Why Quadratic Mean Diameter
Why Quadratic Mean Diameter
Why Quadratic Mean Diameter
Note
ABSTRACT: Quadratic meandiameter themeasure average is of treediameter conventionally in used forestry, ratherthanarithmetic mean diameter. historical practicalreasons thisconvention The and for are reviewed. West. Appl.For. 15(3):137-139. J.
unitsused(0.005454 for B in square feet andQMD in inches; 0.0000785 for B in square metersand QMD in centimeters).
averages means= measures centraltendency), (= of each appropriate specificuses.One of theseis the quadratic to mean(KendallandBuckland1967,Iles andWilson 1977),
defined as
quadratic ( mean =
/n
mean. is therefore It goodpractice authors be specific for to (Curtis1968). The quadratic meangivesgreater weightto larger treesandis equal orgreater to thanthearithmetic mean by an amount that depends the varianceaccording the on to
relationship
whichis the square root of the arithmetic meanof squared values.Other generallyrecognized meanssometimes encountered forestry are the geometricmean, harmonic in
mean, median, and mode.
(QMD)2 2 + s =
where t is arithmetic meandiameter s2 is the variance and
of diameters.
Theexpression average of stand diameter conventionally usedin forestryis not the arithmetic meanof diameters, but
the quadraticmean,
/n
area,is widely usedin Europeand is the symbolrecommended theInternational by Unionof Forest Research Organizations(Van Soestet al. 1959).
quadratic means. Whenthis distinction pointed is out,they naturallywonderhow and why sucha strange "average" came beadopted whyit isstillused. to and Afterall,it israrely mentioned introductory in statistics courses. The answeris partly a matter of customand historical precedent, QMD alsohascertainpracticaladvantages but
that still hold true.
Use of the quadratic meanof diameters a very old is practice in forestry, which goes back to 19th century Germanyand possiblyearlier. It hasbeen standard practice in the United Statesfrom the earliest days of North Americanforestry.Most standard U.S. mensuration texts,
WJAF15(3)2000 137
0
I 2 3 4 DBH class - Inchea 5 6
Figure 1. Median, arithmetic mean, and quadratic mean diametars for stands with (A) small diameters and naarly symmetrical diameter distribution, and (B) larger diameters and somewhat asymmetrical diamater distribution.
starting with Graves (1908), define average standdiameter asthe diametercorresponding thetreeof arithmetic to mean basal area, which is the quadratic mean diameter. Braathe's (1957) summaryof Europeanthinningliterature specifically defines average diameter as the quadratic mean. QMD is commonly used in silviculture research data summariesand reports. Virtually all normal yield tables prepared in the United States in the period from around 1920 through the mid-1960s use quadratic mean
diameters (Schnur 1937, McArdle et al. 1961, Barnes 1962), sometimes referred to in older publications as "average diameter by basal area." This usageof QMD is
wheref= standform factor, which for a given species and stand condition onlya verylimitedrangeof variation has and
can often be treated as constant. N = number of trees / unit area
nient describe to stands terms means 'these in of of components:namely,numberof trees,arithmeticmeanbasalarea, and someaverageheight. Peopledo notusuallythink in termsof basalareaof a tree (cross-sectional area at breastheight). It is much easierto visualize treeof 19in. dbhthanoneof 2.0 ft2cross-sectional a area. It is thereforecommonto describestands QMD (a by surrogate arithmeticmean basal area) rather than by for
arithmetic mean basal area. In these terms,
alsocommonin currentstandsimulation programs (Curtis et al. 1981, Hann et al. 1997). Reineke's (1933) SDI is basedon QMD, as are the variousrelative densitymeasuresand standmanagement diagramsderived from the Reineke relationship(Curtis 1982, Long et al. 1988). In the Germany of some 150 or more years ago, there
were a number of so-called mean tree methods in use for
estimatingvolume of wood in forest stands.These also had somelimited usein the early daysof North American forestry(Graves 1908, p. 224ff.). The basicidea, in simplest form, was that the forester would select a tree(s) consideredaverage for the stand, cut it and measureits wood content, and then multiply by the number of trees. The obviousdifficulty wasin selecting averagetree(s), an whosevolumewouldapproximate overallarithmetic mean volume / tree. In regular even-agedstands, diameterof the treeof arithmeticmeanvolumeis generallycloseto thatof the tree of arithmetic mean basal area (which is also the tree of quadraticmean diameter).Thus, a basiswas provided for selectingsampletreesfor analysis. Such procedures nowancient are history. justification But for use of QMD also arisesfrom the generalrelationship between stand volumeandother,directlymeasurable, stand
attributes.
average heightis of course differentstatistic a from thetop heightor dominantheightusedfor otherpurposes, though highlycorrelated with thesein unthinned stands.)
Expressions the aboveform are not commonlyused of todayto calculate stand volumes, although theyarevalidand aresometimes used stand in simulation programs. generWe ally applytree volumeequations directlyandsumover all trees,ratherthanfirst calculating thesemeans.But thereis anotherstrong reason usingQMD. This stems for from the relationship
be consciousof the difference between quadratic and arithmeticmeandiameters(which usuallyis not large) and be specific in defining the value used.
Literature Cited
B = k * N * (QMD) 2
Thisis anexact relationship. Therefore, knowledge any of two of thevariables automatically confers knowledge the of third.In contrast, there noequivalent is exact relationship for the arithmeticmean, and conversions usingthe arithmetic meanalsorequire knowledge thevariance. is a greatdeal of It easierto makeconsistent estimates projections two and for variables thanfor three,andtheexact relationship exists that whenQMD isused markedly simplifies construction yield of tablesand standsimulators, standprojections, and some inventorycomputations. This directconvertibility alsosimplifies construction the anduseof stand management diagrams based number on of trees,basalarea, and averagediameter(Long et al. 1988, Gingrich 1967, Ernst and Knapp 1985). Becauseof this convertibility, theycanbe expressed termsof anytwo of in
the three variablesN, basal area, and QMD.
BARNES, 1962.Yield of even-aged G.H. stands western of hemlock. USDA For. Serv.Tech.Bull. No. 1273.52 p. BRAAmE, 1957.Thinnings even-aged P. in stands: summary European A of literature. Facultyof For., Univ. of New Brunswick, Fredericton. p. 92
BUCKINGHAM, F.M. 1969. The harmonic mean in forest mensuration. For.
Chron. 45(2):104-106.
CURTIS, R.O. 1968.Which average diameter? For. 66:570. J. CURTIS, 1982.A simple R.O. indexof stand density Douglas-fir. Sci. for For.
28:92-94.
CURTIS, R.O., G.W. CLENDENEN, D.J. DEMARS. 1981. A new stand AND
simulator coast for Douglas-fir: DFSIM user'sguide.USDA For. Serv. Gen.Tech.Rep.PNW-128.79 p. ERNST, R.L., ANDW.H. KNApp.1985. Forest standdensityand stocking: Concepts, terms, theuseof stocking and guides. USDA For. Serv.Gen. Tech.Rep.WO-44. 8p. GINRICh [GINGRICn], S.F. 1967. Measuringand evaluatingstockingand stand density in upland hardwood forests in the central states.For.
Sci. 13:38-53.
Version6.0. OregonStateUniv., Corvallis.133 p. ILES,K., ANDL.J. WILSON. 1977. A further neglectedmean. Math. Teach.
70:27-28.
KENDALL, M.G., AND W.R. BUCKLAND. A dictionary statistical 1967. of terms. Ed. 2. HafnerPublishing Co., New York. 575 p. LONG, J.N., J.B. McCARTER, ANDS.B. JACK. 1988. A modified density management diagramfor coastalDouglas-fir. West. J. Appl. For.
3(3):88-89.
few procedures (suchas defininga normalprobability distribution).But most procedures common use in in forestrydo not specifically requirethe useof the arithmetic mean. Both the mensurational advantagesmen-
tionedaboveandlong-standing precedent makethe quadraticmeanof diameters preferred the "average diameter" for expressing standattributes. any case,usersshould In
MCARDLE, R.E., W.H. MEYER, AND BRUCE. D. 1961 (rev.). The yield of Douglas-fir in the Pacific Northwest. USDA Tech. Bull. No. 201 (rev.). 72 p. REINEKE, L.H. 1933. Perfectinga stand-density index for even-aged forests. J. Agric. Res.46(7):627-637. SC,NUR, 1937.Yield,stand, volume G.L. and tables even-aged for upland oak forests. USDA For. Serv.Tech.Bull. No. 560. 88 p.
VAN SUEST, P.A., R. SCOBER, F.C. HUMMEL. AND 1959. The standardization