11 Separable Space

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 11

Separable Spaces

Unit 11

Separable spaces

§1 Definition and Examples.

§2 Properties.

§3 Solved problems.

Page | 135
Separable Spaces

Page | 136
Separable Spaces

Unit 11: Separable spaces

§1 Definition and Examples


We know that a subset E of a topological space ,  is dense in X if   .
viz. the set Q of all rational numbers is dense in 
,  .

Definition 1.1: A topological space ,  is called separable if there exists a countable dense
subset of X.

Examples 1.2:
Separable spaces.
1) 
,  is a separable space as the set of all rational numbers Q is a countable dense subset
of
.
2) Let X be a countable set and ,  be discrete topological space. Then ,  is a
separable spaces as    and X is a countable set.
3) Let ,  be a co finite topological space and let X be an uncountable set. For any
countable set A of X,   (since the only closed set containing A is X). Hence , 
is a separable space.
4) Let X be an uncountable set and  be the discrete topology on X. Then ,  is not a
separable space as X is the only dense subset of X. In particularly, the discrete
topological space 
,  is not a separable space.
Note that the discrete topological space is separable if and only if X is a countable set.

Non separable spaces.


1) Discrete topological space defined on uncountable set  is a non-separable space.
2) Co-countable topological space ,  defined on an uncountable set  is not a separable
space.
3) Let  be any uncountable set and   .
    exclusion topology on  i.e.        |   .

Page | 137
Separable Spaces

Let if possible  is a separable space.


Hence  a countable set such that  . Select any     ,    . [ This is
possible as   is an uncountable set ]. Then   and   imply     .
As   is an open set containing , we get        . But as     , we
have      . Thus         ; a contradiction.
Hence our assumption is wrong .Therefore ,  is not a separable.

§2 Properties
Theorem 2.1: Property of being a separable space is a topological property.
Proof: - Let ,  be a separable space. Let  ,   be any topological space. Let !:  #  be
a homeomorphism. To prove that  ,   is a separable space.
Let ,  be a separable space. Hence  a countable subset A of X such that  . As ! is

onto, !    . !:  #  being continuos we get ! / 0  ! / 0 (see Theorem …

Continuous function). Hence ! /0  ! 
/ 0 implies   ! 
/ 0 1. 2.   ! / 0 . Thus ! / 0 is a
countable dense subset of  . Hence  is a separable space. Thus homeomorphic image  ,  
of a separable space ,  is a separable space. Hence being a separable space is a topological
property.

Theorem 2.2: Every second axiom space is a separable space.


Proof:- Let ,  be a second axiom space. Hence there exists a countable base say
3  45 | 6  7 for . Define   85  45 | 6  7 .
Then A is a countable subset of X.
Claim that  .
Let    and G be any open set containing . Hence by the definition of base,  6  9 such
that   45  :. Select 85  45 such that 85  . Then 85  :    implies  is a limit
of A. Thus   implies  . Thus there exists a countable dense subset A of X. Hence
,  is a separable space.

Page | 138
Separable Spaces

A property of a space is said to be hereditarily separable if each subspace of the space is


separable.
Theorem 2.3: Every second axiom space is hereditarily separable.
Proof:- Let ,  be a second axiom space. Let ;,   be a subspace of , . As every
sub-space of a second axiom space is a second axiom space, we get ;,   is a second axiom
space (see Unit (9) Theorem 1.4).
By Theorem 2.2 , ;,   is a separable space. Thus each subspace of a second axiom space is
separable. Hence the result.

Theorem 2.4: Any topological space is a subspace of a separable space.


Proof:- Let ,  be any topological space and ∞  . Define     ∞ and
       :  ∞ | :  .
I] To prove that  is a topology on  .
(i)    and    .
(ii) , 4   =   ∞ and 4  4  ∞ for , 4  
=  4    4  ∞   as  4  .
(iii) Let :>   , ?  Λ. Then :>  :>  ∞ , where :>   ; B?  Λ.

Then C :>  C/ :>  ∞0  EC :> F  ∞.


>D >D >D

As C :>   . We get C :>  


>D >D

From (i), (ii) and (iii) we get  is a topology on  .

II] ,  is a subspace of  ,   as   :   | :    and    .

III] 
∞   . Let      ∞ and :   with   : .
:  ∞      ∞ implies x is a limit point of ∞.
Thus each   ∞   is a limit point of ∞. Hence   ∞   .
As 
∞   ∞    ∞  ∞     .
IV] As ∞ is a countable dense set in  , we get  ,   is a separable space.

Page | 139
Separable Spaces

Thus given any space ,  there exists a separable space  ,   such that ,  is a
subspace of  ,  .

Remark: As any topological space is a subspace of a separable space, subspace of a separable


space need not be a separable space.

Theorem 2.5: A metric space is separable if and only if it is a second axiom space.
Proof:- As if part follows by Theorem 2.3 we prove ‘Only if part’ only.
Only if part –
Let ,   be a metric space and let  denote the topology induced by  on X. Hence
   :   | B   :  G H 0 such that J , G  : .
Given ,  is a separable space. To prove that ,  is a second axiom space.
As X is separable,  a countable dense set say A in X.
Let   K , L , M , … …  . Then  .
1
Define 3  OJ P5 , S T 5  , R, 6  9U . Then 3 is a countable set and 3  .
R
To prove that 3 is a base for .
(1) 3  .
(2) Let :   and   :. By the definition of  ,  G H 0 such that   J  , G  :.

. Then J Y , VZ  J Y , LZ  J, G.


K X K X
Select R  7 such that V
W L

As  ,  is a limit point of . Hence   J Y , VZ and J Y , VZ   will imply


K K

J Y , VZ      .
K

Let 5  J Y , VZ  . To prove that J Y5 , VZ  J , G.


K K

Let [  J Y5 , VZ. [  J Y5 , VZ =  5 , [ W V .


K K K

Hence,   , [ W  , 5  \ 5 , [

=   , [  W V \ V
K K K
…… ]since 5  J Y , VZ^

=   , [  W V
L

=   , [ W G …… ]since
K X
W L^
V

Page | 140
Separable Spaces

= [  J , G .
K K
This proves J Y5 , VZ  J Y , VZ.

As J Y , Z  J, G  :, we get J Y5 , Z  :.


K K
V V
K K
Thus given :   and   :,  J Y5 , Z  3 such that J Y5 , Z  :.
V V

Hence, from (1) and(2) we get, the countable family 3 forms a base for the topology 
.Hence, ,   is a second axiom space.

Theorem 2.6: In a separable space any countable family mutually disjoint open sets is countable.
Proof:- Let ,  be a separable space. As  is separable space there exists a countable dense
set say D in . Let _ denote the family of mutually disjoint open sets in .
To prove that _ is countable.
For :, `  _ , :  `   , 1! :  `.
Case (1):   _.
b   = :  a   for any :  _. Select c  :  a, B :  _.
a
Define !: _ # a by ! :   c .
Obviously ! is onto.
!:   ! ` = c  d = :  `   = :  ` … 8[ 2!161e1f6 f! _ .
This shows that ! is one-one.
As !: _ # a is one-one and onto and a is countable we get _ is countable.
Case (2):   _.
Applying the case (1) for the family _   we get the family _   is countable.
And hence _  _     is countable.

§3 Solved problems
Problem 1: Show that being a separable space is not a hereditary property.
Solution: Let  be an uncountable set and   .
    inclusion topology on .
I) ,  is a separable space.
Consider  . Claim that  .

Page | 141
Separable Spaces

Select any     . Then any open set : containing  must contain . Hence
:    and hence :    
       . But this shows that  is a limit point of . Thus      .
Hence            .
Thus is dense in . As is a countable, dense subset of ,  is separable space.
II) Define ;    . Then the subspace ;,   is the discrete topological space.
Claim: ;,   is not a separable.
Let if possible ;,   is separable space. Hence there exists a countable dense set say
in ;. But since ;,   is the discrete topological space, each subset of ; is closed in ;.
Hence  (since  ; as is countable and ; is uncountable). This shows that our
assumption is wrong. Hence ;,   is not a separable space.
Hence being a separable space is not a hereditary property.

Problem 2: Give an example to show that every separable space need not be a Lindelof
space.
Solution:- Let  be an uncountable set and   .
    inclusion topology on .
I) ,  is a separable space.(see Problem 1)
II)  is not a Lindelof space.
Consider the family g,  |   h. This family of open sets forms an open cover
for . But this open cover has no countable sub-cover for , as  is an uncountable
set. This shows that ,  is not a Lindelof space.
Hence every separable space need not be a Lindelof space.

Problem 3: Give an example to show that every Lindelof space need not be a separable
space.
Solution: -Let  be any uncountable set and   .
    exclusion topology on  i.e.        |   .
I) ,  is a compact space.
Let :> | ?  Λ be any open cover of .

Page | 142
Separable Spaces

Then   C :> and    will imply   :>i for some ?j  Λ .


>D

But by definition of  , :>i  . Hence, the open cover :> | ?  Λ of  has a finite
sub-cover g:>i h of .
This shows that ,  is a compact space.
II) ,  is a Lindelof space.
As every compact space is a Lindelof space we get ,  is a Lindelof space.
III) ,  is not a separable space.
Let if possible  is a separable space.
Hence  a countable set such that  . Select any     ,    . [ This is
possible as   is an uncountable set ]. Then   and   imply     .
As   is an open set containing , we get        . But as     , we
have      . Thus         ; a contradiction.Hence our assumption is
wrong.
Therefore ,  is not a separable. Thus there exists a Lindelof space which not a
separable space.

Problem 4: Show that for a metric space ,  , the following statements are equivalent:
(1) The metric space  is separable.
(2) The metric space  is a Lindelok f space.
(3) The metric space  is a second axiom space.
Solution:-We know a metric space is separable if and only if it is a second axiom space and a
metric space is a Lindelok f if and only if it is a second axiom space.
Hence for a metric space ,  , the given three statements are equivalent.

Problem 5: Show that every subspace of a separable metric space is separable.


Solution: -Let  be a separable metric space and let ; be its subspace. Then  is a second axiom
space (see Theorem 2.5). As subspace of a second axiom space is a second axiom space we get ;
is a second axiom space (see Unit (9) Theorem 1.4)
This shows that any subspace of a separable metric space is a separable metric space.

Page | 143
Separable Spaces

Problem 6: Show that the open subspace of a separable space is separable.


Solution: Let ,  be a separable space and let ;,   be its open subspace. Then as ; is open
is open in ,   .
As  is a separable space,  a countable dense set say in  i.e.  .
Define 4   ;. Then 4 is countable subset of ;.
Claim: 4  ;.
Let [  ;. Let : be any open set in ;. Then :   and [  : .
As [  , we get, :   [  
i.e. :  ;   [  
i.e. :  ;    [  
i.e. :  4  [  .
But this shows that [  ; is a limit point of 4. Hence 4  ;.

Problem 7: Show that continuous image of a separable space is a separable space.


Solution: - Let ,  be a separable space. Let  ,   be any topological space.
Let !:  #  be an onto continuous mapping.
To prove that  ,   is a separable space.
Let ,  be a separable space. Hence  a countable subset A of X such that  . As f is onto,

!    . !:  #  being continuous we get !/ 0  ! / 0 (See Unit (5) Theorem 2.5).

Hence ! /0  ! 
/ 0 implies   ! 
/ 0 1. 2.   ! / 0 . Thus !/ 0 is a countable dense
subset of  . Hence  is a separable space. Thus continuous image  ,   of a separable space
,  is a separable space. Continuous image of a separable space is a separable space.

Exercises ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
State whether the following statements are true or false.
1) Every Lindelof space is a separable space.
2) Every separable space is a Lindelof space.
3) Every metric space is a separable space.
4) Every subspace of a separable space is a separable space.

Page | 144
Separable Spaces

5) Every discrete topological space is a separable space.


6) Co-finite topological space defined on an uncountable set is a separable space.
______________________________________________________________________________

Page | 145

You might also like