Q3

2022

QUARTERLY
RANKINGS
CONTENT: MEDIA • SOCIAL • OPERATOR

1
 FROM THE CEO CHRIS ADAMS
Welcome to SharpRank’s Q3 Report. As a Company, we look for ways to improve our offerings while not sacrificing
our market responsibility as the industry’s Independent Ratings Agency. At SharpRank, we represent the tip of the
integrity spear in sports betting and we do not take that lightly. On a weekly basis we see, evidence, and catalog
multiple misrepresentations of reporting data across the industry. It is our responsibility to point out when mistakes
are made to elevate this industry and stabilize its growth. And, we will do what is necessary to ensure that. We have seen what
happens in more mature markets if we do not establish this standardized validation responsible for unlocking the casual consumer
and tying in financial products/markets.

Collectively, the US market presents an opportunity to build a total addressable market that is orders of magnitude larger than
projections currently suggest. All of that potential growth - and we mean all of it - hinges on trust, validation, and integrity.

WHAT’S NEW
This quarter we introduced the industry’s Pitch Book equivalent in SharpRank+. Access reports, research, audits, and a whole lot
more. Everything. All in one place. There are both consumer and commercial access levels within SharpRank+. While a lot of the
report will look familiar, we showcase some SharpRank+ features in the Spotlight Heatmap, Audit Report(s), Sport Snapshot(s), etc.
From a data science standpoint, we produced our first set of Bias Metrics - we will continue to dig in there. All that said, we spent
the past quarter refining our Audit process, improving our ratings algorithm based on learnings, and fine tuning existing metrics -
like TAR, Princeton Percentile, Alignment, and BBS. All of which can be found in a Sharp’s Tearsheet. Make no mistake, we are an
Independent Ratings Agency, whose core functions are data science and technology.

AUDIT
Misinformation is one of this industry’s biggest obstacles. SharpRank’s Audit process is overseen and executed by CPAs and former
Big4 Public Accountants. For those unfamiliar with an audit process, here are definitive attributes we test:

• Completeness: all picks that have been disclosed in a given time period have actually occurred in that time period and no
information is excluded improperly
• Accuracy: picks (types and amounts) and other related data are correct; ratings and rankings are shown correctly and for their
intended use without misrepresentation
• Existence: picks (types and amounts) of which claims have been made, are real and have happened
• Valuation: attributes (line, odds, etc) of picks made are valid and available at a licensed US sportsbook at time of selection
• Occurrence: picks are accessible to the consumer, and such picks pertain to the relevant Sharp and/or Platform
• Presentation: proper disclosure to the consumer and aggregation of information (rating, ranking, etc), in an understandable
manner to the required frameworks

Testing thresholds are determined based on confidence levels and materiality of the exposure, individual Sharp, Platform, and the
entirety of the population. There are, of course, certain criteria that demand 100% certainty, specifically early in the coverage phase.
The more we can standardize this validation process the more efficient it will become for the industry participants. There is an example
of this process’s output later in the report. We use a combination of automated scripts and manual testing to ensure SharpRank’s
approach is comprehensive; enabling the safest environment for consumers to source information. As we see the market evolve,
we have seen the full versions of these Audit Reports used to facilitate partnerships, affiliate deal structure, negotiate contracts for
internal functions with HR, due diligence, and more. Standardized validation, complete transparency, and independence will always
be necessary to move this market forward.

2
TOC DEFINITIONS
02 INTRO TAR – TALENT ABOVE REPLACEMENT
SharpRank has successfully implemented our sports betting take on baseball’s
WAR (Wins Above Replacement) statistic. TAR, or “Talent Above Replacement”,
03 GLOSSARY shares the objective of encapsulating overall performance in one statistic that
determines if a player/Sharp is better or worse than the average replacement
04 ENTERPRISE MEDIA RANKINGS and by how much. By considering return on investment, closing line value, the
Princeton Percentile, and Volume Index, we have defined the average replacement
Sharp in the sports betting market and assigned value to individual Sharps
05 ENTIRY MEDIA RANKINGS that gives an indication of both past and future performance. This metric has
amplified impact and implications for content platforms as it digs into an array of
metrics tailored specifically for outlets looking for the perfect mix of high content
06 NFL PICK VOLUME production and ability.

07 CFB/SEC PICK VOLUME PRINCETON PERCENTILE

Named after the birthplace of Game Theory, this metric is based on a multi-faceted
payoff matrix. This is the truest form of measuring risk/reward trade-offs. Given the
08 METRICS: TOP 5 SHARPS multiple options for a Sharp to pick, the Princeton Percentile demonstrates both
Opportunity Cost – how much a Sharp leaves on the table, versus Opportunity Gain
– how much a Sharp advantageously increases their position. For instance, if a
09 METRICS: TOP 5 PLATFORMS Sharp chooses a moneyline pick on an underdog and the bet wins, the opportunity
gain would be the difference in money/units between taking the underdog against
the spread and taking them to win outright. Conversely, if the underdog lost but
10 SPOTLIGHT HEAT MAP covered the spread, the opportunity cost would be the sum of money/units lost, and
the amount that could have been won picking the spread. When aggregated, both
11 AUDIT REPORT: SPORTS ILLUSTRATED cumulative and weighted, the result is a net percentile relative to the dataset.

12 SHARP ECOSYSTEM NAIL – NATIONAL AVERAGE INDICATOR LINE

Given the vast, multi-layered data set aggregated by SharpRank, some metrics
and rankings can leverage a benchmark. In the Overall and by Sport Company
13 NFL RANKINGS rankings, the NAIL refers to the average raw score of the overall and segmented
data sets, respectively. For instance, if the data set rankings for Overall Enterprise
(p. 4) is based off of 100 platforms, the NAIL would be the average raw score
14 CFB RANKINGS of the 100 Enterprises. If the data set for Overall Entity (p.5) is based of 500
platforms, the Entity NAIL would be the average raw score of the 500 Entities. The
Raw Score is based on SharpRank’s positioning algorithm which ever evolves and
15 MLB RANKINGS blends four proprietary concepts/calculations: 2 backwards looking and 2 forward
looking. The companies that sit above this National Average have higher overall
ratings and consequently higher rated individuals. If the NAIL is not present on
16 INDEX the graph it can be assumed this benchmark sits under all listed rankings.

WANT TO LEARN MORE? THE ENCYCLOPEDIA OF THESE METRICS/TEAR SHEETS

AND THE INDUSTRY’S PITCHBOOK EQUIVALENT ARE AVAILABLE VIA SHARPRANK+
3
ENTERPRISE MEDIA RANKINGS
The Overall Enterprise Rankings are based on an organization and its currently covered subsidiaries’ cross-sport
performance; ranked by their affiliated Sharps performance during a defined time period which began at the
start of Q3 (July 1, 2022) and ended at the end of Q3 (September 30, 2022).

IMPORTANT
• During the portion of the quarter where the only active sport was Major League Baseball (Weeks 1-7), the Enterprise data
set experienced high volatility, similar to effects and outcomes of day or high frequency trading.

TAKEAWAYS • The Talent Above Replacement (TAR) Bench activation from Q2, stabilized already high performing TAR rosters and
enhanced the positioning of lower performing rosters.

Q3 ENTERPRISE ALL SPORTS Q3 ENTERPRISE SHARPS RANKINGS

COMPANY TOP SHARP Q3 RANK
1 PENN NATIONAL GAMING
2 MINUTE MEDIA BARSTOOL SPORTS Mintzy # 35
3 DRAFTKINGS BETSIDED Josh Yourish #6
4 AUDACY DRAFTKINGS NATION Pat Mayo # 11
5 YAHOO SPORTS AUDACY Ken Barkley # 25
6 NEWS CORP
YAHOO SPORTS Frank Schwab #9
7 FOX SPORTS
*NAIL OR “NATIONAL AVERAGE INDEX LINE” is a weighted average of generally accepted
and proprietary metrics for the companies overall or by sport segment score and positioning
8 ESPN relative to peers.
DISCLAIMER: The exhibited data is the aggregation of each organization and their outlets or
9 GANNETT subsidiaries based on the performance of their affiliated Sharps. Picks which did not pass
validation and audit tests (unless subsequently adjusted) and picks made outside of the Sharps
10 WARNER MEDIA affiliated media outlet or platforms were not included.

SCORE OVER Q3 Q3 ENTERPRISE LEADERBOARD

PENN NATIONAL GAMING
Week over week ranking of the
FOOTBALL

MINUTE MEDIA
COLLEGE

Top 5 Q3 finishers. Quarter long

STARTS

DRAFTKINGS
performance demonstrates AUDACY

Enterprise volatility during MLB 5 YAHOO SPORTS

LEADERBOARD INDEX

only segment of Q3, stability and

floor support occur once CFB and
NFL begin.
10

15
2 4 6 8 10 12
Q3 WEEK NUMBER

TAR SCORE 4 ROLLING 365-DAY

An Enterprise’s TAR score is based Q3 ONLY
3
on the aggregate and weight
of each of its Sharps. In Q2 we
showed Platforms TAR Bench 2

strength - in Q3 we are seeing the

result of those Sharps becoming 1

active for their platform with the

start of football season(s). 0

-1

LEGAL: SharpRank, Inc.’s use of institutional

logos is licensed through the Associated Press -2
(AP) for use in an editorial manner.
PENN PENN MINUTE MINUTE GANNETT GANNETT WARNER WARNER
365 Q3 365 Q3 365 Q3 365 Q3

4
ENTITY MEDIA RANKINGS
The Overall Entity Rankings are based on an organization and its currently covered subsidiaries’
cross-sport performance; ranked by their Sharps performance during a defined time period which
began at the start of Q3 (July 1, 2022) and ended at the end of Q3 (September 30, 2022).

IMPORTANT
• The Top Q3 Entity finisher, Odds Checker, was also the most volatile of the Top 2 finishers throughout the quarter, but at the beginning of
football season (Week 8) they began a steady climb to the top of the rankings due to high CLV and TAR.

TAKEAWAYS • Of the Top 5 finishers, Sports Gambling Podcast Network showed the most stability and floor support through the most volatile portion of
the quarter where the only active sport was Major League Baseball (Weeks 1-7).

Q3 ENTITY ALL SPORTS Q3 ENTITY SHARPS RANKINGS

1 ODDS CHECKER COMPANY TOP SHARP Q3 RANK

2 SPORTS GAMBLING PODCAST NETWORK ODDS CHECKER Albert Nguyen #1

3 LAS VEGAS SUN SGPN PattyC #2
4 COVERS
LAS VEGAS SUN Case Keefer # 15
5 THE RINGER
COVERS Josh Inglis # 13
6 PRO FOOTBALL NETWORK
7 SPORTSMEMO THE RINGER Sheil Kapadia #3
8 FACEOFF SPORTS NETWORK *NAIL OR “NATIONAL AVERAGE INDEX LINE” is a weighted average of generally accepted
and proprietary metrics for the companies overall or by sport segment score and positioning
9 BACONWIRE relative to peers.
DISCLAIMER: The exhibited data is the aggregation of each organization and their outlets or
10 EMPTY BETTERS subsidiaries based on the performance of their affiliated Sharps. Picks which did not pass
validation and audit tests (unless subsequently adjusted) and picks made outside of the Sharps
NAIL affiliated media outlet or platforms were not included.

SCORE OVER Q3 Q3 ENTITY LEADERBOARD

ODDS CHECKER
Week over week ranking of the Top SGPN
5 Q3 finishers. At the Entity level, LAS VEGAS SUN
more stability existed during the COVERS

generally volatile Q3 segment of 5 THE RINGER

MLB only. Football heavy Platforms

quickly settled in to form at the end
of the Quarter.
LEADERBOARD INDEX

10
COLLEGE
FOOTBALL
STARTS

15
2 4 6 8 10 12
Q3 WEEK NUMBER

TAR SCORE 5
ROLLING 365-DAY
An Entity’s TAR score is based on Q3 ONLY
the aggregate and weight of each 4

of its Sharps. In Q2 we showed

Platforms TAR Bench strength - in 3
Q3 we are seeing the result of
those Sharps becoming active for
their platform with the start of 2

football season(s).
1

LEGAL: SharpRank, Inc.’s use of institutional

logos is licensed through the Associated Press 0
(AP) for use in an editorial manner.
ODDS CHECKER ODDS CHECKER SGPN SGPN BACONWIRE BACONWIRE EMPTY BETTERS EMPTY BETTERS
365 Q3 365 Q3 365 Q3 365 Q3

5
NFL PICK VOLUME
This is a view of highly trafficked NFL teams from the entire 2021 season and the start of the 2022 season,
making it easily digestible for the eye to grab trends throughout the season(s) and week over week.

2021 2022

SPECTRUM LOW VOLUME HIGH VOLUME

IMPORTANT
• Broken down by team, heavy NFL Volume trends towards high profile teams, elite quarterbacks, and number of primetime games,
supporting (with a few exceptions) the bias testing SharpRank has executed.

TAKEAWAYS • The increase in Volume throughout the 2021 season is largely due to Sharps letting the teams demonstrate their identities early in the
season, and thus 2022 Volume is expected to increase over the next month of the season.

6
CFB PICK VOLUME: SEC
This is a view of highly trafficked SEC college football teams from the entire 2021 season and the
start of the 2022 season. The top half is Volume in a vaccum for the specified time periods, while
the bottom half dives into a year over year, same period Volume comparison (weeks 1-4 2022 vs
weeks 1-4 2021) and a rolling comparison (weeks 1-4 2022 vs weeks 10-13 2021).

ATS & MONEYLINE

2021 2022

2021 2021 2022 MOVEMENT

Weeks 1-4 2022 vs Weeks 1-4 2022 vs
Weeks 1-4 Weeks 10-4 Weeks 1-4 Weeks 1-4 2021 Weeks 10-13 2021

SPECTRUM LOW VOLUME HIGH VOLUME

IMPORTANT
• In the same period year over year comparison, the highest increases in Volume, Arkansas and Tennessee, were tied to many Sharps’
highly positive pre-season predictions about the Razorbacks and Volunteers.

TAKEAWAYS • Teams that have seen an uptick in Volume for both comparisons: Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, LSU, Mississippi State, South Carolina,
Texas A&M, and Vanderbilt.

7
METRICS: TOP 5 SHARPS
During a defined time period which began at the start of Q3 (July 1, 2022) and ended at the end of Q3
(September 30, 2022), these Sharps made an impact in a variety of different sports and betting types.

CLV (per pick)

Closing Line Value is a performance metric
defined as the difference in “price” (odds)
from the time a pick is selected to when that
matchup begins. Positive CLV indicates a
picker is gaining value and if a picker is on
the right side of value consistently enough THOR NYSTROM AVERAGE JOE’S FIVETHIRTYEIGHT WILL LAWS NICKY CASHIN
it should correlate to positive ROI (Return (BettingPros) (Odds Checker) (FiveThirtyEight) (Sports Illustrated) (Independent)
on Investment) - much like investing in 22.78 14.26 12.53 11.50 8.76
stocks that are undervalued relative to the
market price.

ROI (per pick)

Return on investment (ROI) is a
performance measure used to evaluate
the efficiency or profitability of an
investment or compare the efficiency of
a number of different investments. Given
a Sharp’s dataset, this is showing their ALBERT NGUYEN BRANDON GDULA DREW LOFTIS TEDDY SEVRANSKY CASEY OLSON
percentage returned per pick. (Odds Checker) (NumberFire/FanDuel) (New York Post/News Corp) (SportsMemo) (Independent)
44.51% 26.08% 24.8% 22.93% 22.18%

PRINCETON
Named after the birthplace of Game Theory,
this metric is based on a multi-faceted
payoff matrix. Given the multiple options
for a Sharp to pick (ATS, Total, Moneyline,
etc.), this metrics demonstrates Opportunity MATT PERRAULT
Cost – how much a Sharp left on the table, ADAM RANK JOEY RICOTTA JOE VITALE MAURICE JONES-DREW
(NFL Network) (Just The Picks/Props.com/ (On Tap Sports Network) (USA Today/Gannett) (NFL Network)
versus Opportunity Gain – how much a Sharp American Affiliate)
advantageously increases their position. 4.38 3.28 3.19 3.13
The results are broken down into Cost, Gain, 3.51
and Net to demonstrate where a Sharp is
seemingly finding an edge relative to their
peers. For purposes of this award we are
looking at strictly Net numbers.

TAR
TAR, or “Talent Above Replacement”, shares
the objective of encapsulating overall
performance in one statistic that determines
if a Sharp is better or worse than the
average replacement and by how much. By
considering return on investment, closing ALBERT NGUYEN DREW LOFTIS RYAN FOWLER JT MILLER MUNAF MANJI
line value, the Princeton Percentile, and (Odds Checker) (New York Post/News Corp) (Odds hark) (Odds Checker) (SGPN)
Volume Index, we have defined the average 3.0767 1.9109 1.7184 1.0870 1.0790
replacement Sharp in the sports betting
market and assigned value to individual
Sharps that gives an indication of both past
and future performance.

VOLUME INDEX
Given the number of opportunities, how
many selections does the Sharp actually
make? Do they narrow down to only a game
or two, or do they make a lot of picks. There
are advantages to both but knowing where
they sit on this spectrum is important. The RYAN CRAIG ODDSSHARK COLBY DANT PEOPLEVSVEGAS NUMBERFIRE
higher the index the more opportunities (Independent) (OddsShark) (SGPN) (SoBet) (NumberFire/FanDuel)
being taken by the Sharp. 220.06 84.39 68.06 64.39 51.33
For full access of these reports
and more through SharpRank+,
[email protected]

8
METRICS: TOP 5 PLATFORMS
During a defined time period which began at the start of Q3 (July 1, 2022) and ended at the end of Q3 (September
30, 2022), these Platforms made an impact in a variety of different sports and betting types.

CLV (per pick)

Closing Line Value is a performance
metric defined as the difference in “price”
(odds) from the time a pick is selected to
when that matchup begins. Positive CLV
indicates a picker is gaining value and
if a picker is on the right side of value
consistently enough it should correlate
to positive ROI (Return on Investment) BETTINGPROS FIVETHIRTYEIGHT ODDS CHECKER SGPN LA TIMES
- much like investing in stocks that are
undervalued relative to the market price. 15.24 12.53 4.55 3.18 3.12

ROI (per pick)

Return on investment (ROI) is a
performance measure used to evaluate the
efficiency or profitability of an investment
or compare the efficiency of a number of
different investments. Given a Platform’s
dataset, this is showing their percentage
returned per pick. ON TAP SPORTS
SPORTSMEMO NETWORK THE RINGER YAHOO SPORTS LAS VEGAS SUN
21.15% 19.69% 12.77% 5.28% 4.69%

TAR
TAR, or “Talent Above Replacement”,
illustrates Platform’s roster of Sharps
relative to each other and other platforms.
The metric is normalized so Platforms of
different sized rosters can be compared.
Bench TAR scores demostrate Sharps at
Platforms who are not applicable this
quarter - primarily due to the Sharp’s Sector ODDS CHECKER NEWS CORP SGPN MINUTE MEDIA GANNETT
(or sport) being out of season.
4.8585 4.5139 4.3718 3.4391 3.1609

ALIGNMENT (all pick types)

In its simplest form, this alignment metric
exhibits how frequently a pick is made that is
with the Sports Book and against the public.
This metric is calculating, in different bet
types, how often a Platform’s Sharps are
“fading the public”.
WASHINGTON
THE RINGER POST THE PARLEH BOSTON GLOBE LEE ENTERPRISES
56.06% 54.72% 53.33% 49.28% 48.84%

BBS
This metric looks at how a picker performs
in certain sized spreads (both positive and

For full access of these

negative) and compares their performance
in each to a set of benchmarked peers. The
percentage shown is the platforms overall
winning % when picking within the specified
Spread Cap, Small, Mid, Large. Generally
SPORTING NEWS SOBET
COLD HARD
FOOTBALL FACTS
reports and more
through SharpRank+,
speaking, these cap sizes trend towards
“football numbers” (Small: -2.5 to 2.5, Mid: (LARGE CAP SPREADS) (MID CAP SPREADS) (SMALL CAP SPREADS)
-6.5 to -3 and 3 to 6.5, Large: lower than -7
61.54% 56.45% 60.78%
and greater than 7) in Q3 but they are set
to adjust to breakpoints of emphasis in the [email protected]
dataset so different seasons will influence
these break points.
9
SPOTLIGHT HEATMAP (NFL)
On a rolling 365 day basis, as of September 30, 2022, this is a look at some of the best Sharps by NFL team. Circle sizes
are based on number of wins when picking the respective NFL team. Circle colors relate to the Sharp’s Overall Rating (5,
4, or 3 Star). In the bottom breakout, you will see each Sharp’s overall recrod when picking that team and in parenthesis
their Adjusted Win % (which is a risk adjusted winning percentage when picking that team). SharpRank+ opens access
to these full lists for every team and every sport covered by SharpRank with additional metrics (including bias).

10
AUDIT REPORT SPORTS ILLUSTRATED
This is not a skill based measure, rather a report and opinion on the integrity and validity of the Platform and
its Sharps. The Audit Report is based on SharpRank’s tests around key assertions from generally accepted audit
practices created and executed by CPAs. The Audit Opinion serves as a reflection of the integrity of SharpRank’s Audit
Report and is based on key factors like data availability, reporting procedure, control testings, level of materiality, etc.

ASSERTION GRADES * See page 2 for category descriptions

Completeness Existence Accuracy Occurrence Valuation Presentation

A B A- A- A B+
AUDITOR’S OPINION: UNQUALIFIED Qualified Disclaimer Adverse
This is a confirmation of a clean audit report. An unqualified opinion is an independent auditor’s judgment
that a platform’s statements are fairly and appropriately presented, without any identified exceptions.

ROSTER RECENTS
SHARP RATING • By partnering with 888, the Sports Illustrated Sports Book is now live
in Colorado, Michigan, and Virginia with New Jersey, Indiana, and
Albert Breer 578.2k Iowa upcoming.
Bill Enright 9.3k • Arena Group finalized purchase of golf publisher, Morning Read, to be
rebranded as SI Golf.
Conor Orr 26.5k
• Sports betting related content at SI and affiliated platforms increased
Frank Taddeo 4.1k over 90% year over year at the end of June.
Gary Gramling 3.9k
Jen Piacenti 12.3k QUALITATIVE CONSIDERATIONS
John Garcia 24.8k
• SI retained its core Sharp roster for the current football season(s) -
Mitch Goldich 4.6k which finished 2nd and 4th for NFL and CFB, respectively, for last
season’s end of the season platform rankings.
Molly Geary 1k
• Supported by brand operator Arena Group, SI has overlapping insight
Pat Forde 345.3k and influence in sports and finance verticals enabling engagement in
Richard Johnson 23.7k a relatively unique and distinct audience.
• The benefit of leveraging an established brand name and Sharp
Ross Dellenger 70.4k Roster in an infancy staged industry, presents one less challenge - the
Will Laws 840 audience and trust already exists.
• Localized platforms through SI and affiliated platforms present a
Sector Coverage - NFL, CFB, NBA, NHL, MLB
personalized approach and micro community harvesting.

WANT TO LEARN MORE OR RECEIVE FULL INDUSTRY PLATFORM AUDITS? THE ENCYCLOPEDIA OF THESE
METRICS/TEAR SHEETS AND THE INDUSTRY’S PITCHBOOK EQUIVALENT ARE AVAILABLE VIA SHARPRANK+

11
SHARP ECOSYSTEM
When financial transactions can be influenced, oversight & accreditation are required to
combat predatory scams & pervasive misinformation. At the epicenter of this new industry
is a highly valuable group, Sharps, that have massive impacts across multiple channels.

SHARPS
Publicly faced ‘experts’ advertising
real money wagers: media personality,
professional handicapper, content creator,
social media influencer, etc.

CONTENT OPERATORS SOCIAL TANGENTIAL

CHANNELS CHANNELS CHANNELS CHANNELS

Papers/Magazines, Sports books Social medias Advertising tech
Radio, TV, Podcasts Peer to peer platforms Streaming platforms Marketplaces
Trading markets Apparel

EFFECTS

Through use of written, By leveraging Sharps In each sphere of influence, With increasing
video, audio mediums, from their content partners, Sharps can alter evidence partnerships, unvalidated
Sharps affect financial sports books can influence or past results, leading the Sharps can be weaponized
transactions by influencing the public to sides of a bet public to consume & make to create personalized
the public to place bets where dollars are needed to financial decisions based promotions to increase
through affiliate sports book balance each side on incomplete & inaccurate engagement of the public
partnerships information

12
NFL RANKINGS (ONGOING)
The ongoing NFL rankings are based on an organization and its currently covered subsidiaries;
ranked by their affiliated Sharps performance during a defined time period which began at the
start of Q3 (July 1, 2022) and ended at the end of Q3 (September 30, 2022).

IMPORTANT
• Penn National Gaming claimed the top spot in the Q3 NFL Enterprise Rankings. Led by Mintzy (Barstool), Penn had 3 additional
Sharps in the top 20 as of quarter end.
TAKEAWAYS • Geoff Feinberg’s NFL performance led Odds Checker not only to the top of the Q3 NFL Entity Rankings, but also the top of the Overall
Entity Rankings.

Q3 NFL ENTERPRISE
SHARPRANK SECTOR RATING RANK COMPANY TOP SHARP (SECTOR RANK)

1 PENN NATIONAL GAMING: Barstool Sports Mintzy (#3)

2 MINUTE MEDIA: BetSided Joe Summers (#21)
3 YAHOO SPORTS Frank Schwab (#14)
4 NEWS CORP: New York Post Steve Serby (#46)
5 AUDACY Nick Kostos (#58)

Q3 NFL ENTITY
SHARPRANK SECTOR RATING RANK COMPANY TOP SHARP (SECTOR RANK)

1 ODDS CHECKER Geoff Fienberg (#19)

2 THE RINGER Sheil Kapadia (#1)
3 ODDSSHARK Ryan Fowler (#38)
4 BACONWIRE Sean Dwyer (#10)
5 SOBET PeoplevsVegas (#50)

Q3 NFL SHARP NOTABLES

ROI CLV Princeton TAR Volume Index
(Total per Pick) (Total per Pick) (Total per Pick)

JARED SAPP CHRISTOPHER GATES

ZOGIE’S PICKS FIVETHIRTYEIGHT ADAM RANK (Arrowhead Pride/ (Daily Norsemen/SB Nation/
(Independent) (FiveThirtyEight) (NFL Network)
SB Nation/Vox Media) Vox Media)
41.94% 12.53 4.38 2.1343 198.98

DISCLAIMER: The exhibited data is the aggregation of each organization and their outlets or Legal: SharpRank Inc., is not affiliated or partnered with the National Football League, the NFL, NFL.com or any
subsidiaries based on the performance of their affiliated Sharps. Picks which did not pass conferences, affiliates, organizations, or teams. SharpRank, Inc.’s use of institutional logos is licensed through the
validation and audit tests (unless subsequently adjusted) and picks made outside of the Associated Press (AP) for use in an editorial manner.
Sharps affiliated media outlet or platforms were not included.

13
CFB RANKINGS (ONGOING)
The ongoing CFB rankings are based on an organization and its currently covered subsidiaries;
ranked by their affiliated Sharps performance during a defined time period which began at the
start of Q3 (July 1, 2022) and ended at the end of Q3 (September 30, 2022).

IMPORTANT
• BetSided claimed the top spot in the Q3 CFB Enterprise Rankings. Led by Josh Yourish, BetSided had 2 additional Sharps in
the top 10 as of quarter end.
TAKEAWAYS • Odds Checker came close to owning the top spot in all ongoing sport rankings for Entities; however, The Las Vegas Sun edged
them out for the number 1 ranking.

Q3 CFB ENTERPRISE
SHARPRANK SECTOR RATING RANK COMPANY TOP SHARP (SECTOR RANK))

1 MINUTE MEDIA: BetSided Josh Yourish (#9)

2 AUDACY Ken Barkley (#2)
3 YAHOO SPORTS Sam Cooper (#11)
4 PENN NATIONAL GAMING: Barstool Mintzy (#4)
5 PRO FOOTBALL FOCUS: CFBNumbers CFBNumbers (#21)

Q3 CFB ENTITY
SHARPRANK SECTOR RATING RANK COMPANY TOP SHARP (SECTOR RANK)

1 LAS VEGAS SUN Case Keefer (#1)

2 ODDS CHECKER Average Joe’s (#6)
3 SPORTS GAMBLING PODCAST NETWORK PattyC (#3)
4 BETTINGPROS Thor Nystrom (#8)
5 COVERS Douglas Farmer (#18)

Q3 CFB SHARP NOTABLES

ROI CLV Princeton TAR Volume Index
(Total per Pick) (Total per Pick) (Total per Pick)

MATT PERRAULT
(Just The Picks/Props.com/ THOR NYSTROM JAKE VOGEL ERIC BROLIN COLBY DANT
American Affiliate) (Bettingpros) (First&Goal Podcast) (CFN/USA Today/Gannett) (SGPN)

25.31% 22.78 3.49 1.1017 224.85

DISCLAIMER: The exhibited data is the aggregation of each organization and their outlets or Legal: SharpRank, Inc. is in no way affiliated or partnered with the National Collegiate Athletic Association, NCAA,
subsidiaries based on the performance of their affiliated Sharps. Picks which did not pass NCAA.com or any universities, colleges or teams. Additionally SharpRank, Inc. is in no way affiliated or partnered with
validation and audit tests (unless subsequently adjusted) and picks made outside of the any conference teams, properties, organizations or franchises of the aforementioned organization. SharpRank, Inc.’s use
Sharps affiliated media outlet or platforms were not included. of institutional logos is licensed through the Associated Press (AP) for use in an editorial manner.

14
MLB RANKINGS (ONGOING)
The ongoing MLB rankings are based on an organization and its currently covered subsidiaries;
ranked by their affiliated Sharps performance during a defined time period which began at the
start of Q3 (July 1, 2022) and ended at the end of Q3 (September 30, 2022).

IMPORTANT
• After finishing first in the NBA End of Season Rankings (Q2 Report), Paramount Global again finds themselves in the top spot
as the number 1 MLB Q3 Enterprise Platform.
TAKEAWAYS • Albert Nguyen of Odds Checker is not only the top Q3 Entity Sharp, but also the Sharp with the highest ROI and TAR score as of
the end of the 3rd quarter.

Q3 MLB ENTERPRISE
SHARPRANK SECTOR RATING RANK COMPANY TOP SHARP (SECTOR RANK)

1 PARAMOUNT GLOBAL: CBS Sports Tom Fornelli (#3)

2 MINUTE MEDIA: BetSided Iain MacMillan (#6)
3 DRAFTKINGS Garion Thorne (#8)
4 SPORTS ILLUSTRATED Jen Piacenti (#24)
5 AUDACY Jake Hasan (#26)

Q3 MLB ENTITY
SHARPRANK SECTOR RATING RANK COMPANY TOP SHARP (SECTOR RANK)

1 ODDS CHECKER Albert Nguyen (#1)

2 SPORTS GAMBLING PODCAST NETWORK Munaf Manji (#13)
3 COVERS Josh Inglis (#21)
4 ACTION NETWORK D.J. James (#11)
5 SPORTSMEMO Matt Josephs (#2)

Q3 MLB SHARP NOTABLES

ROI CLV Princeton TAR Volume Index
(Total per Pick) (Total per Pick) (Total per Pick)

ALBERT NGUYEN GRANT MITCHELL CJ OLSON KEVIN ERICKSON RYAN CRAIG

(Sportsbook Wire/
(Odds Checker) (Independent) (Fifth Quarter) (Independent)
USA Today/Gannett)
47.47% 4.48 3.41 0.8744 248.26

DISCLAIMER: The exhibited data is the aggregation of each organization and their outlets or Legal: SharpRank, Inc. is in no way affiliated or partnered with Major League Baseball, MLB, MLB.com or any respective
subsidiaries based on the performance of their affiliated Sharps. Picks which did not pass teams, properties, organizations or franchises of the aforementioned organization. SharpRank, Inc.’s use of institutional
validation and audit tests (unless subsequently adjusted) and picks made outside of the logos is licensed through the Associated Press (AP) for use in an editorial manner.
Sharps affiliated media outlet or platforms were not included.

15
Q3 SHARP INDEX
Listed below are all Sharps covered during the second quarter (which began April 1, 2022 and ended June 30,
2022) - not included are those Sharps who do not meet the criteria for SharpRank to initiate coverage in Q2
(pick count thresholds, out of season sports, Watch List Phase - prior to Coverage Initiation, etc).

70PercentClub Barstool Angelina Brandon Osborne Christopher Dunnells

A’S Picks Barstool Bigcat Brandon Walker Christopher Gates
AAA Sports Barstool Carl Brendan McAlinden Chuck Carlton
Aaron Casey Ben Burns Brendan Moore CJ Olson
Aaron Leming Ben Heisler Brendan O’Bryan Clay Travis
Aaron Quinn Ben Natan Brenden Ertle Cletis Cutts
Aaron Schill Ben Niewoehner Brent Sobleski Clint Corey
Accuscore Ben Rajavuori Brett Vito Cody Roark
Adam Pelletier Ben Standig Brian Pellerin Colby Dant
Adam Rank Ben Volin Brianna Pirre Colleen Wolfe
Albert Breer Ben Weinrib Brock Smith Conor Orr
Albert Nguyen Ben Ditlevson Bryan Fischer Cory Bonini
Alfie Crow Big Ev Bryan Stewart Craig Miller
Allie O’Neill Bill Bender BurninTheBooks CrunchTimeVIP
Andrew Bell Bill Connelly Cam Mellor CT Smith
Andrew Caley Bill Enright Cameron DaSilva D.J. James
Andrew Reid Bill Simmons Caroline Darney Damien Woody
Anita Marks Bill Williamson Case Keefer Damon Marx
Anthony Cervino Bill Zimmerman Casey Olson Dan Bradley
Anthony North Billy Gorman CFBHome Dan Graziano
Anthony Romeo BJ Rudell CFBNumbers Dan Harralson
Antoine Bethea Blake Murphy Chad Finn Dan Mennella
Ariel Epstein Blake Schuster Charles Curtis Dan Wolken
Art Stapleton BookitWithTrent Chip Patterson Daniel Harms
Austan Kas bothbasketballs Chosen Blakey Daniel Jeremiah
Austin Swaim Brad Castronovo Chris Fowler Darius Butler
Average Joe’s Brad LaPlante Chris Mueller Dave Blezow
Barrett Sallee Brandon Gdula Chris Perfett Dave Portnoy
Barry Shuck Brandon L. Gowton Chris Spiering Dave Richard

16
Q3 SHARP INDEX
Listed below are all Sharps covered during the second quarter (which began April 1, 2022 and ended June 30,
2022) - not included are those Sharps who do not meet the criteria for SharpRank to initiate coverage in Q2
(pick count thresholds, out of season sports, Watch List Phase - prior to Coverage Initiation, etc).

Dave Schofield Freudy Jack Salo Jess Root

David Dorey Gabb Goudy Jacob Infante Jesse Pantuosco
David Moore Garion Thorne Jake Hasan Jesse Ryan Kuroiwa
Dennis Dodd Gary Davenport Jake Kokoris Jim McBride
Devin’s Bookie Gary Gramling Jake Louque Joe DiTullio
D. Foxworth Geoff Clark Jake Vogel Joe Fortenbaugh
Donnavan Smoot Geoff Fienberg James Bryer Joe Giglio
Doug Kezirian Grant Gordon James Kehm Joe Summers
Doug Ziefel Grant Mitchell James Yarcho Joe Vitale
Douglas Farmer Greg Cote Jamey Eisenberg Joel Lawless
Drew Loftis Greg Peterson Jared Dubin Joey Ricotta
Dustin Cox Gregg Rosenthal Jared Sapp John Breech
Dylan Rockford Gregory Tompsett Jarrett Bell John Dixon
EB_Harrison Griffin Carroll Jason La Canfora John Garcia
Ed Brodmarkle Griffin Conant Jason Logan John Healy
Eddie Timanus Hamza Baccouche Jason Radowitz John Holler
Eric Brolin Harley Redlick Jason Wilson John Hyslop
Eric Thompson Harley Schultz Jay Morrison John P. Gilbert
Erick Smith Hayden Reel Jay Skurski John Reger
Erik Buchinger HC Green JD Yonke John Ryan
Erik Schlitt Heath Stewart J. Jacques Taylor John Supowitz
Evan Kirschner Howie Kussoy Jeff Hartman John Venezia
Evan Western Iain MacMillan Jeff Nusser John Whiticar
FiveThirtyEight Ian Kenyon J. Goodridge-Reid Johnny Parlay
Frank Platko J Andrews Jen Piacenti Johnny Perun
Frank Schwab Jace Evans Jeremy Conn JoMaddenSports
Frank T. Raines Jace Wittmus Jeremy Mauss Jon Meerdink
Frank Taddeo Jack Cote Jeremy Reisman Josh Inglis
Freddy Larrinaga Jack Mac Jerry Palm Josh Yourish

17
Q3 SHARP INDEX
Listed below are all Sharps covered during the second quarter (which began April 1, 2022 and ended June 30,
2022) - not included are those Sharps who do not meet the criteria for SharpRank to initiate coverage in Q2
(pick count thresholds, out of season sports, Watch List Phase - prior to Coverage Initiation, etc).

Joshua Vowles Michael Singh Peter Dewey Steve DeAngelo

Jovan Alford Mike Clay Peter Voight Steve Gallo
JSpenceTheKing Mike Florio Phil Harrison Steve Serby
JT Miller Mike Jones Prince J. Grimes Steve Serda
Jude Seymour Mike Payton RB Hayek Steven Lassan
Justin Walsh Mike Vieth rcraig52 Stitches
Jwright Minty Bets Reed Wallach Stu Feiner
K. Fitzgerald Mintzy Richard Johnson Talon Graff
Katie Pondiscio Miss Charleen Rico Bosco Tanner Kern
Kelly in Vegas Mitch Goldich RJ Ochoa Tara Sullivan
Ken Barkley Molly Geary Robert Criscola Tashan Reed
Ken Pomponio M. Alexander Rocky Magana Teddy Ricketson
Kenny Ducey Morgan Cannon Rohit Ponnaiya Teddy Sevransky
Kevin Erickson Munaf Manji Ron Jaworski The Bear
Kevin Knight Nasty_Sports Ron Kopp Thomas Vecchio
Kevin McGuire Nate Davis Ross Dellenger Thor Nystrom
K. Sherrington Nathan Beighle Ryan Day Tim Cowlishaw
Kevin Thomas Nathan Jahnke Ryan Dodson Tim Kelly
Kramer Sansone Nathan Ruddock Ryan Dunleavy Tim Lynch
Kyle Barber Neil Greenberg Ryan Fowler Tom Fornelli
Kyle Henning Nicholas Martin Ryan Kramer Tom Moore
Laura Rutledge Nick Bromberg Ryan Mathews Tom Rock
Lorenzo Reyes Nick Dant Ryan O’Bleness Tom Ryle
Mac Vogel Nick Falato Ryan Wilson Tommy Griffenkranz
M. Bamford Nick Friar Sam Cooper Tone’s Takes
Marek Brave Nick Kostos Sam Farmer Tony Sartori
Mark Davison Nick Nordi Sam Householder Turk2112
Mark Gaughan Nick Shepkowski Scott Bell Tyler Brooke
Mark Gunnels Nick Shook Scott Steehn Tyler Fulghum
Mark Kaboly NickyBoiCa$hin Scott Thurston Tyler Jackson
Mark Ross Nicole Yang Sean Dwyer Tyler Nettuno
Martin Frank Noah Bieniek Sean Green Vasilis Lericos
Marty Mush Numberfire Sean Murphy Vaughn Dalzell
Matt Bowen OddsShark Seth Wickersham Vic Tafur
Matt De Saro Parker Ainsworth Shannon White Vinnie Iyer
Matt Greene Pat Forde Shawn Wronka Wallace Delery
Matt Josephs Pat Mayo Sheil Kapadia Warren Ludford
Matt LaMarca Pat Sullivan Skip Snow Wes O’Donnell
Matt McCuen Patrick Conn Smitty Will Brinson
Matt Perrault PattyC SourcePodcast Will Laws
Matt Stagner Paul Casanova Spencer Schultz William King
Matt Verderame Paul Fanson Spencer Weston Zach Braziller
Matty Peverell Paul Myerberg Stan Taylor Zach Krueger
M. Jones-Drew Paul Noonan Stephen Nover Zach Lowder
Megan M. Money PeoplevsVegas Stephen Reed Zogie’s Picks
Michael D. Smith Pete Fiutak Sterling Furrowh
Michael Gehlken Pete Prisco Sterling Holmes
Michael Hauff Pete Sweeney Steve Buchanan

18
 1-3 NOV 2022
SEMINOLE HARD ROCK HOTEL & CASINO
HOLLYWOOD, FLORIDA

CONNECTING
LATIN AMERICA’S
SPORTS BETTING AND IGAMING MARKETS

1,000 100 50
DELEGATES SPEAKERS EXHIBITORS

SPEAKER PREVIEW

JD DUARTE GONZALO PÉREZ JUAN PABLO VARSKY SILVIA PALEARI

CEO CEO Sports Journalist & Senior Public Affairs Manager
Betcris Apuesta Total Brand Ambassador International Betting
Futbol Sites | Playmaker Integrity Association

JOAQUÍN GAGO MARCOS OLIVEIRA ANDRE GELFI JAVIER TRONCOSO

CEO COO Managing Partner Brazil Chief Revenue Officer
BetanDeal Group Clever Advertising Betsson Futbol Sites
Group

ZENO OSSKO FERNANDA SAINZ XABIER MARIBONA KAREN MARCELA

CEO CMO CEO SIERRA-HUGHES
BetWarrior Caliente Grupo Retabet Vice President of Latin
America & Caribbean
GLI

FOR MORE INFORMATION

PLEASE VISIT SBCEVENTS.COM

#SBCSUMMITLATAM

19
 Q3
2022

[email protected]

20