Online Assessment Guide-2019-10-24
Online Assessment Guide-2019-10-24
Online Assessment Guide-2019-10-24
Online Assessment
in Higher Education
Ashley Weleschuk
Patti Dyjur
Patrick Kelly
Authors
Ashley Weleschuk
Research Assistant, Learning and Instructional Design
Taylor Institute for Teaching and Learning, University of Calgary
Patti Dyjur
Educational Development Consultant
Taylor Institute for Teaching and Learning, University of Calgary
Patrick Kelly
Manager, Learning and Instructional Design
Taylor Institute for Teaching and Learning, University of Calgary
October, 2019
Taylor Institute for Teaching and Learning
434 Collegiate Blvd
University of Calgary, Calgary AB Canada T2N 1N4
http://www.ucalgary.ca/taylorinstitute/
This guide is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons — Attribution Non-
Commercial License 4.0 International (creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which
permits sharing and adapting of the material, provided the original work is properly attributed (see
recommended citation below), any changes are clearly indicated, and the material is not used for commercial
purposes.
Recommended Citation
Weleschuk, A., Dyjur, P., & Kelly, P. (2019). Online Assessment in Higher Education. Taylor Institute for
Teaching and Learning Guide Series. Calgary, AB: Taylor Institute for Teaching and Learning at
the University of Calgary. Retrieved from https://taylorinstitute.ucalgary.ca/resources/guides
BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................................................... 4
THE ROLE OF ONLINE ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................................................. 5
DEFINITION OF ONLINE ASSESSMENT.................................................................................................................... 5
BENEFITS, CHALLENGES, AND STRATEGIES OF ONLINE ASSESSMENT..................................................................... 5
VALIDITY AND RIGOUR ............................................................................................................................................. 6
TRANSITIONING TO ONLINE ....................................................................................................................................... 6
FORMATIVE FEEDBACK OPPORTUNITIES ....................................................................................................................... 6
ACCESSIBILITY & FLEXIBILITY ...................................................................................................................................... 7
ACADEMIC INTEGRITY .............................................................................................................................................. 7
COLLABORATIVE LEARNING ....................................................................................................................................... 8
INSTRUCTOR WORKLOAD ......................................................................................................................................... 9
STUDENTS’ CONCERNS ............................................................................................................................................. 9
PLANNING YOUR ONLINE ASSESSMENTS......................................................................................................................10
PRINCIPLES OF EFFECTIVE ASSESSMENT ...............................................................................................................11
However, according to King and Boyatt (2014), effective online learning requires strategic leadership,
pedagogical and technical support, and opportunities for instructor development. There are certain
considerations that need to be made before
“
teaching and learning can take place in an
online space, especially for instructors who are
used to face-to-face environments. The Through the discussion board
purpose of this guide is to provide some of this
students acquired constructive
necessary pedagogical support by providing
relevant research and literature, suggestions and professional communication
from practice, and pragmatic strategies for skills.”
assessing students in online environments. – Hieu Ngo, Faculty of Social Work
Assessments play a major role in students’ experiences within a course. The primary goal of assessments
is for students to demonstrate their achievement of the course learning outcomes (Boud, 2010), for
formative feedback, a grade, or for a pass. However, they are much more than that. Often, assessments
are the biggest source of motivation for students and drive
their decisions of when and how to study (Boud, 2010;
Effective and rigorous Olofsson et al., 2011). In online environments, students may
assessments can be incorrectly assume that they will not have to dedicate as
facilitated online much effort to learning course material or completing
assessments, because they are no longer in a traditional
course (Kebritchi et al., 2017). While certainly, some
traditional assessment methods do not fit within an online
environment, effective, rigorous assessments can be facilitated online. When designing a course online,
particular care should be given to the assessments to ensure the activities that students do are effective
at meeting their learning outcomes but fit within the online space (Gikandi, Morrow, & Davis, 2011).
Online assessment can and should have the Top Benefits of Online Assessment
same academic rigour as face-to-face
o Detailed feedback in a variety of
assessment; it still needs to align with
formats
course and program learning outcomes,
o Instant feedback
provide valuable learning opportunities for
o Accessibility
students, and have a level of excellence for
o Flexibility
students to work toward (Vlachopoulos,
2016).
Transitioning to Online
Converting a course from a face-to-face to online format, or creating a new online course, can inspire
instructors to reflect on and improve their course design and teaching practices. Investigating how to
develop courses online can expose instructors to teaching and assessment methods that are novel and
interesting to them (Bennett et al., 2017). Certainly, there is a risk of instructors using online assessment
without adequate pedagogical justification, for the sake of using technology and appearing innovative
(Abubakar & Adeshola, 2019; Sweeny et al. 2017). However, when institutions provide resources and
pedagogical development opportunities for instructors who want to teach online, instructors can avoid
ineffective teaching choices and using technology just to appear modern (King & Boyatt, 2014).
One of the most highly reported benefits of online assessment is the ease associated with providing
detailed feedback to students (Daradoumis et al. 2019, McLaughlin & Yan, 2017, Rolim & Isaisas, 2018).
Feedback can be given in different formats in an online environment, such as written, audio-recorded,
or video-recorded (Johnson & Cooke, 2016); this
“
diversity can improve the accessibility of
feedback for some students. Instructors and
students both highlight their appreciation for Provide students with timely and
timely and frequent feedback (Dermo, 2009, clear feedback by using audio or
Khan & Khan, 2019, Redecker, Punie & Ferrari, video feedback.”
2012). In general, students are more motivated
– Barbara Brown, Werklund School of
and tend to achieve higher grades when
Education
formative feedback is available (Redecker, Punie
& Ferarri, 2012). Instructors can utilize automated feedback on certain types of assessments, which
reduces their workload, particularly in large classes (Abubakar & Adeshola, 2019). For example, online
assignments can have built-in hints or feedback that can become available when students submit a
wrong answer.
Students and instructors also appreciate the accessibility of online assessments (Lei & Gupta, 2010;
Rolim & Isaisas, 2018). Students have more flexibility in how they can approach their coursework, as
they can choose when and where they do it, rather than having to fit within the constraints of a
classroom (Lei & Gupta, 2010). For example, instead of having to be present in class for a group
discussion or quiz, students can add to an asynchronous discussion board or complete an online quiz at
the times and locations that are most convenient to them. This can take immense pressure off students
who have jobs, family commitments, or other factors that may restrict their ability to be present on-
campus (Lei & Gupta, 2010). Concerns about classroom distractions and interruptions during work time
are also alleviated when using online assessments (Lei & Gupta, 2010). There are fewer concerns about
distractions and interruptions during assessments.
However, this flexibility requires students to be self-directed and self-motivated (Beebe et al., 2010;
Kebritchi et al., 2017). Some students thrive when given more control over their learning but some
others, particularly first year students, are not prepared for such responsibility (Hung et al., 2010).
Additional supports, such as time management
“
plans or activities to familiarize students with
online communication, may need to be put in place
Support student engagement to ensure students’ are prepared to self-regulate
and learning by providing and complete their assessments in time (Hung et
assessment options for students al., 2010; Kebritchi et al., 2017). Hung et al. (2010)
to select an assessment that is also notes the importance of a clear course outline
more relevant to their learning.” that explains the expectations and role of students
- Jessica Ayala, Faculty of Social Work in the course, and encourages them to be self-
regulated learners from the first day of class.
Academic Integrity
Despite the benefits of online learning, instructors often have concerns that have limited the
widespread adoption of online assessment. Instructors worry about academic misconduct, students
cheating, plagiarising, or otherwise getting unfair advantages over their peers (Abubakar & Adeshola,
2019, Dermo, 2009, Mellar et al. 2018). Without in-person proctoring, instructors feel that they do not
have the same ability to monitor students to ensure academic integrity (Fask et al., 2014). Research
regarding effective ways to authenticate students and reduce cheating is beginning to emerge.
Simple measures for protecting academic integrity on online assignments and quizzes, such as
randomization of questions, varying numbers, or blocking access to other course content during the
assessment period, are built into LMS and can be easily employed (Boitshwarelo et al., 2017, Tsai, 2016).
Anti-plagiarism software, used in conjunction with education about academic integrity has been shown
to reduce instances of plagiarism (Levine & Pazdernik, 2018). Using a diverse set of assessment methods
can also reduce academic misconduct (McLaughlin & Yan, 2017). Technologically advanced methods,
such as checking biometric data or keystroke dynamics are promising measures to authenticate students
Collaborative Learning
Another concern when using online assessment is that students will be isolated and less collaborative if
they are not together in a physical classroom (Abubakar & Adeshola, 2019; Bolliger & Shepherd, 2010;
Dumford & Miller, 2018; Kebritchi et al., 2017).
“
Learning is inherently social and building
relationships helps enhance it (Bolliger &
Shepherd, 2010; Gikandi, Morrow & Davis, 2011; Using ePortfolios helped
Kehrwad, 2010).
students learn more about their
There are opportunities to increase peers, boosting morale when the
communication and connectedness between
class became challenging.”
students in online courses through strategies
- Duy Dau, Haskayne School of Business
such as peer feedback activities (Mostert &
Snowball, 2013), discussion boards (Champion &
Gunnlaugson, 2017; Skinner, 2007), and
implementing study or working groups community of practice framework into discussions or
assignments (Wang, 2010). As such, connecting students needs to be an intentional part of the
assessment and course design to mitigate this concern.
What aspects of your course might be transferable to online? What would have to be
changed?
Students’ Concerns
Student Concerns
Students have reported several of their own concerns
about online assessments as well. In one study, o Equity and fairness
students’ main concern was equality and fairness o Technical issues
(Dermo, 2009). When they do not see other students, o Differing technical abilities
they question whether their peers are cheating and
o Less opportunity to clarify
whether their instructors are detecting it. Transparency
assignment guidelines
in the reasoning behind online assessments, as well as
the methods used to determine grades, provide
students with more comfort and understanding (Khan & Khan, 2019).
As well, students question their instructors’ competency with technology (Khan & Khan, 2019). Because
their grades are being determined online, they need to be confident that technical issues or an
instructor’s inabilities will not diminish their achievements (Bennett et al., 2016). Instructors should
familiarize themselves with the learning technologies they will be using, and should note how students’
work is tracked. They can then explain to students the processes in place for if technical issues occur.
Including a short, ungraded practice assessment can also help students become comfortable with the
technologies and explore them without the high stakes of a graded assessment (Khan & Khan, 2019).
What concerns do you have about How will you address them?
online assessment?
o Start planning and designing assessments early. Ensure that all materials are available by the
first day of class and that important resources are easy to find in the LMS (Beebe et al., 2010;
Page & Cherry, 2018).
o Instructions, rubrics, and expectations need to be clear and complete (Ardid et al. 2015).
Provide a space for students to ask questions, such as a discussion board, so that all students
have equal access to information.
o Use a variety of assessment types to allow students the opportunity to demonstrate their
understanding in different ways (Sato & Haegele, 2018).
o Interactive and higher order learning opportunities can increase engagement with assessments.
Provide videos, simulations, case studies or other resources to get deeper engagement from
students (van de Heyde & Siebrits, 2019).
o When providing formative feedback, use action-focused statements that give students
suggestions for future work (Drury & Mort, 2015). Non-specific feedback is less helpful to
students than specific, detailed comments.
o Have a plan for promoting academic integrity in the online environment. Discuss this plan and
its importance with the students (Levine & Pazdernik, 2018).
o Have a contingency plan for submitting or completing assignments in case of technology issues.
Make note of how students’ work is recorded and documented in your LMS, so you and your
students can be confident in the technology (Bennett et al., 2016).
Online Exams
We define online exams as unproctored tests or quizzes that students can complete from any computer,
rather than exams done on a computer in a controlled, supervised environment. Usually, online quizzes
are done within the LMS.
Strategies/Recommendations
o Design exams and quizzes to be open-web, open-book exams. This method works effectively
when assessing deeper learning, such as case-based or application questions (Myyry &
Joutsenvirta, 2015).
o Frame online quizzes as review activities for students, so they can ensure they are staying on
top of course materials.
o Include some element of formative feedback, such as multiple attempts for questions, hints, full
solutions, and recommendations for the future, to help students learn through doing the quiz
(McLaughlin & Yan, 2017).
o Add self-assessment or reflective questions at the end of assignments or quizzes (Cukusic et al.
2014).
o Matching or short answer questions can increase the difficulty of online exams and can still be
easily implemented into an LMS.
o Incorporate existing videos, case studies, simulations, and other interactive components into
assignments to promote engagement and higher-order thinking without having to create all new
resources (van de Heyde & Siebrits, 2019). For example, have students complete an online
simulation in order to answer quiz questions.
o Have students generate exam-style questions. Use the best few student questions on the tests
you give.
o If you are using questions made by another instructor or by an online textbook, verify that they
are appropriate for your course and students before using them.
o If you have multiple quizzes in a course, drop students’ lowest quiz score from their final grade.
o Allow multiple attempts at online quizzes, to prevent technical issues on one attempt affecting
students’ grades.
o Determine an appropriate schedule for quizzes that balances the quizzes with the other course
assessments.
Challenges
o Students, especially those who struggle most with writing, tend not to use additional resources
provided to them (Dargusch et al., 2017; Drury & Mort, 2015; Skinner et al., 2012).
o Providing detailed, specific feedback to each student can be time consuming in large classes
(Daly et al., 2010), especially when using journaling or ongoing writing assessments (Barkley &
Major, 2016).
o It is easy to fall behind the grading process when assessments are long and you want to be
detailed in your response.
Strategies/Recommendations
o Writing resources should be discipline specific and should be incorporated into notes or
assignment descriptions (Drury & Mort, 2015)
o If many students are struggling with the same areas on a written assignment, send out feedback
to the entire class (Daly et al., 2010)
o Schedule time for grading written assignments to ensure it is done promptly.
o Larger projects can be structured as cumulative assignments, split into stages for more frequent
feedback and learning throughout the process. For example, a larger essay could have three
graded components: a proposal, an outline and annotated bibliography, and a final submission.
o Train Teaching Assistants (TAs) to grade effectively using the rubric, to help remove some of
the grading workload. Take time to discuss grading throughout the course.
o Feedback can be given in writing, as annotations within a students’ work, or in audio/video
forms.
o Use examples of expert writing in the same format as students will be writing in. For example, if
students are writing blog posts, have them read some high quality blog posts and discuss what
qualities make them strong pieces.
ePortfolios
ePortfolios are electronic compilations of academic, personal, and professional development. They can
be used to demonstrate skill development, reflection, and course achievements (Bolliger & Shepherd,
2010) by showcasing students’ best work (Bryant & Chittum, 2013).
Challenges
o Students do not always understand the purpose of creating an ePortfolio (San Jose, 2017)
o Students experience stress when ePortfolio platforms are not intuitive for users (Tse, Scholz &
Lithgow, 2018).
o ePortfolios can feel daunting to students. They may feel stressed about the workload of a large
project (Mueller & Bair, 2018).
Strategies/Recommendations
o Explain the reasoning behind the project throughout the course to remind students why it is
valuable (Tse, Scholz & Lithgow, 2018)
o Take time ahead of the course to familiarize yourself with the platform you plan to use. Create
detailed instructions and expectations for students to use (Tse, Scholz & Lithgow, 2018).
o Develop a grading scheme that can reduce the weight of the final product, such as Pass/Fail or
scaffolding the project into several smaller components with feedback opportunities (Mueller
& Bair, 2018)
o Provide students’ with a clear rubric at the beginning of the project that is straightforward and
easy to use when grading.
o Have students submit a draft portfolio mid-way through the course to encourage them to start
working earlier and to get feedback.
o Digital Media Projects: Students present course work in digital media form rather than
submitting written work.
o Digital Posters: Academic poster created and presented on a computer. They may include
interactive elements or links to online sources.
o Research Projects: Large assignments in which students aim to answer a research question by
disproving or failing to disprove a hypothesis.
o Time Management: Online courses tend to be front-heavy, requiring a lot of preparation before
the start of the course. Assessment descriptions, rubrics, and supporting resources all need to
be ready for students from the first day of the semester. However, the amount of work does not
diminish afterwards. Although there is no physical classroom, it is the instructors’ role to be
present and accessible for students and to monitor their progress (Beebe et al., 2010).
o Course and Material Organization: Without face-to-face opportunities to communicate with
students, it becomes essential that course materials are clear, accessible and easy to find.
Instructions also may need to be re-worded to ensure they are not misinterpreted (Page &
Cherry, 2018)
o Informal Assessment Opportunities: In online courses, instructors cannot monitor students’
progress by assessing their body language or by checking in with them during class. This makes
structured formative assessment even more important. Plan more formal opportunities to check
in with students, such as question and answer discussion boards, feedback requests, or news
bulletins (Beebe et al., 2010).
o Communication with Students: Instructors who are used to making comments, suggestions, or
clarifications about assessments in class will need to find new ways to share these thoughts with
students, whether through news bulletins, emails, or discussion board comments (Beebe et al.,
2010).
o Adjustment Time: Students who are unfamiliar with the LMS and other technologies used may
benefit from an opportunity to practice navigating it, such as through a practice assignment.
Ensure students know where to find help with navigating the LMS if needed (Duesbery et al.,
2015).
Course Information: SOWK 201: Introduction to Social Work is an online course that discusses the
foundations of the theory, practice, and ethics of social work. Eighty to 100 students take the course
each semester.
Assessment Method: At the start of the semester, students pick a case study from a variety of
options. These cases are real examples of scenarios in which their social work skills would need to be
applied. For each module in the course, students create a discussion board post relating the module
topics to their case study. Dr. Ngo divides students into smaller discussion groups of no more than 25
students, so they can build a community over the semester.
Students also must read and comment on two other posts. Dr. Ngo teaches students to provide
feedback in an empowering and encouraging way. They are asked to frame constructive feedback as
an invitation to try something new or do more, such as “I invite you to consider how social workers
can include the perspectives of their communities” or “What other models for practice could be
used in this scenario?” This helps students see the positive intentions in the comments, and gives
them specific actions for future work.
Dr. Ngo uses a simple grading criteria for these posts. Students have a list of requirements for their
posts, and their grade is determined by how well they meet them. For the discussion posts, students
must connect course materials to the case study, demonstrate understanding of their case and the
context, use critical thinking skills, and organize their thoughts clearly. The four discussion posts are
worth 40% of the course grade (10% per post) as they are the primary academic writing for the
course
Learning Technologies: All course activities are done in D2L™. Dr. Ngo ensures that the content is
logically organized and easy for students to find. All assessments and feedback are posted in
discussion boards, so students can learn from one another and can see all of the feedback. Grades
are posted privately.
Academic Integrity: To prevent quick copying and not engaging with the case study, students are not
able to read posts from their peers until they submit their own main discussion posts.
Key Advice:
o Root all assessments in your teaching philosophy and pedagogy. Dr. Ngo believes in
education as a means of empowering students to think critically and independently and
considers whether the work they are doing aligns with this intention.
o Invest time in training and checking in with Teaching Assistants (TAs), to ensure grading
and feedback is fair and consistent. Disputes over grades disappear when TAs and
instructors approach assessment the same way.
Course Information: Dr. Brown teaches research and specialization courses for students in the
Interdisciplinary Master of Education (MEd) program. Most MEd students are educational
professionals, either in the K-12 system or in postsecondary institutions. They usually take Dr.
Brown’s courses alongside their professional commitments.
o Instructor Feedback: Dr. Brown sends individual feedback to students early in the course to
help them determine if their project is on track. She also posts commentary and general
advice to the whole class. In order to improve the clarity of feedback, Dr. Brown has started
using brief (1-3 minute) one-take videos to provide her comments and suggestions. Students
appreciated seeing and hearing the emotions associated with the feedback in the videos,
which made it feel more personalized and easier to understand.
o Peer Feedback: Students form “studio groups” that meet synchronously to give one another
feedback. They remain in these groups for the entire semester so that students can see how
their peers are improving and do not have to keep familiarizing themselves with new topics.
Dr. Brown joins each synchronous session a few times, as an additional opportunity to
communicate with and support the students.
o Expert Feedback: Dr. Brown helps connect students to professors, researchers, and other
experts in their fields to provide another lens of feedback and additional context for their
work. One of the benefits of an online course is being able to reach a wide variety of experts,
not just those on campus.
Dr. Brown uses the grading rubric when providing feedback and encourages students to use it for
providing peer feedback. They are rarely surprised when they see their final grade because they have
received so much feedback and know the grading rubric well.
Learning Technologies: D2L™ is the primary platform for the course. It is organized and available to
students before the start of the semester. Synchronous peer feedback sessions are done using
Adobe Connect™.
Key Advice:
o Most effective assessment methods work well in any environment. Utilize your face-to-
face assessment strategies and make modifications to fit them into an online space.
o Keep video feedback simple. Jot down key points ahead of time, but still be brief and
authentic. Do not worry about the background or small noises, as long as it they are not
distracting.
Course Information: BTMA 431: Gathering, Wrangling, and Analyzing Data in R is a course for upper
level business students. The focus is on finding and analyzing online data to answer questions. This
course is also offered as DATA 613 (for the post-baccalaureate diploma in Data Science and
Analytics) and BTMA 736 (for the MBA program). Up to 35 students take the course in each iteration.
This course is delivered face-to-face but Dr. Dao uses online assessment methods.
Assessment Method: At the beginning of the semester, students must create a website and write a
short biography of themselves. Throughout the course, they do a series of individual and group
projects, where they use course skills such as searching for data, statistical analysis, and visualizing
results. For each, they must submit a short video, explaining their interest in the topic, their question
and their results for a non-expert audience, presentation slides that explain their process in detail,
and the code they used to analyze the data. Each component is posted on the ePortfolio. Students
have a lot of freedom over the topics for these projects. They tend to select topics that interest
them, so they want to do the research and produce high quality work.
Learning Technologies: Students can use any website platform to create their ePortfolio. Dr. Dao
recommends Google Sites, as it is easy to implement Google Analytics, which is necessary for the
course work. He has experience using Google Sites to develop his own portfolio, and notes that it is
user-friendly, and there are many online resources available to help create and polish websites. His
students have never found the process of making the website difficult.
Academic Integrity: Lots of R code is available online, which makes plagiarism easy for students. Dr.
Dao regularly searches to see what kind of R code is easily accessible online, but notes that the kinds
of questions students answer in their projects are specific and complex, so it would be nearly
impossible to find all of the code required online.
Key Advice:
o Provide a few key exemplars to show students what a high-quality ePortfolio looks like, as
the concept may be unfamiliar to students.
o ePortfolios do not have to include just completed course work. Students can add draft work,
reflections on assignments, peer or instructor feedback, or work from previous courses in
their final ePortfolio. All of these components can be valuable for students’ learning. Dr. Dao
leaves them as optional, because he believes that since ePortfolios are a tool students can
use beyond the course, they should include only what is important to them.
Students may not be used to reflective writing and may not know where to start when one of their
assessments require it of them. Reflection is an important part of developing metacognition, an
awareness of how one thinks and learns (Tanner. 2012). The following questions can be given to
students to spark reflective writing for ePortfolios, Discussion Boards, Journals, Blogs, or other
assessments in online courses.
o What kind of emotional response did you have to your recent learning experiences? Did
your feelings impact any actions you took?
o Why is your learning significant to you? What do you want to do with the information
from this lesson/topic/course?
o What expert views or perspectives exist on the topic of the reflection? How are they
similar or different to your perspectives? How can you use these perspectives to guide
further work?
o If you “step back” from this learning experience, does it look different? How?
o Describe a challenging moment in your learning process. How did you overcome this
challenge?
o What was the most powerful learning you experienced? Why?
o When solving a problem, how do you know when you have found the best solution?
o How did my learning goals change throughout the course activities?
o What are some of my strengths as a learner? How can I use them to help me?
Consider an assessment that you use in a face-to-face course. What elements could translate to an
online environment? Transitioning to an online space may be an opportunity to rework some aspects of
course assessments, but often, many elements do not require significant changes.
Associated Learning
Outcomes (eg-
Communicate research
findings and their relevance
in writing that is
appropriate for a non-
expert audience)
Grading/Weighting (eg-
30% of total course grade,
10% for proposal, 20% for
final project)
Required
resources/technology (eg-
D2L™ assignment
description, library
database, etc)
There are many important factors to consider when implementing an online assessment. Before doing
so, review the following questions and ensure that you can answer them all fully.
The RISE model is one of many ways to format both instructor and peer feedback. This model structures
feedback around four main components (Wray, 2011). The following table outlines the feedback levels
and the types of prompts associated using the RISE model.
Elevate: ideas for future “It would be interesting to explore … in a deeper way”
work or for raising the “In the future, you could use… to do …”
current work
Reflect
What do you like/dislike about this
students’ work? Why?
Inquire
What do you still want to know?
What is missing?
Suggest
What can be changed to help this
work better meet the assessment
criteria?
Elevate
How can this work be brought to a
higher level?
Research has highlighted some of the benefits, challenges, strategies and good practices of online
assessments. These should be utilized within a specific context when developing new assessments or
when transitioning assessments from face-to-face to online. This guide has outlined these practices, and
provided pragmatic suggestions for the design process in the hopes of encouraging thought and
reflection for instructors. However, it is just the start of the process. Assessment design is an iterative
process and should be continually evaluated for effectiveness.
Discussion board: An online forum within a learning management system that is available for students
to make comments, post assignments, and communicate with one another depending on the context of
the course. Most often, discussions are done asynchronously. Different threads can be created for
different purposes (Horstmanshof & Brownie, 2011).
Formative Assessment: Low-stakes (or no stakes) assessments that provide information to students and
teachers about the student’s current understanding of course materials and learning progress.
Formative assessment often has a feedback component (Dixon & Worrell, 2016).
Formative Feedback: Non-evaluative comments and suggestions for improvement made on students’
work before its final submission
Learning Management System (LMS): A central online platform used to provide learning materials to
students in an online course. Usually, institutions mandate that only the approved LMS (or multiple LMS
platforms) be used within them (Ellis, 2009).
Metacognition: One’s understanding of their learning and thinking processes (Tanner, 2012).
Online assessment: Any means of evaluating student achievement or providing feedback in fully online
credit courses. These assessments can be completely online (such as online exams) or just require online
submission (such as essays).
Peer feedback: The process in which students provide comments and suggestions about an assignment
or project to one another (Usher & Barak, 2018).
Scaffolding: The process of providing students with prompts and supports to help them achieve higher
learning. These supports are gradually lifted as students gain knowledge and skills (Sawyer, 2006).
Summative Assessment: Assessments that capture students’ learning up to a given point, and evaluate
it against a criteria or standard. These are higher-stakes than formative assessments and provide
students with a grade (or a Pass/Fail). (Dixon & Worrell, 2016).