Spectrophotometric Analysis of A Mixture Caffeine and Benzoic Acid-Annotated

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

22.

Spectrophotometric Analysis of a Mixture: Caffeine and Benzoic Acid in


a Soft Drink1
In this experiment we use ultraviolet absorbance (Figure 1) to measure two major species in soft
drinks. Caffeine is added as a stimulant and sodium benzoate is a preservative.
O CH3
H 3C C N
N C
CH CO 2H
C C N
O N
CH3

Caffeine Benzoic acid (pKa = 4.20)


FM 182.18 FM 122.12

All solutions will contain 0.010 M HCl, so the sodium benzoate is protonated to make benzoic
acid. Caffeine has no appreciable basicity, so it is neutral at pH 2.

1.6
All solutions contain 0.010 M HCl
1.4

1.2

1.0 Benzoic acid


8.74 mg/L
Absorbance

0.8
Mountain Dew soda
1:50 dilution
0.6 Caffeine
10.88 mg/L
0.4

0.2

0.0
200 220 240 260 280 300
Wavelength nm)

Figure 1. Ultraviolet absorption of benzoic acid, caffeine, and a 1:50 dilution of Mountain Dew
soft drink. All solutions contain 0.010 M HCl.

54
We restrict ourselves to non-diet soft drinks because the sugar substitute aspartame in
diet soda has some ultraviolet absorbance that slightly interferes in the present experiment. We
also avoid darkly colored drinks because the colorants have ultraviolet absorbance. Mountain
Dew, Mello Yello, and, probably, other lightly colored drinks are suitable for this experiment.
There is undoubtedly some ultraviolet absorbance from colorants in these beverages that
contributes systematic error to this experiment.
The procedure we describe includes the construction of calibration curves. The
experiment could be shortened by recording just one spectrum of caffeine (20 mg/L) and one of
benzoic acid (10 mg/L) and assuming that Beer's law is obeyed. The experiment could be
expanded to use high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and/or capillary
electrophoresis to obtain independent measurements of caffeine and benzoic acid (and
aspartame in diet drinks).1
Reagents
Stock solutions: An accurately known solution containing ~100 mg benzoic acid/L in water and
another containing ~200 mg caffeine/L should be available. Note the actual concentrations.

0.10 M HCl: Dilute 8.2 mL of 37 wt % HCl to 1 L.

Procedure
1. Calibration standards: Prepare benzoic acid solutions containing 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 mg/L in
0.010 M HCl. To prepare a 2 mg/L solution, mix 2.00 mL of benzoic acid stock standard plus
10.0 mL of 0.10 M HCl in a 100-mL volumetric flask and dilute to the mark with water.
Use 4, 6, 8 and 10 mL of benzoic acid to prepare the other standards. In a similar manner,
prepare caffeine standards containing 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20 mg/L in 0.010 M HCl.
2. Soft drink: Warm ~20 mL of soft drink in a beaker on a hot plate to expel CO2 and filter the
warm liquid through filter paper to remove any particles. After cooling to room temperature,
pipet 4.00 mL into a 100-mL volumetric flask. Add 10.0 mL of 0.10 M HCl and dilute to the
mark. Prepare a second sample containing 2.00 mL of soft drink instead of 4.00 mL.
3. Record an ultraviolet baseline from 350 to 210 nm with water in the sample and reference
cuvets (1.000 cm pathlength). Record the ultraviolet spectrum of each of the 10 standards
with water in the reference cuvet. Note the wavelength of peak absorbance for benzoic acid
(’) and the wavelength for the peak absorbance of caffeine ("). Prepare a calibration graph
of absorbance versus concentration (M) for each compound at each of the two wavelengths.
Take at least three replicate readings for each standard. The least-squares slope of the graph
is the molar absorptivity at that wavelength.
4. Unknowns: Measure the ultraviolet absorption spectrum of the 2:100 and 4:100 dilutions of
the soft drink. With the absorbance at the wavelengths ’(~273nm) and ” (~230nm), find
the concentrations of benzoic acid and caffeine in the original soft drink. Run at least three
trials for each of the soft drink prepared samples. Report results from both dilute solutions
and the original soft drink.
1. V. L. McDevitt, A. Rodriquez and K. R. Williams, J. Chem. Ed. 1998, 75, 625.

55

You might also like