Storz MP100 Booklet
Storz MP100 Booklet
Storz MP100 Booklet
• Radial Shockwave therapy with various • For muscle and connective tissue • Hamstrings
shock transmitters activation/smoothing • Myofascial trigger points
• Vibration therapy (V-ACTOR®) 1. Achilles Tendinopathy
2. Bursitis Indications Success Rate
3. Hallux Rigidus Calcific Rotator Cuff Tendonitis 91%
4. Non-Healing Ulcers Plantar Fasciitis 90%
5. Tendonitis Achilles Tendinopathy 76%
6. Scar Tissue Hamstring Tendinopathy 80%
• Shoulder pain Tennis Elbow 77%
• Shin Splints Myofascial trigger points 80%
• Tennis Elbow Acupuncture Shockwave Therapy up to 90%
• Patellar Tendonitis
• Plantar Fasciitis/Heel Spur Facts and Figures
4 | Products Products | 5
Background: Results:
Radial extracorporeal Shockwave therapy is an Radial extracorporeal Shockwave therapy proved
effective treatment for chronic plantar fasciitis significantly superior to placebo with a reduction of
that can be administered to outpatients without the visual analog scale composite score of 72.1%
anesthesia but has not yet been evaluated in compared with 44.7% (P = .0220), and an overall
controlled trials. success rate of 61.0% compared with 42.2% in the
placebo group (P = .0020) at 12 weeks. Superiority
Hypothesis: was even more pronounced at 12 months, and
There is no difference in effectiveness between all secondary outcome measures supported
radial extracorporeal Shockwave therapy and radial extracorporeal Shockwave therapy to be
placebo in the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis. significantly superior to placebo (P < .025, 1-sided).
No relevant side effects were observed.
Study Design:
Randomized, controlled trial; level of evidence, 1. Conclusion:
Radial extracorporeal Shockwave therapy
Methods:
significantly improves pain, function and
Three interventions of radial extracorporeal quality of life compared with placebo in
Shockwave therapy (0.16 mJ/mm 2; 2000 patients with recalcitrant plantar fasciitis.
impulses) compared with placebo were studied in
245 patients with chronic plantar fasciitis. Primary
endpoints were changes in visual analog scale Source:
patient-rated pain scores were collected before Investigation performed at Sciuba Diagnostic Imaging and Rehabilitation Center, Sulmona, Italy
By Robert Gordon, MD; Charles Wong, BHSc; Eric J. treatment and at follow-up (minimum of 12 months
Crawford, BHSc Toronto, Canada
post-treatment). Twenty-five subjects (35 feet) met
Background: Results:
the inclusion criteria. The average follow-up time
Chronic Proximal Hamstring Tendinopathy is an The patients were observed for a mean of 10.7
was 29.4 ± 13.1 (M ± SD; range, 12 to 54) months.
Background: overuse syndrome that is usually managed by non- months (range, 1-12 months). Six patients were
operative methods. Shockwave therapy has proved lost to follow-up because they underwent a surgical
Ultrasonographic measurement of the plantar
Results: to be effective in many tendinopathies. intervention: 3 (all in TCT group) were lost at 3
fascia can be used to objectively diagnose
plantar fasciitis. The purpose of this study was The average thickness of the plantar fascia of months; 2 (1 in each group), at 6 months; and 1 (in
Hypothesis: the TCT group), at 12 months. Primary follow-up was
to determine the long-term effectiveness of the symptomatic heels was 7.3 ± 2.0 mm before
Extracorporeal Pulse-Activated Therapy (EPAT) - treatment and 6.0 ± 1.3 mm after treatment (p Shockwave therapy may be more effective than at 3 months after the beginning of treatment. The
Shockwave therapy - for the treatment of plantar < 0.001). The average change in thickness of other non-operative treatments for Chronic VAS scores in the SWT and TCT groups were 7 points
fasciitis using ultrasonographic measurement as the treated heels was − 1.3 mm (− 0.8 to − 1.8 Proximal Hamstring Tendinopathy. before treatment (P = .84), and 2 points and 5 points,
an objective outcome measure, with a minimum mm; 95% CI, p < 0.0001). No correlation was respectively, 3 months after treatment (P < .001).
follow-up of 12 months. found between length of follow-up and change in Study Design: The NPRS scores in the SWT and TCT groups were 5
ultrasound measured plantar fascia thickness (r = − points in either group before treatment (P = .48), and
Randomized controlled clinical study; level of
0.04, p = 0.818). 2 points and 6 points, respectively, 3 months after
evidence, 1.
treatment (P < .001). At 3 months after treatment,
17 of the 20 patients (85%) in the SWT group and 2
Conclusion: Methods:
of the 20 patients (10%) in the TCT group achieved
For patients with a greater than 12-month Forty professional athletes with Chronic Proximal a reduction of at least 50% in pain (P < .001). There
history of heel pain, Shockwave therapy can Hamstring Tendinopathy were enrolled between were no serious complications in the SWT group.
effectively decrease plantar fascia thickness February 1, 2004 and September 30, 2006.
as demonstrated objectively by ultrasound Patients were randomly assigned to receive either
Shockwave therapy, consisting of 2500 impulses Conclusion:
evaluation and reduce patient-reported pain.
No relationship between length of follow-up per session at a 0.18 mJ/mm energy flux density Shockwave therapy is a safe and effective
and change in plantar fascia thickness was without anesthesia, for 4 weeks (SWT group, treatment for patients with Chronic Proximal
found after 12 months. n = 20), or traditional conservative treatment Hamstring Tendinopathy.
consisting of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory
drugs, physiotherapy and an exercise program for
Source: hamstring muscles (TCT group, n = 20). Patients Source:
were evaluated before treatment, 1 week and 3, American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2011; 39: 146
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL ©2012 by the
6, and 12 months after the end of treatment. The DOI: 10.1177/0363546510379324
American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society DOI:
10.3113/FAI.2012.0202 visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain and Nirschl
phase rating scale (NPRS) were used as primary For more information visit:
outcome measures. shockwavecanadainc.ca/scientific-evidence
For more information visit:
shockwavecanadainc.ca/scientific-evidence
By Jan D. Rompe, MD, Angelo Cacchio, MD, John P. Furia, MD, and Nicola Maffulli, MD, MS, PhD, FRCS(Orth), FFSEM(UK) Jan D. Rompe, MD, Bernhard Nafe, MD, John P. Furia, MD, PhD, and Nicola Maffulli, MD, PhD, FRCS(Orth)
From OrthoTrauma Evaluation Center, Mainz, Germany, the Department of Medicine and Physical Rehabilitation, San From the OrthoTrauma Clinic, Gruenstadt, Germany, Rüsselheim-Bauschheim, Germany, the SUN Orthopaedic Group,
Salvatore Hospital of L’Aquila, Italy, SUN Orthopaedics, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, and the Centre for Sports and Exercise Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, and the Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Keele, University of Medicine,
Medicine, Barts, and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, England Staffordshire, England
12 | Scientific Evidence
When you consider all the superior benefits, you can
understand why Shockwave Canada Inc. is the only
choice that makes sense.