ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res.

10(07), 490-496

Journal Homepage: - www.journalijar.com

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/15063

DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/15063

RESEARCH ARTICLE
FORENSICS FRAMEWORK FOR MURDER INVESTIGATIONS

Gururaj Devarhubli1 and Bushra Sarfaraj Patel2

1. Assistant Professor of Law, Institute of Law, Nirma University.
2. Student of 4th Year, 8th Semester B.A.LL.B., Parul Institute of Law, Parul University.
……………………………………………………………………………………………………....
Manuscript Info Abstract
……………………. ………………………………………………………………
Manuscript History The article forms the basics for forensic methods of homicide
Received: 24 May 2022 investigation, identifies typical investigative situations and directions
Final Accepted: 28 June 2022 for their solution. It is proved that the perpetrator’s identity in the
Published: July 2022 structure of the forensic characterization of murders should be
investigated in two directions: the first one is to obtain information on
Key words:-
Forensic Methodology, Investigation, the basis of the material and ideal traces; the second one is the study of
Homicide, Perpetrator’s Identity, the perpetrator’s identity during the pre-trial investigation. The
Forensic Characteristics, Investigative methodology for investigating homicides s is based on typical
(Search) Actions
investigative situations that are developed at the initial stage of criminal
proceedings. Typical situations of the initial period of the investigation
depend on the actions of the offender, the place, time, conditions of the
murder, and the content of the source information. Forensic
recommendations for their implementation are proposed.

Copy Right, IJAR, 2022,. All rights reserved.

……………………………………………………………………………………………………....
Introduction:-
The human right to life is fundamental one, guaranteed by leading international regulations. According to Art. 2 of
the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 1950 (European Court of Human
Rights, 1950), the right of every individual to life is protected by law. The human right to life is inalienable. The
Basic Law of Ukraine – the Constitution of 1996 – not just declares, but also guarantees the protection of human
life, human rights and freedoms, entrusting these functions to the State and the law enforcement system.

However, modern socio-economic conditions, moral degradation of the society are determinants of crimes against
human life. The methods and tools of criminal activity, the ways of hiding the traces of crime are being improved.
These and other circumstances affect both the forensic characterization and the methodology of the homicide
investigation.

Homicide is of the greatest public danger among the crimes against life and health of the person, the detection and
investigation of which requires a high level of professional training of investigators, operational officers, forensic
experts, other law enforcement officers, and their effective co-operation. Thus, we will focus on the basis for
forensic methods of homicide investigation within this scientific article.

Material and Methods:-

Some problematic issues of homicide investigation were considered in the works by Hruzd (2018), Zahorodnii
(2017), Zamula (2018). However, nowadays it is worth paying attention to the formation of the basics for forensic

Corresponding Author:- Bushra Sarfaraj Patel 490

Address:- Student of 4th Year, 8th Semester B.A.LL.B., Parul Institute of Law, Parul University.
ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 10(07), 490-496

methods of homicide investigation, which will be universal in nature and can be used by law enforcement
practitioners as a guide in establishing the algorithm for various investigative situations.

Thus, the purpose of the Article is to form the basis for forensic methods of homicide investigation and to identify
typical investigative situations and the ways to solve them.

The theoretical foundation for the study is the dialectical and materialist method of scientific knowledge, which was
used to analyze the relationships in the mechanism of homicide. The following general scientific methods were also
used in the process of the research: formal and logical was applied to clarify the content of structural elements of
forensic characteristics of homicide; general and theoretical method helped to interpret the concept of “identity of
the perpetrator” as the object of forensic investigation; deductive method was used in the study of investigative
(search) actions as a means of gathering information about homicide and the identity of the perpetrator; the method
of analysis made it possible to reveal the process of proposing the versions of the identity of the perpetrator in
situations where there is no evidence of homicide and it is not possible to predict the behaviour of the perpetrator;
structural and functional method-was applied in the formation of the foundations of forensic methods of homicide
investigation.

Results and Discussion:-

Forensic tools and methods of collecting, investigating and using trace information should be used, proper
organization and planning of investigations, cooperation of investigative, operational and expert units, rapid
identification of the victim and the search for the perpetrator are required to ensure the effective investigation of
homicides.

One of the structural elements of forensic characteristics is the identity of the perpetrator, without which it is
impossible to choose the correct tactics of investigative (search) actions, to detect and investigate the crime.

It is necessary to study social, psychological characteristics of the perpetrator, to analyze the signs of human
appearance. The use of physical features has traditionally been applied to solve crimes, search and identify the
perpetrators. Currently, the doctrine of the identity of the perpetrator was formed as a separate forensic theory,
which has its own conceptual apparatus, methodological tools, practical tasks.

The analysis of empirical data is an important aspect in the study of the identity of the perpetrator. Based on the
generalization of a set of practical information, one can make a typical portrait of the perpetrator’s identity; form a
theory about the causes and the mechanism of the crime.

The study of the identity of the perpetrator is important for the implementation of preventive activities of law
enforcement, forecasting of individual criminal behavior and the development of measures to prevent it.

Finally, the study of the perpetrator’s identity has a clear purpose – to form theoretical positions and build practical
recommendations for the investigation of homicides. Such theoretical provisions and practical recommendations
form the basis for the relevant forensic methodology. Recommendations for the study of the perpetrator’s identity
substantially supplement the algorithms for investigating certain types of crimes, and increase their effectiveness.

The perpetrator’s identity is traditionally studied in two ways in criminology. The first one is to obtain information
about perpetrator’s identity on the basis of both material and ideal traces, as sufficiently informative trace pattern
remains in the preparation, commission and concealment of the consequences of homicide. Detected traces allow to
establish and detain the perpetrator, and to perform his (her) identification in the future. The second way involves
the study of the suspect in the pre-trial investigation in order to form a comprehensive forensic characteristic of the
actor and use it during the investigative (search) actions.

Traditional approaches to the study of the perpetrator’s identity cause problems in the formation of a typical portrait
of the identity of the murderer. After all, using the first approach, allows only drawing probable conclusions about
some signs, properties of the person suspected of committing homicide because of the variety of material and ideal
traces. According to the second approach, an approximate conclusion on the identity of the suspect and the real
murderer is formed. The method used is characterized as a retrospective analysis (directed to the past), i.e. the study

491
ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 10(07), 490-496

of crimes already committed and the perpetrators. The statistical method, the method of system analysis, etc. are also
used.

The murderer’s identity as an element of forensic characteristics is characterized by a number of features: gender,
age, education, financial and social status, professional skills, criminal experience, etc. Besides, scientists include
physical data, professional skills, mental integrity of the perpetrator to the important information on the perpetrator’s
identity (Shepitko, 2009). This information is formed as a system, and is a prerequisite for a model portrait of the
murderer.

Volobuiev (2011) considering the forensic characteristics of the perpetrator’s identity notes that the complex of
personality traits includes everything that can serve to determine the effective areas of identification, search and
detection of the perpetrator. This is a number of negative traits (selfishness, cruelty, aggression, contempt for public
duty, other people’s interests and feelings, greed, vanity, domestic corruption), at the same time – the presence of
great willpower, cynicism, mental imbalance, propensity to abuse alcohol, high suspicion and other mental
anomalies.

Thus, the forensic characteristics of the murderer allow identifying the following components that create the system:
physical, social, demographic, psychological characteristics and properties, mental disorders, criminal record and
professional skills, alcohol and drug abuse.

Thus, the murderer’s identity has a system of signs and properties that characterize him (her) as the person who
committed crime. The perpetrator’s identity has common features (gender, age, profession, education, social status,
etc.), as well as the unique characteristics, which express the nature and degree of danger to society. For the most
part, these characteristics are divided into: socio-demographic; socio-professional; moral and psychological;
criminal law. These features constitute a typical structure of the murderer’s identity, which is an important
component of both forensic characteristics and forensic methods of investigation.

Socio-demographic characteristics include gender, age, education, place of birth and residence, citizenship, etc.
These attributes are common to every individual and are not forensic ones in their nature. But in the statistical
population of perpetrators of murders, these features provide important information, without which a complete
forensic description of the perpetrator’s identity is impossible. For example, based on such a feature as gender, we
can conclude that male criminality is significantly higher than female criminality.

A wide range of forensic information is used to detect and investigate murders, to search for the perpetrators, and to
select the most effective tactics for conducting investigative (search) actions.

Important is the conclusion that the construction of forensic methods of investigation of certain types of crimes
involves the detection and study of additional features, which are based not only on the nature of the offence but also
on forensic characteristics of certain types (groups) of crimes. Processing of such data expands scientific ideas about
the essence of crimes, creates preconditions for using effective methods, means and receptions of investigation, and
promotes the increase of efficiency and optimization of law enforcement activity taking into account their
specificity.

Management of significant forensic information is carried out by conducting investigative (search) actions. Typical
homicide investigations include: scene inspection and corpse inspection; interrogation of witnesses; interrogation of
the suspect; search of the suspect’s house or other property; presentation for identification; investigative experiment;
conducting forensic examinations and forensic medical examinations.

The methodology for homicide investigation is based on typical investigative situations that develop at the initial
stage of criminal proceedings. The content of these situations is determined by the nature of the case, the
peculiarities of the initial situation and other factors. It is about:

1. Adverse investigation situations in homicide investigations. These are “non-obvious” homicides, which are
accompanied by difficulties in identifying the perpetrator and revealing the signs of concealment of the crime. The
main focus is on the identification, search and detention of the perpetrator. It is necessary to find out: the nature of
the relationship between the suspect and the murdered person; motives and goals of the action; specific traces

492
ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 10(07), 490-496

indicating the identity of the offender; the instruments of crime; the method of committing and concealing the traces
of the crime; signs of stolen items and documents.
2. Favorable investigation situations in homicide investigations are characterized by the public nature of procedural
acts of criminals, the presence of witnesses to the crime. We are talking about the so-called domestic murders,
murders accompanied by torture, beatings. An informative trace is the "key" to the detection and investigation of
these crimes. Under these conditions, initial information is collected, the scene is inspected, and eyewitnesses are
questioned. These investigative (search) actions create the basis for the next stage of the investigation.

In any investigation situation, the following elements must be proved in the investigation of the homicides:
1. The fact of the homicide, the type of violent death, the time and conditions, under which it occurred;
2. Place, time and circumstances of the crime;
3. The method of preparation, direct commission of homicide, concealment of the consequences of the crime;
4. Data on the identity of the victim, his (her) connections, including with the probable murderer;
5. Purpose, motive of homicide;
6. Characteristics of the perpetrator.

Typical situations of the initial period of the investigation depend on the actions of the perpetrator, place, time,
conditions of the homicide, the time elapsed since it was committed, the content of the source information.

Depending on the investigative situation, certain tasks are solved at the initial stage of the homicide investigation. In
summary, we should name the main ones:
1. Determining the place of the homicide. If the place of discovery of the corpse is not the place of murder, it can be
established during the inspection in the absence of traces that should be (for example, abundant stains and puddles of
blood), and in the presence of traces that should not be (traces of corpse dragging, the presence of an inappropriate
corpse spots to victim posture);
2. Establishing changes at the scene. Changes at the scene (traces) can be divided into two groups:
1. Traces formed as a result of the interaction of the perpetrator and the victim, traces of their actions, reflected at
the crime scene;
2. Traces of actions of persons not involved in the investigated case. From the first steps of the investigation, it is
important to immediately separate the traces of the first group from the second one. To do this, it is necessary to
interview eyewitnesses of the case before the inspection to model the mechanism of the crime:
1. Identification of the victim. To do this, the documents, notebooks, personal belongings are inspected; the
statements of persons capable of recognizing the murdered person by signs of appearance are recorded. After
establishing the victim’s identity, his (her) portrait of her is formed;
2. Establishing the cause of the death. Preliminary data can be obtained from a forensic physician after an external
examination of the corpse, and the final conclusion is based on the results of forensic examination of the corpse;
3. Establishing the time of the death, which does not always coincide with the time of bodily harm infliction. It is
established by cadavers occurring from the moment of death, depending on the temperature and humidity of the air,
precipitation and other environmental conditions;
4. Establishing the mechanism of the crime and the actions of the perpetrator. Given the possibility of mocking, it is
necessary to look for and record the facts that contradict the circumstances of the event (negative circumstances).
For example, clean shoes on the feet of a corpse hanging in a loop with abundant dirt around; the presence on the
body of a «suicide» of wounds he could not have inflicted himself;
5. Identification of persons who were at the scene of the homicide or nearby. The solution to this problem is finding
witnesses who possess information about the event; perhaps, they saw the murderer shortly before or after the
homicide;
6. Finding out the motives and purpose of the homicide. It is necessary to conclude whether the homicide was
intentional or negligent, to establish its purpose and motive by analyzing all the circumstances. It is crucial to study
the relationship between the murderer and the victim. The question should be answered: to whom the death of the
victim was beneficial and why; what close and distant events could have occurred during the victim’s lifetime and
what consequences may occur after her death;
7. Identification of the murderer or his (her) features. Qualitative investigative examination provides grounds for
proposing a version of probable suspects with the identification of their sex, height, age, physical development,
habits and skills, appearance, blood type, etc .;
8. Identification of the deceased. During the examination of the corpse and its forensic examination, all signs of
appearance are described by the method of verbal portrait; they are recorded by photography and by making plaster

493
ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 10(07), 490-496

masks of the face, hands and feet. Special signs, tattoos are fixed, the condition of teeth is described and casts of
jaws are made, the fingerprint card is prepared. Age, height, racial characteristics, diseases, blood type, the traces of
alcohol, drugs, sleeping pills, poisons in the body are revealed. The subtotal content, hand flushes are removed, the
remains of food in a stomach are investigated. There are traces that indicate the type of occupation, profession, place
of residence, habits. Clothes, shoes, personal belongings are inspected. Micro-particles (fibers of other people’s
clothes, dust in pockets, dirt and particles of plants on trousers, footwear) are fixed and investigated. Trademarks,
labels, traces of repair are found. The card of the unidentified corpse is filled in and sent for check on the account of
the missing persons, as well as other circumstances are established (Piaskovskyi, 2020).

Thus, the “key” investigative (search) actions in the structure of the forensic methodology of the investigation of
homicides are the inspection of the scene and the examination of the corpse. Further, we will form forensic
recommendations for their implementation.

First of all, during the inspection of the scene it is necessary to identify, record and remove: traces-reflections:
hands, gloves, shoes, teeth, ears, other parts of the body; instruments of crime (cold steel and firearms, explosives,
tools of burglary); traces of vehicles; textile fibers and other micro-objects; traces of blood, saliva, sweat and other
secretions; traces of bodily harms; traces of the perpetrator’s smell; objects of soil, plant and animal origin; samples
of materials and substances that could remain on the body and clothing of the offender; buttons, cigarette butts;
things belonging to the perpetrator; documents, etc. As Havryliuk et al. (2021) correctly point out it is increasingly
important to use micro-objects to obtain forensic information that, because of their size, is difficult to destroy, falsify
to prevent their formation and remain at the crime scene.

Besides, one should:

1. Apply a set of measures to protect the scene of the crime, covering the widest possible range of trace information
(available and potentially possible). Specially designed forensic tape is used, as a rule, for this purpose, but in case
of extreme necessity, improvised materials can be used;
2. Remove outsiders from the areas (in particular law enforcement officers who do not perform the function of
collecting forensic information) to take photographs of the inspection site in accordance with procedural and
forensic requirements;
3. Involve additional participants in the investigative (search) action: forensic expert or doctor, with a search dog,
explosives specialist;
4. obtain preliminary indicative information on the circumstances of the event, the ways of arrival and departure of
the perpetrator, the mechanism of the event from eyewitnesses in order to effectively organize the work during the
inspection of the crime scene;
5. Conduct a thorough inspection of the crime scene using the principle “from general to individual” in order to find
the widest possible range of trace information: biological traces, trace evidence, weapons and traces of its use; smell
traces, micro-objects;
6. Use a wide range of forensic tools during the inspection. The unified suitcase designed for investigators, officials
conducting initial inquiries, forensic experts is widely used. In Ukraine, it has been modified and received by the
authorities under the name of a unified suitcase "Flint-M1", "Flint-M2" and other configurations (Tsilmak et al.,
2015);

It is necessary to agree with the view by Chornous (2020), who claims that technical and forensic support of
criminal proceedings should correspond to the best experience of foreign States. 3D scanning technologies for
procedural actions have become the part of the daily practice of law enforcement agencies of leading world and
European countries. We believe that it is advisable to use laser scanning of the crime scene in addition to
"traditional" photography and video recording during the investigation of homicides.

Special attention should be paid to the examination of the corpse. Because forensic expert or physician is involved in
the examination, it is he (she) who determines whether death has occurred. To do this, forensic experts use several
methods: checking the reaction of the pupil to light; listening to the work of the heart and breath; heart rate test;
breathe test, etc. There are obvious signs: body temperature, cadaveric asphyxiation and cadaveric stains,
putrefaction.

It first conducted general examination of the corpse, and then – a detailed one. The exact location of the corpse is
fixed. The description of the corpse is made according to the method of “verbal portrait”. The appearance of the

494
ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 10(07), 490-496

victim may be the subject matter of an expert examination in order to identify him (her). Thus, currently the study of
the signs of human appearance is carried out within the photo technical, portrait and holographic images of the
examination. The scientific basis of such examination is criminology, its scientific concepts, the theory of forensic
identification, theory and practice of anthropology, anatomy, medicine (Manko, 2017).

Depending on the results obtained, the following general investigative versions can be put forward: death as the
result of homicide; death as a result of another crime against person (infliction of bodily harm, torture, rape); death
as the result of suicide; death is the result of an accident; natural death.

Conclusion:-
In the investigation of homicides, not only the forensic characterization of the perpetrator plays an important role,
but also the connections of this element of the forensic characterization with the following ones: the manner and
circumstances of the crime; trace picture, victim of crime.

A comprehensive approach to the study of the perpetrator is necessary not only for an objective investigation of
crimes, but also to determine the most appropriate measures to influence the perpetrator, identify and eliminate the
causes and conditions of the crime, and choose the right measures for re-education.

It is advisable to compile a psychological portrait of the perpetrator, which gives an idea of his (her) identity,
determines the tactics of conducting investigative (search) actions. A composite psychological portrait can be used
to search for a suspect whose whereabouts have not yet been established.

Data on the perpetrator’s identity is an important structural element of forensic characteristics of homicides and
forensic methods of their investigation.

Depending on the results obtained, the following general investigative versions can be put forward: death as the
result of homicide; death as a result of another crime against person (infliction of bodily harm, torture, rape); death
as the result of suicide; death is the result of an accident; natural death.

These investigative versions are the basis for choosing forensic methods of their investigation; determine the set of
investigative (search) and other procedural actions, operational and investigative measures that are carried out to
achieve the objectives of criminal proceedings.

References:-
1. Chornous, Y. (2020). Topical issues of investigation and trial by an International criminal court of cases of
international crimes. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 27(4), 268-281.
2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
3. European Court of Human Rights. (1950). Convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental
freedoms.
4. Indexed at
5. Havryliuk, L., Drozd, V., Nenia, O., Kyslyi, A., & Andrii, N. (2021). Systemic approach to the choice of optical
methods of forensic examination of micro-objects. CuestionesPolíticas, 39(69).
6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
7. Hruzd, O. (2018). Investigation of intentional homicide committed with use of excessive force in self-defence.
PhD Dissertation. National Academy of Internal Affairs.
8. Indexed at, Google Scholar
9. Manko, Y. (2017). History of development, concepts and theoretical bases for the personal identification on the
basis of physical appearance. Forensic Bulletin, 1(27), 148 – 153.
10. Google Scholar
11. Piaskovskyi, V. (2020). Forensics: A textbook. Kyiv: Pravo.
12. Shepitko, V. (2009). Guide to the investigation of crimes: Scientific and practical handbook. Kharkiv: Odissey.
13. Tsilmak, O., Korystin, O., Shaptala, D., &Talalai, D. (2015). Forensic tools and methods of detection and
investigation of criminal offenses: textbook. Odessa: ODUVS.
14. Volobuiev, A. (2011). Criminalistics: Textbook. Kharkiv: Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs.

495
ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 10(07), 490-496

15. Zahorodnii, I. (2017). Forensic classification of crimes related to homicides. South Ukrainian Law Journal, 2,
10–13.
16. Zamula, B. (2018). Criminal characteristics of killings committed by foreigners on the territory of Ukraine.

496