Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 555 views

    Jagualing V CA

    Uploaded by

    Judiel Pareja
    1. The case involves a dispute over ownership of an island that was formed in a non-navigable river between Janita Eduave, the owner of land along the river margin, and Maximo and Anuncita Jagualing, who were in possession of the island. 2. The Court of Appeals applied Article 465 of the Civil Code and declared Eduave as the lawful owner of the island, as the owner of the land along the nearer river margin has preferential rights over any formations that increase the owner's land like alluvial deposits. 3. The Supreme Court affirmed this decision, finding that under Article 465, the island belongs to Eduave as the riparian owner, regardless of whether the

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Jagualing V CA

    Uploaded by

    Judiel Pareja
    555 views2 pages
    1. The case involves a dispute over ownership of an island that was formed in a non-navigable river between Janita Eduave, the owner of land along the river margin, and Maximo and Anuncita Jagualing, who were in possession of the island. 2. The Court of Appeals applied Article 465 of the Civil Code and declared Eduave as the lawful owner of the island, as the owner of the land along the nearer river margin has preferential rights over any formations that increase the owner's land like alluvial deposits. 3. The Supreme Court affirmed this decision, finding that under Article 465, the island belongs to Eduave as the riparian owner, regardless of whether the

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Jagualing v CA

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1. The case involves a dispute over ownership of an island that was formed in a non-navigable river between Janita Eduave, the owner of land along the river margin, and Maximo and Anuncita Jagualing, who were in possession of the island. 2. The Court of Appeals applied Article 465 of the Civil Code and declared Eduave as the lawful owner of the island, as the owner of the land along the nearer river margin has preferential rights over any formations that increase the owner's land like alluvial deposits. 3. The Supreme Court affirmed this decision, finding that under Article 465, the island belongs to Eduave as the riparian owner, regardless of whether the

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    555 views2 pages

    Jagualing V CA

    Uploaded by

    Judiel Pareja
    1. The case involves a dispute over ownership of an island that was formed in a non-navigable river between Janita Eduave, the owner of land along the river margin, and Maximo and Anuncita Jagualing, who were in possession of the island. 2. The Court of Appeals applied Article 465 of the Civil Code and declared Eduave as the lawful owner of the island, as the owner of the land along the nearer river margin has preferential rights over any formations that increase the owner's land like alluvial deposits. 3. The Supreme Court affirmed this decision, finding that under Article 465, the island belongs to Eduave as the riparian owner, regardless of whether the

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Jagualing v. Court of Appeals 194 SCRA 607 Facts: A certain parcel of land is located in Sta.

    Cruz, Tagoloan, Misamis Oriental with an area of 16,452 sq. m., forming part of an island in a non-navigable river, bounded by the Tagoloan River on the north, south, and east and by the portion belonging to Vicente Neri on the west. Janita Eduave claims that she inherited the land from her father, Felomino Factura, together with his co-heirs, Reneiro Factura and Aldenora Factura, and acquired sole ownership of the property by virtue of a Deed of Extra Judicial Partition with sale. The land is declared for tax purposes under Tax Declaration 26137 with an area of 16,452 sq. m. Since the death of her father on 5 May 1949, Eduave had been in possession of the property although the tax declaration remains in the name of the deceased father. The entire land had an area of 16,452 sq. m. appearing in the deed of extrajudicial partition, while in tax declaration the area is only 4,937 sq. m., and she reasoned out that she included the land that was under water. The land was eroded sometime in November 1964 due to typhoon Ineng, destroying the bigger portion and the improvements leaving only a coconut tree. In 1966 due to the movement of the river deposits on the land that was not eroded increased the area to almost half a hectare and in 1970 Eduave started to plant banana trees. In 1973, Maximo and Anuncita Jagualing asked her permission to plant corn and bananas provided that they prevent squatters to come to the area. Eduave engaged the services of a surveyor who conducted a survey and placed concrete monuments over the land. Eduave also paid taxes on the land in litigation, and mortgaged the land to the Luzon Surety and Co., for a consideration of P6,000.00. The land was the subject of a reconveyance case between Janita Eduave vs. Heirs of Antonio Factura, which was the subject of judgment by compromise in view of the amicable settlement of the parties. The heirs of Antonio Factura had ceded a portion of the land with an area of 1,289 sq. m., to Janita Eduave in a notarial document of conveyance, pursuant to the decision of the CFI, after a subdivision of the lot 62 Pls-799, and containing 1,289 sq. m. was designated as Lot 62-A, and the subdivision plan was approved. Eduave also applied for concession with the Bureau of Mines to extract 200 m3 of grave, and after an ocular inspection the permit was granted. Eduave, after permit was granted, entered into an agreement with Tagoloan Aggregates to extract sand and gravel, which agreement was registered in the office of the Register of Deeds. Maximo and Anuncita Jagualing assert that they are the real owners of the land in litigation containing an area of 18,000 sq. m. During the typhoon Ineng in 1964 the river control was washed away causing the formation of an island. Jagualing started occupying the land in 1969, paid land taxes as evidenced by tax declaration 26380 and tax receipts, and tax clearances. Actual occupation of the land by Jagualing included improvements and the house. Rudygondo and Janita Eduave filed with the RTC Misamis Oriental an action to quiet title and/or remove a cloud over the property in question against Jagualing. On 17 July 1987 the trial court dismissed the complaint for failure of Eduave to establish by preponderance of evidence their claim of ownership over the land in litigation. The court found that the island is a delta forming part of the river bed which the government may use to reroute, redirect or control the course of the Tagoloan River. Accordingly, it held that it was outside the commerce of man and part of the public domain, citing Article 420 of the Civil Code. As such it cannot be registered under the land registration law or be acquired by prescription. The trial court, however, recognized the validity of Jagualings possession and gave them preferential rights to use and enjoy the property. The trial court added that should the State allow the island to be the subject of private ownership, the Jagualings have rights better than that of Eduave. On appeal to the CA, the court found that the island was formed by the branching off of the Tagoloan River and subsequent thereto the accumulation of alluvial deposits. Basing its ruling on Articles 463 and 465 of the Civil Code, the CA reversed the decision of the trial court, declared Eduave as the lawful and true owners of the land subject of the case and ordered Jagualing to vacate the premises and deliver possession of the land to Eduave. Issue: Who between the one who has actual possession of an island that forms in a non-navigable and nonfloatable river and the owner of the land along the margin nearest the island, has the better right thereto? Held: The parcel of land is part of an island that formed in a non-navigable and non-floatable river; from a small mass of eroded or segregated outcrop of land, it increased to its present size due to the gradual and successive accumulation of alluvial deposits. The CA did not err in applying Article 465 of the Civil Code. Under this provision, the island belongs to the owner of the land along the nearer margin as sole owner thereof; or more accurately, because the island is longer than the property of Eduave, they are deemed ipso jure to be the owners of that portion which corresponds to the length of their property along the margin of the river. Lands formed by accretion belong to the riparian owner. This preferential right is, under Article 465, also granted the owners of the land located in the margin nearest the formed island for the reason that they are in the best position to cultivate and attend to the exploitation of the same. In fact, no specific act of possession over the accretion is required. If, however, the riparian owner fails to assert his claim thereof, the same may yield to the adverse possession of third parties, as indeed even accretion to land titled under the Torrens system must itself still be registered. There is no need to make a final determination regarding the origins of the island, i.e., whether the island was initially formed by the branching off or division of the river and covered by Article 463 of the Civil Code, in which case there is strictly no accession because the original owner retains ownership, or whether it was due to the action of the river under Article 465, or whether it was caused by the abrupt segregation and washing away of the stockpile of the river control, which makes it a case of avulsion under Article 459, as the case is not between

    parties as opposing riparian owners contesting ownership over an accession but rather between a riparian owner and the one in possession of the island.

    You might also like