LP1 - Unit1 - GE10-Methods of Research
LP1 - Unit1 - GE10-Methods of Research
LP1 - Unit1 - GE10-Methods of Research
1.1 Introduction
Hello! First of all , my congratulations for reaching this far in your academic studies.
But , your academic peat would not be complete if you will not hurdle research. By passing a
proposal, defending it, and finally coming up with a publishable research article is the true mark
of your acumen. But don’t worry because this module will guide you in your research endeavor.
Sit back and relax, straighten your chair, prepare your pen and notebook for we are about to
engage in an activity only few dare to engage. Be open minded, inquisitive, and most of all, be
a problem-solver and critical thinker .
Review Questions:
Before we continue with the discussion, answer the following the questions. Write
your answer in a separate sheet of paper.
1. Why is it important that you understand the basics of conducting research?
2. What makes a question researchable?
3. In your opinion, how is a typical research paper organized?
1.2 Topics
1.2.1 Definition and Purpose of Research
Research is a logical and systematic search for new and useful information on a particular
topic (Goundar, 2019). It is an investigation of finding solutions to scientific and social problems
through objective and systematic analysis. It is a search for knowledge, that is, a discovery of
hidden truths. Here, knowledge means information about matters. The information might be
collected from different sources like experience, human beings, books, journals, nature, etc. A
research can lead to new contributions to the existing knowledge. Only through research is it
possible to make progress in a field. Research is done with the help of study, experiment,
observation, analysis, comparison and reasoning. Research is in fact ubiquitous. More precisely,
research seeks predictions of events and explanations, relationships and theories for them.
questions. But to qualify as research, the process must have certain characteristics: it must, as
far as possible, be controlled, rigorous, systematic, valid and verifiable, empirical and critical.
• Controlled - in real life there are many factors that affect an outcome. The concept of
control implies that, in exploring causality in relation to two variables (factors), you set
up your study in a way that minimizes the effects of other factors affecting the
relationship.
• Rigorous - you must be scrupulous in ensuring that the procedures followed to find
answers to questions are relevant, appropriate and justified. Again, the degree of rigor
varies markedly between the physical and social sciences and within the social sciences.
• Systematic - this implies that the procedure adopted to undertake an investigation follow
a certain logical sequence. The different steps cannot be taken in a haphazard way. Some
procedures must follow others.
• Valid and verifiable - this concept implies that whatever you conclude on the basis of
your findings is correct and can be verified by you and others.
• Empirical - this means that any conclusions drawn are based upon hard evidence
gathered from information collected from real life experiences or observations.
• Critical - critical scrutiny of the procedures used and the methods employed is crucial to
a research inquiry. The process of investigation must be foolproof and free from
drawbacks. The process adopted and the procedures used must be able to withstand
critical scrutiny.
From the process adopted to find answer to research questions – the two approaches are:
Structured approach and Unstructured approach. The structured approach to inquiry is usually
classified as quantitative research. Here everything that forms the research process- objectives,
design, sample, and the questions that you plan to ask of respondents- is predetermined. It is
more appropriate to determine the extent of a problem, issue or phenomenon by quantifying
the variation. e.g. how many people have a particular problem? How many people hold a
particular attitude? On the other hand, the unstructured approach to inquiry is usually
classified as qualitative research. This approach allows flexibility in all aspects of the research
process. It is more appropriate to explore the nature of a problem, issue or phenomenon without
quantifying it. The main objective is to describe the variation in a phenomenon, situation or
attitude. e.g., description of an observed situation, the historical enumeration of events, an
account of different opinions different people have about an issue, description of working
condition in a particular industry. Both approaches have their place in research. Both have
their strengths and weaknesses. In many studies you have to combine both qualitative and
quantitative approaches. For example, suppose you have to find the types of cuisine /
accommodation available in a city and the extent of their popularity. Types of cuisine is the
qualitative aspect of the study as finding out about them entails description of the culture and
cuisine. The extent of their popularity is the quantitative aspect as it involves estimating the
number of people who visit restaurant serving such cuisine and calculating the other indicators
that reflect the extent of popularity.
Research ethics also concerns the responsibility of researchers to be honest and respectful
1 Methods of Research 4
to all individuals who are affected by their research studies or their reports of the studies’ results.
An informed consent is secured before involving a person in the study. The general concept of
informed consent is that human participants should be given complete information about the
research and their roles in it before agreeing to participate.
For example, let's take a study in which the investigators want to determine how often
an exercise must be done to increase strength. Stop for a minute and think about how they might
organize a study so they could figure this out. There are usually several possible studies that
could be done to address a question. These investigators decided to compare 3 groups, one
group participate in a set of specific exercises 4 times per week; a second group would do the
same exercises, but only twice per week, and a control group would participate in stretching
exercises that would have no impact on strength. The variable that differs between these 3
groups that are compared is an Independent Variable. This particular independent variable has
3 LEVELS of the SINGLE independent variable - in this example: type of exercise.
Some non-experimental studies also have independent variables, but they may not be
determined or manipulated by the investigators. For example, a study may compare test
performance between men and women; so gender would be the independent variable.
However, since investigators didn't determine or specify which individuals would be men and
which would be women, it is not considered to be an active independent variable. Because
gender does define the variable used for comparison, it is still an independent variable, even
though it has lost some of its power.
1 Methods of Research 5
For example, in a study entitled Effects of a new tooth paste (YummyTooth) on incidence
of caries in 1st grade children. The intervention group was given YummyTooth toothpaste,
while the control group was given an identical toothpaste that did not contain the secret
ingredient in YummyTooth. Subjects were observed brushing their teeth 3x per day with the
assigned toothpaste (by teacher or parent). 6 months later, dental appointments were scheduled,
and the number of dental caries present in each child was reported. In this study, the toothpaste
was the independent variable; it was different between the two groups: one level was the
YummyTooth toothpaste itself, and the second level (a control group) was the identical non-
YummyTooth toothpaste (a placebo).
The outcome measure (dependent variable) - that "depended" upon the type of
toothpaste, was the number of dental caries.
Source: Basics of Research for the Health Professions by Linda L. Wright & David A. Lake
Gill and Johnson (1991) suggest the following in their characteristics of a good research topic:
1. Access - will you be able to obtain the data required for the research?
2. Achievability - can the work be completed in the allocated time?
3. Symmetry of potential outcomes - will the research be of value regardless of the outcome?
4. Student capability - Students should choose topics that play to their strengths.
5. Value and scope of the research - both students and supervisors are much more likely to
be highly motivated if the outcome of the study is valuable to others.
Activity
List down at least five research problems following the criteria of a good research topic.
Identify the variables (Independent and Dependent) of the study. The first one is done for
you.
1. First year college students learning modalities and attitude towards shifting to online
learning modalities.
Learning modalities—Independent variable
Attitude towards Online modalities—Dependent variable
2. _______________________________________________________________________
3. _______________________________________________________________________
4. _______________________________________________________________________
5. _______________________________________________________________________
1 Methods of Research 6
The basic purposes of all research proposals are to convince the reader that: (a)the
research project has clear objectives; (b)the research project is worth doing (it is significant /
important in some sense and will make an original contribution to knowledge /understanding
in the field) (c)the proposed methods are suitable and feasible; (d)there is a well thought
through plan for achieving the research objectives in the available timeframe. Note that it is not
enough to simply describe previous works, your project, and your methods.
Title
This should be short and explanatory.
Introduction
The introduction is the part of the paper that provides readers with the background
information for the research reported in the paper. Its purpose is to establish a framework for
the research, so that readers can understand how it is related to other research.
In an introduction, you should
1. create reader interest in the topic,
2. lay the broad foundation for the problem that leads to the study,
3. place the study within the larger context of the scholarly literature, and
4. reach out to a specific audience.
Questions are relevant to normative or census type research (How many of them are
there? Is there a relationship between them?). They are most often used in qualitative inquiry,
although their use in quantitative inquiry is becoming more prominent. Hypotheses are relevant
to theoretical research and are typically used only in quantitative inquiry. When a writer states
hypotheses, the reader is entitled to have an exposition of the theory that lead to them (and of
the assumptions underlying the theory). Just as conclusions must be grounded in the data,
hypotheses must be grounded in the theoretical framework.
Theoretical Framework
Theories, theoretical frameworks, and lines of inquiry may be differently handled in
quantitative and qualitative endeavors.
1. “In quantitative studies, one uses theory deductively and places it toward the
beginning of the plan for a study. The objective is to test or verify theory. One thus begins the
study advancing a theory, collects data to test it, and reflects on whether the theory was
confirmed or disconfirmed by the results in the study. The theory becomes a framework for the
entire study, an organizing model for the research questions or hypotheses for the data
collection procedure”
2. In qualitative inquiry, the use of theory and of a line of inquiry depends on the nature
of the investigation. In studies aiming at “grounded theory,” for example, theory and theoretical
tenets emerge from findings. Much qualitative inquiry, however, also aims to test or verify
theory, hence in these cases the theoretical framework, as in quantitative efforts, should be
identified and discussed early on.
Conceptual Framework
A conceptual framework illustrates what you expect to find through your research. It
defines the relevant variables for your study and maps out how they might relate to each other.
You should construct a conceptual framework before you begin collecting data. It is often
represented in a visual format.
Most studies have two potential audiences: practitioners and professional peers.
Statements relating the research to both groups are in order.
When thinking about the significance of your study, ask yourself the following questions.
1. What will results mean to the theoretical framework that framed the study?
2. What suggestions for subsequent research arise from the findings?
3. What will the results mean to the practicing educator?
4. Will results influence programs, methods, and/or interventions?
5. Will results contribute to the solution of educational problems?
6. Will results influence educational policy decisions?
7. What will be improved or changed as a result of the proposed research?
8. How will results of the study be implemented, and what innovations will come
about?
Definition of Terms
The first chapter of the proposal includes definitions of important terms. For example,
“cooperative learning” has a variety of definitions. Which one pertains to the particular study?
“Looping” may be a term that is not familiar to all. A definition would help the reader
understand just what the study concerns.
In a proposal, the literature review is generally brief and to the point. Be judicious in your
choice of exemplars—the literature selected should be pertinent and relevant. Select and
reference only the more appropriate citations. Make key points clearly and succinctly.
Research Design
Which type of research is better depends on the study itself. The research approach needs
to be appropriate for the specific question. While some people prefer one type of research to
another, really the better method is the one that will address the problem—and sometimes both
methods are needed in the same study. The question determines which type(s) of research
design is required.
Research Locale
The research locale provides information as to where the study will be conducted. It
should also an explanation as to why the specific locale was chosen.
Instrumentation
Which type of research is better depends on the study itself. The research approach needs
to be appropriate for the specific question. While some people prefer one type of research to
another, really the better method is the one that will address the problem—and sometimes both
methods are needed in the same study. The question determines which type(s) of research
design is required.
Outline the instruments you propose to use (surveys, scales, interview protocols,
observation grids).Include an appendix with a copy of the instruments to be used or the
interview protocol to be followed. Also include sample items in the description of the
instrument.
Validation of Instrument
The key reason for being concerned with sampling is that of validity—the extent to which
the interpretations of the results of the study follow from the study itself and the extent to which
results may be generalized to other situations with other people. If instruments have previously
been used, identify previous studies and findings related to reliability and validity. If
instruments have not previously been used, outline procedures you will follow to develop and
test their reliability and validity. In the latter case, a pilot study is nearly essential.
Sampling Procedure
In this part, describe how you will determine the number of participants in your study.
Also, describe how individual participants will be determined.
10
1 Methods of Research
References
Follow APA guidelines regarding use of references in text and in the reference list. Only
references cited in the text are included in the reference list
1.3 References
Abadiano, M. (2016). Research in Daily Life 1: Qualitative Research Method. PH: Cronica
Bookhaus.
Besnik, D. (December 2015). What Is Ethics in Research & Why Is It Important?. Retrieved
from https://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/whatis/index.cfm.
Creswell, J. W. (2014) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods
Approaches 4th Ed. SAGE Publication, Inc. (Module: Chapters 1,2,3).
Dawson, C (2007) A Practical Guide to Research Methods: A user-friendly manuals for
mastering research techniques and projects 3rd Ed. How To Books Spring Hill House,
Spring Hill Road Begbroke, Oxford.
Gill, J., & Johnson, P. (1991). Research methods for managers, London, Paul
Chapman. Anderson S (1981) Positivism kontra hermeneutik Uddevalla: Korpen p82 also
Gummesson E (1991/2000) Qualitative Methods in Management Research London:
Sage.
Goundar, S. (2019). Chapter 3 - Research Methodology and Research Method. Published and
available in the Research Gate at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
333015026.
Goundar, S. (2019). Chapter 3 - Research Methodology and Research Method. Published and
available in the Research Gate at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
333015026.
Li, W., Liping, P. & Khan, Q. (2018). Research methods in education. India: Sage Publications
India Pvt Ltd.Lin, L. & Spector, J.M. (2018). The Sciences of Learning and Instructional
Design. New York: Taylor and Francis publishing.
1 Methods of Research 13
1.4 Acknowledgement
The images, tables, figures and information contained in this module were taken
from the references cited above.