The Economist (Intelligence Unit) - The Potential and The Reality (2013) by (Illyrian-King)
The Economist (Intelligence Unit) - The Potential and The Reality (2013) by (Illyrian-King)
The Economist (Intelligence Unit) - The Potential and The Reality (2013) by (Illyrian-King)
SPONSORED BY:
The potential and the reality: The opportunities and challenges around IT adoption in Asia
Contents
Preface2
Executive summary 3
Introduction5
Technology leapfrogging 16
Conclusion17
Preface
The potential and the reality: The opportunities We would like to thank the following interviewees
and challenges around IT adoption in Asia is for their time and insights (listed alphabetically
an Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) report, by organisation):
commissioned by SAP. The EIU conducted the
survey and interviews independently and wrote Ron Fons, global head, financial services
the report. The findings and views expressed here industries, Huawei
are those of the EIU alone.
Kathleen McQuire, infrastructure project
This report is one in a series of three—the others, manager, JP Morgan
The new planning conversation and Plan to
Achal Agarwal, president, Asia-Pacific, Kimberly-
change, change the plan, are based on the same
Clark
survey.
Arina Campbell-Pitt, senior IT executive, Li &
Ross O’Brien was the author of the report and
Fung
Sudhir Vadaketh was the editor. Tan Kane Juan
was responsible for design and layout.
Brandon Lee, chief strategy officer, NTT
Communications
March 2013
Executive
summary
Technology decision-makers in Asia are Among the key findings of this report are the
constantly reacting to both a dynamic technology following:
landscape and the ever-changing needs of
l C-suite executives at firms in Asia clearly
internal users and customers. Asia’s rapid
recognise the benefits of new information
economic growth, and the expectations on firms
technologies. The majority of survey
to grow quickly and profitably, make the job of
respondents believe that technologies such as
managing these pressures that much harder. In
cloud computing, data capture and analytics
addition, when making their technology adoption
(managing big data), enterprise mobility,
decisions, decision-makers must consider a
software as a service (SaaS), IT security and
wide variety of factors, including business
social media will have a positive impact on
value, alignment with corporate strategy, and
their business strategies in Asia. Almost three-
the likelihood of successful implementation.
quarters of respondents say the ability to adopt
In addition, decision-makers must ensure that
leading-edge IT solutions is critical to business
all senior executives are committed to the
performance. Moreover, close to half of all
information technology (IT) strategy.
respondents believe that most new technologies
Even when the impetus to launch new technology have made collaborative decision-making faster.
is clear, however, and the benefits to the firm l But technology adoption is held back by the
clearly articulated, the changing expectations of lack of established track records, misalignment
internal users and customers often complicate between the new technologies and current
technology selection and implementation. So, business processes, and the bewildering
how do senior executives of global firms in Asia diversity of technologies available. While
assess the value of technological change? Which the drivers for change appear obvious, and
factors promote new technology adoption and the links between technology adoption and
which ones retard it? When can firms realistically meeting business objectives are recognised, it
see results of such change in Asia’s fast-paced is striking that not even one of the six different
markets? This report, based on a survey of over technologies— cloud computing, data capture
350 C-level executives in Asia, attempts to answer and analytics (managing big data), enterprise
these questions. mobility, software as a service, IT security
and social media—has been implemented by a
majority of companies. They are primarily held
© The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2013
3
The potential and the reality: The opportunities and challenges around IT adoption in Asia
back by three factors: a lack of proven success and biotechnology sector; and the remainder
metrics; misalignment between current business in IT and technology; professional services;
processes and the outputs of new solutions; and chemicals; consumer goods; transportation,
the diversity of the technology landscape in the travel and tourism; retailing; automotive;
Asian markets in which they operate. logistics and distribution; telecoms; and some
other smaller sectors.
l Those who have cleared these obstacles to
adoption have done so out of necessity rather
than foresight. Respondents from the financial
services industry, for example, have responded
to the recent global crisis with investments
in IT security to protect against information
leaks; SaaS as a way to lower costs; and mobile
technologies to maintain customer loyalty
and generate more revenue. In the healthcare
sector, where cost reduction remains crucial,
respondents are looking to SaaS to reduce costs
and analytics to help them better leverage the
extensive amount of customer data available. All
this indicates that technology adoption in Asia is
still more reactive than proactive.
l Technology leaders incorporate technology
decisions early in the business planning
process. Survey respondents who consider their
firms to be “leaders” in technology adoption
see more alignment between technology and
business planning functions. They consider
two factors as important to their successful
deployments: early identification of technologies
by senior management, and the incorporation
of technology planning at the initial stages of
strategic initiatives.
About the survey:
The EIU surveyed 351 Asia-based C-level
executives. CEOs and CFOs together make up
45% of the respondents; the rest are CIOs, COOs,
CMOs, CHROs and other C-level executives. In
terms of size, 38% work at companies whose
global headcount exceeds 1,000 people. Some
28% of respondents work at firms whose global
annual revenues exceed US$1bn.
The respondents work in a broad mix of
industries—15% in manufacturing; 13% in
financial services; 9% in the energy and natural
resources sector; 9% in construction and real
estate; 9% in the healthcare, pharmaceuticals
Introduction
C-suite executives at firms in Asia clearly Asia. Almost three-quarters of respondents say
recognise the benefits of new information the ability to adopt leading-edge IT solutions is
technologies. The majority of survey respondents critical to business performance.
believe that solutions such as cloud computing,
data capture and analytics (managing big In short, receptiveness to the technology change
data), enterprise mobility, software as a service is high, as is acceptance that technology change
(SaaS), IT security and social media will have a brings with it positive change for the business as
positive impact on their business strategies in a whole (see chart A).
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Moreover, close to half of all respondents see that the underpinnings of a decision-making process
most new technologies have made collaborative that is by nature responsive to the benefits of the
decision-making faster, thereby creating a scale and speed brought about by the enabling
virtuous cycle: enabling technologies provide technologies.
Firms in Asia believe that customers and supplier. Ms Campbell-Pitt observes that end-
employees have the most influence on their user demands within the firm tend to be driven
technology adoption decisions (see chart by “I-need-an-app” reactions to the latest new
B). “These stakeholders put pressure on IT technology. Firms need to pursue these in order
environments,” according to Arina Campbell- to stay current.
Pitt, a senior IT executive with Li & Fung, a global
Chart B: What sources of information have the greatest influence on your technology adoption decisions?
(% respondents)
Great Influence 1 2 3 4 No influence 5
Customers 21 42 27 8 3
Employees 12 41 37 7 3
Business partners 12 40 32 9 7
Government/regulators 13 30 33 12 11
Suppliers 9 31 41 14 6
Analysts 5 26 36 20 13
External consultants 5 23 39 26 7
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Therefore, given that there is consensus in the the case for higher technology investment seems
C-suite about the perceived business value of clear. However, it is striking that not even one of
these technologies—and adoption pressure from the six different technologies— cloud computing,
stakeholders such as customers and employees— data capture and analytics (managing big
Chart C: At what stage are you in implementing a strategy to address your business challenges?
(% respondents)
IT security 39 40 11 7 3
Enterprise mobility 33 27 19 10 11
Cloud computing 9 37 15 14 25
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Fully adopted; in management and refinement stage Considering need for adoption
In process of adopting No action taken
Evaluating implementation options
There appear to be three broad adoption managed rather than made the most of. “One of
challenges for IT executives, all linked to the main directives from my CTO is to manage the
technology maturity. The first is that critical noise from our end users,” she says.
applications for many new trends have yet to
emerge. For instance, firms have for some time The second adoption challenge is that while many
been exploring multiple avenues to manage the technologies, such as big data, are known to
flow of data through mobile devices across the have a critical impact on business performance,
enterprise. “But there is still no silver bullet,” the non-technical processes have yet to catch up
says Ms Campbell-Pitt. to the technical capabilities. “Powerful tools to
manage big data exist, but if industry standards
Similarly, with regards to the latest “apps” for generating standard data do not exist, or
that employees demand, she points out that if day-to-day business decision processes do
these new apps— as they are currently used— not incorporate the regular use of the data’s
rarely help win new business; that remains the implications, it is not very easy to implement,”
purview of established technologies, such as EDI says Ms Campbell-Pitt.
(electronic data interchange), which manages
supply chain information. The resulting mindset These conditions spell an opportunity for
is that these technology options are to be technology providers that can articulate,
demonstrate and measure the competitive edge second and more crucial obstacle: the formation
of new technologies to such relatively receptive of isolated management silos within technology
firms. The “killer app” that technology providers departments, hindering the firm’s ability to
can offer may lie less in the technology itself achieve more effective technological change.
than in the integration of new technologies with
companies’ internal structures and processes. For all these reasons, senior management input
is critical to any IT adoption decision. “Executives
Finally, the third obstacle to seamless IT adoption want to understand the business value, and
is the sheer diversity across Asia’s technology understand the implications of technology
landscape. This has two aspects. The first is choices on that value,” says Brandon Lee, chief
the variance in available technologies across strategy officer for NTT Communications, a
countries with differing development levels. This telecommunications firm.
complicates widespread adoption across a firm’s
various locations. This in turn gives rise to a
The disconnect between respondents’ When can decision-makers see results from
appreciation of technology and their actual technological change in Asia’s fast-paced
adoption reveals a profound and interconnected markets? The realistic answer is “always”—if
implication for the future of technology decision- decision-makers can be both quick to see the
making in Asia. In their low adoption rates, potential impact of new technologies, and careful
firms are exhibiting not a failure to execute, but and deliberate in their adoption.
a level of caution that can in fact be seen as a
competitive advantage in and of itself. Survey respondents who consider their firms to
be “leaders” in technology adoption perhaps
Certainly, part of the deliberation in strike the right balance here by incorporating
technology adoption is a function of the “noise technology decisions early in the business
management” described earlier, which itself is planning process. They consider two factors
informed by previous decades of occasionally as important to their successful deployments:
profligate and over-enthusiastic IT spending. But early identification of technologies by senior
in the new decision-making culture surrounding management, and the incorporation of
technology adoption, our survey respondents technology planning at the initial stages of
are showing that this caution is not informed by strategic initiatives.
pessimism so much as optimism: a desire to not
just adopt a new technology to be current but—as
almost two-thirds of our respondents indicated—
to find business-relevant IT solutions to adopt for
competitive advantage.
Given that most firms in Asia have been busy Given the pressures on banks to respond
simply keeping abreast of rapid economic growth, to challenging times, there is little time to
it appears as if many of those who have cleared implement the business process redesigns that
the obstacles to IT adoption have done so out must accompany the adoption of new enabling
of necessity rather than foresight. Consider the technology. “A bank that creates new products
financial services sector in the wake of the global doesn’t necessarily always relate them to
financial crisis. The post-crisis fallout, including applications,” observes Ron Fons, global head
tighter budgets, weaker consumer demand and of financial services industries at Huawei, an
more onerous regulations, is largely behind the information and communications technology
string of rapid technology adaptations in the firm. He does, however, expect two different
sector. pressures—the need to increase operational
efficiency and the need to address the desires
In general, financial service industry respondents of internal and external end users—to drive
did not report very different technology adoption tremendous change in the retail banking
rates compared to the survey average (see chart industry.
D). But in two areas the sector is a clear leader.
The first is SaaS—utility application models that The banks’ experience typifies this sometimes
allow users to pay for IT functionality as and clumsy, reactive discovery process, where firms
when they use it. This can relieve pressure on IT appreciate technology’s potential but do not
budgets. know how to maximise it. In cloud computing,
for example, the limiting factor for firms may
The second is IT security. Over half of finance not be costs per se, but the scalability of the
respondents indicated that they have fully technology—the cloud stores massive historical
adopted IT security technologies—as opposed to databases that require the right tools and
less than 40% of all respondents—and another processes to monetise.
quarter are in the process of adopting. This is
undoubtedly part of a long-term effort given
the clear and understandable sensitivities in the
industry. In the years ahead, increased mobile
access to banking services and networks will
further boost adoption.
(% of sector respondents)
50
57
Data capture and analytics 43
65
64
41
53
IT security 52
34
30
24
47
Software as a service 42
50
30
28
30
Enterprise mobility 35
50
42
11
30
Social media technologies 24
22
24
9
3
Cloud computing 9
6
6
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Firms in Asia do face common internal and social media technology, with roughly a quarter
external pressures. The need to expand into new of respondents having adopted it, and over half
markets quickly is a common business imperative in the process of doing so.
across all industries, and while respondents in
the financial services sector may be relatively The adoption of other technologies is more
more concerned with improving profitability, directly matched to tactical aims: cloud
improving business performance and efficiency is computing infrastructure as a response to
a universal concern. So too are the technologies lowering operational costs, or enterprise
employed to address them. For instance, mobility as a tool to enable swift entry into new
respondents from all industries generally agree markets.
that data capture and analytics is the most useful
In some ways, social media represents the front
technology response to business challenges and
line of early adoption for enterprise technology.
strategic initiatives. (see chart E).
Whereas end users appreciate its immediacy,
However, the survey findings show that industry firms find it challenging to articulate exactly
dynamics do also influence technology adoption. how social media can help achieve business
Like in the finance sector, respondents in objectives. “Every worker in every industry finds
healthcare show a higher-than-average adoption social media useful in their lives, but enterprises
of SaaS and IT security. In addition, reflecting the are still struggling to make it business relevant,”
R&D- and customer data-intensive nature of their says Ms Campbell-Pitt at Li & Fung.
industry, healthcare respondents are much more
This link is more easily made for those firms in
on board with data capture and analytics—some
consumer businesses in Asia: “Social media is
57% percent of healthcare industry respondents
one of the most powerful ways to discover what is
indicated that they have fully adopted a big data
relevant to our customers,” says Achal Agarwal,
programme, as compared to 47% of the general
president of Asia-Pacific at Kimberly-Clark, a
survey population.
personal care company. In reference to Huggies,
Meanwhile, respondents in the construction and one of his firm’s popular diaper brands, Mr
real estate sector exhibit higher adoption rates Agarwal cites Kimberly-Clark’s ability to manage
for all technologies, particularly those related to customer relationships through a social media
big data. They are also more enthusiastic about community—known as the “Huggies Club”—as
crucial in expanding its sales presence across Chart E: How companies are using Big Data technologies
the region. For instance, the company has seen
its e-commerce business in Korea grow from (% of sector respondents)
last four years. “In Australia, almost every new Increasing local content in 13
product/design/R&D processes 40
mum in the country is on Facebook—and in the 26
business decision-making structures, and their Construction and real estate Healthcare, pharmaceuticals and biotechnology
6 Technology leapfrogging
Conclusion
Our research reveals that while senior executives cloud computing and data analytics, that have
are convinced that leadership in technology been around in some form for some time. Second,
adoption translates into leadership in their while many technologies, such as big data, are
markets, they have yet to show particularly known to have a critical impact on business
strong levels of take-up for the newer technology performance, the non-technical processes have
solutions that are on the IT frontier. Moreover, yet to catch up with the technical capabilities.
respondents across all sectors clearly appreciate Third, the diversity of the technology landscape
the impact that these newer technology tools and in the Asian markets may result at best in
processes could have on their business planning complex integration projects across economies
processes, in that they see technology’s potential with differing technology levels; and at worst
to address key operational and environmental in stridently independent IT silos, without solid
challenges. However, only a minority of firms are governance from the firm’s strategic decision-
actually reaping these benefits now. making centre.
There are several reasons for this. The first is The answer to this adoption conundrum,
that critical applications for many new trends according to our survey respondents, is to ensure
have yet to emerge. Partly as a result, senior that a technology strategy is not only understood
executives of global firms in Asia are still not able and committed to by the firm’s most senior
to measure the success of technological change leaders, but also integrated at the very beginning
for “unproven” concepts, even those, such as of the business planning process.
Appendix:
Survey results
Note: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding or the ability of respondents to
choose multiple responses
18
India
16
Australia
11
China
11
Singapore
8
Hong Kong
7
Japan
7
Malaysia
7
South Korea
5
Philippines
4
Indonesia
3
Thailand
Vietnam 3
Taiwan 2
Manufacturing 15
Financial services 13
IT and technology 8
Professional services 8
Chemicals 6
Consumer goods 5
Retailing 3
Automotive 2
Education 1
Government/Public sector 1
Telecoms 1
1-10 6
11-50 9
51-100 8
101-200 12
201-500 12
501-1,000 14
1,001-10,000 27
Over 10,000 11
$500m or less 47
$500m to $1bn 25
$1bn to $5bn 18
$5bn to $10bn 3
$10bn or more 7
CFO/Treasurer/Comptroller, or equivalent 19
Staff shortages 53 47
Legal/regulatory uncertainty 38 62
Infrastructure deficits 30 70
Labour unrest 17 83
Improving profitability 82 18
3a. For each of the concerns you’ve identified, please indicate if any of the following technologies
are being adopted to address the challenge. Please tick all that apply.
(% respondents)
44
26
Improving profitability 28
22
17
22
42
19
Revising/creating new 22
customer segments 18
28
15
37
21
Creating new 23
products/services 18
26
17
36
23
Entering new markets 20
15
27
16
Data capture and analytics
34 Enterprise mobility
26
Reducing 27
Software as a service
operational costs 16 Enhancing IT security
15
Social media technologies
22
Cloud computing
29
Increasing local 17
content in product 20
19
/design/R&D processes 17
15
26
17
Building new 18
production facilities 18
11
11
25
11
Insufficient market/ 9
customer data 7
15
6
23
18
Staff shortages 15
12
15
10
22
18
16
Rising labour costs
15
10
10
20
17
17
Reducing capital expenditure
11
10
15
17
13
12
Working capital/getting paid
10
6
11
14
6
8
Legal/regulatory uncertainty 11 Data capture and analytics
8
Enterprise mobility
5
Software as a service
13 Enhancing IT security
8 Social media technologies
10
Infrastructure deficits 9
Cloud computing
5
6
11
10
7
Property prices/ rents 7
5
9
11
7
7
Intellectual property theft
24
8
8
8
6
5
Labour unrest
6
5
4
0
impact. (% respondents) 25
37
IT security 24
10
4
16
36
Enterprise mobility 27
14
7
15
38
Software as a service 28
13
6
11
31
Social media technologies 35
15
9
12
21
Cloud computing 32
16
19
5. At what stage are you in implementing a strategy to address your business challenges?
(% respondents)
IT security 39 40 11 7 3
Enterprise mobility 33 27 19 10 11
Cloud computing 9 37 15 14 25
Fully adopted; in management and refinement stage Considering need for adoption
In process of adopting No action taken
Evaluating implementation options
6. How has implementing these technologies changed the perception of IT within the
organisation? Rate on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 = Strong positive impact and 5 = Strong negative
impact. (% respondents)
20
39
29
IT security 4
0
8
21
39
24
Data capture and analytics 1
1
14
14
34
28
Software as a service 4
1
19
13
30
31
Enterprise mobility 4
1
22
10
36
27
Social media technologies 7
1
21
13
26
21
Cloud computing 2
1
38
7. When your company evaluates technology adoption, are strategic objectives or financial/
budgetary considerations more important? (% respondents)
8. Which statement best describes your company’s position relative to your industry peers in
terms of technology adoption?(% respondents)
We are lagging
16
our industry peers
Don’t know 1
1
9. Which statement best describes the role of your CIO in decisions regarding business strategy?
(% respondents)
CIO is actively involved in the planning
stages of all firm-wide strategic initiatives,
and makes technology decisions based
33
primarily on the firm’s strategic direction
CIO makes technology decisions based
primarily on the firm’s operational 33
requirements, and/or budgetary parameters
10. Which statement best describes the role of your CIO in your IT decisions?
(% respondents)
11. Which statement best describes the role of your CEO in decisions regarding the adoption of
technology? (% respondents)
12. Within your company, what degree of influence do the following functional roles have on
technology adoption decisions? (% respondents)
CEO 61 27 11 1
CIO/CTO 26 65 81
CFO 19 56 20 5
2 2
IT specialist 40 49 9
Relevant
3 36 49 12
business head
13. What sources of information have the greatest influence on your technology adoption
decisions? Rate on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 = Great influence and 5 = No influence.
(% respondents)
51
Customers 21 42 27 8 3
Employees 12 41 37 7 3
45
Business partners 12 40 32 9 7
42 Government/regulators 13 30 33 12 11
8
Suppliers 9 31 41 14 6
Analysts 5 26 36 20 13
External consultants 5 23 39 26 7
14. What methods do you use to capture stakeholder feedback? Select all that apply.
(% respondents)
Regularly scheduled discussions 57
Social media 34
15. Which of the following technology adoption issues are of most concern to your external
stakeholders? Select up to three. (% respondents)
Data capture and analytics
56
(managing big data)
IT security 47
Enterprise mobility 46
Software as a service
36
(or other IT utility usage models)
Cloud computing 27
33
50
56 Data capture and analytics
52
15
32
44
IT security
50
13
27
44
Software as a service
42
22
26
44
60 Enterprise mobility
43
24
24
42
Social media technologies
42
27
21
28
Cloud computing
31
44
0
17. Which of the following statements best describes the relationship between technology trends
and ongoing strategic planning? (% respondents)
Technology decisions are
formulated as a result of our 43
overall business strategy process
Technology adoption decisions
are evaluated concurrently with 35
larger business strategy decisions
Technology decisions are
largely financially driven 15
and unconnected to core
business strategy
Our technology decisions
7
are reactive to external pressures
18. At what stage of the following types of specific business strategy initiatives is the technology
planning team brought in? (% respondents)
Initial project commissioning
Project specification and design
After project kick-off
Process redesign or
46 38 16
efficiency drive
Addressing/refining 41 39 20
customer experience
New product design 38 35 27
Revising key enterprise
32 40 27
performance metrics
19. To what extent do you agree with the following statements? Rate on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 =
Strongly agree and 5 = Strongly disagree. (% respondents)
Strongly Agree 1 2 3 4 Strongly disagree 5
NEW YORK
750 Third Avenue
5th Floor
New York, NY 10017, US
Tel: (1.212) 554 0600
Fax: (1.212) 586 0248
E-mail: [email protected]
HONG KONG
6001, Central Plaza
18 Harbour Road
Wanchai
Hong Kong
Tel: (852) 2585 3888
Fax: (852) 2802 7638
E-mail: [email protected]
GENEVA
Rue de l’Athénée 32
1206 Geneva
Switzerland
Tel: (41) 22 566 2470
Fax: (41) 22 346 9347
E-mail: [email protected]