Possible Questions
Possible Questions
Possible Questions
Literature Review
Measurement
Data Collection
How will you actually collect the data for your study (observation, interviews,
document analysis, focus group, photography and video, etc.)?
Question 1: In a few sentences, are you able to tell us what your study is all about?
Many professors will tell you that the majority of students get choked on an issue like this.
Anyways the question is straightforward, but a touch technical.
To answer this question, you would like to understand every detail of your scientific research
from chapter one to the top.
The question needs a solution in sort of a summary of the whole study, therefore, to ace this
particular question you would like to understand every detail in your abstract.
If you wrote an honest abstract, this question is going to be a cross-over for you.
These questions are often very tricky and it goes an extended way in convincing your panel
members that your study is worth their time.
Another way this question might be twisted is what’s THE RESEARCH PROBLEM?
To answer this question, you’ll plan to elaborate on the matter investigated within the study.
Do not state financial reasons or the necessity to graduate as a motivation as you’ll easily
explode point.
Question 3: How will this study contribute to the body of knowledge?
At some point, the necessity for justification will arise which is once you are going to be
asked to say how your study will increase the body of data if approved.
Here you’ll get to use your methods, case study, or any unique model or conceptual
framework utilized in the study to defend it.
Just like stating how your study will contribute to the body of data, you’ll get to state the
importance of your study.
To answer this question, you’ll get to highlight how your study will aid the govt in policy
development and implementation, how it’ll help other students who may wish to conduct
research studies on the topic matter, and therefore the way organizations and society will
enjoy your study.
Your ability to unravel this problem and explore areas not yet researched gives you the
complete marks allocated for answering this question.
You must be ready to convince the committee members that your approach is exclusive and
it covered areas where much hasn’t been done by other researchers.
This is another simple but tricky question. Most times the question isn’t asked to feel for you,
but rather urge loopholes to criticize your work.
To answer this question, you want to take care with words as you’ll implicate yourself. Be
careful enough not to sell out yourself.
Do not discuss limitations in your methods or data analysis techniques as this might imply
that your study could also be biased or not well-researched.
Use simple limitations like difficulties encountered in combining lectures and projects rather
than limiting your study.
At now it’s expected of you to present your results or findings from the study in a clear and
concise manner.
As discussed above, you ought to not only state a specific method for the study.
You must even be ready and ready to justify why you chose the tactic in a convincing
manner.
At now you’re liberal to quote sources or similar studies where such methods were adopted.
Recommendations are very vital in every research study and will not be joked with.
Question 11: supporting your findings what areas will you suggest for future research?
Questions like this are just there to check your reasoning and authority in your research
area.
Based on your findings during a manageable scope, you ought to be ready to suggest future
research areas in line with your study.
For example, if I researched the challenges of private tax collection in Cameroon, an honest
area for further study is going to be in other sorts of taxation such as VAT, Company tax, etc.
Question 12: How can your research study be put into practice?
Easy for science and engineering students, but a touch tough for management and social
sciences since most management/social science projects are more abstract in nature.
Relate your study to current trends in your environment, office, economy, government,
schools, church, etc.
The use of relevant examples and illustrations will score a good point here.
Question 13: How would you summarize your study to a practitioner using a few sentences?
Your ability to convey technical information from the study will score you good points here.
Question 14: What would you modify if you were to conduct the study again?
Hmmm. Be careful! don’t be too jovial. there’s a loophole here! a bit like your limitations, this
question is often asked to spot your weak points.
In simple terms, what data collection method did you use for the study?
Here you state if questionnaires were distributed or data was gotten from secondary
sources.
Here you’ll get to convince your panel members that you simply know what you’re talking
about.
You would like to elucidate your independent and dependent variable(s) to convince them
that you simply are on point. Your variables are present in your project topic.
You would like to spot these variables and know their definitions also to ace your defense.
It should take about 0.015 seconds to answer this question if you’re fully prepared.
Question 18: What does one decide to do together with your scientific research after
Graduation?
If you plan to publish it, this is often the simplest opportunity to discuss and interact with the
committee members-maybe a professor there can help.
Question 19: What source of knowledge was employed for the study?
At now you’ve got to state the source(s) you bought data from. generally, you’ve got to state
whether data was gotten from a primary or secondary source or both.
You’ll further convince the committee members by discussing the literature review for the
study-both theoretical and empirical.
Question 20: What theories or theoretical framework is your study based on?
If you can’t find relevant theories to copy your study, consult your supervisor for help.