Carl Miguel - Analyzation About The Agora

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Sem. Carl Joshua DC.

Miguel Analyzation and


Goal
Comparative Philosophy January 19, 2022

At The Agora, In The Wilderness, Across the Warring States:


Landscape and Travelling: East and West

People usually compare themselves to other people as they live with others. They
compare what they have and what other people have. It has become part of people’s living that
comparing themselves to others is seemingly natural. However, this may sometimes lead to
improper comparison, turning to subjective and biased comparison. In line with this, in
Philosophy, especially in Comparative Philosophy, people need to suspend judgment and biases
when they compare. There must be a healthy comparison among the differences between
Western and Eastern. In the study of Comparative Philosophy, it is a must to know and realize
the intention. What is the primary intention? If talking about the intention, it must be good and
pure intentions regarding comparing the two philosophical worlds: Western (Occidental) and
Eastern (Oriental).
As we have discussed the topic regarding the Agora, I was able to enter into the world of
Greek philosophers, who looked into the world’s origin. The Greek or Western belief and
philosophical thoughts are far from the view of the Eastern people, philosophers, and sages. The
Western had the Greeks Great Philosophers, while the Eastern have as well, like Confucius,
Buddha, Lao Tzi, and many others. The Western thinkers focus more on reason, knowledge, and
truth. On the other hand, regarding the Wilderness, I entered the world of the so-called sages
thinkers and philosophers. The Eastern thinkers focus more on spiritual and practical or the way
of living. The Eastern is more on Centripetal because it goes inwardly or towards the center or
within. While the Western, I think more on Centrifugal as it moves in a curved path and goes
outward away from the center or within.
Moreover, with regards to Comparative Philosophy, it was mentioned that it
encompasses all. Therefore, it does not disregard others’ beliefs but includes the totality. The
primary source consists of both sides, so there must be no one-sided approach. All in all, one of
the goals that I see in this chapter is ‘Seeking Harmony in Contrasts.’ Western and Eastern have
differences in belief, way of living, and how they think. So, knowing their differences, people
may compare what they have and what characteristics they possess and acquire. I affirm that
there must always be harmony in contrasts. How will people find harmony in differences? For
me, it is by appreciating the belief of both sides (eastern and western), removing the biases and
judgments for both sides, respecting the idea of each other, and making their differences as a
source of improving their own beliefs and thoughts.
To conclude, no one is born the same as others. There would always be differences in
people’s beliefs, cultures, traditions, and understanding of life and their philosophy. What is
good then in differences is in order for the people to know and appreciate what they have and
what they do not have. Also, for them to better improve the traditions and beliefs they have. To
seek harmony in contrasts is what everyone needs. It does not mean that there will be no
harmony despite differences. But, I assure everyone that it is possible to have harmony and unity
among various people who have their own personalities, cultures, traditions, beliefs, aphorisms,
etc.

You might also like