Flow of Reporting
Flow of Reporting
Flow of Reporting
Arjay: Good day! Everyone! Before we start with our report about theories of
Michael: In the name of the father and of the son and of the holy shit….
This is Michael pepito speaking, before I begin, I would like to ask someone about
In Utilitarianism, Utilitarian justice means that the action that leads to the greatest
good. A just government should set rules that maintain the greatest good.
According to Jeremy Bentham, the greatest good: reduce pain and maximize
pleasure.
To John Stuart mill, there is one thing, and one thing only, that is desirable in its
self; pleasure.
welfare, well-being and utility is focused. With the guiding principle of as the
greatest good for the greatest number. In other words, whatever distribution that
maximizes aggregate welfare. With Jeremy bentham and john stuart mill as the key
authors. The best example that resonates with utilitarian justice is sarok festival,
since sa sarok festival nakagastu man gyud tag daku even nga naa pay mas
importanti nga gastusan, ma apply ang utilitarian justice ani kay some would argue
nga kalas-kalas man lang ug kwarta while some argues nga justice rapd or just
rapud siya since makapahalipay man siya sa mga tao. Thus, sarok festival relates
end of my report.
This is Valerie Otara speaking, aside from Utilitarian justice, we have the social
contract justice.
A just society is based on laws that most rational people would choose to adopt.
According to John Rawls, people ought to abide by two rules when making laws:
First, people should not consider their own selfish interests but rather common
goods.
Second, people are placed behind a ‘veil of ignorance’ that deprives them of any
All will choose to live under impartial laws that work to no – one’s advantage in
particular.
Moreover, according to David Gauthier if the individual will gain more by
cooperating with others, then that individual would choose the outcome that leaves
Laws and institutions that come about from this general consensus are just.
philosophers to revive the old idea of the social contract as a better way of bringing
coherence to our thinking about justice. The idea here is not that people actually
have entered a contract to establish justice, or that they should proceed to do so,
but that we can understand justice better by asking the question: what principles to
govern their institutions, practices and personal behavior would people choose to
adopt if they all had to agree on them in advance? The contract, in other words, is
hypothetical; but the search for agreement is meant to ensure that the principles
chosen would, when implemented, not lead to outcomes that people could not
to support slavery – if the misery of the slaves were outweighed by the heightened
principle permitting slavery, lest they themselves were destined to be slaves when
ideally unconditional and unspoken man jud ang rules sa relationship however sa
uban mas maayu nga ma storyaan ug naay klaro nga rules or in other word social
contract. Firstly, Majority of relationship find it “just” if their partner remains faithful
their partner continues to show love and respect to them and the people they love.
Lastly, majority of relationship wants honesty and openness. That will be the end of
my report.
This is arjay pepito live, In Egalitarian justice, justice is treating everyone equally.
equally.
But, what is equality? It could be the case that the same rule applied to people
EQUALITY OF OPPURTUNITY
In egalitarian justice Equality is defined as political and economic status should rest
on individual merit.
account of uncontrollable factors – e.g. ‘brute; bad luck, physical ability, social
class, etc…
Inequalities that arise through the exercise of personal responsibility are justified.
civil liberties.
An example of egalitarian justice is the free education from the government. It used
to be that education are only limited to those who can afford it. Now with the free
education program from the government, it allowed equal opportunity for everyone
between justice and equality: they ask the question ‘what kind of equality does
justice require?’, and to that several competing answers have been given. But we
should not be too hasty to assume that what justice demands is always equality,
justice requires the impartial and consistent application of rules, from which it
follows that when two people are alike in all relevant respects, they must be treated
equally. But, as Aristotle among others saw, justice also involves the idea of
twice as deserving or twice as needy as B, justice may require that she receives
more than B does. So here formal equality of treatment – the same rule applied to
both – leads to an unequal outcome. Again, when justice takes the conservative
form of respect for existing entitlements or legitimate expectations (see para 2.1)