9607 w21 Ms 4 PDF
9607 w21 Ms 4 PDF
9607 w21 Ms 4 PDF
Published
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the
details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have
considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for
Teachers.
Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes for the October/November 2021 series for most
Cambridge IGCSE™, Cambridge International A and AS Level components and some Cambridge O Level
components.
These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers. They should be applied alongside the
specific content of the mark scheme or generic level descriptors for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these
marking principles.
• the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question
• the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question
• the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts.
Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions).
• marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However, credit is given for valid answers which go beyond
the scope of the syllabus and mark scheme, referring to your Team Leader as appropriate
• marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do
• marks are not deducted for errors
• marks are not deducted for omissions
• answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when these features are specifically assessed by the
question as indicated by the mark scheme. The meaning, however, should be unambiguous.
Rules must be applied consistently, e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed instructions or in the application of generic level
descriptors.
Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question (however; the use of the full mark range may
be limited according to the quality of the candidate responses seen).
Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should not be awarded with grade thresholds or
grade descriptors in mind.
The Assessment Objectives are applied to each question. The assessment objectives for the paper are:
• AO1 Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of media concepts, contexts and critical debates, using terminology appropriately. (60%)
• AO2 Analyse media products, and evaluate their own work, by applying knowledge and understanding of theoretical and creative approaches,
supported with relevant textual evidence. (40%)
The Level Descriptors guide examiners to an understanding of the qualities normally expected of, or typical of, work in a band. They are a means
of general guidance, and must not be interpreted as hurdle statements. For the purposes of standardisation of marking, they are to be used in
conjunction with the Standardisation scripts discussed during the coordination meeting and with Team Leaders, as well as the question-specific
notes.
The indicative content provided is for general guidance; it is not designed as prescriptions of required content and must not be treated as such.
Whilst there are legitimate expectations of the content of most answers, examiners may see responses that include ideas not covered in the
indicative content. For these cases, examiners should credit valid responses fairly and not penalise candidates for including valid points outside the
mark scheme.
Place the answer in a level first. Look for the “best fit” of the answer into a level. An answer needs to show evidence of most but not necessarily
ALL of the qualities described in a level in order to be placed in that band. Then award a mark for the relative position of the answer within the level.
AO1: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of media concepts, contexts AO2: Analyse media products, and evaluate their
and critical debates, using terminology appropriately. own work, by applying knowledge and
understanding of theoretical and creative
approaches, to explain how meaning is created,
supported with relevant textual evidence.
9 marks 6 marks
Media Concepts Contexts & Use of Terminology Analysis of how meaning Use of Examples
Critical Debates is created, including use
of theory
3 marks 3 marks 3 marks 3 marks 3 marks
Sophisticated Insightful understanding of A wide range of media Sophisticated and Insightful and fully
understanding of and the wider contexts and terminology is used insightful analysis of texts appropriate selection of
insightful reference to critical debates raised in precisely and accurately, from multiple case studies examples from a wide
several relevant key the question and with sophistication, to is used to explore the range of texts
concepts make subtle points chosen area in depth
Clear understanding of Clear understanding of the Media terminology is used Clear analysis of texts Clear and appropriate
and appropriate reference wider contexts and critical appropriately, to make from one or more case selection of examples from
to some key concepts debates raised in the clear points study is used to respond a range of texts
question appropriately
Occasional references to
relevant theories, not
always accurately used or
understood
2 marks 2 marks 2 marks 2 marks 2 marks
Media Concepts Contexts & Use of Terminology Analysis of how meaning Use of Examples
Critical Debates is created, including use
of theory
3 marks 3 marks 3 marks 3 marks 3 marks
Basic understanding of Minimal understanding of Basic use of media Basic analysis, from case Basic and minimal
and minimal reference to the wider contexts or terminology, with frequent studies which may not be selection of examples,
any key concepts critical debates raised in errors which impede appropriate to the question may lack relevance in
the question communication parts
Minimal references to even
basic media theory.
No creditable content No creditable content No creditable content No creditable content No creditable content
0 marks 0 marks 0 marks 0 marks 0 marks
4 ‘We talk about print, film, TV and radio as separate media, but these 30 Assessment will take place across five criteria:
are all converging and will impossible to tell apart in the future.’ • Media concepts (AO1) [6 marks]
Evaluate the evidence which supports this view. • Contexts and debates (AO1) [6 marks]
• Use of terminology (AO1) [6 marks]
Indicative content • Analysis of how meaning is created (AO2)
[6 marks]
Material listed below demonstrates how candidates might approach the • Use of examples (AO2) [6 marks]
question. It is a description of possible content only. It is not prescriptive,
nor is it exclusive; examiners must be careful to reward original but well- Candidates’ work should be judged on each of
focused answers. these criteria individually and marks awarded
according to the level attained. It should be
This question is synoptic so candidates should draw on their learning noted that it is possible for a candidate to
throughout the course, and may also make connections between this achieve a different level for each assessment
learning and other, related, areas. criterion.
The focus here is technological convergence, and the degree to which a This guidance should be used in conjunction
vision of fully converged media will be realised. Candidates should with the Level Descriptors. It is not prescriptive,
assess the current media landscape, with a focus on a few apposite nor is it exclusive; examiners must be careful to
examples, and use this to make an informed judgement about possible reward original but well- focused answers and
developments; as long as the evidence is appropriate, any conclusion is implicit as well development. This indicative
acceptable. content is intended to indicate aspects of
questions that may feature in candidates’
answers.
AO1: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of media concepts, contexts AO2: Analyse media products, and evaluate their
and critical debates, using terminology appropriately. own work, by applying knowledge and
understanding of theoretical and creative
approaches, to explain how meaning is created,
supported with relevant textual evidence.
18 marks 12 marks
Media Concepts Contexts & Use of Terminology Analysis of how meaning Use of Examples
Critical Debates is created, including use
of theory
6 marks 6 marks 6 marks 6 marks 6 marks
Sophisticated Insightful understanding of A wide range of media Sophisticated and Insightful and fully
understanding of and the wider contexts and terminology is used insightful analysis of texts appropriate selection of
insightful reference to critical debates raised in precisely and accurately, from multiple case studies examples from a wide
several relevant key the question and with sophistication, to is used to explore the range of texts
concepts make subtle points chosen area in depth
Clear understanding of Clear understanding of the Media terminology is used Clear analysis of texts Clear and appropriate
and appropriate reference wider contexts and critical appropriately, to make from one or more case selection of examples from
to some key concepts debates raised in the clear points study is used to respond a range of texts
question appropriately
Occasional references to
relevant theories, not
always accurately used or
understood
3–4 marks 3–4 marks 3–4 marks 3–4 marks 3–4 marks
Media Concepts Contexts & Use of Terminology Analysis of how meaning Use of Examples
Critical Debates is created, including use
of theory
6 marks 6 marks 6 marks 6 marks 6 marks
Basic understanding of Minimal understanding of Basic use of media Basic analysis, from case Basic and minimal
and minimal reference to the wider contexts or terminology, with frequent studies which may not be selection of examples,
any key concepts critical debates raised in errors which impede appropriate to the question may lack relevance in
the question communication parts
Minimal references to even
basic media theory
1–2 marks 1–2 marks 1–2 marks 1–2 marks 1–2 marks
No creditable content No creditable content No creditable content No creditable content No creditable content
0 marks 0 marks 0 marks 0 marks 0 marks