God’s word vs.

the Perverted word

There are people that pervert and corrupt the word of God (Jeremiah 23:36, 2
Corinthians 2:17)
The word of God is not bound (KJV has no copyright, all others do) – 2 Timothy
2:9
Where the word of a king is, there is power – Ecclesiastes 8:4
Use by the Christians during the Philadelphian church age that saw the greatest
missionary effort in the history of the world – Revelation 4:8, Acts 14:27, 1
Corinthians 16:9, 2 Corinthians 2:12
The type of Christians it produces
It exalts God’s word, assures it’s preservation, and declares it to be truth (2 Timothy
3:16, Psalm 12:6-7)
Never attacks the deity of Christ
Never attacks the virgin birth
It never gives the title of Jesus Christ to the devil
It is the only Bible that tells you to study and rightly divide the Scriptures (2
Timothy 2:15)
It contains the name of God Jehovah (Exodus 6:3, Psalm 83:18, Isaiah 12:2, Isaiah
26:4)
It comes from Antioch of Syria not Alexandria, Egypt
•  The Byzantine text-type (also called Majority, Traditional, Ecclesiastical,
Constantinopolitan, or Syrian) is one of several text-types used in textual criticism
to describe and group the textual character of Greek New Testament Manuscripts.
It is the form found in the largest number of surviving manuscripts.
•  The distinct Byzantine readings tend to show a greater tendency to smooth and
well-formed Greek, they display fewer instances of textual variation between
parallel Synoptic Gospels passages, and are less likely to present contrary or
"difficult" issues of exegesis. For example, Mark 1:2 reads "As it is written in the
prophets.." in the Byzantine text; whereas the same verse reads, "As it is written in
Isaiah the prophet..”
•  The Traditional Received Text (Textus Receptus), also called the Byzantine
Text or the Majority Text because it is based on the vast majority of manuscripts
still in existence. These extant manuscripts (MSS) were brought together by various
editors such as Lucian (AD 250-312), Erasmus, Stephanus, Beza and the Elzevir
brothers to form the text known as Textus Receptus, the name given to the
Majority Text in the 17th century. The most notable editor of all was Desiderius
Erasmus (1466-1536) one of the greatest scholars the world has ever known. When
the early Protestant Reformers of the 16th and 17th centuries decided to translate
the Scriptures directly from Greek into the languages of Europe, they selected
Textus Receptus as their foundation Greek document.
Why did the early churches of the 2nd and 3rd centuries and all the Protestant
Reformers of the 15th, 16th and 17th centuries choose Textus Receptus in preference
to the Minority Text?

•  Textus Receptus is based on the vast majority (90%) of the 5000+ Greek
manuscripts in existence. That is why it is also called the Majority Text.
•  Textus Receptus is not mutilated with deletions, additions and amendments, as is
the Minority Text.
•  Textus Receptus agrees with the earliest versions of the Bible: Peshitta (AD150)
Old Latin Vulgate (AD157), the Italic Bible (AD157) etc. These Bibles were
produced some 200 years before the minority Egyptian codices favoured by the
Roman Church.
•  Textus Receptus agrees with the vast majority of the 86,000+ citations from
scripture by the early church fathers (which includes 1 John 5:7).
•  Textus Receptus is untainted with Egyptian philosophy and unbelief.
•  Textus Receptus strongly upholds the fundamental doctrines of the Christian
faith: the creation account in Genesis, the divinity of Jesus Christ, the virgin birth,
his miracles, his bodily resurrection and literal return AND Go’s promise to
preserve his word which is erased from all new “bible versions.”
•  Textus Receptus was - and still is - the enemy of the Roman Church. This is an
important fact to bear in mind.

Over 90% of Greek Manuscripts that exist today form the

“Majority” Text and they agree with one another. These are the
Greek Texts that underlie the Holy King James Bible!
•  The Peshitta Version (AD 150) - The Peshitta was the first Syrian translation
from the original languages. Even to this day there are around 350 copies of the
Peshitta (or Peshitto) version in existence and they match the “Majority” Greek
Text (Textus Receptus) that underlie the King James Bible.
•  The Old Latin Vulgate (AD157) - The word 'vulgate' is Latin for vulgar or
common. The Old Latin Vulgate is a version. It was used by early believers in
Europe when Latin was in popular use. It was sometimes referred to as the Itala
version. The Old Latin Vulgate must not be confused with Jerome's Vulgate, which
was produced over 220 years later in AD 380. Jerome's Vulgate (also written in
Latin for the Roman Church) was rejected by the early Christians for almost a
millennium. The Waldenses, Gauls, Celts, Albegenses and other groups
throughout Europe used the Old Latin Vulgate and rejected Jerome's Vulgate.
The Gallic Bible (Southern France) (AD177) , The Gothic Bible (AD 330-350),
The Old Syriac Bible (AD 400), The Armenian Bible (AD 400) There are 1244
copies of this version still in existence, The Palestinian Syriac (AD 450), The
French Bible of Oliveton (AD 1535), The Czech Bible (AD 1602), The Italian
Bible of Diodati (AD 1606), The Greek Orthodox Bible: Used from Apostolic
times to the present day by the Greek Orthodox Church.

All the above mentioned Bibles and the vast majority (about 90%) of
the 5200 extant New Testament MSS are in agreement with the
text now known as Textus Receptus; the Text which underlies the
Authorized King James Bible!
•  Alexandrian Text-Type called the Minority Text
•  They are referred to as the 'Minority Texts' simply because they represent only
about 5% of existing manuscripts. Another 5% are Neutral Texts: sometimes
agreeing with the majority and at others with the minority. The 'Minority Texts'
are also known as the Alexandrian Texts because they were produced in
Alexandria in Egypt. The Minority Texts were rejected by the early Christians
and also by all the Protestant Reformers of the 16th and 17th centuries. The
Reformers, who were well aware of the existence of the Minority Texts, considered
them unfit for translation purposes.
•  Modern critical editions of the New Testament tend to conform most often to
Alexandrian witnesses - especially Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus.
•  The earliest of the Church Fathers to witness to a Byzantine text-type in their
New Testament quotations is John Chrysostom (c. 349 — 407). The earliest
translation to witness to a Greek base conforming to the Byzantine text is the
Syriac Peshitta
Why did the early Christians and the Protestant Reformers reject the Minority
Texts?

•  The Minority Texts were the work of unbelieving Egyptian scribes who did not
accept the Bible as the Word of God or JESUS as the SON of GOD! (Origen)
•  The Minority Texts abound with alterations, often a single manuscript being
amended by several different scribes over a period of many years; something the
Aaronic priests and Masorites would never have tolerated when making copies of
the Scriptures.
•  The Minority Texts omit approximately 200 verses from the Scriptures. This is
equivalent to 1st and 2nd Peter. Pause and consider that stunning fact!
•  The Minority Texts contradict themselves in hundreds of places.
•  The Minority Texts are doctrinally weak and often dangerously incorrect.
Yet, startling as it may sound, virtually every modern English Bible relies on the
Minority Text as its underlying New Testament text in preference to Textus
Receptus! Isn't that an amazing revelation? What brought about this almost
incredible switch from the reliable Textus Receptus, beloved by the early Christian
church and the Protestant Reformers, to the corrupt minority text favoured by the
Roman Catholic Church?

Bible students are often told that Codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus are older and
better than other manuscripts: the implication being that they must, therefore, be
more accurate.

Let us look at these two manuscripts.

Codex Vaticanus - contains the apocrypha in the OT, listed in the Vatican Library
in the 1400’s. A text that originated from Alexandria, Egypt. Westcott and Hort’s
Greek New Testament came from this source.
Codex Sinaiticus – contains the apocrypha in the OT, found in a garbage can in St.
Catherine’s Monastery in 1844. A text that originated from Alexandria, Egypt.
Wescott and Hort’s Greek New Testament comes from this source.

These two Bible manuscripts disagree with each other in more than 2,000 (Yes,
Two Thousand) places. Further, these two manuscripts have more Bible verses
which disagree with each other, than that agree with each other. (These
manuscripts however, are held in high regard by the Roman Catholic Church)
Both of these [Vaticanus & Sinaiticus ] comprise the oldest copies of what Westcott
& Hort called their "Septuagint".

Next we will talk about “The Myth of the Septuagint”

Here is what they say: The Septuagint (LXX) is the major Greek translation of the
Old Testament. It was produced between the third and first centuries B.C. and is
extensively quoted in the New Testament. The great majority of times that the New
Testament quotes from the Old, it's the LXX version that is being used.

Originally, the term "Septuagint" just referred to the main Greek translation of the
five books of Moses (Genesis-Deuteronomy), which were allegedly put into Greek
by 70 scholars in Alexandria, Egypt. This is where the name "Septuagint" came
from and why the Roman numeral for 70 (LXX) is used as an abbreviation for the
translation. Over time (before the first century), it came to include all of the books
of the Old Testament, including the deuterocanonicals – the apocrypha!

It's true that the LXX has an important role in Catholic translations of the Old
Testament, but they generally are not straightforward translations from the LXX.
The Septuagint includes some books not found in the Hebrew Bible. Many
Protestant Bibles follow the Jewish canon (Romans 3) and exclude the additional
books. Roman Catholics, however, include some of these books in their canon
while Eastern Orthodox Churches use all the books of the Septuagint. The King
James Bible in its Authorized Version includes these additional books in a separate
section labeled Apocrypha.
The history of the translation of the Septuagint is shrouded in myth and legend.
According to Aristeas, a 2nd-century BC Hellenistic Jew, Ptolemy Philadelphus set
up his court in Alexandria and set about expanding the library there to include as
many works as possible. The president of the library, Demetrius, told the king
about the Books of the Law of the Jews, and urged the king to have these translated
into Greek and added to the library. According to this account, Philadelphus sent
for seventy-two Hebrew scholars, six from each tribe of Israel, to undertake the
work. He secluded these men on the island of Phares, where each worked
separately on his own translation, without consultation with one another.
According to the legend, when they came together to compare their work, the
seventy-two copies proved to be identical.
The Truth concerning “The Septuagint”
•  No one has ever seen this so called “Septuagint” just like no one today has ever
seen an “original autograph” just like no one has ever seen the mysterious “Q”
document that scholars decide to make up (literally) to account for their ignorance
when it comes to the differences in the 4 Gospels. This is the Alexandrian line of
thought among all “Bible Scholars” in all Colleges and Universities, whether they
be secular or religious. They do not believe the Bible is the word of God and they
sure don’t believe God preserved his word today. Their beliefs are contrary to God,
Jesus, Paul, Peter, the Apostles, Daniel, and the Prophets.
•  All of the texts used to cite the existence of the “Septuagint” were all written 200
years after the completion of the New Testament (Alexandrinus, Sinaiticus,
Ephraemi, and Vaticanus and they omit great portions of the Bible).
•  There is no evidence of any kind that there was ever on this earth one single copy
of and Old Testament translation in Greek before the heading up of the school at
Alexandria by Origen, 100 years after the entire New Testament was complete.
(The “Errors” in the King James Bible, p. 418)
•  There isn’t one script or fragment of any portion of the Old Testament written in
Greek in the 3rd century BC that anyone has ever seen.

Yet “scholars” will tell you the NT writers quoted from the Septuagint. But how do
they arrive at this conclusion?

By comparing the Old Testament readings of Vaticanus, Sinaiticus, Alexandrinus

(all written more that 240 years after the completion of the New Testament) with
the New Testament readings, you assume that the New Testament writers and
speakers are quoting manuscripts written 240 years after they were dead (The
“Errors” in the King James Bible, p. 421).
The Septuagint is based on a myth and a legend. No one knows if it ever existed.
What likely happened was that Origen in his Hexpla added to the word of God.

He saw how the NT writers, when they cited OT texts in their writings, did not
“quote” exactly what it said in Hebrew. So in order to make them match, he
changed the OT readings to match the NT quotations.
For example in Hebrews 1:6, “And again when he bringeth in the firstbegotten into
the world, he saith, “And let all the angels of God worship him.” However there is
no such verse in the entire 39 Books of the OT. However in the “Septuagint” (in
other words, the minority texts of Vaticanus, Sinaiticus, etc) it adds this to
Deuteronomy 32:43, “Rejoice, ye heavens, with him, and let all the angels of God
worship him, rejoice ye Gentiles, with his people, and let all the sons of God
strengthen themselves in him; for he will avenge the blood of his sons, and he will
render vengeance, and recompense justice to his enemies, and will reward them
that hate him; and the Lord shall purge the land of his people.”

The KJB which comes from the Hebrew says differently, “Rejoice, O ye nations,
with his people: for he will avenge the blood of his servants, and will render
vengeance to his adversaries, and will be merciful unto his land, and to his people.”
The author of Hebrews is actually referencing Psalm 97:7 since angels are called
gods in the Bible (Genesis 3, Job 1-2, Deuteronomy 32:17)
The question is why did he add to the word of God?

Just like any “scholar” or Christian or whoever that doesn’t understand the
Scriptures, adds to it, takes away from it, or spiritualizes it so that he can make it
say or not say what he wants it to say or not say for whatever reason!

This is the case with all people that do not like, and refuse to accept what the
Scriptures LITERALLY SAY! The reason why people are against the Bible is
because the Bible is against them! Amen? This was Origen’s problem, and this is
the problem of the Roman Catholic Church, Pentecostals, Protestants, etc, etc, and
all others that refuse to believe and accept the Bible as the holy, perfect, word of
God and REFUSE to submit to its authority.
Origen
•  He set up his own school in Alexandria, Egypt. He was a universalist. He
believed that all will be saved in the end, even Satan himself! Sounds like the
apostates today!
•  He believed the Son was lower and not equal to the Father.
•  He rejected the literal approach to the Bible. How come? Because he was unable
to reconcile the “contradictions” and “differences” in the Bible so he concluded
that the literal, historical interpretation of the Scriptures is invalid. He believed the
truth lied in the “deeper meaning” of the text (i.e. he spiritualized the Bible).
However we know the Prophets, Apostles, and Jesus Christ took the literal, “as it is
written” approach to the Scriptures.
Again why do people add to, take away from, alter, or spiritualize the word of
God?

The main reason is always this: They do not like what it says. That is in it’s literal
“as it is written” sense. Notice they never alter or change the verses on God’s love
or heaven but they always alter sin, and the wages of sin as eternal death in a lake
of fire. They don’t translate the Greek word for hell “hades” but they do translate
the Greek word for heaven “ouranos” in the new modern “bibles.” Why is that?
Because they don’t like what it teaches. It will always boil down to that.

How man rebels do you know that don’t believe in hell? Why is that? Certainly it is
taught in the word of God?

And all of this stuff simply reveals their heart condition! They are rebels against the
word of God and reject it! Sounds like the devil! It all goes back to Genesis 3.
Majority Text: Minority Text:
•  Over 90% of all Greek Texts match •  Only 5% of all Greek Texts match the
the King James Bible modern “bible” versions
•  All of the non-catholic translations of •  The Vaticanus was found in the
the Bible (Syriac Peshitta, Old Latin Vatican and Sinaiticus was found in a
Vulgate, etc) match the Majority Texts garbage can not being used by any
and the King James Bible Christian!
•  Derives its authority from the amount •  Derives its authority from a
of copies that actually exist today, its mythological “Septuagint” that no one
usage by Christians from the 1st century has ever seen, and for which there is no
up until 2008, and the fruit it bears evidence of prior to 200 AD, based on
•  Traces back to Antioch of Syria where the translation of the heretic
they were first called Christians (we will universalist, Origen
get into this heavily in the second part) •  Traces back to Alexandria, Egypt
(from where God called his people out)