified version of the salt spray corrosion method. A standard test solution is applied to bare or coated metallic test
specimens by combining the solution and compressed air at an atomizing spray nozzle. Unlike the salt spray method, cyclic
corrosion alternates between periods of spray and specimen dry-off from air circulation within the chamber. Many versions of this
method exist, but the one chosen here uses a dilute sodium chloride and ammonium sulfate solution with one-hour periods of spray
and dry-off. The test temperature ranges between 35°C and laboratory ambient conditions. This test typically provides more realistic
results than the continuous salt spray method and indicates relative corrosion resistance between specimens.
NOTE 12: Section 8.8.2 previously addressed Salt Spray Resistance requirements. This section has been updated to use the ASTM
G85, Annex A5 test instead of the B117 test.
8.8.2.2 Procedure
Score the film sufficiently deep to expose the base metal using a sharp knife or blade instrument. Expose the sample for 2,000 hours
according to ASTM G85, Annex A5, dilute electrolyte cyclic fog/dry test. Remove and wipe sample dry.
Immediately apply tape (tape specified per ASTM D3359) 20 mm (3/4 in) wide over scored area by pressing down firmly against the
coating to eliminate voids and air pockets. Sharply pull the tape off at a right angle to the plane of the surface being tested.
8.8.2.3 Performance
There shall be a minimum rating of 7 on scribe or cut edges, and a minimum blister rating of 8 within the test specimen field, in
accordance with Table 4 and Table 5 (Reference ASTM D1654).
Representative Mean Creepage From Scribe

Millimeters Inches (Approx.) Rating Number
Zero 0 10
Over 0 to 0.5 0 to 1/64 9
Over 0.5 to 1.0 1/64 to 1/32 8
Over 1.0 to 2.0 1/32 to 1/16 7
Over 2.0 to 3.0 1/16 to 1/8 6
Over 3.0 to 5.0 1/8 to 3/16 5
Over 5.0 to 7.0 3/16 to 1/4 4
Over 7.0 to 10.0 1/4 to 3/8 3
Over 10.0 to 13.0 3/8 to 1/2 2
Over 13.0 to 16.0 1/2 to 5/8 1
Over 16.0 Over 5/8 0
TABLE 4: Rating of Failure at Scribe
Area Failed, % Rating Number

No Failure 10
0 to 1 9
2 to 3 8
4 to 6 7
7 to 10 6
11 to 20 5
21 to 30 4
31 to 40 3
41 to 55 2
56 to 75 1
Over 75 0
TABLE 5: Rating of Unscribed Areas
AAMA 2605-20 Page 10

NOTE 13: The use of a ruled plastic grid is recommended as an aid in evaluating this type of failure. A 6 mm (1/4 in) grid is
suggested as most practical for the usual specimen. In using the grid, the number of squares in which one or more points of failure
are found is related to the total number of squares covering the significant area of the specimen to get a percentage figure as used in
the tabulation. In some instances, the rating numbers may be used as factors with exposure time intervals related thereto, to produce
a performance index number which provides an indication of relative quality.
8.9 Weathering
8.9.1 Principle
Sunlight, temperature, and moisture in the outdoor environment degrade materials such as coatings, polymeric profiles, and others
used in fenestration products. South Florida is considered a global benchmark location for outdoor weathering tests, due to its
consistently high levels of sunlight, heat, and moisture. In the vast majority of cases, a material that performs well in this
environment will perform well in major international markets.
After weathering exposure, specimens may be evaluated for a number of appearance and physical properties, including color,
cracking, erosion, and others.
8.9.2 South Florida Exposure
The coating shall maintain its film integrity and at a minimum meet the following color retention, chalk resistance, gloss retention
and erosion resistance properties. The architect, owner or contractor should request data relative to the long-term durability of the
color(s) selected. Access to exposure panels must be made available to the architect and/or owner upon request.
8.9.2.1 Test Site and Duration
Test sites for on-fence testing are acceptable as follows: Florida exposure south of latitude 27° North at a 45° angle facing south for a
minimum of 10 years, maintained and operated in accordance with ASTM G7/G7M. Time elapsed when the coating is off the test
fence for evaluation, or other purposes, shall not be counted as part of the 10-year exposure minimum.
8.9.2.2 Color Retention
8.9.2.2.1 Procedure
Measurements shall be made per Section 5.7. For solid colors, average at least three separate measurements; for variegated colors,
average at least six separate measurements. To determine color change of materials whose tests were started prior to the publication
of these requirements, the final color measurements shall be made using the same parameters as the initial color data.
Color change shall be measured on the exposed painted surface which has been cleaned of external deposits with clear water and a
soft cloth, and compared against the initial values obtained prior to exposure or to the measurements of a retained file specimen. A
portion of the exposed panel may be washed lightly to remove surface dirt only. Heavy scrubbing or any polishing to remove chalk
formation or restore the surface is not permitted where color measurements are made. New colors, whether formulated by a paint
manufacturer or blended by an applicator according to a paint manufacturer's specifications, may be qualified without the exposure
test per Section 8.9.2.1, provided that they are produced with the same pigments in the same coating resin system as a color on which
acceptable 10-year test data is available and which is within ±10 Hunter units in lightness (L).
There shall be a maximum of 5∆EH units of color change after the minimum 10-year exposure test per Section 8.9.2.1.
8.9.2.3 Chalking
Chalk Resistance shall be greater than or equal to that represented by a No. 8 rating based on ASTM D4214, Test Method A (Method
D 659) after test site (weathering) exposure (per Section 8.9.2.1) for 10 years. Chalking shall be measured on an exposed, unwashed
painted surface.

8.9.2.4 Gloss Retention
8.9.2.4.1 Procedure
After weathering exposure (per Section 8.9.2.1), measure 60° gloss of exposed and unexposed areas of a test site exposure panel
following ASTM D523. The exposure panel may be washed lightly with clear water and a soft cloth to remove loose surface dirt.
Heavy scrubbing or any polishing to restore the surface is not permitted where gloss measurements are made.
Gloss retention shall be a minimum of 50% after the 10-year exposure test per Section 8.9.2.1 expressed as:
60° Gloss Exposed

% Retention = �� x 100%�
60° Gloss Unexposed
8.9.2.5 Resistance to Erosion
8.9.2.5.1 Procedure
After weathering exposure (per Section 8.9.2.1), measure dry film thickness of exposed and adjacent unexposed areas of exposure
panels using an eddy current meter as defined in ASTM B244 or other instrumental methods of equal precision.
There shall be less than 10% film loss after the exposure test per Section 8.9.2.1 expressed as a percent loss of total film:
Dry Film Thickness Exposed

Loss = 100% - �� x 100%�
Dry Film Thickness Unexposed
9.0 TEST REPORTS AND RESULTS

9.1 Test reports on file with the applicator shall include the following information:
9.1.1 Date when tests were performed and date of issue of report.
9.1.2 Identification of organic coating and/or coating system tested, including the production date, batch or lot number, cure
conditions, pre-treatment data, manufacturer's name and name of the company submitting the coated samples used in test.
9.1.3 Copy of drawings submitted showing exposed surfaces.
9.1.4 Test results – all results shall be reported.
9.1.5 A statement indicating that the organic coating and/or coating system tested passed all tests or failed one or more.
9.1.6 In the case of a failure, which test(s) and a description of the failure(s).
9.1.7 Statement that all tests were conducted in accordance with this standard.
9.1.8 Name and address of the laboratory which conducted tests and issued the report.

APPENDIX A: COIL COATING
A1.0 SCOPE
A1.1 This appendix describes differences in test procedures and performance requirements for AAMA 2605 for superior performing
organic coatings, applied on a coil coating line, to aluminum architectural products.
A1.2 This appendix covers factory-applied coil coatings.
A2.0 PURPOSE
This appendix to AAMA 2605 will assist the architect, owner and contractor to specify and obtain factory-applied organic coatings,
which will provide and maintain a superior level of performance in terms of film integrity, exterior weatherability and general
appearance over a period of many years.
This appendix speaks specifically to modifications of the AAMA 2605 specification based upon the differences between spray-
applied and coil-applied coatings. Unless otherwise modified by this addendum, the AAMA 2605 specification applies in its entirety.
A3.0 GENERAL
A3.1 The total dry-film thickness shall be assessed utilizing the ASTM D7091 method.
A3.2 Eighty percent (80%) of measurements on primary exposed surfaces shall meet or exceed 23 microns (0.9 mil) total film
thickness.
A3.3 Paint process capability may result in readings below 19 microns (0.75 mil). No more than 5% of the total readings, on primary
exposed surfaces, shall be below 19 microns (0.75 mil) (or, 83% of film thickness specified), assuming appropriate color and hide.
A3.4 Film thickness specified may be increased to be consistent with color selection and type of coating as recommended by the
coating manufacturer.
A4.0 METAL PREPARATION AND PRE-TREATMENT
A4.1 Performance
The cleaning/pre-treatment process and coating weights shall be within the performance range approved by the cleaning and pre-
treatment chemical supplier.
A4.2 Quality Assurance
The in-plant testing and control of cleaning and pretreatment shall meet or exceed the minimum requirements established by the
cleaning and pretreatment chemical manufacturers.
A5.0 TESTS
A5.1 T-Bend Test for Coating Flexibility
A5.1.1 Procedure
A5.1.1.1 Using the T-bend test method, in accordance with ASTM D4145, the coated sample shall be at least 51 mm (2 in) across
the bend direction, by 152 mm (6 in).
A5.1.1.2 The test specimen temperature shall be 18°C to 27°C (65°F to 80°F).
A5.1.1.3 Secure approximately 13 to 19 mm (½ to ¾ in) of the sample in the jaws of a bench vise or holding jig. Bend the free end of
the specimen 90° in a smooth and uniform manner so that the coating is on the outside of the specimen after it is bent. Continue
bending so the metal is completely bent upon itself, forming a 180° arc. This is a 0-T bend.
NOTE A1: If needed, the vise can be used to help flatten the metal upon itself so that the apex of the bend is as flat as can be
reasonably achieved.

A5.1.1.4 Secure the bent end of the specimen in the vise and bend the free end 90°. Continue to bend the free end around the first (0-
T) bend to complete a 180° bend. This forms a 1-T bend. Continue to bend the free end around the first (0-T) bend to form a 90°
bend; this forms a 2-T bend.
A5.1.1.5 After each bend has been completed, apply 19 mm (3/4 in.) wide pressure-sensitive tape (tape specified per ASTM D3359)
along the bend. Rub the tape flat; then, holding the specimen firmly, remove the tape with a rapid movement at an angle of 180° to
the bend surface. Examine the tape for coating removed from the surface of the specimen (called pick-off).
A5.1.2 Performance
There shall be a minimum of 2-T flexibility with no pick-off at the area of the bend. Express the T-bend to no pick-off as the number
of thicknesses around which the metal is being bent. For example, if no pick-off occurs when the metal is bent back upon itself once,
the paint would take a 0-T bend.
NOTE A2: Minute cracking at the edge of the bent area of the test panel is permissible but no paint pick-off shall be apparent. The
test is valid to the point of substrate rupture.
A5.2 Impact Resistance
A5.2.1 Direct Impact
Using a 15 mm (5/8 in) diameter round-nosed impact tester in the 18 N-m (160 in-lb) range, such as a BYK-Gardner impact tester,
apply a load directly to the coated surface which creates a minimum of 3 mm ± 0.3 mm (0.10 in ± 0.01 in) deformation . After
deformation, apply 20 mm (3/4 in) wide tape (tape specified per ASTM D3359) of sufficient size to cover the test area to the front of
the coating by pressing down firmly against the coating to eliminate voids and air pockets under the tape. Sharply pull tape off at a
right angle to the plane of the surface being tested. Test pieces should be at ambient temperature, approximately 18°C to 27°C (65°F
to 80°F).
A5.2.1.1 Performance
There shall be no removal of film to substrate.
A5.2.2 Reverse Impact
Using a 15 mm (5/8 in) diameter round-nosed impact tester in the 18 N-m (160 in-lb) range, such as a BYK-Gardner impact tester,
apply a load to the back side the coated surface which creates a deformation which is three times the thickness of the metal (see
formula in the following Example). After deformation, apply 20 mm (3/4 in) wide tape (tape specified per ASTM D3359) to the
front of the coating of sufficient size to cover the test area by pressing down firmly against the coating to eliminate voids and air
pockets under the tape. Sharply pull tape off at a right angle to the plane of the surface being tested. Test pieces should be at ambient
temperature, approximately 18°C to 27°C (65°F to 80°F).
EXAMPLE 2: If the aluminum thickness is 0.70 mm (0.0276 in), multiply the metal thickness by 0.45 (1000) to obtain a load in m-kg
(in-lbs).
0.70mm x 0.45 = 0.315 m-kg required

Drop a 1 kg weight a distance of 0.315 m
(0.0276 in x 1000 = 27.6 in-lbs required)

(Drop a 2 lb weight a distance of 13.8 in)
NOTE A3: The industry standard for impact resistance uses a factor of 0.45 (1000) for aluminum. Higher performance is possible.
Deformation depth will differ according to the yield strength of the aluminum.
A5.2.2.1 Performance
There shall be no removal of film to substrate.
NOTE A4: Minute cracking at the perimeter of the convex area of the test panel is permissible but no paint pick-off should be
apparent. Test is valid to the point of substrate rupture.

Changes from AAMA 2605-17a to AAMA 2605-20
• Various editorial changes were made.
• The sections for adhesion, color retention, nitric acid resistance and abrasion resistance have been updated.
• Note 6 was updated.
• Principle statements have been added to all the finishes documents.
• This document was updated by the AMC Finishes Committee, the Abrasion Resistance (Falling Sand) Test Method Review
Task Group and the Finishes Steering Committee.
Changes from AAMA 2605-17 to AAMA 2605-17A

• Updated Section 8.4 Peel Adhesion to reference ASTM D3359 rather than re-stating the procedure within the document.
• Language was added to 8.4.1 to clarify that all tests shall be performed sequentially as shown in the document and the order
of testing was changed.
• Updated reference to ASTM D3359-17 for new requirements for tapes used in adhesion testing.
• References to sub-sections of 8.4 have been updated accordingly in Section 5.5
• Various editorial changes were made
• Developing Group: AMC Finishes Committee
Changes from AAMA 2605-13 to AAMA 2605-17

• Updated the solid detergent composition chart to be consistent in nomenclature in the AAMA Finishes Documents 612,
613, 614, 615, 623, 624, 625, 633, 653, 2603, 2604 and 2605.
Changes from AAMA 2605-11 to AAMA 2605-13

• Various editorial changes were made
• Added new Section 1.4
• Added requirement repair scratches per Section 8.4.1.2 in Section 5.5
• Changed language in Section 7.2.2 to reference “chromium chromate or chromium phosphate”
• Range of 2ΔE in Section 8.1.2 was made a maximum deviation
• Added language about ASTM D2244 no longer recommending the Hunter scale in NOTE 6
• Changed reference from “Permacel 99 or equivalent” tape to “tape specified per ASTM D3359” in Sections 8.4.1.2, 8.5.1,
8.7.4.1, 8.8.2.1, A5.1.1.5, A5.2.1, A5.2.2
• Added reference to Section 8.4.1.2 in Section 8.7.5.1
• Added new NOTE 10 & NOTE 11
• Added requirement to utilize ASTM G7 in Section 8.9.1.1
• Changed Section A5.1.1.4 to better define a 2-T bend
• Updated EXAMPLE in Section A5.2.2

Fenestration and Glazing Industry Alliance
U.S. Headquarters
1900 E. Golf Rd. Suite 1250
Schaumburg, IL 60173
Phone: (847) 303-5859
Canada Office
1769 St. Laurent Blvd. Suite 104
Ottawa, ON, Canada K1G 5X7
Phone: (613) 233-1510
Email: [email protected]
Website: fgiaonline.org

2605-20 Errata 2022

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

2605-20 Errata 2022

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

2605-20 Errata 2022

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What is the document about?

What is the document about?

What are some of the tests mentioned in the document?

What are some of the tests mentioned in the document?

F E N E S T R A T I O N A N D G L A Z I N G

Fenestration and Glazing Industry Alliance

This document contained an error in publication.

The previous document read:

The document has been corrected to read:

APPENDIX A: COIL COATING ..................................................................... 13

This document was developed and maintained by representative members of FGIA as

AAMA 2605-20, an FGIA Voluntary Specification

Fenstration and Glazing Industry Alliance

1.2 This specification covers factory-applied organic coatings only.

2.0 SIGNIFICANCE AND USE

3.0 REFERENCED DOCUMENTS

3.2 AAMA, Fenestration and Glazing Industry Alliance (FGIA) Standards

AAMA 800-16, Voluntary Specifications and Test Methods for Sealants

AAMA 2605-20 Page 1

AAMA AG-13, AAMA Glossary

3.3 ASTM International (ASTM)

ASTM D523-14(2018), Standard Test Method for Specular Gloss

ASTM D2248-01a(2018), Standard Practice for Detergent Resistance of Organic Finishes

AAMA 2605-20 Page 2

AAMA 2605-20 Page 3

7.0 METAL PREPARATION AND PRE-TREATMENT

7.2 Chemical Conversion Coating Weight

AAMA 2605-20 Page 4

8.2 Specular Gloss

Gloss values shall be within ± 5 units of the manufacturer's specification.

NOTE 7: Standard gloss range values are as follows in Table 1.

Gloss Specular Gloss Value

TABLE 1: Standard Gloss Range Values

8.3 Dry Film Hardness

Coating shall meet minimum F scratch hardness as defined by ASTM D3363.

8.4 Film Adhesion

AAMA 2605-20 Page 5

8.4.2.1 Dry Adhesion

8.4.2.2 Boiling Water Adhesion

8.4.2.3 Wet Adhesion

8.5 Impact Resistance

There shall be no removal of film from substrate.

AAMA 2605-20 Page 6

Abrasion Coefficient (Liters Per Mil) = V/T

where: V = volume of sand used in liters

8.7 Chemical Resistance

8.7.1 Muriatic Acid Resistance (15-Minute Spot Test)

8.7.2 Mortar Resistance (24-Hour Pat Test)

AAMA 2605-20 Page 7

8.7.3 Nitric Acid Resistance

8.7.4 Detergent Resistance

Technical Grade Reagent % by Weight

TABLE 2: Detergent Formulation

AAMA 2605-20 Page 8

8.7.5 Window Cleaner Resistance

“All-purpose” glass cleaner composition is as follows in Table 3:

Raw Materials % By Weight

TABLE 3: Window Cleaner Formulation

*Dow Chemical, propylene glycol methyl ether