Menelaus
Menelaus
Menelaus
Contents
1 Menelaus’ theorem 1
2 Menelaus applications 2
3 Menelaus projective 3
1 Menelaus’ theorem
Menelaus theorem deals with “signed ratios” of segments, which are properly defined in
“affine geometry” (see file Affine geometry). In euclidean geometry the theorem has the
following formulation.
B'' C'
B' C''
A''
ε
B C A'
Theorem 1. The points { A0 ∈ BC, B 0 ∈ C A, C 0 ∈ AB} on the sides of the triangle ABC are on a
line, if and only if the following condition holds.
A 0 B B 0C C 0 A
· · = 1. (1)
A 0C B 0 A C 0 B
The necessity of the condition results by projecting the vertices on the line ε and using
the similar triangles (See Figure 1):
A0 B BB 00 B 0C CC 00 C 0 A AA00
= , = , = . (2)
A C CC 00
0 B0 A AA00 C 0 B BB 00
The result follows by multiplying the sides of the equations and simplifying.
2 Menelaus applications 2
The sufficiency can be proved using the proved part of the necessity. In fact, assuming
that the condition of the theorem is valid for the three points { A0, B 0, C 0 } and defining the
line ε = B 0C 0 and its intersection A00 = ε ∩ BC , we show that A00 = A0 . This is so because
by the first part of the theorem
A00 B B 0C C 0 A A 0 B B 0C C 0 A
· · =1 and by assumption · · = 1. ⇒ A00 = A. (3)
A00C B 0 A C 0 B A 0C B 0 A C 0 B
2 Menelaus applications
Consider a parallelogram E FGH and two points {I, J} on two opposite sides. The inter-
section points K, L of the two triangles {H JG, E I F} define a line ε = K L, passing through
the center O of the parallelogram ([Ant95, p.77], [Pap96, II,p.62]).
H I G
N
K
L
O
ε
M
E J F
To see this Apply Menelaus’ theorem two times for the line ε and the two triangles :
M F K E LI N H LG K J
EIF ⇒ · · = 1, H JG ⇒ · · = 1. (4)
M E K I LF NG L J K H
Divide the sides of the equations and note that
KE KJ LI LG MF NH
= , = ⇒ = . (5)
KI KH LF LJ ME NG
Later implies that M F = N H. Hence line ε passes through the center O of the parallel-
ogram.
Remark-1 Essentially the exercise is a special case of the famous “theorem of Pappus”
on the collinearity of three intersection points (see file Pappus’ theorem). The general
case of this theorem reduces to the present particular case by using a special “projectivity”
which sends two intersection points to the points at infinity corresponding to the parallel
sides of the present parallelogram.
In the next exercise we consider a parallelogram ABCD and an arbitrary point E. Then,
we draw from E parallels to the sides to build parallelograms { AHE I, FCGE } (See Fig-
ure 3). Then, the diagonals {HI, FG, BD} of these parallelograms and the original one
intersect at a point J.
To see this consider point J as the intersection of the two lines J = BD ∩ FG and
apply Menelaus’ theorem to triangle BCD and its secant FG :
GD FC J B GD H A FC ID ID HA JB
· · = 1, noticing = , = ⇒ · · = 1.
GC F B J D GC HB F B IA I A HB J D
3 Menelaus projective 3
A I D
H E G
B F C
J
This, by applying the Menelaus theorem to triangle ABD, implies that HI passes through
J too.
Next exercise formulates a generalization of the previous property of parallelograms.
In fact, consider an arbitrary quadrangle q = ABCD and an arbitrary point E. Join point
E to two intersections {K, L} of opposite sides of q and consider also the quadrilateral
q 0 = FGIH, defined by the intersections of lines {EK, E L} with the sides of the original
quadrilateral (See Figure 4). Then, the pairs of opposite sides of q 0 intersect on the diag-
L
A
H
I
B J
E D
F G
C
K
onals of q.
Figure 4 shows only one pair (HI, FG) of opposite sides of q 0, intersecting at J, the
other pair being (HF, GI). The property follows by transforming the quadrilateral to a
parallelogram via a “projectivity” and applying the results of the previous exercise.
3 Menelaus projective
The condition of Menelaus’ theorem can be generalized to cross ratios (see file Cross
ratio) by introducing an arbitrary line ε, which together with the other four lines forms a
set in general position, i.e. such that no three lines of the set pass through the same point.
Figure 5 shows such a case. The condition of Menelaus is then equivalent to
The proof ([Gre54, p.354]) can be given as in the projective case of Ceva’s theorem (see file
Ceva’s theorem). For this, define the “projective transformation” which maps the side-lines
of the triangle, each to itself and the line ε to the line at infinity ε∞ . Then the cross ratios
are preserved and their values are transferred to corresponding equal “ratios” in the case
4 Menelaus from Ceva 4
J
A
D ε
E
F I
B C H
of line at infinity, e.g. (ABDJ) becomes DA/DB when J is at infinity. The theorem then
reduces to Menelaus theorem in its usual form.
Z
D
E
F X
C Y
But (DB/DC)(EC/E A)(F A/F B) , −1, otherwise by Ceva’s theorem {AD, BE, CF} would
be concurrent (or parallel). Hence the previous relation yields
C'
D
B'
A' Ζ
B C
E
Hint: Draw the parallel from B to B 0C 0 which intersects AC at H (See Figure 7). Calculate
0
DB0 = E H , where E is the point at which AA intersects
AC
first the ratio AH and next the ratio DC EB 0
BH.
B0 A 1 1
= µ ⇒ B0H = B0 A = CA
B0H µ µ(1 − λ)
1 1 µ−1
H A = HB 0 + B 0 A = − CA + CA = C A.
µ(1λ) 1−λ µ(1 − λ)
µλ − 1 HC µλ − 1
HC = H A + AC = CA ⇒ = .
µ(1 − λ) HA µ−1
Exercise 3. Show that for every point O, not lying on the side-lines of the triangle ABC, and the
intersection points { A0, B 0, C 0 } respectively of {O A, OB, OC} with {BC, C A, AB}, holds:
O A0 OB 0 OC 0 AO BO CO
+ + = 1, + + = 2.
AA0 BB 0 CC 0 AA0 BB 0 CC 0
Exercise 4. Given is a triangle ABC and two points D, E. Point Z moves onto BC and the lines
DZ, E Z intersect AB, AC respectively at points I and J. Show that the intersection point H of
DJ, E I moves on a fixed line B 0C 0.
Α
Β'
Ε
Ι'
D
J' Η
J
Ι C
Β Ζ
C'
L Κ
Hint: Apply the theorem of Menelaus on ABC twice, for the secant lines Z D and Z J (See
Figure 8). The following equalities result
I A Z B KC Z B JC L A I A KC JC L A
· · = 1, · · =1 ⇒ · = · .
I B ZC K A ZC J A LB I B K A J A LB
The last equality is written equivalently
IA LA KA JA
(ABI L) = : = : = (ACK J).
I B LB KC JC
However, according by the preservation of cross ratio on pencils (see file Cross ratio)
Bibliography
[Ant95] O. Anthony. Problem 36. Amer. Math. Monthly, 2:50, 1895.
[Gre54] H. Green. On the theorems of Ceva and Menlelaus. Amer. Math. Monthly, 64:354–
357, 1954.
[Pap96] Georges Papelier. Exercices de Geometrie moderne. Editions Jacques Gabay, 1996.