Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 35 views

    AHP Tool

    Uploaded by

    roberto carlos angel
    This document summarizes an analysis of surveillance system purchase options. Four alternatives were considered (Mazda, Ford, Seat, Other) based on four criteria: equipment, price, aesthetics, and motor. Mazda scored highest based on the criteria weights and alternative scores. The consistency ratio for each criterion was below 0.1, indicating consistent judgments. Mazda is recommended as it had the highest overall score of 0.1706 based on the analysis.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    AHP Tool

    Uploaded by

    roberto carlos angel
    35 views16 pages
    This document summarizes an analysis of surveillance system purchase options. Four alternatives were considered (Mazda, Ford, Seat, Other) based on four criteria: equipment, price, aesthetics, and motor. Mazda scored highest based on the criteria weights and alternative scores. The consistency ratio for each criterion was below 0.1, indicating consistent judgments. Mazda is recommended as it had the highest overall score of 0.1706 based on the analysis.

    Original Description:

    Omitido

    Original Title

    1. AHP tool (3)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document summarizes an analysis of surveillance system purchase options. Four alternatives were considered (Mazda, Ford, Seat, Other) based on four criteria: equipment, price, aesthetics, and motor. Mazda scored highest based on the criteria weights and alternative scores. The consistency ratio for each criterion was below 0.1, indicating consistent judgments. Mazda is recommended as it had the highest overall score of 0.1706 based on the analysis.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    35 views16 pages

    AHP Tool

    Uploaded by

    roberto carlos angel
    This document summarizes an analysis of surveillance system purchase options. Four alternatives were considered (Mazda, Ford, Seat, Other) based on four criteria: equipment, price, aesthetics, and motor. Mazda scored highest based on the criteria weights and alternative scores. The consistency ratio for each criterion was below 0.1, indicating consistent judgments. Mazda is recommended as it had the highest overall score of 0.1706 based on the analysis.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    of 16

    COMPRA SIST DE VIGILANCIA

    Equipamento Precio Estética Motor


    0.12187261 0.55789248 0.26334511 0.0568898
    Valoración Opciones
    0.4 dolares todo mucho 1 año
    0.6 euros casi todo medio 2 años
    poco 5 años

    Securitas 0.09375 0.18125 0.18125 0.18125


    Coviser 0.59375 0.19583333 0.19583333 0.19583333
    Atmosfera 0.21875 0.28333333 0.28333333 0.28333333
    OTRA 0.09375 0.33958333 0.33958333 0.33958333
    Prestigio

    total puntaje

    0.17058615
    0.24432848
    0.27546239
    0.30962298
    Objetivo COMPRA SIST DE VIGILANCIA
    Criterios 1 Equipamento
    2 Precio
    3 Estética
    4 Motor
    5
    6
    7

    Alternativas 1 Mazda
    2 Ford
    3 Seat
    4 OTRA
    5
    6
    7

    Tabla de Valores Equipamento Precio Estética Motor


    Costo $ 200 buena 5 100%
    Calidad $ 5,000 mala 4 90%
    Tiempo $ 140 regular 3 70%
    Financianción $ 2,000 muy buena 5 80%

    Normalización
    Matriz entre criterios Equipamento Precio Estética Motor
    Equipamento 1 0.2 0.33333333 3 0.10714286 0.11931818 0.07352941 0.1875
    Precio 5 1 3 7 0.53571429 0.59659091 0.66176471 0.4375
    Estética 3 0.3333333333 1 5 0.32142857 0.19886364 0.22058824 0.3125
    Motor 0.333333333 0.1428571429 0.2 1 0.03571429 0.08522727 0.04411765 0.0625
    suma 9.3333333333 1.6761904762 4.53333333 16 1 1 1 1

    Primer Criterio Equipamento


    Normalización
    Mazda Ford Seat OTRA
    Mazda 1 0.2 0.33333333 1 0.1 0.125 0.05 0.1
    Ford 5 1 5 5 0.5 0.625 0.75 0.5
    Seat 3 0.2 1 3 0.3 0.125 0.15 0.3
    OTRA 1.0000 0.2 0.33333333 1 0.1 0.125 0.05 0.1
    suma 10.00 1.6 6.66666667 10 1 1 1 1

    Segundo Criterio Precio

    Mazda Ford Seat OTRA


    Mazda 1 2 3 0 0.1 0.25 0.375 0
    Ford 2 1 1 1 0.2 0.125 0.125 0.33333333
    Seat 3 3 1 1 0.3 0.375 0.125 0.33333333
    OTRA 4 2 3 1 0.4 0.25 0.375 0.33333333
    suma 10 8 8 3 1 1 1 1

    Tercer Criterio Estética

    Mazda Ford Seat OTRA


    Mazda 1 2 3 0 0.1 0.25 0.375 0
    Ford 2 1 1 1 0.2 0.125 0.125 0.33333333
    Seat 3 3 1 1 0.3 0.375 0.125 0.33333333
    OTRA 4 2 3 1 0.4 0.25 0.375 0.33333333
    suma 10 8 8 3 1 1 1 1

    Curto Criterio Motor

    Mazda Ford Seat OTRA


    Mazda 1 2 3 0 0.1 0.25 0.375 0
    Ford 2 1 1 1 0.2 0.125 0.125 0.33333333
    Seat 3 3 1 1 0.3 0.375 0.125 0.33333333
    OTRA 4 2 3 1 0.4 0.25 0.375 0.33333333
    suma 10 8 8 3 1 1 1 1
    Resultados Equipamento Precio Estética Motor Evaluación
    Mazda 0.09375 0.18125 0.18125 0.18125 0.1706
    Ford 0.59375 0.19583333333 0.19583333 0.195833333 0.2443
    Seat 0.21875 0.28333333333 0.28333333 0.283333333 0.2755
    OTRA 0.09375 0.33958333333 0.33958333 0.339583333 0.3096

    PESOS CRITERIOS 0.1218726127 0.5578924752 0.26334511 0.056889801 1 1.0000


    n= 4 Número de Criterios
    Promedio %
    AxP
    0.1218726127 12.2 0.49190222 CI= (nmax-n)/(n-1) 0.05889325 Indice de Consistencia
    0.5578924752 55.8 2.35551948 RI=(1.98*(n-2)/n 0.99 Consistencia Aleatoria
    0.2633451108 26.3 1.09937611
    0.0568898014 5.7 0.22988195 CR=CI/CR 0.034873 Relacipon de Consistencia
    1 4.17667976 debe ser menor a 0,1

    Promedio
    0.09375 9.4 0.37916667 CI= (nmax-n)/(n-1) 0.09444444
    0.59375 59.4 2.625 RI=(1.98*(n-2)/n 0.99
    0.21875 21.9 0.9
    0.09375 9.4 0.37916667 CR=CI/CR 0.09539843
    1 4.28333333

    0.18125 18.1 1.42291667 CI= (nmax-n)/(n-1) 0.88819444


    0.1958333333 19.6 1.18125 RI=(1.98*(n-2)/n 0.99
    0.2833333333 28.3 1.75416667
    0.3395833333 34.0 2.30625 CR=CI/CR 0.89716611
    1 6.66458333

    0.18125 18.1 1.42291667 CI= (nmax-n)/(n-1) 0.88819444


    0.1958333333 19.6 1.18125 RI=(1.98*(n-2)/n 0.99
    0.2833333333 28.3 1.75416667
    0.3395833333 34.0 2.30625 CR=CI/CR 0.89716611
    1 6.66458333

    0.18125 18.1 1.42291667 CI= (nmax-n)/(n-1) 0.88819444


    0.1958333333 19.6 1.18125 RI=(1.98*(n-2)/n 0.99
    0.2833333333 28.3 1.75416667
    0.3395833333 34.0 2.30625 CR=CI/CR 0.89716611
    1 6.66458333

    You might also like