Part 1-Ethics Its Basic Concepts

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 9

PART 1-ETHICS: ITS BASIC CONCEPTS

Expected Outcomes

By the end of the unit, students shall have:


Articulated the significance of ethics/moral principles in both individual and communal
living
Learned the key concepts

*Chapter 1 - BASIC CONCEPTS*

At its simplest, /ethics/ is a system of moral principles. Ethics affect how people make
decisions and lead their lives. It is concerned with what is good for individuals and society
and is also described as _MORAL PHILOSOPHY.
The term is derived from the Greek word /ethos/ which can mean custom, habit, character
or disposition. Our concepts of ethics have been derived from religions, philosophies, and
cultures. They infuse debates on topics like abortion, human rights and professional
conduct.
Our idea of ethics stems from our concept of the acceptability of our acts or decisions to
action. For instance, our decisions to get vaccinated or not during a time of pandemic has
ethical implications. Our decisions involved others e.g. family, neighborhoods, community,
etc. Whatever will be our decisions, the implication of responsibility and accountability is a
factor for consideration.
From the previous paragraph, we can say that ethics is about man-to-man transactions. It is
used to regulate our actions towards others. If I’ll be absent from class, would it have an
impact to my parents? To maintain a relationship with the same sex, would it be accepted
by my society? These and other similar questions do arise as members of society.

Scope of Ethics

*Approaches to Ethics*
Philosophers nowadays tend to divide ethical theories into three areas: METAETHICS,
NORMATIVE ETHICS, APPLIED ETHICS.
1. Meta-ethics deals with the nature of moral judgement. It looks at the origins and meaning
of ethical principles.
2. Normative ethics is concerned with the content of moral judgements and the criteria for
what is right or wrong.
3. Applied ethics looks at controversial topics like war, animal rights and capital punishment.

The uses of ethics?


If ethical theories are to be useful in practice, they need to affect the way human beings
behave. Some philosophers think that ethics does do this. They argue that if a person
realizes that it would be morally good to do something then it would be irrational for that
person not to do it. But human beings often behave irrationally - they follow their ‘gut
instinct’ even when their head suggests a different course of action. However, ethics does
provide good tools for thinking about moral issues.
It provides a moral map
Most moral issues get us pretty worked up - think of abortion and euthanasia for starters.
Because these are such emotional issues we often let our hearts do the arguing while our
brains just go with the flow. But there’s another way of tackling these issues, and that’s
where philosophers can come in - they offer us ethical rules and principles that enable us
to take a cooler view of moral problems. So ethics provides us with a moral map, a
framework that we can use to find our way through difficult issues.
It can pinpoint a disagreement.
Using the framework of ethics, two people who are arguing a moral issue can often find
that what they disagree about is just one particular part of the issue, and that they broadly
agree on everything else. That can take a lot of heat out of the argument, and sometimes
even hint at a way for them to resolve their problem. But sometimes ethics doesn’t provide
people with the sort of help that they really want.
But, it doesn’t give right answers. Ethics doesn’t always show the right answer to moral
problems. Indeed more and more people think that for many ethical issues there isn’t a
single right answer - just a set of principles that can be applied to particular cases to give
those involved some clear choices. Some philosophers go further and say that all ethics
can do is eliminate confusion and clarify the issues. After that it’s up to each individual to
come to their own conclusions.
However, It gives several answers. Many people want there to be a single right answer to
ethical questions. They find moral ambiguity hard to live with because they genuinely want
to do the ‘right’ thing, and even if they can’t work out what that right thing is, they like the
idea that ‘somewhere’ there is one right answer. But often there isn’t one right answer -
there may be several right answers, or just some least worst answers - and the individual
must choose between them. For others moral ambiguity is difficult because it forces them
to take responsibility for their own choices and actions, rather than falling back on
convenient rules and customs.
In other words, the study of Ethics gives us a guide on what decisions or course of actions
to take that would not only have impact to ourselves but also to the community of which
we are all members.
Ethics and people
Ethics is for the “other. At the heart of ethics is a concern about something or someone
other than ourselves and our own desires and self-interest. Ethics is concerned with other
people’s interests, with the interests of society, with God’s interests, with “ultimate goods”,
and so on. So when a person ‘thinks ethically’, they are giving at least some thought to
something beyond themselves.
Can we make abortion legal in the Philippines?

Poverty amidst development? Where does our conscience lie?


To promote peace, do we have to prepare for war?

As a source of group strength. One problem with ethics is the way it’s often used as a
weapon. If a group believes that a particular activity is “wrong”, it can then use morality as
the justification for attacking those who practice that activity. When people do this, they
often see those who they regard as immoral as in some way less human or deserving of
respect than themselves; sometimes with tragic consequences.
It sets examples from good deeds. Ethics is not only about the morality of particular
courses of action, but it’s also about the goodness of individuals and what it means to live
a good life. Virtue Ethics is particularly concerned with the moral character of human
beings.
As the source of what is right and wrong. At times in the past some people thought that
ethical problems could be solved in one of two ways:
1. by discovering what God wanted people to do
Example:
Jesus answered, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he
cannot enter the kingdom of God” (Jn. 3:5, ESV)
And saying, “The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand; repent and believe in
the gospel.” (Mk. 1:15, ESV)
But seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things will be
added to you.” (Mt. 6:33, ESV)
“Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.” (Mt. 5:3, ESV)
“Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one
who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. On that day many will say to me, ‘Lord,
Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many
mighty works in your name?’ And then will I declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart
from me, you workers of lawlessness.’ (Mt. 7:21-23, ESV)
Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be
deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice
homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will
inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were
sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our
God. (1 Corinthians 6:9-11, ESV)
2. by thinking rigorously about moral principles and problems
If a person did this properly they would be led to the right conclusion. But now even
philosophers are less sure that it’s possible to devise a satisfactory and complete theory of
ethics - at least not one that leads to conclusions. Modern thinkers often teach that ethics
leads people not to conclusions but to ‘decisions’. In this view, the role of ethics is limited
to clarifying ‘what’s at stake’ in particular ethical problems. Philosophy can help identify the
range of ethical methods, conversations and value systems that can be applied to a
particular problem. But after these things have been made clear, each person must make
their own individual decision as to what to do, and then react appropriately to the
consequences.

Up to what extent do we allow individual decisions over everybody’s welfare? The problem
of vaccine submission or uptake

Tags: #ethics/part 1/basic concepts# #ethics/part 1/basic concepts/notions#


#Ethics/part 1/basic concepts/approaches#
#ethics/part 1/basic concepts/moral philosophy#
#ethics/part 1/basic concepts/uses of ethics#

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SCHOOLS OF ETHICS
ORIGIN OF ETHICS
MORAL PHILOSOPHY

You might also like