Grammar
Grammar
Grammar
We use used to when we refer to things in the past which are no longer true. It can refer to
repeated actions or to a state or situation:
He used to play football for the local team, but he’s too old now.
That white house over there used to belong to my family. (It belonged to my family in the
past, but not any more.)
Warning:
In statements, the form used to does not change. We do not use the verb be before it. It
always refers to past time:
Not: We are used to go … or We use to go … or We were used to go …
Negative: didn’t use to
The negative of used to is most commonly didn’t use(d) to. Sometimes we write it with a
final -d, sometimes not. Both forms are common, but many people consider the form with
the final -d to be incorrect, and you should not use it in exams:
I didn’t used to like broccoli when I was younger, but I love it now. (Don’t use this form
in exams.)
In very formal styles, we can use the negative form used not to:
Questions
The most common form of question is auxiliary did + use(d) to. Many people consider the
form with a final -d to be incorrect, and you should not use it in exams:
I think we met once, a couple of years ago. Did you use to work with Kevin Harris?
Didn’t she used to live in the same street as us? (Don’t use this form in written exams.)
Emphatic did
We never used to mix very much with the neighbours, but we did used to say hello to them
in the street. (Don’t use this form in written exams.)
Used to
We use used to when we refer to things in the past which are no longer true. It can refer to
repeated actions or to a state or situation:
He used to play football for the local team, but he’s too old now.
That white house over there used to belong to my family. (It belonged to my family in the
past, but not any more.)
Warning:
In statements, the form used to does not change. We do not use the verb be before it. It
always refers to past time:
Not: We are used to go … or We use to go … or We were used to go …
Negative: didn’t use to
The negative of used to is most commonly didn’t use(d) to. Sometimes we write it with a
final -d, sometimes not. Both forms are common, but many people consider the form with
the final -d to be incorrect, and you should not use it in exams:
I didn’t used to like broccoli when I was younger, but I love it now. (Don’t use this form
in exams.)
In very formal styles, we can use the negative form used not to:
Questions
The most common form of question is auxiliary did + use(d) to. Many people consider the
form with a final -d to be incorrect, and you should not use it in exams:
I think we met once, a couple of years ago. Did you use to work with Kevin Harris?
Didn’t she used to live in the same street as us? (Don’t use this form in written exams.)
Emphatic did
We never used to mix very much with the neighbours, but we did used to say hello to them
in the street. (Don’t use this form in written exams.
TOPIC 2: MODAL VERB “MUST”
Must: forms
Must comes first in the verb phrase (after the subject and before another verb):
Not: This must can be your sister. or This can must be your sister.
We can use the full form must not in formal contexts or when we want to emphasise
something:
See also:
Modal verbs
Must: uses
When we think carefully about facts, we often use must to express deductions and
conclusions from these:
A:
B:
Warning:
See also:
Can
Warning:
We use must have + ed form and can’t have + ed form to talk about deductions in the past.
They always refer to deduction, not obligation:
[A wanted to talk to B so she phoned him but he didn’t answer the phone. She phoned
again the next day]
A:
I called you yesterday around three o’clock but you must have been out.
B:
A:
B:
Spoken English:
In speaking, we very often express our reaction to what we hear using phrases such as that
must be or that must have been:
A:
B:
A:
B:
That must have been fun.
Warning:
By the time we got back to our bikes, it was dark and we had to cycle home in the dark
without any lights …
Not: … it was dark and we must cycle home in the dark …
We use must to talk about the future in the past when we report speech or people’s thoughts
in formal contexts:
The pain was back in full force, but she knew she must not give in to it. She must go on
day by day.
We use will have to more than must to express future obligation, especially when talking
about obligations at a particular point in the future:
He’ll have to wait five weeks for his eye operation. Then he’ll have to have both eyes
operated on.
We often use must with more general references to the future, particularly when talking
about obligations that come from the speaker:
The Prime Minister must decide in the next month.
Must and must not often occur in public signs and notices indicating laws, rules and
prohibitions:
See also:
See also:
Invitations
Criticisms
Must and have (got) to?
Obligations
We usually use must to talk about obligations which come from the speaker and we
generally use have (got) to when we refer to obligations that come from outside the
speaker.
Compare
Warning:
Compare
It’s a secret.
to work.
Don’t have to can sometimes be used to criticise someone or to tell them not to do
something. This is less direct than must not:
Deductions
We can also use have got to when we make deductions or draw conclusions. Must is more
common than have (got) to in this meaning:
That must be a fake!
We don’t use must to express obligation and necessity in the past. We use had to instead:
When she got home, she had to cook dinner before everyone arrived.
Don’t worry about our accommodation because I found a nice hotel which will be suitable
for us.
Not: Don’t worry about our accommodation because I found a nice hotel which must be
suitable for us.
TOPIC 3: MODAL VERB “OUGHT TO”
Ought to is a semi-modal verb because it is in some ways like a modal verb and in some
ways like a main verb. For example, unlike modal verbs, it is followed by to, but like modal
verbs, it does not change form for person:
Affirmative
Ought to comes first in the verb phrase (after the subject and before another verb):
Negative
The negative is formed by adding ‘not’ after ought (ought not to). It can be contracted
to oughtn’t to. We don’t use don’t, doesn’t, didn’t with ought to:
Questions
The subject and ought to change position to form questions. We don’t use do, does, did:
Warning:
The question form of ought to is not very common. It is very formal. We usually
use should instead.
We use ought to have + -ed form to talk about things that were desired or ideal in the past
but which didn’t happen. It can express regret:
We ought to have locked the gate. Then the dog wouldn’t have got out. (The ideal or
desired thing was that we locked the gate, but we didn’t.)
I often think that I ought to have studied medicine not pharmacy. (I would be happier now
if I had studied medicine.)
What is likely
We can use ought to when we talk about what is likely or probable:
The concert ought to only take about two hours so we’ll be home by 12 pm.
Ought to or should?
There ought to be more street lights here. (means the same as There should be more street
lights here.)
We use had better to refer to the present or the future, to talk about actions we think people
should do or which are desirable in a specific situation. The verb form is always had,
not have. We normally shorten it to ’d better in informal situations. It is followed by the
infinitive without to:
It’s five o’clock. I’d better go now before the traffic gets too bad.
Had better is a strong expression. We use it if we think there will be negative results if
someone does not do what is desired or suggested:
Spoken English:
Sometimes people say had best instead of had better, especially in informal speaking. This
sounds slightly less strong and less direct:
You’d better not tell Elizabeth about the broken glass – she’ll go crazy!
The question form of had better is made by inverting the subject and had. This means the
same as should, but is more formal:
Had I better speak to Joan first before I send this form off? What do you think?
Had we better leave a note for the delivery guy to take the parcel next door?
Hadn’t you better switch your computer off? It might overheat if you leave it on.
We use had better to give advice in a specific situation. We use the phrase be better or be
best + to-infinitive for more general suggestions:
It’s always better to be safe than sorry. (‘It’s better to be safe than sorry’ is a saying which
means that you should be careful before taking any action.)
I think it would be best to speak to the people in the video shop to see what they
recommend.
Compare
I’d better get a taxi. The buses are so It is a good idea, better, or advisable to get a
slow. taxi.
We use had better to give specific advice, not to talk about obligations or requirements;
instead, we use have to, have got to or must:
See also:
Must
They offered her a job in Warsaw, but she said she’d rather work in a smaller city. (or
… she’d prefer to work …)
Auckland is a great place to visit. I’d recommend you take a boat trip across the bay and
see some of the islands. Then you can find a nice restaurant for lunch. There are plenty of
them.
Not: You’d better take a boat trip across the bay and see some of the islands. Then you’d
better find a nice restaurant for lunch.
TOPIC 5: PAST CONTINUOUS
The Past Continuous tense is an important tense in English. We use it to say what we were
in the middle of doing at a particular moment in the past.
In this lesson we look at the structure and the use of the Past Continuous tense, followed
by a quiz to check your understanding.
For negative sentences we insert not between the auxiliary verb and the main verb.
- We were no joking.
t
The Past Continuous tense expresses action at a particular moment in the past. The action
started before that moment but has not finished at that moment. For example, yesterday I
watched a film on TV. The film started at 7pm and finished at 9pm.
8pm
When we use the Past Continuous tense, our listener usually knows or understands what
time we are talking about. Look at these examples:
We often use the Past Continuous tense to "set the scene" in stories. We use it to describe
the background situation at the moment when the action begins. Often, the story starts with
the Past Continuous tense and then moves into the Past Simple tense. Here is an example:
We often use the Past Continuous tense with the Past Simple tense. We use the Past
Continuous to express a long action. And we use the Past Simple to express a short action
that happens in the middle of the long action. We can join the two ideas
with when or while.
long action:
I was watching TV from 7pm to
9pm.
8pm
short action:
You phoned at 8pm.
We can join these two actions with when:
Notice that "when you telephoned" is also a way of defining the time (8pm).
We use:
The present perfect continuous tense (also known as the present perfect progressive tense)
shows that something started in the past and is continuing at the present time. The present
Here’s a tip: Want to make sure your writing always looks great? Grammarly can save you
from misspellings, grammatical and punctuation mistakes, and other writing issues on all
your favorite websites.
In this sentence, using the present perfect continuous verb tense conveys that reading War
and Peace is an activity that began sometime in the past and is not yet finished in the
present (which is understandable in this case, given the length of Tolstoy’s weighty tome).
Recently and lately are words that we often find with verbs in the present perfect
continuous tense.
Mia has been competing in flute competitions recently. (And she will continue to do so.)
Recently, I’ve been misplacing my wallet and keys. (Because I sure don’t know where they
are.)
Of course, not all verbs are compatible with continuous action. Some examples of such