Academic Task Number: 1 Course code: QTT 103

Date of allotment: Course title: Statistics 1

Date of submission: 19-02-23 Maximum Marks: 30

Academic Task Type: Offline Nature: Individual

SUBMITTED TO: Dr. BLESSY BY:INNOCENT MUSIKANYANGWE 12202068

 QUESTIONNAIRE
The dynamic technological era that we are in has escalated the need
for African students to come and study in India. Most of the students
however fail to come because of fear of the unknown due to a lack of
proper information pertaining to the cost of living for International
students there-in. This survey is aimed at conducting a survey to infer
the cost of living for all international students at LPU.
This is also essential for the school to come up with schemes that can
help lower the cost of living for international students such as
affordable transport and accommodation among other uses.
1. NAME: sex:

2. YEAR OF ADMISSION:

3. NATIONALITY:

4. Residential area in India?

RAMA LAWGATE LPU CAMPUS OTHER

MANDI SPECIFY
5. Mode of transport to and from school?

FOOT BICYCLE BUS MOTORBIKE CAR

6. DAILY TRANSPORT COST?

0-50INR 50- 100-150

100INR
7. DAILY FOOD COST AT SCHOOL?
0-25 INR 25-50 INR 50-75INR 75- 100-125
100INR
8. After school do you cook or buy yes NO
food?
9. IF yes what is your monthly budget for food
1000-1500 1500-2000 INR 2000-2500 INR 2500-3000 INR
INR
 10. IF NO what is your daily expenditure on food?

40-80 80-120 120-160 160-200

11. What is the monthly budget for food for a hostler apart from the mess?

250-500 INR 500-750 INR 750-1000 INR 1000-1250 INR

12. What is your monthly rent?

4000-6000INR 6000-8000 INR 8000-10 00O 10 000-12 000

INR INR
13. Parents or guardians’ occupation?

Civil service Manufacturing Service agriculture

14. Monthly pocket money received?

4000-6000 6000-8000 INR 8000-10000 10000-12000

INR INR INR
15.HOW DO YOU RATE YOUR OVERALL COST OF LIVING IN INDIA?

AFFORDABLE VERY LOW HIGH COST LESS COSTLY

15. HOW RATE THE MODE OF TRANSPORT?

AFFORDABLE EFFICIENT RISKY COSTLY UNRELIABLE

 Q2 Find different data sets from any of the following websites (RBI, WHO, ADB, NSSO, CSO, CMI,
Economic Survey). The data set should be made up of at least 100 quantitative observations. 1. Present
the data using appropriate tables 2. Use appropriate diagrams to present the data

Name of state Poverty Rate Literacy rate Population in Gross state output Per capita net GDP @
% rural (000) @Factor cost. Factor cost constant
(HEADCOUNT
Constant prices prices.
2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011
1.Punjab 14.5 23.2 69.65 76.68 23216 17344 8610813 13698738 25992 46325

2 .Assam 94.6 101.3 63.25 73.18 23216 26807 4718074 6694188 12529 21741

4. Gujarat 67.9 102.2 69.14 79.31 31741 34695 1722650 33688617 18200 56634
0
5. Bihar 425.6 358.2 47 63.82 74317 92341 7016688 1295851 5994 13149

6.Chandigarh 0.5 2.4 81.94 86.43 92 29 761015 1195851 50476 80801

7. DELHI 11.5 17 81.67 86.34 945 419 9471686 18072223 39026 106677

8. Kerala 41 24 90.86 93.91 23574 17471 1047760 17691461 20659 52808

5
9. Tamil Nadu 130.5 82.6 73.45 80.33 34922 37230 1936450 38650813 19748 57093
3
10. Aryana 17.3 28.8 67.91 76.64 15029 16509 8622228 15852299 25638 61716

SOURCE: RBI HAND Book of Statistics

POVERTY RATES OF INDIAN STATES 2001-2011

450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0

2001 2011

-From the bar graph above Bihar is the poorest of all the states and Chandigarh is the least poor of them all.
Assam, Gujarati, and Tamil Nadu have the same rate of poverty though comparatively poorer than Punjab,
Delhi, Aryana, and Kerala. However, though Bihar is the poorest, it was the most improved in 2001-2011.
 LITERACY RATES OF INDIAN STATES 2011

67.91, 10% 69.65, 11%

73.45, 11% 63.25, 10%

69.14, 11%
90.86, 14%

47, 7%

81.67, 13%
81.94, 13%

1.Punjab 2 .Assam 4. Gujarat 5. Bihar 6.Chandigarh

7. DELHI 8. Kerala 9. Tamil Nadu 10. Aryana

Literacy rates for Indian States 2011

1.Punjab

76.64, 11%
76.68, 11% 2 .Assam
4. Gujarat
80.33, 11% 73.18, 10%
5. Bihar
6.Chandigarh
79.31, 11%
93.91, 13%
7. DELHI
63.82, 9% 8. Kerala
86.34, 12%
86.43, 12% 9. Tamil Nadu
10. Aryana

 India’s most literate state between 2001-2011 is Kerala and the

most illiterate is Bihar most probably due to its poverty.
 All the state have progresssed positively interms of literacy , with
Bihar improving by 34,3% in the ten years period.
 Population in rural for different Indian States
100000

92341
90000

80000
74317
POPULATION IN THOUSANDS

70000

60000

50000

40000
37230
34695 34922
30000 31741
26807
23216 23216 23574
20000
17344 17471 16509
15029
10000

0 92
29 945
419
6.Chandig 9. Tamil 10.
1.Punjab 2 .Assam 4. Gujarat 5. Bihar 7. DELHI 8. Kerala
arh Nadu Aryana
2001 23216 23216 31741 74317 92 945 23574 34922 15029
2011 17344 26807 34695 92341 29 419 17471 37230 16509
Column1

2001 2011

 Population in the rural areas is more in Bihar for both the periods
2001 and 2011.
 There is the least population in the rural areas for states like
Chandigarh and Delhi because they are the most developed thus
there is rapid urbanization there.
 Gross state output @Factor cost. Constant prices

40000000
35000000
30000000
25000000
(₹) LAKH

20000000
15000000
10000000
5000000
0

GDP 2001 GDP 2011

 Tamil Nadu and Gujarat are the most productive States

 Chandigarh recorded the least output despite it being a developed state, Bihar and
Assam were less productive though comparatively higher than Chandigarh.
 However due to population differences it is important to look at per capita Gdp to get
a better measure of productivity.

Per capita Net GDP @ Factor cost constant

prices.

120000
100000
80000
(₹)

60000
40000
20000
0

GDP Per capita 2001 GDP per capita 2011

  According to per capita GDP data Delhi was the most productive
state followed by Chandigarh.
 Bihar was the least productive State in per capita GDP terms
which suggests the population was comparatively higher than the
output they produced.
Life expectancy at birth total years as at 2020
Country (yrs.) Country (yrs.) Country (yrs.) Country Name (yrs.) Country (yrs.)
Name Name Name Name
Aruba 75.723 Bangladesh 71.968 Ukraine 71.185 Spain 82.334 Croatia 77.724
Korea, Rep. 83.426 Bulgaria 73.607 Cuba 77.567 Estonia 78.346 Haiti 64.052
Afghanistan 62.575 Bahrain 79.174 Tanzania 66.408 Ethiopia 65.371 Hungary 75.617
Thailand 79.274 Bahamas,Te 72.677 Uganda 62.851 E .U 80.465 IBRD only 73.397
Angola 62.261 Togo 61.035 Cyprus 81.391 Zimbabwe 61.124 IDA&IBRD 70.825
Albania 76.989 Belarus 74.226 Czech 78.226 Finland 82.131 IDA total 63.589
Kuwait 76.92 Belize 72.854 Germany 80.941 Fiji 67.924 IDA blend 61.0047
Arab World 70.923 Bermuda 82.056 Djibouti 62.694 France 82.175 Indonesia 68.808
UAE 78.946 Bolivia 64.467 Tuvalu 64.382 Faroe Islands 83.092 IDA only 64.891
Argentina 75.892 Brazil 74.009 Denmark 81.551 Eritrea 67.133 Isle of Man 80.588
Armenia 72.173 Barbados 77.393 Turkey 75.85 Gabon 66.531 India 70.15
Libya 72.472 Yemen,Rep. 64.65 Algeria 74.453 U. K 80.902 Lesotho 54.693
Sri Lanka 76.393 Bhutan 71.609 Samoa 72.768 Georgia 72.765 Ireland 82.204
Australia 83.2 Botswana 65.647 Kosovo 76.567 Ghana 64.114 Japan 84.615
Austria 81.192 South Africa 65.252 Uruguay 78.43 Gibraltar 82.198 Iraq 69.123
Azerbaijan 66.868 Canada 81.748 UnitedStates 77.28 Guinea 59.327 Iceland 83.065
Burundi 61.566 Slovenia 80.531 Uzbekistan 70.331 Gambia, The 62.612 Israel 82.7
Belgium 80.795 Switzerland 83.1 Ecuador 72.153 Zambia 62.38 Italy 82.343
Benin 60.088 Sweden 82.407 Tunisia 75.292 Eq Guinea 60.708 Jamaica 71.869
Burkina Faso 59.731 Chile 79.377 Euro area 81.537 Greece 81.087 Jordan 75.184
SOURCE: WORLD BANK

TABLE SHOWING no. of countries in each group FOR LIFE EXPECTANCE

CLASS INTERVALS Frequency Cumulative frequency

(yrs) 0
59.327-65.327 15 15
65.327-71.327 10 25
71.327-77.327 22 47
77.327-83.327 28 75
83.327-89.327 1 76
 HISTOGRAM SHOWING Life expectancy at birth total years as at 2020

 The data above is showing that the modal class of life expectance in most countries is 77yrs to
83yrs
 Very few countries are in the 83-89yrs class however most countries have low life expectances
as shown most countries are clustered in the range of 50-75 yrs on average.
 Life expectance is increased by increased standards of living thus because most countries have
not yet developed they will eventually record low life expectancy.