11 Separable Space
11 Separable Space
11 Separable Space
Unit 11
Separable spaces
§2 Properties.
§3 Solved problems.
Page | 135
Separable Spaces
Page | 136
Separable Spaces
Definition 1.1: A topological space , is called separable if there exists a countable dense
subset of X.
Examples 1.2:
Separable spaces.
1)
, is a separable space as the set of all rational numbers Q is a countable dense subset
of
.
2) Let X be a countable set and , be discrete topological space. Then , is a
separable spaces as and X is a countable set.
3) Let , be a co finite topological space and let X be an uncountable set. For any
countable set A of X,
(since the only closed set containing A is X). Hence ,
is a separable space.
4) Let X be an uncountable set and be the discrete topology on X. Then , is not a
separable space as X is the only dense subset of X. In particularly, the discrete
topological space
, is not a separable space.
Note that the discrete topological space is separable if and only if X is a countable set.
Page | 137
Separable Spaces
§2 Properties
Theorem 2.1: Property of being a separable space is a topological property.
Proof: - Let , be a separable space. Let , be any topological space. Let !: # be
a homeomorphism. To prove that , is a separable space.
Let , be a separable space. Hence a countable subset A of X such that
. As ! is
onto, ! . !: # being continuos we get ! /
0 ! /0 (see Theorem …
Continuous function). Hence ! /0 !
/0 implies !
/0 1. 2. ! /0 . Thus ! /0 is a
countable dense subset of . Hence is a separable space. Thus homeomorphic image ,
of a separable space , is a separable space. Hence being a separable space is a topological
property.
Page | 138
Separable Spaces
III]
∞ . Let ∞ and : with : .
: ∞ ∞ implies x is a limit point of ∞.
Thus each ∞ is a limit point of ∞. Hence ∞ .
As
∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ .
IV] As ∞ is a countable dense set in , we get , is a separable space.
Page | 139
Separable Spaces
Thus given any space , there exists a separable space , such that , is a
subspace of , .
Theorem 2.5: A metric space is separable if and only if it is a second axiom space.
Proof:- As if part follows by Theorem 2.3 we prove ‘Only if part’ only.
Only if part –
Let , be a metric space and let denote the topology induced by on X. Hence
: | B : G H 0 such that J , G : .
Given , is a separable space. To prove that , is a second axiom space.
As X is separable, a countable dense set say A in X.
Let K , L , M , … … . Then
.
1
Define 3 OJ P5 , S T 5 , R, 6 9U . Then 3 is a countable set and 3 .
R
To prove that 3 is a base for .
(1) 3 .
(2) Let : and :. By the definition of , G H 0 such that J , G :.
J Y , VZ .
K
= , [ W V \ V
K K K
…… ]since 5 J Y , VZ^
= , [ W V
L
= , [ W G …… ]since
K X
W L^
V
Page | 140
Separable Spaces
= [ J , G .
K K
This proves J Y5 , VZ J Y , VZ.
Hence, from (1) and(2) we get, the countable family 3 forms a base for the topology
.Hence, , is a second axiom space.
Theorem 2.6: In a separable space any countable family mutually disjoint open sets is countable.
Proof:- Let , be a separable space. As is separable space there exists a countable dense
set say D in . Let _ denote the family of mutually disjoint open sets in .
To prove that _ is countable.
For :, ` _ , : ` , 1! : `.
Case (1): _.
b = : a for any : _. Select c : a, B : _.
a
Define !: _ # a by ! : c .
Obviously ! is onto.
!: ! ` = c d = : ` = : ` … 8[ 2!161e1f6 f! _ .
This shows that ! is one-one.
As !: _ # a is one-one and onto and a is countable we get _ is countable.
Case (2): _.
Applying the case (1) for the family _ we get the family _ is countable.
And hence _ _ is countable.
§3 Solved problems
Problem 1: Show that being a separable space is not a hereditary property.
Solution: Let be an uncountable set and .
inclusion topology on .
I) , is a separable space.
Consider . Claim that
.
Page | 141
Separable Spaces
Select any . Then any open set : containing must contain . Hence
: and hence :
. But this shows that is a limit point of . Thus .
Hence
.
Thus is dense in . As is a countable, dense subset of , is separable space.
II) Define ; . Then the subspace ;, is the discrete topological space.
Claim: ;, is not a separable.
Let if possible ;, is separable space. Hence there exists a countable dense set say
in ;. But since ;, is the discrete topological space, each subset of ; is closed in ;.
Hence
(since ; as is countable and ; is uncountable). This shows that our
assumption is wrong. Hence ;, is not a separable space.
Hence being a separable space is not a hereditary property.
Problem 2: Give an example to show that every separable space need not be a Lindelof
space.
Solution:- Let be an uncountable set and .
inclusion topology on .
I) , is a separable space.(see Problem 1)
II) is not a Lindelof space.
Consider the family g, | h. This family of open sets forms an open cover
for . But this open cover has no countable sub-cover for , as is an uncountable
set. This shows that , is not a Lindelof space.
Hence every separable space need not be a Lindelof space.
Problem 3: Give an example to show that every Lindelof space need not be a separable
space.
Solution: -Let be any uncountable set and .
exclusion topology on i.e. | .
I) , is a compact space.
Let :> | ? Λ be any open cover of .
Page | 142
Separable Spaces
But by definition of , :>i . Hence, the open cover :> | ? Λ of has a finite
sub-cover g:>i h of .
This shows that , is a compact space.
II) , is a Lindelof space.
As every compact space is a Lindelof space we get , is a Lindelof space.
III) , is not a separable space.
Let if possible is a separable space.
Hence a countable set such that
. Select any , . [ This is
possible as is an uncountable set ]. Then and
imply .
As is an open set containing , we get . But as , we
have . Thus ; a contradiction.Hence our assumption is
wrong.
Therefore , is not a separable. Thus there exists a Lindelof space which not a
separable space.
Problem 4: Show that for a metric space , , the following statements are equivalent:
(1) The metric space is separable.
(2) The metric space is a Lindelok f space.
(3) The metric space is a second axiom space.
Solution:-We know a metric space is separable if and only if it is a second axiom space and a
metric space is a Lindelok f if and only if it is a second axiom space.
Hence for a metric space , , the given three statements are equivalent.
Page | 143
Separable Spaces
Exercises ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
State whether the following statements are true or false.
1) Every Lindelof space is a separable space.
2) Every separable space is a Lindelof space.
3) Every metric space is a separable space.
4) Every subspace of a separable space is a separable space.
Page | 144
Separable Spaces
Page | 145