Iwa Final Draft
Iwa Final Draft
Iwa Final Draft
AP Seminar
2023
Word Count:2145
Introduction
Alexis Williamson & Bradley Witzel (2016) are professors who major in special
education, counseling, Leadership, and educational studies.They state that “almost half of the
2.2 billion children that live in the world are living in poverty.” Education has existed since the
beginning of ancient civilization and has then played an important role in our society. Most
children who are exposed to poverty do not have access to basic education or are not exposed
to quality education. Not being able to discover basic education can lead children in poverty to
be stuck where they are as they begin to age, leading the next generation to experience the
same lifestyle. Caroline Ratcliff (2015) is an economist and senior fellow at the Urban Institute
who specializes in the poverty and building fields summarizes that most parents that never
finished high school’s children also did not finish high school. In today's society, receiving
fundamental education is of great importance but also having the right tools during your
schooling years can be very significant. Rahill (2016), conducted a study on leaders from the
Haitian community who survived the flooding. He stated that “young men are heads of
themselves, of 120 students who were at our school, 20 returned from rural areas, not even a
bell or chalk; no seats to receive parents or professors, all scholastic equipment, notebooks- all
gone.” Schools will be more influential and can cause the student to be more motivated to learn
in class when they are equipped with what they need. With that being said, childhood poverty
can greatly impact a child's academic performance by taking a mental toll or a physical toll.
Low-income parents are not financially able to afford educational tools for their children
that are going to school. Although this may not be seen as bad, when low-income parents are
faced with money problems they cannot sign their kids up to go to extracurricular activities which
could potentially cause a halt in the students’ ability to excel faster in schools and also be able
to understand what they are learning in class. Sabrina Tavernise (2012), graduated from
Columbia University and is a journalist that writes for the New York Times paper. She is also a
co-host on the Times Daily she concluded that “one reason for the growing gap in achievement,
researchers say, could be that wealthy parents invest more time and money than ever before in
their children (in weekend sports, ballet, music lessons, math tutors, and in overall involvement
in their children’s schools), while lower-income families.” Tavernise further promotes that
wealthy families' children have already moved ahead in school with about “400 more hours than
poor-income children on literacy activities.” The absence of learning tools can take a toll on a
child but the quality of the child's school influences their potential to achieve school success.
Poverty-stricken parents are usually not able to move to schools that are as effective for
their children to reach academic success. Impoverished parents can shift to poor neighborhoods
which in turn might lead the child to school to schools that are underperforming and not well
funded. Ronald Edmonds (1979), an educator, explorer of school research, and author
higher-achieving schools provided more evidence of student monitoring process, student effort,
happier children, and an atmosphere conducive to learning.” Students that receive more
attention in school are better able to concentrate on what they learn in class and understand
important information provided by the teachers. Ben Jacob & Jens Ludwig (2008), professors of
education and economist that focus on social policy and education also implies that
“high-poverty schools are under-performing because teachers and administrators are not
working hard enough, they are not working toward the right goal, or they have good local
knowledge about what would work best but they are not able to implement these ideas because
of centralized author.” Schools that are impoverished are less likely to have students that are
academically successful throughout their learning years. The schools might impact the students
greatly, but the educators can also influence the child's academic skills.
Parents that are low-paid can impact the motivation a child has when they are going to
school. Lack of motivation in school can affect students by causing them to disengage with the
other students and teachers in their classroom. Low-paid families can also decrease their child's
motivation when they face constant stress at home, sudden life changes, and decreased
support from their family in their academic life. Gigi Lam (2014), an assistant professor affiliated
with the Department of Sociology whose main interests are migration and population policy says
that “as a corollary, impoverished parents are depressed, learned helplessness, have low
self-esteem and lack goals and motivation to get rid of poverty….this expectation is associated
with the students with low ability in terms of school attendance, attitude, learning motivation,
study effort and academic result.” Parents can impact the way a child feels about school but
educators can also play an important role in the students’ motivation to do well in school.
teachers can cause the classroom to experience major setbacks in class than with effective
teachers. They can also create learning gaps between the students making some students see
a decrease in their academic success. Teachers' lack of desire to teach or lack of knowledge on
the subject can negatively affect a child's learning. Elaine Mangiante (2011) is a corresponding
author at the University of Rhode Island as she specializes in education and students from ages
10-16 she stated that “students assigned to ineffective teachers over the course of several years
demonstrate significantly lower academic achievement than those students who are assigned to
several highly effective teachers in a row indicating that teacher effects on students are both
additive and cumulative.” Ineffective teachers can be everywhere but impoverished families are
more likely to encounter these types of teachers as Susan Moore Johnson et al. (2004), a
former high school teacher and administrator that studies teacher policy concluded that poor
achieving students and also low-performing students will encounter more teachers who are not
well educated or are not experienced enough to teach. Having teachers who are
underperforming can lead to students receiving lower grades and test scores than average.
Teachers can even place children into socioeconomic status leading them to favor one child
over the other. Teachers dividing the rich and the poor children might see poor children as
people who do not care for education and learning which in the long term can impact the
student gravely. Amy Auwarter and Mara Aruguete (2008), a teacher at the Eugene Elementary
School in Mexico, Missouri and, a professor at Lincoln University say that “if teachers believe
that SES is a strong predictor of academic outcome, they may perceive that their efforts in the
classroom will have little or no influence on poor children.” If teachers believe that their teaching
will not influence children in poverty and that their academics are already determined by how
much money they have, they will begin to pay less attention to the child which can decrease
their success in their academic life. In short, poorly educated teachers can greatly affect a
child's school success but some can also have no effect on how well the child does in school.
Low achieving teachers however, might not be the reason as to why poor students are being
negatively affected in their education as studies show that teachers that are hired into
poverty-stricken schools are as equally effective as those who are not poverty-stricken
(Isenberg et al., 2016). The child must also be willing to learn in order for the teacher to be
proven effective.
Providing rewards for children can play an important role in improving a child's academic
skills. Giving rewards to students to children might not seem like a smart thing to do but
awarding students in need with money when they do well can motivate them to do better in
school. Alexandra Usher and Nancy Kober (2012) are both workers at the Center for education
policy who research student motivation and their success in school. They state that “some
schools… have sought to motivate students to work harder by providing them with money or
other rewards. Examples include programs that give cash to students for earning good grades,
Implementing these programs in schools can prompt children to reach a higher standard in their
academics.
Giving free school supplies and books to children in their schooling years can greatly
improve their school life. When exposed to quality educational tools, focusing on school will be
much easier. Dorothy Lange (1987), a photographer who saw and witnessed the hungry and
desperate migrant mother. The picture she took indicates that the mother and her children are
living in an impoverished area and do not have access to educational resources that could
benefit the children. Even though the parent might not be able to afford educational books for
their child, providing free books and supplies to the family can help the child to be caught up in
school even though they are living in poverty. In a study done by Rahill, most people living in
Haiti did not even finish high school. This could be because of many reasons but providing the
children living in Haiti with free supplies instead of buying them on their own can help them
Providing financial aid can help improve underprivileged children that are going to
college. Children can be able to improve their school life without having to worry about money
Education stated that “researchers have long thought that financial aid is important to supporting
college success, and there have been a number of studies that have analyzed the relationship
between financial aid and persistence.” College students in need will have a higher chance of
Impoverished children can improve their school performance if they obtain a different
mindset about their families economic status. Chelsea Cheang (2018) is a social worker at
AWWA Ltd she specializes in watching children from the ages 2-6. She said that “all children’s
narratives about their aspirations was that their motivation to do well was closely linked to their
desire to give their families’ a better life…Although the children were aware of their family's
impoverished financial situation, all said that they did not see their families as poor.” Even
though children might have a mindset that they are not impoverished they can still not be able to
reach their full potential in their academics due to them not being able to access quality school
tools. Poverty does not always mean the child will not be able to reach academic achievement
on their own. Through diligence and self motivation, impoverished children might be able to rise
up by themselves without the need of educational tools. Christon Arthur (2000), a Chief
Academic Officer at Andrews University says that “diligence…have tremendous implications for
breaking the vicious cycle of poverty and academic failure. Students from economically
disadvantaged homes can break that cycle by becoming more diligent and thereby improving
their academic performance.” Students becoming more diligent in their studies can prompt them
to push through even when they experience circumstances that could cause problems in their
daily lives.
Conclusion
I believe we should provide children in need with school supplies to help them achieve
greater academic performance. Making these programs or making the already existing
programs more effective can improve students' school life by making it easier for them to access
educational sources to help them move further in their academic life. Providing electronics can
help students access different educational sites and videos to be able to study more effectively.
Even though these programs can be very beneficial, funding for them will be very costly. For
example, giving laptops to thousands of students will cost a lot of money. Funding lots of
impoverished schools to give school supplies to hundreds of children may not seem very
realistic. It can also be hard to track down every family that most likely might need this extra
help as some poor kids might not disclose their families’ income (Mathews, 2013). However,
implementing these programs can have consequences in which some families may lie about
their income to gain these free supplies. Children are the future of the country, so aiding in their
success in schools will also help in making the world a better place.
References
Arthur, C. G. (2000). The relationships between student diligence, student support systems,
other related variables and student academic outcomes in high schools in Grenada.
Andrews
University.https://www.proquest.com/openview/6140acb76015caed5134e6bfa03971a8/1
?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
Auwarter, A. E., & Aruguete, M. S. (2008). Effects of student gender and socioeconomic status
https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.101.4.243-246
Cheang C.J.Y., & Goh E. C. L. (2018). Why some children from poor families do well—an
in-depth analysis of positive deviance cases in Singapore. Taylor and Francis group.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2018.1563431
Edmonds, R. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational leadership, 37(1), 15-24.
https://www.midwayisd.org/cms/lib/TX01000662/Centricity/Domain/8/2.%20Edmonds%2
0Effective%20Schools%20Movement.pdf
Isenberg, E., Max, J., Gleason, P., & Deutsch, J. (2022). Do Low-Income Students Have Equal
234-256.https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.3102/01623737211040511?journalCod
e=epaa
Jacob B., & Ludwig J. (2008). Improving educational outcomes for poor children. National
bureau of economic
research.https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w14550/w14550.pd
Johnson, S. M., Kardos, S. M., Kauffman, D., Liu, E., & Donaldson, M. L. (2004). The Support
n61.https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ853526.pdf
Lam, G. (2014). A theoretical framework of the relation between socioeconomic status and
https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A371193110/AONE?u=googlescholar&sid=bookmark-AO
NE&xid=c070f1bc
Aperture.https://resources.saylor.org/wwwresources/archived/site/wp-content/uploads/20
11/06/Dorothea-Lange.pdf
Long, B. T. (2010). Financial aid: A key to community college student success. Washington, DC:
gov/PDFDocs/college-completion/08-financial-aid. Pdf.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11092-010-9107-x
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/class-struggle/post/admissions-101-why-smart-p
oor-students-are-dumb/2013/04/25/925d481e-ad0e-11e2-b6fd-ba6f5f26d70e_blog.html
Rahill, G. J., Ganapati, N. E., Joshi, M., Bristol, B., Molé, A., Jean-Pierre, A., Dionne, A., &
Benavides, M. (2016). In their own words: Resilience among Haitian survivors of the
https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/65766/2000369-Child-Poverty-and-A
dult-Success.pdf
Tavernise, S. (2012). Education gap grows between rich and poor, studies say. The New York
Times.
https://s4.ad.brown.edu/Projects/Diversity/News/inthenews.PDFs/Jan_Feb.2012/us2010.
news.2012.02.09.nyt.pdf
Usher, A., & Kober, N. (2012). Student Motivation: An Overlooked Piece of School Reform.
Williamson A. & Witzel B., S. (2016). Instilling Resilience in Children of Poverty. The Winthrop
https://digitalcommons.winthrop.edu/wmrb/vol2/iss1/13