Chapter 7
Chapter 7
Chapter 7
The objective of a drilling operation is to drill, evaluate, and complete a well that
will produce oil and/or gas efficiently. Drilling fluids perform numerous functions
that help make this possible. The responsibility for performing these functions
is held jointly by the mud engineer and those who direct the drilling operation.
The duty of those charged with drilling the hole – including the oil company
representative, drilling contractor, and rig crew – is to make sure that the correct
drilling procedures are conducted. The chief duty of the mud engineer is to
assure that mud properties are correct for the specific drilling environment. The
mud engineer should also recommend drilling practice changes that will help
reach the drilling objectives.
Drilling fluid (also called drilling mud) is a mixture of water, oil, clay, and various
physical chemical additives. It performs various functions in drilling and con-
tributes with a large portion to the total well cost. In this way the drilling fluid
system (or mud program) has to be carefully designed to ensure a successful
drilling project.
The drilling fluid serves many purposes, which may not all be achieved si-
multaneously for all parts of the well. In this way, an individual prioritization has
to be followed. Below is a summary of some main drilling fluid functions:
1. Transport the drilling cuttings from the bottom of the hole to the surface.
For this, a higher fluid circulation velocity and a higher fluid viscosity are
favorable.
The composition of a particular drilling fluid system depends on the actual re-
quirements of the individual well or well section. Wells are drilled through dif-
ferent formations, which require different mud properties to achieve optimum
1
The ability of a fluid, such as cement or drilling mud, to develop gel strength over time when
not subject to shearing, and then to liquefy when agitated.
1. Water–base fluids
3. Synthetic Fluids
4. Aerated fluids
Water–base fluids are any drilling fluid in which the continuous phase, where
some materials are in suspension and others are dissolved, is water. Thus any
water–base fluid system consists of a water phase, inert solids, reactive solids
phase, and chemical additives. Each of these parts contribute to the overall
fluid properties. The individual contributions are:
To drill compact formations which are normally pressured2 , fresh water and
salt–saturated water can be used as drilling mud. Native muds are the result
of mixing water and clays or shales from the cuttings drilled. Here the clays
or shales are dissolved by the water and returned to the surface. Clear water
and native muds are the cheapest mud systems since no additional material is
needed to form the mud. They are also environmentally best accepted.
When swelling and hydration of clays and shales are expected, inhibitive water–
base muds can be used. Calcium muds are best suited to drill formations
that contain gypsum and hydrite. A subclassification of inhibitive water–base
muds distinguishes seawater muds, saturated saltwater muds, lime muds, and
gypsum muds.
Dispersed muds are used when the following characteristics are required:
In general, these mud systems exhibit better control of viscosity, higher solids
tolerance, and better control of filtration than non–dispersed muds.
2
Formation with pore pressure gradient equal to brine density
To drill sloughing shales and water sensitive rocks such as productive sands,
which are prone to formation damage, fresh water non–dispersed muds are
used. Commonly, non–dispersed muds are associated with low mud weights
and low solid concentrations.
Non–dispersed mud systems consist of:
• inhibiting polymer,
• viscosifier,
• caustic soda,
• lubricants.
Low–solids polymer mud systems are widespread in the industry since they
offer advantages like increased penetration rate, hole stability, shear thinning
ability, hole cleaning with maximum hydraulics, and lower equivalent circula-
tion density over conventional deflocculated muds. Besides these advantages,
they also have disadvantages like instability at temperatures above 250 ◦ F, ir-
reversible absorption of the polymer on clay, higher dilution, the requirement of
adequate solids removal equipment, and the fact that they are more corrosive.
Several mud systems have been included in this classification. Saturated salt
systems have a chloride concentration near 190,000 mg/l (saturated) and are
In oil–base mud systems, crude or diesel oil forms the continuous phase in the
water–in–oil emulsion. In this way oil–base mud can have as little as 3% to 5%
or as much as 20% to 40% (invert emulsions) of water content. Oil–base mud
systems are used when:
Low–gravity solids content has to be monitored closely when drilling with oil–
base muds. The reason is because there is no hydration of solids (clays),
which frequently causes the contents of low–gravity solids to exceed acceptable
levels. This results in reduction of penetration rate, increase risk of formation
damage, and increase risk of differential sticking.
Since oil–base muds contain substantially less colloidal particles, they ex-
hibit an increased spurt fluid loss 3 . Due to the higher filtration rates, the mon-
itoring of high–pressure/high–temperature filtration and the drilling conditions
are important to ensure that excessive filtration or filter cake buildup does not
lead to drilling problems.
3
The instantaneous volume (spurt) of liquid that passes through a filter medium prior to
deposition of a competent and controlling filter cake.
Synthetic fluids are designed to mirror oil–based mud performance without the
environmental hazards. Primary synthetic fluids are esters, ethers, poly alpha–
olefin and isomerized alpha–olefin. They are environmentally friendly, can be
discharged offshore, and are non–sheening and biodegradable.
Four basic operations are included in this specialized category. These include:
1. Dry air drilling, which involves injecting dry air or gas into the wellbore at
rates capable of achieving annular velocities that will remove cuttings;
2. Mist drilling, which involves injecting a foaming agent into the air stream
that mixes with produced water and coats the cuttings to prevent mud
rings, allowing drill solids to be removed;
4. Aerated fluids rely on mud with injected air (which reduces hydrostatic
head) to remove drilled solids from the wellbore.
These fluids are discussed in details in advanced drilling courses (air drilling,
underblanced drilling, etc).
The API has recommended standard methods of conducting field and labora-
tory tests for drilling fluids and detailed procedures may be found in the API
publication, “Recommended Practice: Standard Procedure for Field Testing
Water–Based (Oil–Based) Drilling Fluids,” API RP13B–1, 13B–2 and supple-
ments (also see 13I for Laboratory Testing Drilling Fluids, 13J for Testing Heavy
Brines and supplements).
The density or weight of the mud may be determined by the use of any instru-
ment of sufficient accuracy to permit measurement to within 0.1 lb/gal (0.5 lb/ft3
or 5 psi/1000 ft of depth).
For all practical purposes, density means weight per unit volume and mak-
ing a density test means weighing the mud. The weight of mud may be ex-
pressed as a hydrostatic pressure gradient in psi/1000 ft of vertical depth, as a
density in lb/gal, lb/ft3 , or specific gravity.
The Marsh funnel is used for routine field measurement of the viscosity of
drilling mud. It is a simple device for indicating viscosity on a routine basis.
When used with a measuring cup, the funnel gives an empirical value for the
consistency of a fluid.
The rotary viscometer is used to supplement the information obtained from the
Marsh funnel, particularly with respect to the gel characteristics of the mud.
It is capable of giving the apparent viscosity, plastic viscosity, yield point, and
gel strengths (initial and timed). Drilling fluid contained in the annular space
between two concentric cylinders is sheared by the rotation of the outer cylinder
(rotor sleeve) at a constant RPM (rotational velocity). The torque at the rotor
sleeves is transmitted by the fluid to the inner cylinder (bob). A torsion spring
restrains the movement of the bob, and a dial indicates displacement of the
bob. Instrument constants are adjusted so that plastic viscosity and yield point
are obtained by using readings from rotor sleeve speeds of 600 and 300 RPM.
A six-speed model (600, 300, 200, 100, 6, and 3 rpm) can be used to fully
characterize a fluid.
Determines the filtration properties of drilling muds and cement slurries. Gen-
erally consists of a mud reservoir mounted in a frame, a pressure source, a
filtering medium, and a graduated cylinder for receiving and measuring filtrate.
Working pressure is 100 psi and the filtering area is 7.1 in2 , as specified by the
American Petroleum Institute (API RP13B–1 and RP13B–2).
Similar to API filter press (with half filtration area), but can be used in pressures
up to to 1200 psi and temperatures up to 500◦ F.
Figure 7.4: A API filter press. Figure 7.5: A HTHP filter press.
This is not yet an API test. The purpose is to determine some mechanical prop-
erties of the mud cake like penetration resistance, adherence, compressibility,
etc.
Determines sand content by sieve analysis. The volume of sand, including void
spaces between grains, is usually measured and expressed as a percentage
by volume of the drilling fluid.
Determines the capacity of a clay to absorb cations from a solution, and thereby
predict how the clay will react in its intended use. The clay may be component of
a drilling fluid, a binder in foundry sand, or a clay used for some other purpose.
The Methylene Blue Test is based on the property of clays known as base
exchange capacity, that is, clays can exchange some of their ions for the ions
of certain other chemicals. The number of ions available for this exchange
varies with different types of clay.
Figure 7.8: Methyl blue capacity test kit. Figure 7.9: A pH meter.
7.3.1.10 pH:
Indicator sticks and/or pH meter are used to determine the hydrogen ion con-
centration in the mud and in the filtrate.
• Chloride (Cl)
• Calcium Qualitative
• Total Hardness
• Sulfate
• Potassium (K+)
• Phosphate
• Resistivity
• Resistivity of the mud, filtrate and filter cake is sometimes needed in order
to help evaluate the electric logs.
The test indicates if an oil is likely to damage elastomers that come in contact
with the oil. It is the lowest temperature (°F or °C) at which equal volumes of
aniline (C6 H5 NH2 ) and the oil form a single phase. A low AP is indicative of
higher aromatics, while a high AP is indicative of lower aromatics content.
Figure 7.12: An aniline point kit. Figure 7.13: Electrical stability tester.
Indicates the emulsion and oil–wetting qualities of the sample. The test is per-
formed by inserting the ES probe into a cup of 120 ◦ F (48.9 ◦ C) mud and push-
ing a test button. The ES meter automatically applies an increasing voltage
(from 0 to 2000 volts) across an electrode gap in the probe. Maximum voltage
that the mud will sustain across the gap before conducting current is displayed
as the ES voltage.
• Salinity Chlorides
• Sulfides
Additives are added to the drilling fluid in order to bring the fluid parameters to
the required values. Density and viscosity are the two most basic parameters
to control.
The drilling fluid technician or engineer should carry some calculations, and
laboratory measurements and tests to determine the correct additive and the
correct amount to be mixed to the fluid system. Fluid volumes are normally
measured in barrels. Useful conversion factors are:
1 bbl = 42 gal
1 gal = 231 in3
1 ft3 = 1728 in3
1 in3 = 2.543 cm3
1 lbm = 453.59 g
Powder and dry additives are normally measured in pounds, and liquid ad-
ditives are normally measured in gallons or barrels. Pilot tests are laboratory
(small scale) tests that aim to determine the amount of additive required to
bring some fluid parameters to determinate values. Small scale tests are fast
and cheap to perform. A handy conversion for is that of lbm/bbl to g/cm3:
1in3
lbm 453.59g 1bbl 1gal 1g
1 × × × 3
× 3 3
=
bbl 1lbm 42gal 231in 2.54 cm 350cm3
Therefore, in a pilot test with 350 ml of fluid, 1 gram of added additive cor-
responds to the addition of 1 lbm of dry additive to 1 barrel of fluid. A similar
conversion shows that 25 ml of liquid additive in 350 ml or fluid corresponds to
3 gallons of additive per barrel of fluid.
The assumption that the mixture is ideal, that is, that the volume of the
mixture is equal to the volume of the components (not valid for highly soluble
substances like NaCl in water) facilitates the volume–density calculations. The
relations are: X
Vmix = Vi ,
where Vmix is the volume of the mixture and Vi is the volume of the component
i of the mixture, and
X X
Mmix = ρmix Vmix = Mi = ρi Vi ,
Example 28: Calculate the volume and density of a fluid composed of 25 lbm
of bentonite, 60 lbm of barite, and 1 bbl of fresh water.
Solution:
The volume and the mass of the mixture are:
42gal 25lbm 60lbm
Vmix = 1bbl × + + = 44.87gal
1bbl 21.7lbm/gal 35lbm/gal
42gal lbm
Mmix = 1bbl × × 8.33 + 25lbm + 60lbm = 434.9lbm
1bbl gal
434.9lbm
ρmix = = 9.69 lbm/gal
44.87gal
The density control of a drilling fluid is obtained usually with the use of barium
sulfate (BaSO4) commonly called barite. The specific gravity of pure barite is
4.5, and the average specific gravity of API barite is 4.2 or 35 lbm/gal.
To keep the barite in suspension, a minimum gel strength of 3 lbf/100ft2 is
required and normally obtained with water–bentonite fluid. The bentonite itself
adds viscosity and density to the water.
The most common weight treatment is that of increasing the density of the
fluid by adding barite. Four basic different procedures exist and must be under-
stood. They are:
1. Increase fluid density by adding barite (no volume limit). In this case it is
not necessary to discard part of the original fluid.
3. Increase fluid density by adding barite and water (no volume limit). In this
case, hydration water is added to avoid increasing the viscosity.
4. Increase fluid density by adding barite and water (volume limit). In this
case it is necessary to discard part of the original fluid before adding
barite and hydration water.
5. Reduce fluid density by adding water and bentonite (no volume limit).
6. Reduce fluid density by adding water and bentonite (volume limit).
Let V1 and ρ1 be respectively the volume and the density of the fluid before
the treatment. The required density of the fluid after treatment is ρ2 . Since
there is no limit for the final volume V2 , no discard of fluid is needed before the
treatment. Using volume and mass continuity we have:
V1 + VB = V2 ,
ρ1 V1 + ρB VB = ρ2 V2 ,
where VB and ρB are respectively the volume and density of the barite. Solving
for VB in terms of V1 we get:
ρ2 − ρ 1
VB = V1 . (7.1)
ρ B − ρ2
The barite is added to the fluid in mass quantity (usually in lbm), and since
mB = ρB VB we can write:
mB = ρB VB . (7.2)
This is the mass of barite needed to add to obtain a fluid with density ρ2 . The
final volume V2 is given by:
V2 = V1 + VB . (7.3)
In this case, since the volume is limited (and assumed to be the initial volume
V1), it is necessary to discard a volume Vd before increasing the density. Using
volume and mass continuity we have:
V1 − Vd + VB = V1 → Vd = VB ,
ρ1 V1 − ρ1 Vd + ρB VB = ρ2 V1 .
Note that the discarded volume will be equal to the volume of barite added to
increase the density. Substituting Vd for VB in the second equation and factoring
out Vd we obtain:
ρ2 − ρ1
Vd = VB = V1 . (7.4)
ρB − ρ1
With VB , the mass of barite to be added is given by
mB = ρB VB . (7.5)
If barite is added to the mud, a part of the free water in the mud will be adsorbed
by the particles of barite (particle sizes in the silt and fine sand range - 2 µm to
100 µm). The water will come from the fluid and, as consequence, an increase
of viscosity will occur. To avoid this increase in viscosity, a volume of water is
added along with the barite to serve as hydration water, and thus keeping the
viscosity under control. The amount of water added depends on the amount
of barite added. Normally, 2 to 3 gallons of water are required for 100 lbm of
barite.
Let vh be volume of hydration water per mass of barite, and Vw and ρw the
volume and density of the hydration water. Then we have:
V1 + VB + Vw = V2 ,
ρ1 V1 + ρB VB + ρw Vw = ρ2 V2 .
The volume of water and the volume of barite are related by the specific volume
vh :
Vw = mB vh = ρB VB vh .
Substituting this value in the system above we get:
V1 + (1 + ρB vh ) VB = V2 ,
ρ1 V1 + (1 + ρw vh ) ρB VB = ρ2 V2 .
Solving for VB in terms of V1 we get:
ρ2 − ρ1
VB = V1 . (7.6)
(1 + ρw vh ) ρB − (1 + ρB vh ) ρ2
With VB , the mass of barite, volume of water, and the final volume are given by:
mB = ρB VB , (7.7)
Vw = mB vh , (7.8)
V2 = V1 + VB + Vw . (7.9)
The final volume is V1 , and a volume Vd must be discarded before the treatment.
The continuity equations are:
V1 − Vd + VB + Vw = V1 → Vd = VB + Vw ,
ρ1 V1 − ρ1 Vd + ρB VB + ρw Vw = ρ2 V1 .
Using Vw = ρB VB vh and the first equation above gives:
Vd = (1 + ρB vh ) VB .
Substituting these two results in the second equation and solving for VB results
in:
ρ 2 − ρ1
VB = V1 . (7.10)
(1 + ρw vh ) ρB − (1 + ρB vh ) ρ1
With VB , the volume to discard, the mass of barite, and the volume of hydration
water are:
Vd = (1 + ρB vh ) VB , (7.11)
mB = ρB VB , (7.12)
Vw = mB vh . (7.13)
Example 29: It is required to increase the density of 300 bbl of a drilling mud
from 9.3 ppg to 10.5 ppg. Calculate the amount of barite and the suitable
procedure (discard, hydration water, etc) for the four cases above. (Assume
ρB = 35 ppg, vw = 2.4 gal/100 lbm of barite, and ρw = 8.34 ppg.)
Solution:
Case 1: No volume limit, no hydration water. Using Equations 7.1 to 7.3:
10.5 − 9.3
VB = × 300 bbl = 14.69 bbl
35 − 10.5
lbm 42 gal
mB = 35 × 14.69 bbl × = 21, 600 lbm
gal 1 bbl
V2 = 300 + 14.69 = 314.69 bbl ≈ 315 bbl
Case 2: Volume limit, no hydration water. Using Equations 7.4 and 7.5:
10.5 − 9.3
Vd = VB = × 300 = 14.01 bbl
35 − 9.3
mB = 35 × 14.01 × 42 = 20, 591 lbm
The final volume is equal to the original volume, i.e., 300 bbl.
Case 3: No volume limit, hydration water. Using Equations 7.6, to 7.9:
10.5 − 9.3
VB = 2.4
2.4
× 300 = 15.87 bbl
1 + 8.34 × 100
× 35 − 1 + 35 × 100
× 10.5
10.5 − 9.3
VB = 2.4
2.4
× 300 = 14.46 bbl
1 + 8.34 × 100
× 35 − 1 + 35 × 100
× 9.3
2.4
Vd = 1 + 35 × 100
× 14.46 = 26.6 bbl
From the graph in Figure 7.14, we see that premium clay produces 15 cP
mud at the density of 8.94 ppg. We have 3 continuity equations and 1 relation-
ship to solve: Final mud volume and mass equations:
Vw + Vc + Vh + VB = Vm
ρw Vw + ρc Vc + ρw Vh + ρB VB = ρm Vm
Mass of the initial mud (water and premium clay):
ρi (Vw + Vc ) = ρw Vw + ρc Vc
Vh = ρB VB vh
Vw + Vc + Vh + VB = 350
Vw = 323.21 bbl
Vc = 15.2 bbl
Vh = 5.29 bbl
VB = 6.3 bbl
Therefore, the total water volume, and the mass of clay and barite are: