MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTES

(MANAGEMENT AND HANDLING) RULES, 2000

ANNUAL REPORT 2004-2005

(Annual Report prepared in compliance to

the provision 8(2) of the Rule)

CENTRAL POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD

(Ministry of Environment & Forests)
Parivesh Bhawan, East Arjun Nagar,
DELHI-110 032

FEBRUARY, 2006
 CONTENTS

1. Introduction

2. Local bodies

3. Annual Report, 2004-05

4. Implementation status of rules.

4.1 Authorizations
4.2 Compliance with CSST
4.3 Compliance with Schedule-III
4.4 Compliance with Schedule-IV

5. Initiatives at National Level

6. Utilisation of grants under 12th Finance Commission

7. Recommendations
1. INTRODUCTION

As per the Provision (8) of Municipal Solid Wastes (Management and

Handling) Rules, 2000, the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) is
required to prepare the consolidated annual review report on management of
municipal solid waste (MSW) and the same is to be forwarded to the Central
Government that is, Ministry of Environmental and Forests (MoEF) along
with its recommendations before 15th December every year. However,
report of CPCB is to be based on the annual report to be prepared by the
State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs) and Pollution Control Committees
(PCCs) which is required to be forwarded by them to CPCB before 15th
September every year.

Based on the receipt of annual consolidated report from SPCBs/PCCs, the

status of implementation of MSW rules is reviewed. During the year, regular
interaction with SPCBs/PCCs through Meetings and Workshops is made to
facilitate implementation of rules. Reviews of status of implementation of
rules is based on following observations;

(i) Number of application received and number of authorizations granted by

SPCBs/PCCs during the year to the local bodies.

(ii) Initiatives taken by local bodies to implement Schedule-II relating to

collection, Segregation, Storage and Transportation of waste;

(iii) Initiatives taken to implement Schedule-III with regard to set-up waste

disposal facilities; and

(iv) Efforts made to set-up waste processing plants in accordance with

Schedule-IV of the rules.

After detailed analysis of feed-back received from SPCBs, attempts are

made to highlight ‘Recommendations’ which will help in expediting actions
for implementation of MSW rules.

2. LOCAL BODIES

There are large number of local bodies in the country and MSW rules are
applicable to all of them. As per 2001 census, number of cities/ towns are as
under:

Population Class No. of Cities

>10,00,000 and above (metro only) 35
>1,00,000 and above Class I 393

1
 Population Class No. of Cities
50,000 – 99,999 Class II 401
20,000 – 49,999 Class III 1,115
10,000 – 19,999 Class IV 1,344
5,000 - 9,999 Class V 888
> 5,000 Class VI 191
Unclassified 10
4377

3. ANNUAL REPORT – 2004-05

Local bodies are required to forward Annual report for each year to
SPCBs/PCCs before 30th June every year and SPCBs in turn, will send their
consolidated report for the year before 15th September to CPCB. However,
in terms of adhering with stipulated schedule, delay has been observed. As
of 31st January, 2006, CPCB could receive Annual reports from 25
SPCBs/PCCs. Based on information received from 24 SPCBs, the present
Annual Report of 2004-05 is prepared.

4. STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES

4.1 Authorizations

 During 2004-05, out of local bodies reported by SPCBs/ PCCs, local

bodies have applied for seeking authorizations from SPCBs. SPCBs
in turn, have granted authorizations to local bodies

 It has been observed that many local bodies are not applying for
authorizations and the reason for not applying relates to not having
definite plans for setting-up of waste processing and disposal
facilities.

 States like Maharashtra, Tripura, West Bengal, Madhya Pradesh,

Punjab, Himachal Pradesh, Chhatisgarh, Rajasthan, Andhra Pradesh,
Orissa and Karnataka could receive good response from local bodies
for receiving applications. Many SPCBs have issued good number of
authorizations such as, Maharashtra, Gujarat, Tripura, West Bengal,
Madhya Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh, Chhatisgarh, Pondicherry,
Madhya Pradesh and Karnataka.
 The compliance of data on Authorization during 2003-04 and 2004-05
is as under: (out of 2148)

No. of applications received No. of authorizations granted

2003-2004 2004-2005 2003-04 2004-05
1700 1840 766 1180

2
 Details (Statewise) on authorization status is given in Annexure-I.

4.2 Implementation of Schedule-II

 The level of awareness and strengthening of efforts are made by local

bodies to systematize waste collection, segregation, storage and
transportation. Such efforts are either restricted to a few localities or wards
within the town or taken up at entire town level.

 It has been observed that local bodies require adequate funds to augment
the existing infrastructure. Infrastructure need to be strengthened in terms of
tools / equipment and transportation. In mega cities, operation and
maintenance costs are high due to quantum of garbage to be handled.
There is necessity that large number of companies take part in
manufacturing MSW handling equipment which should be available at
reasonable cost and having lesser expediture on operation and
maintenance.

 The combination of manual and mechanical handling of waste is continued.

Smaller towns will probably continue with manual handling but, this will be
improved by adopting safer tools/ equipment to prevent health risks of
conservancy staff.

 Segregation of waste at house-hold level needs notification through larger

mass awareness campaigns.

 Still, at large number of towns, slaughter house waste and bio-medical waste
is ultimately mixed at landfill/ dumping sites.

The efforts made by local bodies for bringing improvement in waste

collection, segregation, storage and transportation is given in Annexure-II.

4.3 Implementation of Schedule-III

 Disposal of waste through open dumping still continuous.

 It has been observed that many States have initially land emphasis on
identification of sites and ensuring that sites are transferred to local bodies.
Such initiatives have been observed in the State/UT; Arunachal Pradesh,
Maharashtra, Tripura, Mizoram, West Bengal, Madhya Pradesh,
Chhatisgarh, Gujarat, Punjab, Himachal Pradesh, Haryana, Rajasthan, Goa,
Pondicherry , Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka.

 States like Maharashtra, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat have

taken initiatives to set-up engineered landfill sites. State like Gujarat and
Karnataka have taken actions to set-up common/regional landfill facilities.
3
  The summary table indicating information on landfill is given at Annexure-III

4.4 Implementation of Schedule-IV

 There has been good move on setting up of waste processing facilities as

compared to the efforts observed during 2003-04.

 In many States, several towns have responded that there is partial

composting/ vermi-composting facilities. SPCBs have however, indicated
that such efforts are not scientific.

 Statewise information on existing and proposed waste processing plants is

given at Annexure-IV.

 It has been observed that ‘composting’ and ‘vermi-composting’ is preferred

as easy technological option by local bodies and other options like thermal
processing (incineration pyolysis etc.) are not attempted due to non-
availability of operating experiences.

5.0 INITIATIVES AT NATIONAL LEVEL

CPCB and MoEF and other Central Ministries such as Ministry of Urban
Development (MoUD) and Ministry of Non-Conventional Energy Sources
(MNES) have taken several direct and indirect initiatives which will facilitate
expeditious implementation of MSW rules. Some of such initiatives are
briefing summarized as under:

5.1 Demonstration Projects

CPCB and MoEF have instituted a scheme for setting up of demonstration

project for solid waste management in accordance with MSW Rule.
Objective of the scheme is to demonstrate total implementation of MSW
Rule. The scheme is an cost sharing basis where concerned local body is
required to contribute 50% of the total cost of the project. Initially, the
scheme is confined for one town in each State/UT. The following project
have been taken up/ planned.

S.No State Town Status

1 West Bengal North Dum-Dum New Under Implementation
Barrakpore
2 UT Chandigarh Chandigarh Under Implementation
3 Tamil Nadu Udumalpet Under Implementation
4 Kerala Kozhikode Under Implementation
5 Himachal Pradesh Mandi Under Implementation
6 Andhra Pradesh Suryapet Under Implementation
7 Nagaland Kohima Under Implementation

4
 S.No State Town Status
8 Maharashtra Jalna Planned
9 Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar Planned
10 Sikkim South West District Planned
11 Tripura Agartala Planned
12 Pondicherry (UT) Pondicherry Planned

5.2 Studies of CPCB

To provide back-up to MSW rule, CPCB has completed a few studies on

some of the aspect indicated in MSW rules. The studies carried out include
the following:

5.2.1 Status of MSW in 59 cities

CPCB sponsored a project to NEERI on “Assessment of Status of Municipal

Solid Wastes Management in Metro Cities and State Capitals” with a view to
establishing database on National level for selected 59 cities. The selected
cities include 35 metro cities and 24 State capitals. The objectives of the
study is to collect field data on composition and characteristics of municipal
solid waste alongwith determination of waste generation rates. Field studies
for all the 59 cities have been completed. Studies have revealed that waste
generation rate varies from 0.12 to 0.60 kg per capita per day. Analysis of
physical composition indicates total compostable matter in the waste is in the
range of 40-60 percent while recyclable fraction was observed between 10
and 25 per cent. The moisture content in the MSW was observed to vary
from 30 to 60 per cent while the C:N ratio was observed to be in the range of
20-40.

Based on the study, suggestive guidelines for management of MSW are

indicated and each local body will have to prepare detailed project report
estimating requirement of tools and equipment and fund estimates.

5.2.2 Methane emissions from MSW dump sites

Most of the waste disposal sites in the country are uncontrolled dumps. These sites
are constant threat to ground water contamination and emits several gases
including methane. Due to various variable factors, it becomes difficult to estimate
correct quantities of such gaseous emissions. With this background, CPCB
instituted studies on estimation of landfill gases in collaboration with IARI and
NEERI.

Organic matter content in the deposited MSW at the landfill site tends to
decompose anaerobically leading to emission of volatile organic compounds and
gaseous by products. Emission of gaseous products from landfills commonly called
landfill gas (LFG) contains methane and carbon dioxide as major constituents. LFG
has potential for non-conventional energy, which also contributes to greenhouse

5
 gas effect, if not managed properly. The study involved development of
methodology for monitoring LFG emissions from the landfill at Nagpur and
validation of methodology at other landfill sites.

For the studies, flux box method was used for LFG flux emission
measurement. The unit consist of a rectangular box (60cm x 33 cm x 70 cm)
of plexiglass provided with support of MS angles. The box is provided with
ports for collection of LFG samples and recording the inside temperature
initially, the monitoring was carried out at Bhandewadi disposal site, Nagpur
and validity of the methodology was tested at Sukhali landfill site in Amravati
(6.0 lakhs population). The LFG emission flux for landfill site at Nagpur was
observed in the range of 0.57 to 16.5 mg/m2/sec while for Amravati landfill
sites the LFG emission flux was in the range of 0.67 and 0.88 mg/m2/sec.
The results of study indicated that the established methodology for Nagur
landfill site could be very well applied for the other landfill sites in the
country.

5.2.3 Compost quality and its application in Agriculture

CPCB undertook detailed studies on characterization of compost quality and

its application on agricultural crops. Seven compost plants were studied for
characterization of compost quality. Studies indicated that average
concentration of heavy metals in the raw waste that was fed to the various
compost plants was in the range of 47 to 185 mg per kg in respect of lead,
36-63 mg/kg for nickel and 1.5 to 6.5 mg/kg for cadmium. The levels of
mercury in raw waste was between 0.01 and 0.23 mg/kg. Heavy metals in
the finished compost were ranging as follows; Pb; 108-203 mg/kg; ni- 8-80
mg/kg; cd-3.8-12.4 mg/kg and mg – 0.01-0.31 mg/kg.

India has a good potential for the production and use of MSW based
compost and sewage sludge generated in various metros and municipalities.
The research has been largely restricted to its production, composition etc.
Relatively few studies have been conducted on its safe and economic
disposal and its application on agricultural land in different cropping system.
An analysis of manorial potential of MSW compost and the sewage-sludge is
needed.

The project taken up by Central Pollution Control Board with IARI attempts to
cover the safe and beneficial use of MSW compost and sewage sludge in
agriculture vis a vis its environmental impacts based on extensive
experimentations and a review of the scientific literature.

It has been observed that the growth attributes of wheat/ maize and
vegetable crops viz., plant height, number of cobs/tillers/m2, dry matter
production and leaf area index, were increased due to supply of nitrogen
through combination of different doses of urea with compost/ sewage sludge.
6
5.2.4 Health studies

A study was instituted by CPCB on assessment of health status of

conservancy staff and other community associated with handling of solid
waste management. The study was taken-up at Kolkata through Chittaranjan
Cancer Research Institute and at Chennai with the assistance of Sri.
Ramchandra Medical College. The objective of the study is to assess health
status of each target group involved in handling of municipal solid waste
(MSW).

Studies at Kolkata

Health assessment studies at Kolkata included clinical examination of 732

individuals of which, 376 were conservancy workers, 151 regpickers and 205
controls. After detailed examination, the findings of the study are
summarized as under;

Parameter Con RP MSW Implication

Upper respiratory symptoms 43 82 93 Infection in nose, throat
Lower respiratory symptoms 32 80 89 Infection in lung
Impaired lung function 43 84 71 Breathing problem
Sputum neutrophilia 13 53 64 Infection, Inflammation
Elevated AM number 12 65 85 High PM10 exposure
Larger and multinucleated AM 8 23 32 Sustained high pollution load
Multinucleated giant cell 2 5 10 Bacterial infection
Curschman’s spiral 2 4 5 Obstruction in airways
Goblet cell hyperplasia 2 16 25 Elevated mucus production
Elevated siderophage count 6 34 44 Covert lung hemorrhage
Elevated micronucleus count 8 68 82 Chromosome break
Low hemoglobin, RBC in blood 17 32 45 Anemia
Leukocytosis 7 26 34 Infection
Elevated platelet count 12 62 75 Cardiovascular rish
High platelet P-selectin 9 55 87 Do
Low CD 4+high CD8+cells 11 42 78 Altered immunity
Low CD20+high CD56+cells 12 54 89 Do
Sputum eosinophilia 11 28 36 Allergy, asthma

Con=Control, RP=Ragpickers, MSW=conservancy staff of Kolkata Municipal

Corporation

5.3 Action Plans for 59 cities

 Pursuant to the Hon’ble Supreme Court order dated 4.10.2004, CPCB

interacted with Pollution Control Boards to get the action plans prepared
from local bodies of 35 metrocities and 24 State Capitals.

 Local bodies of following metro cities and State Capitals have taken
initiatives to prepare action plan for management of MSW:
7
 Metro cities State Capitals
 Surat  Coimbatore  Delhi  Silvasa  Thiruvananthapuram
 Rajkot  Vadodara  Bangalore  Daman  Ranchi
 Ahemdabad  Kanpur  Bhopal  Shillong  Chandigarh
 Jabalpur  Indore  Vishakhapatnam  Pondicherr  Panjai
y
 Vijaywada  Hyderabad  Faridabad  Raipur  Aizwal
 Chennai  Madurai  Coimbatore  Agartala  Guwahati
 Delhi  Bangalore  Jaipur  Jammu  Bhubaneshwar
 Agra  Lucknow  Kolkata  Shimla  Dehradun
 Asansol  Nasik  Nagpur  Gangtok  Gandhinagar
 Pune  Allahabad  Ludhiana  Itanagar  Kohima
 Amritsar  Varanasi  Mumbai
 Patna  Kochi
 Meerut  Kavarati
 Jamshedpur  Port Blair
 Dhanbad  Srinagar
 Imphal

5.4 Report of MoUD on Compost Plants

An Interministrial Task Force on integrated plant nutrient management using

city compost was constituted by the Ministry of Urban Development on 26th
March, 2003. The task was set-up in pursuance to the orders of Hon’ble
Supreme Court dt.14.01.03 (WPC 888/96) and subsequent directions of the
Cabinet Secretariat dt.16.02.03. The Task Force has submitted its report
which has been accepted by MoUD and the report has been filed in the
Hon’ble Supreme Court on 06.05.05. The report dwells on length the
general/technical and financial requirement for setting-up of compost plants
as a viable option for promoting integrated plant nutrient management using
city compost. The State Governments and local bodies may refer this report
and particularly the smaller local bodies will be benefited as the report is
giving guidelines on technical and financial matters.

5.5 Report of MNES on Waste to Energy

In pursuance of an order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court on a writ petition

regarding solid waste management in Class-I cities, Ministry of Non-
conventional Energy & Sources constituted an Expert Committee to inspect
the functioning and records of the project at Lucknow for energy recovery for
municipal solid waste. The report of the Expert Committee which has
submitted its report to MNES on 7.12.05 has covered issues relating to
composting and energy generation. This Report of MNES will help State
Governments/ Local Bodies while taking decision for setting up of waste
processing plants and particularly with reference to Waste to Energy Project.

8
6.0 UTILISATION OF GRANTS UNDER 12th FINANCE COMMISSION

The Twelfth Finance Commission has recommended devolution of grants for

Urban Local Bodies to the tune of Rs.5000 crores for the period 205-2010 of
which Rs.2500 crores have to be devolved upon local bodies exclusively for
setting-up of solid waste management systems in Urban areas to ensure
management of MSW in accordance with MSW Rules. Ministry of Urban
Development on 6th October, 2005 has circulated guidelines for preparation
of DPRs and selection of technologies for processing and final disposal of
MSW for different categories of towns for the benefit of State Government/
Local bodies. The emphasis has also be given to implement various
activities of solid waste system through private sector participation.

State Governments and Pollution Control Boards may initiate the process for
utilizing the grants and set-up appropriate committees/ technical institutions
to guide local bodies in preparing DPR for cities and towns

7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

(i) MoEF and CPCB may continue the on-going scheme on Demo-Projects for
at least one to two towns in each State and this scheme may go in addition
to recommended grants under Twelfth Finance Commission to the States.
However, smaller towns preferably having population < 5 lakh could be
preferred for pilot project

(ii) Central Ministries such as Ministry of Urban Development (MoUD), Ministry

of Agriculture and Ministry of Non-Conventional Energy Sources (NCES)
may provide necessary assistance to the States in terms of technical
assistance and in selection of appropriate technologies relating to waste
processing and disposal including facilitating States in seeking private sector
participation. This proposed action will help States in proper utilization of
grants under the Twelfth Finance Commission.

(iii) Ministry of Urban Development may circulate the report of an Inter-

ministerial task force on integrated plant nutrient management using city
compost which has been filed in the Hon’ble Supreme Court on 06.05.2005
(in the matter of WPC 888/96) to Pollution Control Boards/ Pollution Control
Committees and State Governments. This report has brought out various
relevant issues on composting particularly technical and financial
requirements for setting up of compost plant and will be useful to State
Govts, local bodies and other concerned agencies to refer before taking final
decisions.

9
(iv) A report of the expert committee for inspection and evaluation of the project
for energy recovery from MSW at Lucknow; 2005 (brought out with reference
to MNES Order dated 19.05.2005) may be circulated to State Govts. for their
reference. The recommendations of Expert Group MNES would be useful to
States while taking decisions on selection of waste processing technologies
and particularly with reference to waste-to-energy projects.

(v) MoEF may consider to suitably amend the Schedule-I of MSW rules while
taking view on funds being provided under the Twelfth Finance Commission
(TFC) which are to be utilized during 2005-2010

(vi) Specific attention may be required while amending MSW rules in view of ;

- Promotion of regional facilities (common facilities) for setting-up of

waste processing and disposal facilities.
- Aviation authorities may issue appropriate guidelines to States while
deciding for identification of sites for waste processing and disposal.

(vii) Pollution Control Boards/Local Bodies/ State Governments who have taken
initiatives in preparing action plans for solid waste management in metro
cities and State Capitals ( in pursuance with Supreme Court order dated
04.10.04, WPC 888/96), may get Detailed Project Report (DPR) for each
metro city and State Capital and immediately start implementation. During
the Eleventh Plan period, States may target to achieve to cover major local
bodies in ensuing their compliance to MSW rules taking benefit of grants
released and also meeting balance out of own resources of local bodies
through State Plan.

(viii) State governments may set up solid waste mission (as set up by Govt. of
West Bengal) and evolve state level policies (like Rajasthan, Andhra
Pradesh, Karnataka, Maharashtra and others) and providing technical/
financial guidance to local bodies in their State/UT.

(ix) Dissemination of information through Electronic media including mass

awareness campaigns and seeking private sector participation in solid waste
management should be continued activity. Pollution Control Boards/ State
Urban Development Departments may place consolidated status on solid
waste management (may also include other sanitation issues of state),
Annual reports of local bodies and initiatives taken on web site for public
benefit.

10
 Annexure-II

Implementation Status of Schedule-II

S.No States/UT Local bodies taken initiatives for improving collection,

segregation, storage and Transportation of waste
1 Arunachal 14 District Head quarters have taken initiatives in Selected
Pradesh zones
2 Mahrashtra Local bodies at several places have organized collection of
MSW by house-to-house collection by using Ghanta
Gandies and colletion bins. (Pune,Nasik,Nagpur,Mumbai
and others).
3 Tripura Partially done at Agartala
4 Mizoram Yet to be taken up.
5 West Bengal  Out of 126 local bodies, 119 have taken some
initiatives.
 House-to-house collection of waste for almost all wards
have been reported by 13 local bodies (Barrackpore,
North Dum Dum, Bidhaunagar, Kumarhati, Khardata,
Madhyamgram, Naihati, Rajarhat-Gopalpur, South Dum
Dum, Kulti, Cooch Behar, Suri
6 Assam No significant initiatives
7 Madhya 33 local bodies have taken some initiatives (Bhopal,
Pradesh Indore, Rewa, Gwalior, Shahdol, Amarkantak, Chandi,
Ujmariya, etc.)
8 Gujarat Several local bodies have taken initiatives (Ahemdabad,
Surat, Bejalpur, Gandhinagar
9 Punjab Being proposed at Mandi Gobindgarh and Kartarpur
10 Himachal Yet to be picked up. On demo-basis, initiated at Mandi
Pradesh
11 Chhatisgarh Initiated in:9 Nagar Nigam, 21 Nagar Palika and 21 Nagar
Panchyat (Raipur, Ambikapur, Korba, Durg, Rajnadgaon,
Munjeli, Champa, Dhamtari, Ratnpur, Sukma etc.)
12 Nagaland Kohima, Dimapur
13 Haryana 19 ULBs have taken some step (Faridabad, Ambala,
Bhwani, Hissar, Jind, Karnal, Panipat etc.)
14 Daman Diu & Yet to be started
DNH
15 Bihar Yet to be started
16 Meghalaya Shillong, Jowai, Tura, Williamnagar, Baghmora,
Resubelpara.
17 Chandigarh House-to-house collection of waste widely practiced.
18 Rajasthan Initiatives taken by 14 towns.
19 Goa Panjim
20 Pondicherry Pondicherry
21 Andhra Hyderabad, Vishakapatnam, Vijaywada, Suryapet, Guntur,
Pradesh Vizianagaram
22 Andaman At Port Blair in 70 locations covering 18 wards.
Nicobar
23 Karnataka Many local bodies have taken initiatives
24 Orissa Not yet initiated
 .2.

S.No States/UT Local bodies taken initiatives for improving collection,

segregation, storage and Transportation of waste
25 Tamil Nadu Almost all the local bodies have partially taken the
initiatives for source segregation. Notable works have
been done in Chennai, Tirunelveli, Tiruppur, Namakkal,
Udumalpet, Polacode, Udagamandalam
26 Jammu & 25% coverage by NGOs in Jammu and Srinagar for
Kashmir House-to-house collection.
27 Uttar Pradesh Lucknow, Kanpur
 Annexure-I
Local bodies and status of Authorisations
S.No States/UTs Local Bodies No. of appli- No. of authorizations
cations received granted
Corporations Councils Nagar Punchayat Municipalities Cantonments Total
1 Andhra Pradesh 14 - - 104 - 122 111 66
2 Arunachal Pradesh - - - - - 16 14 Nil
3 Assam - - - - - 85 47 13
4 Andaman Niccobar - - - - - 01 1 1
5 Chattisgarh 10 28 72 - - 110 79 29
6 Chandigarh - - - - - 01 1 1
7 Maharashtra 22 221 4 - 3 250 250 246
8 Tripura - 1 12 - - 13 13 13
9 Mizoram - - - - - 02 1 1
10 West Bengal 6 - - 120 - 126 85 31
11 Madhya Pradesh - - - 337 3 340 334 293
12 Gujarat - - - - - 154 154 152
13 Punjab 5 91 37 - 4 137 137 1
14 Himachal Pradesh 1 20 28 - 7 56 56 36
15 Nagaland - - - - - 06 1 1
16 Haryana - - - - - 68 12 Nil
17 Daman Diu - 2 10 - - 12
DNH - - 11 - - 11 -
18 Bihar 5 32 85 - - 122 38 Nil
19 Meghalaya - - 6 - 1 07 2 2
20 Rajasthan 14 58 72 39 - 183 119 4
21 Goa 1 12 - - - 13 - -
22 Pondicherry - - 10 5 - 15 15 2
23 Orissa 103 54 17
24 Karnataka 6 497 97 44 - 226 226 226
25 Tamil Nadu 6 - 561 152 - 719 90 45
26 Jammu & Kashmir - - - 69 - 69 - -
27 Uttar Pradesh 11 - 399 200 - 610 499 41
TOTAL 101 962 1005 1070 18 3577 2339 1220