The New Food Revolution - Lab-Made Meat
The New Food Revolution - Lab-Made Meat
The New Food Revolution - Lab-Made Meat
This is what the food tech industry coins the “Uncanny Valley of Food.” Inspired by the
famous “Uncanny Valley Hypothesis” created by Masahiro Mori, this phenomenon describes
the immediate reaction of disgust a consumer has towards food that tastes or looks slightly
off6. In a world where we have long figured out which foods won’t kill us, these innate
preferences serve as an anachronistic survival mechanism3. However, in today’s world, these
food choices seem to be a hindrance to emerging industries focused on creating food
alternatives. One of these is the lab-made meat industry.
In 2001, the first patent was filed to produce cultured meat for consumption21. Since then, the
industry of lab-made meat – also called cultured, cell-based, or clean meat – has emerged
with one goal: reinvent how mainstream meat is produced to reduce environmental impact.
As suggested by a 2011 Oxford University study, if all beef production was lab-made, there
would be a drastic decrease in environmental pollutants30 (Figure 2). Why is this such an
urgent matter? To put this in perspective, a third of the world’s land and 16% of the world’s
fresh water is currently devoted to livestock farming2. The raising of animals also contributes
to about 15% of greenhouse gas emissions, 75% of Amazon rainforest deforestation and huge
amounts of water pollution18,21. Today, more than 320 million tons of meat is produced to
sustain market demand22. Taking into account our exponentially growing population and
world economy, animal agriculture is projected to increase about 70% by 205022.
Figure 2. Chart comparing difference in resources required between beef farm raised and
lab-made from Oxford University30
For these reasons, well-known names such as Bill Gates, Tyson Foods, and Google are
investing heavily in the research and market development of lab-made meat products24,27. As
Bill Gates writes in his personal blog, “Put simply, there’s no way to produce enough meat
for 9 billion people. Yet we can’t ask everyone to become vegetarians. That’s why we need
more options for producing meat without depleting our resources24.” Others driven by animal
cruelty concerns have also joined the movement to advocate for alternative methods of meat
production. PETA (People for Ethical Treatment of Animals), for example, has invested in
this research as its members claim their mission to eliminate animal suffering aligns with the
lab-made meat industry.13 . The diversity of those who support this food revolution – from
powerful capitalists to humanitarian organizations – illustrates the sheer scale at which lab-
made meat can have beneficial impact.
Where is food technology today?
In 2013, Dr. Mark Post from Maastricht University in the Netherlands created the first lab-
made hamburger. This hamburger was cooked and taste-tested publicly at a press event in
London and served as the first proof of concept that lab-made meats could be available for
human consumption. Since 2013, there has been a booming lineup of other proof-of-concept
food samples around the world: salmon filet (Wild Type from San Francisco, California),
chicken nuggets (JUST Inc. from San Francisco, California), foie gras (IntegriCulture from
Tokyo, Japan), and even steak (Aleph Farms from Rehovot, Israel )1,14,15,31 (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Lab-made meats: salmon lox from Wild Type, chicken nuggets from JUST Inc, foie
gras from IntegriCulture, steak filets from Aleph Farms1,14,15,31
As mentioned before, people are the toughest critics when it comes to food. Above all else,
lab-made meat companies must create products good enough to overcome the Uncanny
Valley of Food phenomenon. As founding CEO of Mosa Meat, Peter Verstrate emphasizes,
“When they [the consumers] taste the product, they have to have the experience of meat, not
the experience of a product that looks like meat and comes close to meat or has the distinct
hints of something that looks like meat24.” This sentiment spoken by Verstrate is a prime
representation of the industry’s mentality; from taste to texture to smell, there is no question
that cell-based meat companies are aware of consumer expectations.
So, how is this even done? Making meat from a hunk of cells is essentially a four-step
process: 1) Biopsy/Isolation 2) Expansion 3) Differentiation 4) Assembly5,25.
Figure 4. Simple schematic of lab-made meat published in the Journal of Integrative
Agriculture4
First, muscle stem cells – cells derived from skeletal muscle that can mature into multiple
muscle fiber types– are non-invasively isolated from a tissue sample of an animal. The cells
are fed with essential nutrients and grown in plastic dishes. Once the cell colonies expand
into 2D cell sheets, they are then relocated and fed a modified nutrient solution. This change
in environment causes the stem cells to differentiate into mature muscle fibers. Lastly,
scientists assemble these thin layers of muscle fibers into multiple layers and add other cell
types such as fat cells to create the final product25 (Figure 4).
Figure 5. Left: Tissue culture flasks used for making the first lab-made hamburger in 2013
(during the expansion step)9. Right: In vitro meat samples (during the differentiation step)20
Making lab-made meat sounds easy. What’s the catch?
The simplified pipeline of lab-made meat production seems straightforward. You might be
wondering: why aren’t lab-made meats found in supermarkets yet? As you might guess,
mimicry of nature is hard for scientists to perfect in a laboratory, let alone on a global market
scale. Scientists have yet to fully understand the numerous molecular factors and tissue
interactions that result in the various meat textures and tastes. Further, the enormous scale at
which lab-made meat would need to be produced for world-wide consumption creates a large
manufacturing obstacle; how can we convert a laboratory protocol into a business model?
These issues of scalability and texture perfection are driving the lab-made meat industry’s
research today.
Harvard professor Kit Parker and his Disease Biophysics team recently published a paper in
October 2019 which introduced an exciting breakthrough in this field: the creation of novel
3D edible gelatin scaffold19. Gelatin – a very common muscle protein derived from
collagen— is spun like cotton candy creating a scaffold into which muscle stem cells can be
seeded into (Figure 6). The resulting properties of the synthetic meat have been shown to
have the texture and nutritional outputs of meat analogs.
Figure 6. Gelatin scaffold before cells are added, from afar and under the microscope19
This material could possibly replace the separate steps of expansion to assembly and could
address scalability issues. For instance, a Jerusalem-based company called Future Meat uses
large bioreactors (Figure 7) to scale their product production10,17. It may be possible to
vertically layer gelatin scaffolds within the bioreactors which would allow scientists to seed
and culture billions of cells at once.
Figure 7. Lab-made meat company Future Meat use pharmaceutical bioreactors to grow
their chicken, beef, lamb, and pork products17.
Food science is advancing at a rapid pace; however, until specific textures and looks can be
refined, companies are focused in the meantime on bringing their processed meats –
hamburgers, meatballs, chicken nuggets – to market.
The first lab-made hamburger cost over $300,000 to make in 2013, but prices for production
have drastically dropped over seven years12. In fact, Mosa Meats stated that they plan to
release their first burger product to market in 2021 at a cost of about $10 each26. This
pricing, although more than McDonald’s, is within the ballpark of organic food pricing and
much more affordable than ever before. Another up-and-coming company named JUST Inc.
has announced partnership with local San Francisco restaurants to sell their lab-made chicken
nuggets in the near future. Amongst other things, JUST Inc. has also created theoretical
packaging for future cell-based hamburgers and chicken cutlets in anticipation for their
commercialization (Figure 8).
Anticipating public skepticism, businesses are trying to rebrand “lab-made meats” to “clean
meats” for good reason. Aside from getting rid of the outlandish stigma of anything labeled
“lab-made,” these meats are arguably more “natural” than most foods in your pantry today.
Simply put, lab-made meat production would be a less worrisome process than the current
production of meat from live animals.
Firstly, converting to lab-made meat would eliminate the use of antibiotics. Studies show that
E. coli bacteria (a very common strain of bacteria frequently connected to antibiotic
resistance) is rampant in animals that are fed grain for reasons that are beyond the scope of
this article29. The key takeaway is that industrial farms feed enormous amounts of grain to
their animals, which creates E. coli breeding grounds7. With lab-made meat, there is no need
for grain feeding because there is no animal to raise. Instead, all we would need are sterile
laboratories. Consequently, the risk of food contamination, blood borne pathogens and
zoonotic diseases would be almost non-existent.
Further, the cultured meat industry is much more transparent regarding production and
commercialization in comparison to industrialized farming today. Currently, there is no
standard rating system for live meat production16. Without concrete regulation, industrialized
farms are not unified in their practices and can get away with ethical and health neglect. In
conjunction with the business mentality of maximizing production while minimizing cost,
factory farms are one big melting pot of mixed messages, confusing labels, and claims.
Luckily, rules and regulations regarding lab-made meat production are being drafted in real-
time. This enables the creation of a direct production pipeline that could be universally
implemented, ethically accepted and better regulated. In other words, products that are from
lab-made meat companies offer eaters the experience of responsibly sourced and regulated
food.
Another consideration to take into account is the range of which lab-made meats could be
bioengineered for our health benefit. Studies show that eating red meat increases risk for
cardiovascular disease because of high saturated fatty acid levels28. The simple methodology
of lab-based meat makes it possible to modify certain material components of the meat. For
instance, scientists could reduce the amount of saturated fatty acids in favor of good fats such
as omega3 fatty acids. Or, they could enrich the meat with more vitamins4. These are
conversations that will most likely come to fruition in the future. So, in addition to no use of
antibiotics, low risk of contamination, and manufacturing transparency, you could, in theory,
gain nutritional benefits as well.
Figure 9. Lab-made meat illustration by Rejeanne de Jong11
Initially, it might sound scary to eat meat from a test tube. But, looking at the science, we can
see that protein grown outside the body is molecularly the same as it would be grown inside
the body. By making the process of lab-made meat and all its benefits transparent, the
industry hopes that public acceptance will follow. While there is still a long way to go before
all meats you see in grocery stores will be generated in labs, we will inevitably start to see
lab-made meat products hit the market in the coming years. A new food revolution has
started. Are you ready?
References