Spof 6211 Learning Unit 5 Powerpoint Slides - Crimes Against Dignity and Reputation - 2021

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 18

SPOF 6211

LEARNING UNIT 5:

CRIMES AGAINST
DIGNITY AND
REPUTATION
LEARNING UNIT 5
CRIMES AGAINST DIGNITY AND REPUTATION
◼ THE TWO SPECIFIC OFFENCES THAT ARE GOING TO BE
STUDIED THAT DEAL WITH CRIMES AGAINST THE
DIGNITY AND REPUTATION OF A PERSON ARE:
◼ 1. CRIMEN INIURIA

◼ 2. CRIMINAL DEFAMATION

IT IS IMPORTANT TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN THESE 2


CRIMES AS THEY ARE OFTEN CONFUSED WITH EACH
OTHER.
EACH OF THE TWO SPECIFIC OFFENCES OF CRIMEN
INIURIA AND CRIMINAL DEFAMATION WILL BE
DISCUSSED IN TERMS OF:
1. DEFINITIONS
2. ELEMENTS
3. RELEVANT CASE LAW
LEARNING UNIT 5: CRIMEN INIURIA

DEF unlawful + intentional serious violation → dignity / privacy of another.

~ unlawful: #NOT triviality → S VSharp


#only serious violations
#Test for serious violation: subjective (how did victim feel)
+ objective ( will reasonable person feel violated?)
#factors to ascertain unlawfulness … Momberg

~ Dignity = self-respect and mental tranquility (subjective attributes of a person’s


personality.
~ Privacy = No need to prove that person was aware that privacy was violated.

~ Must victim be aware of violation?

Dignity: Yes Privacy: No – S v Holliday.

4
5) CRIMEN INIURIA

Def: THE UNLAWFUL, INTENTIONAL AND


SERIOUS VIOLATION OF THE
DIGNITY OR PRIVACY OF ANOTHER.

Sec. 10 Sec. 14
Crimen iniuria = COMMON LAW CRIME

ELEMENTS:

 UNLAWFULNESS

• Grounds of justification (official capacity)


• Only serious violation = unlawful (objective test)
• Everyday abuses – de minimus non curat lex
(You are a pig/bitch)
Factors to take into consideration in order to determine
whether a violation was unlawful:

• Time and place (In front of others / on duty)


• Respective ages
• Sex and social status (female/employee/employer)
• The relationship between the accused and complainant
(Strangers?)
• The way in which the accused acted.
(Tests used – subjective and objective.)
(Momberg case – “Jou lae donnerse bliksem, ag fock-off jou lae
bliksem – jy is laer as ‘n donnerse vark”)
 INTENTION
⬧ Any type of dolus = sufficient.

1) Spit in face
2) Expose
 VIOLATION 3) Sexually
assault
▪ Can take place in various ways (verbally/conduct)
▪ Abusive language – usually suggestion of sexuality or
Racism
▪ Sending indecent photos to someone , etc. (Peeping Tom)
 DIGNITY & PRIVACY
• Dignitas refers to both terms
• See descriptions in manual (respect, self-respect, value
attached to your own life)

• Dignity – the victim must by aware of violation


(2 Exceptions: Children; mentally retarded)

• Privacy – Victim does not have to be aware of


violation (Peeping Tom / Listening-in device)
LEARNING UNIT 5: CRIMINAL DEFAMATION

DEF: unlawful + intentional publication of accusations → another: which seriously


injures that person’s reputation.
~ Unlawful: general common law grounds of justification +
special grounds of justification (3)
~ Publication = Must come to the attention of third persons.
~ violation of reputation = Exposing a person to hatred; diminish the esteem to which
the person is held by others.
S vHoho → Criminal defamation = is it a crime?
→ Criminal defamation = constitutional? Limit freedom of expression but…
→ must be serious injury of reputation?

DISTINGUISH BETWEEN CRIMEN INIURIA + CRIMINAL DEFAMATION

VIOLATE WHAT? Dignity/privacay Reputation

VIOLATE HOW? Words / conduct Publication: known to other(s)


10
Unit 10 CRIMINAL DEFAMATION

DEF: unlawful+intentional publication accusations→another:seriously injure reputation


~ Unlawful: general common law grounds of justification +
special grounds of justification (3)
~ Publication =
~ violation of reputation =
Hoho → C/D = a crime?
→ C/D = constitutional? Limit freedom of expression but…
→ must be serious injure of reputation?

DISTINGUISH BETWEEN CRIMEN INIURIA + CRIMINAL DEFAMATION

VIOLATE WHAT? Dignity / privacy Reputation

VIOLATE HOW? No publication required by words/conduct Publication: known to other(s)

11
6) CRIMINAL DEFAMATION
Def: The UNLAWFUL & INTENTIONAL
PUBLICATION of MATTER
CONCERNING ANOTHER
WHICH TENDS
SERIOUSLY to INJURE
the OTHER PERSON’S
REPUTATION.

*Balance between sec. 10 &


16 (Constitution)
DISTINGUISH CRIMEN INIURIA FROM
CRIMINAL DEFAMATION:

CRIMINAL
CRIMEN INIURIA
DEFAMATION
Dignity & privacy Reputation / fama
Words or conduct Publication of accusations
towards victim to others
ELEMENTS:

 UNLAWFULNESS

General grounds for justification often raised are, e.g.:


✓ Consent
✓ Necessity

Special grounds for justification – EXCLUSIVE TO


CRIMINAL DEFAMATION:
THE DEFAMATORY PUBLICATION WAS
THE TRUTH AND IN THE PUBLIC
INTEREST.

THE DEFAMATORY PUBLICATION BOILS


DOWN TO REASONABLE COMMENTARY

THE DEFAMATORY ALLEGATION IS MADE


AT A PRIVILEGED OCCASION
 INTENT
- Intent must be proved. (Animus iniuriandi)
- Dolus eventualis is sufficient

 PUBLICATION
o Publication of accusations must be made in:
 written, or
 verbal
announcement to someone else.
 VIOLATION OF REPUTATION

✓ A person’s reputation or fama is violated when a


publication exposes him to hatred, contempt or
ridicule. (Diminish your esteem)
THE END

You might also like