T4 - Benefits of Strategic Management

T4 – Benefits Of Strategic Management
Strategic management allows an organization to be more proactive than reactive in shaping

its own future; it allows an organization to initiate and influence (rather than just respond to)
activities – and thus to exert control over its own destiny. Small business owners, chief
executive officers, presidents and managers of many for-profit and nonprofit organizations
have recognized and realized the benefits of strategic management.
Historically, the principal benefit of strategic management has been to help organizations
formulate better strategies through the use of a more systematic, logical and rational approach
to strategic choice. This certainly continues to be a major benefit of strategic management,
but research studies now indicate that the process, rather than the decision or document, is the
more important contribution of strategic management. Communication is a key to successful
strategic management. Through involvement in the process, on other words, through
dialogue and participation, managers and employees become committed to supporting the
organization. Figure 1-2 illustrates this intrinsic benefit of a firm engaging in strategic
planning.
The manner in which strategic management is carried out is thus exceptionally important. A
major aim of the process is to achieve the understanding of and commitment from all
managers and employees. Understanding may be the most important benefits of strategic
management, followed by commitment. When managers and employees understand what the
organization is doing and why, they often feel they are a part of the firm and become
committed to assisting it. This is especially true when employees also understand linkages
between their own compensation and organizational performance. Manager and employees
become surprisingly creative and innovative when they understand and support the firm’s
mission, objectives and strategies. A great benefit of strategic management is the opportunity
that the process provides to empower individuals. Empowerment is the act of strengthening
employees’ sense of effectiveness by encouraging them to participate in decision making and
to exercise initiative and imagination and rewarding them for doing so.
Strategic planning is learning, helping, educating and supporting process not merely a paper-
shuffling activity among top executives. Strategic-management dialogue is more important
than a nicely bound strategic-management document. The worst thing strategists can do is
develop strategic plans themselves and the present them to operating managers to execute.
Through involvement in the process, line managers become “owners” of the strategy.
Although making good strategic decisions is the major responsibility of an organization’s
owner or chief executive officer, both managers and employees must also be involved in
strategy formulation, implementation and evaluation activities. Participation is a key to
gaining commitment for needed changes.
Strategic Management © KOLEJ TEKNOLOGI YPC-iTWEB
FIGURE 1-2 Benefits To A Firm Does Strategic Planning
Financial Benefits
Research indicates that organizations that use strategic-management concepts are more
profitable and successful than those that do not. Business using strategic-management
concepts show significant improvement in sales, profitability and productivity compared to
firms without systematic planning activities. High-performing firms tend to do systematic
planning to prepare for future fluctuations in their external and internal environments. Firms
with planning systems more closely resembling strategic-management theory generally
exhibit superior long-term financial performance relative to the industry.
High-performing firms seem to make more informed decisions with good anticipation of both
short- and long-term consequences. In contrast, firms that perform poorly often engage in
activities that are shortsighted and do not reflect good forecasting of future conditions.
Strategists of low-performing organizations are often preoccupied with solving internal
problems and meeting paperwork deadlines. They typically underestimate their competitors’
strengths and overestimate their own firm’s strengths. They often attribute weak
performance to uncontrollable factors such as poor economy, technological change or foreign
competition. More than 100,000 businesses in the United States fail annually. Business
failure include bankruptcies, foreclosures, liquidations and court-mandated receiverships.
Nonfinancial Benefits
Besides helping firms avoid financial demise, strategic management offers other tangible
benefits, such as an enhanced awareness of external threats, an improved understanding of
competitors’ strategies, increased employee productivity, reduced resistance to change and
clearer understanding of performance-reward relationships. Strategic management enhances
the problem-prevention capabilities of organizations because it promotes interaction among
managers at all divisional and functional levels. Firms that have nurtured their managers and
employees, shared organizational objectives with them, empowered them to help improve the
product or service and recognized their contributions can turn to them for help in a pinch
because of this interaction.
In addition to empowering managers and employees, strategic management often brings order
and discipline to an otherwise floundering firm. It can be the beginning of an efficient and
effective managerial system. Strategic management may renew confidence in the current
business strategy or point to the need for corrective actions. The strategic-management
process provides a basis for identifying and rationalizing the need for change to all managers
and employees of a firm; it helps them view change as an opportunity rather than as a threat.
T4 – Benefits Of Strategic Management 2

Greenley stated that strategic management offers the following benefits:
1. It allows for identification, prioritization and exploitation of opportunities.

2. It provides an objective view of management problems.
3. It represents a framework for improved coordination and control of activities.
4. It minimizes the effects of adverse conditions and changes.
5. It allows major decisions to better support established objectives.
6. It allows more effective allocation of time and resources to identified opportunities.
7. It allows fewer resources and less time to be devoted to correcting erroneous or ad
hoc decisions.
8. It creates a framework for internal communication among personnel.
9. It helps integrate the behavior of individuals into a total effort.
10. It provides a basis for clarifying individual responsibilities.
11. It encourages forward thinking.
12. It provides a cooperative, integrated and enthusiastic approach to tackling problems
and opportunities.
13. It encourages a favorable attitude towards change.
14. It gives a degree of discipline and formality to the management of a business.
Why Some Firms Do No Strategic Planning
Some firms do not engage in strategic planning and some firms do strategic planning but
receive no support from managers and employees. Some reasons for poor or no strategic
planning are as follows:
 Lack of knowledge or experience in strategic planning – no training in strategic

planning.
 Poor reward structures – when an organization assumes success, it often fails to
rewards success. When failure occurs, then the firm may punish.
 Firefighting – an organization can be so deeply embroiled in resolving crises and
firefighting that it reserves no time for planning.
 Waste of time – some firms see planning as a waste of time because no marketable
product is product. Time spent on planning is an investment.
 Too expensive – some organizations see planning as too expensive in time and
money.
 Laziness – people may not want to put forth the effort needed to formulate a plan.
 Content with success - particularly if a firm is successful, individuals may feel there
is no need to plan because things are fine as they stand. But success today does not
guarantee success tomorrow.
 Fear of failure – by not taking action, there is little risk of failure unless a problem is
urgent and pressing. Whenever something worthwhile is attempted, there is some risk
of failure.
 Overconfidence – as managers amass experience, they may rely less on formalized
planning. Rarely, however, is this appropriate. Being overconfident or
overestimating experience can bring demise. Forethought is rarely wasted and is
often the mark of professionalism.
 Prior bad experience – people may have had a previous bad experience with
planning, that is, cases in which plans have been long, cumbersome, impractical, or
inflexible. Planning, like anything else, can be done badly.

 Self-interest – when someone has achieved status, privilege, or self-esteem through

effectively using and old system, he or she often sees a new plan as a threat.
 Fear of the unknown – people may be uncertain of their abilities to learn new skills,
of their aptitude with new systems, or of their ability to take on new roles.
 Honest different of opinion – people may sincerely believe the plan is wrong. They
may view the situation from a different viewpoint, or they may have aspirations for
themselves or the organization that are different from the plan. Different people in
different jobs have different perceptions of a situation.
 Suspicion – employees may not trust management.
Pitfalls In Strategic Management
Strategic planning is an involved, intricate and complex process that takes an organization
into uncharted territory. If does not provide a ready-to-use prescription for success; instead,
it takes the organization through a journey and offers a framework for addressing questions
and solving problems. Being aware of potential pitfalls and being prepared to address them is
essential to success.
Some pitfalls to watch for and avoid in strategic planning are these:
 Using strategic planning to gain control over decision and resources

 Doing strategic planning only to satisfy accreditation or regulatory requirements
 Too hastily moving form mission development to strategy formulation
 Failing to communicate the plan to employees, who continue working in the dark
 Top managers not actively supporting the strategic-planning process
 Failing to use plans as a standard for measuring performance
 Delegating planning to a “planner” rather than involving all managers
 Failing to create a collaborative climate supportive of change
 Viewing planning as unnecessary or unimportant
 Becoming so engrossed in current problems that insufficient or no planning is done
 Being so formal in planning that flexibility and creativity are stifled
Guidelines For Effective Strategic Management
An important guideline for effective strategic management is open-mindedness. A

willingness and eagerness to consider new information, new viewpoints, new ideas and new
possibilities is essential; all organizational members must share a spirit of inquiry and
learning. Strategists such as chief executive officers, presidents, owners of small businesses
and heads of government agencies must commit themselves to listen to and understand
managers’ positions well enough to be able to restate those positions to the managers’
satisfactions. In addition, manager and employees throughout the firm should be able to
describe the strategists’ positions to satisfaction of the strategist. Table 1-3 summarizes
important guidelines for the strategic-planning process to be effective.

TABLE 1-3 Seventeen Guidelines For The Strategic-Planning Process To Be Effective

1. It should be a people process more than a paper process.
2. It should be a learning process for all managers and employees.
3. It should be words supported by numbers rather than numbers supported by words.
4. It should be simple and nonroutine.
5. It should vary assignments, team memberships, meeting formats and even then planning
calendar.
6. It should challenge the assumptions underlying the current corporate strategy.
7. It should welcome bad news.
8. It should welcome open-mindness and a spirit of inquiry and learning.
9. It should not be a bureaucratic mechanism.
10. It should not become ritualistic, stilted or orchestrated.
11. It should not be too formal, predictable or rigid.
12. It should not contain jargon or arcane planning language.
13. It should not be a formal system for control.
14. It should not disregard qualitative information.
15. It should not be controlled by “technicians.”
16. Do not pursue too many strategies at once.
17. Continually strengthen the “good ethics is good business” policy

T4 - Benefits of Strategic Management

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

T4 - Benefits of Strategic Management

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

T4 - Benefits of Strategic Management

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

T4 – Benefits Of Strategic Management

Strategic management allows an organization to be more proactive than reactive in shaping

FIGURE 1-2 Benefits To A Firm Does Strategic Planning

T4 – Benefits Of Strategic Management 2

Greenley stated that strategic management offers the following benefits:

1. It allows for identification, prioritization and exploitation of opportunities.

Why Some Firms Do No Strategic Planning

 Lack of knowledge or experience in strategic planning – no training in strategic

T4 – Benefits Of Strategic Management 3

 Self-interest – when someone has achieved status, privilege, or self-esteem through

Pitfalls In Strategic Management

 Using strategic planning to gain control over decision and resources

Guidelines For Effective Strategic Management

An important guideline for effective strategic management is open-mindedness. A

T4 – Benefits Of Strategic Management 4

TABLE 1-3 Seventeen Guidelines For The Strategic-Planning Process To Be Effective

T4 – Benefits Of Strategic Management 5

You might also like