The Theory of Key Account Management: For AKAM Diploma Students
The Theory of Key Account Management: For AKAM Diploma Students
The Theory of Key Account Management: For AKAM Diploma Students
Account Management
For AKAM Diploma students
Dr Diana Woodburn
BSc, MSc, MBA, PhD, FCIM Professionalising Key Account Management | a4kam.org
Dr Diana Woodburn & KAM
Is it worth it?
[email protected]
How does KAM work? [email protected]
Content of this session
3. KAM relationships
5. Implementing KAM
Who What do
gets they
KAM? get?
Complete KAM definition
By volume,
contribution
or potential
Medium Medium
accounts accounts
Small
accounts
Small accounts
Difference between AM and KAM
1 year supplier strategy-led action 3-5 year complete strategic business plans unique to
plans customer, closely aligned with customer strategy*
Requires Account Manager Requires Key Account/ Business Manager and KAM
team
Integrated/co-ordinated customer approach
Hi-tech company
Scope of KAM
relationship
Strategy
and
planning
Organisation
and culture
Processes
Woodburn, 2006
2. Key Account selection and categorisation
Who gets what kind of KAM?
High Account’s
Star Strategic spend
Selective Strategic
investment investment
Key account
attractiveness Streamline Status
‘Hard’ ‘Soft’
Total 100
Observation Analysis
Enquiry
Ask them!
Customer's view of your business strength
Total 100
Score = weight x rating (0 – 10)
Who gets KAM?
High Customer’s
Star Strategic spend
Relationship level:
? Basic
Key account Co-operative
attractiveness Streamline Status Interdependent
Integrated
?
Low
Low High
G=Growth
KAM KAM
CR=Cost Reduction Profitability Profitability
KAM=KAM input/cost possibly good
low
CR G CR G
High
Star Strategic
Key account
attractiveness Streamline Status
Low
G CR G
CR
3. KAM relationships
Multi-layered relationships
Layers of
involvement
Activity links
Co-ordination
Resource ties
Change
People bonds
Facilitation
Gedde & Snehota, 1999
Relationship stages
Complex
Integrated
Interdependent
Co-operative
Basic Simple
Supplier Customer
Basic relationships
Cranfield, 1996
Co-operative relationships
Woodburn, 2000
Interdependent KAM relationships
• Rare
• High exit barriers, exit is traumatic
• Dedicated, cross-boundary functional/project teams with
individual organisations subsidiary to team
• Open information sharing including sensitive subjects
• Transparent costing systems
• Assumption of mutual trustworthiness, at all levels
• Abstention from opportunistic behaviour
• Lowered protection against opportunism
• Joint long-term strategic planning
• Real partnership: complementary, mutually dependent
• Better profits for both
Cranfield, 1996
Tool: quick relationship check
To what extent does this statement apply to your relationship with Score Rating Score
your customer? Strongly agree 3
Agree 2
If our relationship ended, both parties would find it difficult and Disagree 1
complicated to exit Strongly disagree 0
There is a real spirit of partnership and trust between our two companies
Together we have produced long-term strategic plans for the
development of our relationship and business together
Any information at all relevant to our business together is passed straight
on to the customer
People at all levels in both organisations are in constant communication
with each other
We have both realised substantial benefits through working together
Total Score
Matching relationships with customer potential
Selling
company
strategic
intent
Integrated
Supplier delusion
Interdependent
Co-operative
Selling company
Buying company
Basic
Buying company
strategic intent
Relationships need management
• Don’t develop Basic relationships unless you can/ want to reach Interdependent
• Don’t prolong the Co-operative stage.
• If a relationship is stuck at Co-operative, move it forwards or backwards.
4. Value creation & strategic account planning
Strategies for key accounts
Value
proposition
Capability Cost
What you have and what you What the customer must pay
can do for the customer or sacrifice for the privilege
Two key requirements of VPs
Strategy 1
VP 1 …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….................
Strategy 2
VP 2 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Strategy 3
VP 3 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Writing
The plan
A. Where are we now?
Appendices
B. Customer
Background detail
understanding
Executive
Business analysis
summary C. Accord strategies &
objectives Development of
thinking
D. High level action &
review
Reading
Critical importance of the plan
Added value
The
customer
Key
3-5 Corporate
Peers and account
Shared
functions years business Delivering
learning plan plan the vision
Key
account
team
Professor Patrick Godfrey,
Halcrow Strategic Relationship Director Team success
5. Implementing KAM
KAM strategic processes
Operations
Present
46
Operational processes with KA impact
Key Account
Manager
Strategy
monitors
Future
E.g.
Value-add
▪ Selling
Change
▪ Order processing
▪ Production/operations
Operations ▪ Customer service
Present ▪ Delivery
▪ Payment
Value-adding KAM processes
Process
step
Continue
as
Person mainly necessary
responsible & until
action complete
Key account
manager’s
role
Inputs? Meetings?
Outputs? Approval points?
Tools & forms? Links to other processes?
KAM measurement model
Making the
right strategic
decisions Strategy
PROFIT
Aligning
implementation Realisation
with strategy
VALUE
Improving Operations
efficiency and (Transactions/Process/Project)
productivity
PRICE/PERFORMANCE
SUPPLIER CUSTOMER
Alignment of measurement
Measurement: Strategic level
51
Measurement: Operational level
52
Measurement: Realisation level
Headline
Headlinecriteria
Headline criteria
criteria Breakdown Score
Breakdown 0-5
Assured supply •Product
Productquality
qualitymanagement
management
•Supply
Supplymanagement
management
•Teamwork
Values/trust based business Teamwork
relationship
business relationship •Openness,
Openness,honesty,
honesty,fair
fairplay
play
Management excellence •Quality
Qualitymanagement
management
•Environmental
Environmentalmanagement
management
•Management
Managementdepthdepth
Low cost- best value •Competitive
Competitivevalidation
validation
•Process
Processoptimisation
optimisation
•Financial
Financialstrength
strength
System player •Communication
Communication
•Best
Bestpractices
practices
•Customer
Customersatisfaction
satisfaction
Technical competencies •Health
Health&&safety
safety
•Product
Productconsistency
consistency
Overall score
Soft (judgment) metrics matter as much to KAs as
54
hard (quantitative) metrics – you’d better believe it!
Aligning with customers via KAM measurement
Relationship
development
Risk Resource
management management
Retention/
business
strategy
Who gets what kind of Key Account Manager?
Developer
High
Star Strategic Business
manager
Selective Strategic
investment investment
Key account
attractiveness Streamline
Tactician Status Customer
manager
Manage for Pro-active
cash maintenance
Low
Low High
Promoting brand/business 0% 5%
Team management 0% 5%
Other ? 10% 59
The roles of the key account manager
Supplier Joint Customer
perspective perspective perspective
LEADER
Builds relationships Leverages relationships
Boundary spanner in suppler organisation
in the customer
Facilitation
Reference point
Focal point of Single point of
contact contact
60
Three leadership roles for KAMs
Key
customer
KAM as
leader
Internal
KA team organisation
peers & managers
61
In summary
• Many Key Account Managers fall into the trap of executing the role just as
salespeople and/or trouble-shooters, but it requires so much more.
• This and other sessions in this series offer concepts that should underpin
and inform what you do as a Key Account Manager every day. “Nothing is
as useful as a good theory”.
• They will also help you to demonstrate your understanding and application
of the concepts in your competency write-ups for the Diploma.