Digital Asset Industry Response Group Aotearoa NZ

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 13

Submission by

Digital Asset Industry Response Group Aotearoa NZ

to the

Finance and Expenditure Committee

on the

Inquiry into the current and future nature, impact, and risks of
cryptocurrencies

August 2021

Proudly supported by
1. INTRODUCTION
1. Thank you for the opportunity to submit to the Parliamentary Inquiry into the Current and
Future Nature, Impact, and Risks of Cryptocurrencies.

2. Cryptocurrencies are part of a large and rapidly growing group of diverse financial and non-
financial assets, part of the broader blockchain evolution in data infrastructure. Blockchain
enables moving from large monopoly technology companies to community owned
infrastructure for all kinds of applications - known collectively as Web3 or as many have
called it the third evolution of the internet itself. The sector is still young and new to the
public and decision-makers, who are often not familiar with the concepts underlying it.

3. The objective of this briefing is to provide the Committee with

● an overview of cryptocurrency
● its place in the financial system
● the wider potential of blockchain
● the sector as it stands in New Zealand and its potential
● the need for regulatory reform and overseas examples
● facts about some common criticisms of cryptocurrency
● some recommendations for the future of government policy towards cryptocurrency

4. Cryptocurrency is here, it is being used, helping Kiwi businesses succeed, and is creating jobs.
The technology has a range of benefits and opportunities. There are risks but they need to be
managed appropriately and any regulation should be proportionate and specific to the actual
applications being developed rather than broadly applied to the technology as a whole. We
agree there is a role for appropriate safeguards in this space. There is clear international best
practice that can help New Zealand respond, and regulatory changes should look to be
adaptive (not prescriptive) as this is a technology that is maturing. Many of the benefits will
become more pronounced as time passes, while the risks can be appropriately managed.

2. CONTENTS

About - Digital Asset Industry Response Group Aotearoa NZ 3

Cryptocurrency basics 3

Some cryptocurrencies are a mainstream financial asset that large financial institutions invest in 4

Benefits of cryptocurrency 6

State of the cryptocurrency sector in New Zealand 8

Current regulation of cryptocurrency in New Zealand 9

What other countries are doing 10

Cryptocurrency’s electricity use 11

Cryptocurrencies can prevent money laundering 12

Recommendations 13

2
3. ABOUT - DIGITAL ASSET INDUSTRY RESPONSE GROUP AOTEAROA NZ
1. The Digital Asset Industry Response Group was set up by industry leaders Centrality, Easy
Crypto and Techemy in order to respond to the Cryptocurrency Inquiry by Parliament’s
Finance and Expenditure Committee. The broader group comprises of globally recognised
pioneers, entrepreneurs, advisors and professional service providers across all facets of the
cryptocurrency and blockchain industry. This submission is proudly supported by
BlockchainNZ, a member of the New Zealand Tech Alliance.

4. CRYPTOCURRENCY BASICS
1. Cryptocurrencies are a type of digital asset - assets and mediums of exchange that exist
entirely digitally.

2. In contrast to a currency created and authenticated by government authority or by a


corporation or a bank through a centralised system, such as a fiat currency or corporate
loyalty currencies, a cryptocurrency is issued following a mathematical schedule built into
code and authenticated by networks of computers that track every transaction of the
currency through a blockchain (a series of ‘blocks’ of data recording transactions within a
certain period of time) to reach a shared agreement on the contents of each block and
therefore the state of the ledger.

3. There are many types of technology used to achieve this shared view of the truth, commonly
known as “consensus” In the case of Bitcoin and other “proof of work” type networks
validation of transactions added to these blocks requires solving complicated algorithms,
which takes processing power by computers. The purpose of cryptocurrencies in this
network is to incentivise people to operate the computers and to play by the commonly
agreed rules the “protocol”, in a sense it’s like earning points for playing a game honestly.
New currency is earned by ‘miners’ as a consequence of their using computing power to
show they are active in the network “proof of work” in validating the blockchain.

4. Globally, Bitcoin is being seen as “digital gold”, with the potential to become even more
useful than gold as a store of value. Large institutions and fund managers allocating at least
a small portion of their portfolios to Bitcoin for various reasons, including as a hedge against
inflation caused by Covid-19 related fiscal and monetary stimulus, and as an investment.
More conventional financial products like derivatives and exchange traded funds (ETFs) are
being built around the world to provide institutional and everyday investors an indirect
economic exposure to Bitcoin. Bitcoin by itself has the potential to create new industries in
technology, financial services, insurance, etc, or evolve existing ones. The “digital gold”
thesis is predicated on, among other things, the strength of the Bitcoin protocol, which
requires computing power for protection. To date, the Bitcoin protocol has never been
hacked or compromised and the network has had zero downtime, a remarkable feat for any
technology.

5. Another increasingly popular new type of “consensus” is called “Proof of stake”. These
networks are much less energy-intensive because they use a different type of protocol game

3
that doesn’t rely on complex algorithms and computers doing “work” but rather by people
placing some value in the network at risk like a rental bond they get caught by the protocol
breaking the rules they can have this at risk portion taken away from them.

6. It is worth noting that cryptocurrencies in general are moving away from energy-intensive
proof of work systems, and towards environmentally friendly options such as proof of stake.

7. In both these systems, though, the purpose of the “cryptocurrency” is to incentivise people
to collectively run the network , like a shared cloud , so that others can reliably build other
applications on top of them. Sometimes those applications are also other kinds of digital
assets such as currencies, loyalty points, game items , digital identity and so-on.

8. The blockchain technology underlying cryptocurrencies creates a public but immutable


history of transactions, divided into blocks with users each having the option of
independently verifying their own identical copy of the chain of blocks. Rather than
traditional information management systems that rely on a ‘single source of truth’, database
usually owned by a single entity, blockchains are a distributed database of mutually
distrusting computers, each with their own copy of the database, which must reach majority
consensus on its contents.

9. Any user could change their own copy of the blockchain, but those edits would be rejected
by the vast network of other computers with their own copies. Thus, while cryptocurrency is
one of the most commonly known use of blockchain to date, it can be used for any process
where non-corruptible record-keeping is needed or any kind of open source application– and
do so through a decentralised system.

10. The cryptocurrency and blockchain industry is one of the fastest growing sectors in the
world, with many of the world's largest financial institutions, technology companies and even
nation states are developing new technology in it. Kiwi companies are some of the leading
companies in the developing cryptocurrency space. Government should understand how to
help grow this success and ensure Kiwi companies continue to thrive and innovate.

5. SOME CRYPTOCURRENCIES ARE A MAINSTREAM FINANCIAL ASSET


1. Some cryptocurrencies are a mainstream financial asset, usually these are classified as
commodities. The combined value of cryptocurrencies is over US$2 trillion, making this the
fourth most valuable asset in the world – after gold (US$11T), Apple (US$2.5T) and Microsoft
($2.3T). Understandably, many of the world’s major finance firms having sizeable
investments in cryptocurrencies. That wealth is as real as any of their other investments, and
it is very sizeable.

2. Cryptocurrency isn’t a fringe idea for computer enthusiasts. It is a serious investment that, as
mentioned above, the world’s largest finance firms are taking seriously. Collectively,
cryptocurrencies represent the fastest-ever growing asset class, with Bitcoin taking just 12
years to reach a US$1 trillion valuation – half the time it took Amazon to reach the same
mark.

4
3. Cryptocurrencies are also popular with New Zealand retail investors. A recent survey
conducted for the Financial Markets Authority (FMA) has found 28% of investors have some
form of cryptocurrency holding and 34% intend to be investing in cryptocurrency by next
year.

5
4. Laypeople sometimes have the impression that cryptocurrency isn’t “real” because it is
purely digital and doesn’t represent an interest in an underlying physical asset. The truth is
that any store of wealth or medium of wealth transfer only has the value that people
collectively assign it. A hundred-dollar bill is just a piece of paper, gold is just a type of shiny
rock – their value is in our collective agreement that they have value, which is rooted in their
authenticity, limited supply, and fungibility. Cryptocurrencies meet these requirements –
their authenticity is proven via the blockchain, their supply is limited by the cryptography
that underlies them, and they can be traded for other things of value.

5. Beyond this Intangible assets now represent 90% of the value of the S&P 500’s total assets
and this is only growing in an increasingly digital economy.

6. BENEFITS OF CRYPTOCURRENCY
1. At its heart, cryptocurrency is about enabling open-source infrastructure for applications
which are community-owned, not corporate-owned. Blockchain can be used to immutably
record any system of transactions, whether exchanges of cryptocurrency, health records,
food distribution chains, changes in asset ownership, or any of myriad other applications that
are now usually recorded in data held by the state or large multinational corporations. The
currency is an internal payment incentive, like loyalty points, built into the code to encourage
people to collectively host infrastructure for recording those transactions.

2. This helps create more open systems and applications, which respect privacy, inclusion and
diversity. This new open infrastructure is ideal for developing alternative community-centric

6
applications to compete against existing technology monopolies. For example, SYLO is a local
company building a messenger app with more than 500,000 users already that doesn't rely
on harvesting user data. Sylo applications use the network for decentralised, private
communication, storage and micro-payments. Instead of centralised cloud server
infrastructure, Sylo users create the decentralised Sylo Network together by running
software on their own computers in the same way SKYPE originally worked before it was
purchased by corporate interests. By running a node, users earn tokens, like loyalty rewards
in exchange for their device automatically providing critical services to the network.

3. Cryptocurrency and blockchains are ideal for improving processes and providing
transparency to financial applications. Because all the data is available to all the participants
in a transaction at the same time, the system can remove errors and improve the speed of
settlements. Information is easily independently audited. Visa, Mastercard , Paypal, Square
are all investing heavily to leverage the technology to improve payments infrastructure. Local
New Zealand company Centrapay is building technology to help small businesses reduce the
fees they pay for transactions.

4. The specific problem cryptocurrency solves is to provide open source infrastructure with a
built in incentive for the community to maintain it. The “currency” is key to this as it enables
the system to operate independent of a company. This enables applications to be built in a
way that doesn't force all the participants and their data to ultimately be at the mercy of a
single corporation.

5. If the technology reaches its full potential we should see more and more of the value in our
society being owned by individuals using these modern global digital co-operatives rather
than by global mega corporations. It’s our best chance of achieving that.

6. As David Marcus, former president of PayPal and Vice President of Messaging Products at
Facebook, and co-creator of Diem, a cryptocurrency project initiated by Facebook, says:
It has never been more urgent to transform our broken payments infrastructure. The systems we
have today are costly, slow, and not interconnected. There are still about 1.7 billion people who are
unbanked around the world, and even more who are underserved… — people left behind by the
current system and stuck in the cash economy. Globally the state of play for cross-border payments
is dramatically bad with an average cost to consumers, who can afford it the least, of 6.5% (more
than double the Sustainable Development Goal of 3%) and end-to-end settlement times of three days
on average.

…if money and payments systems were invented today for a digital-only world, what would they look
like? They certainly wouldn’t look like our current infrastructure. A global, open, interoperable, near
real-time, cheap, compliant global protocol for money would be required to enable people, creators,
and businesses to move money around seamlessly and to innovate via programmable money.
Wallets would need to support NFTs. Real contracts and titles would be replaced by smart contracts.

7. Another fast growing sector of cryptoassets are “non fungible tokens”. These are digital
certificates for items, collectables, games, virtual reality spaces and other digital media
rights. The difference between the traditional approach and ones using the blockchain and
cryptoassets is that these items are owned by the end users and transportable between
environments making them freely tradable by the users and avoiding “walled garden” or
“Vendor Lock In” for end users.

7
8. Some of the largest venture firms in the world have raised billions of dollars to invest in start-
ups building in this space including millions of dollars in leading kiwi firms developing
innovative new games and virtual experiences.

9. Mark Zuckerberg has said of the future of Facebook “Our overarching goal across all of these
initiatives is to help bring the metaverse to life, and that the metaverse is an “embodied
internet,” Zuckerberg said, operated by many different players in a decentralised way.

10. Zuckerberg said, the metaverse will bring enormous opportunity to individual creators and
artists; to individuals who want to work and own homes far from today’s urban centers; and
to people who live in places where opportunities for education or recreation are more
limited.

11. The head of gaming at YouTube has also said that blockchain based assets and gaming is the
future of gaming. The game development sector is already a large and growing industry in
New Zealand, one that needs to keep up with where the world is headed and capital is
flowing.

12. The pandemic has sped up both innovation in decentralised finance and digital business. We
are still at the beginning of the evolution of digital currency, but the potential opportunities
for our weightless economy are enormous.

7. STATE OF THE CRYPTOCURRENCY SECTOR IN NEW ZEALAND


1. As mentioned above, cryptocurrency is a popular investment for New Zealand investors but
there is also an active industry developing cryptocurrency applications in New Zealand.

2. The cryptocurrency ecosystem in New Zealand supports ideation, structuring proof of


concept, development, audit, fundraising and scale up. This ecosystem is supported by global
expertise across the professional services sector domiciled here, including
MinterEllisonRuddWatts, Bell Gully, Blockchain Labs, Deloitte, PWC, EY and more. There are
at least 100+ entities building in this sector including well-known brands. Centrality alone has
helped build an ecosystem of more than 20 start-ups, with more than 400 employees and
more than $300m of enterprise value.

3. New Zealand companies such as Techemy and Brave New Coin are also involved in financial
innovation and enabling financial services organisations around the world to accurately price
and track crypto assets.

4. New Zealand is also home to world class crypto asset exchanges and retailers such as Dasset
and EasyCrypto (examples of virtual asset service providers) which allow New Zealanders
safe and convenient access to this asset class.

5. NZ tertiary providers are developing and have created education programs to underpin the
sector. These programs have significant demand. The University of Auckland has recently
launched their world leading Master of Information Governance programme.

8
8. CURRENT REGULATION OF CRYPTOCURRENCY IN NEW ZEALAND
1. New Zealand’s current regulatory framework largely reflects the current guidelines of the
Financial Action Task Force (FATF), which sets international guidance and standards for
regulation of Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs).

2. The adaptive (rather than prescriptive) nature of New Zealand’s current regulation has
resulted in most cryptocurrency activities being captured under existing regulation. The FMA
provides advice to investors and recommends any New Zealand cryptocurrency platform
New Zealanders use is registered on the Financial Service Providers Register. This has the
effect of bringing virtually all VASPs within the FMA’s jurisdiction, where even if the
underlying cryptocurrencies serviced by a VASP are not financial products under the Financial
Markets Conduct Act 2013 (FMC Act), that VASP must still comply with the fair dealing
obligations of financial service providers under Part 2 of the FMC Act. If a VASP is servicing
cryptocurrencies which are financial products under the FMC Act, then that VASP will be
regulated like any other financial service provider, requiring a product disclosure statement
(PDS), licence, licensed supervisor, and/or financial reporting obligations, depending on the
types of financial products involved.

3. Further, VASPs are universally captured by the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering
Financing of Terrorism Act 2009 (AML/CFT Act) as reporting entities. VASPs generally fall
under the Department of Internal Affairs’ (DIA) jurisdiction although there is scope for them
to be within the FMA’s remit instead. New Zealand’s regulation of VASPs under the AML/CFT
Act is largely in line with the FATF’s guidance on virtual assets and VASPs, which will be
updated later this year. The current regulatory settings for VASPs has the positive effect of
ensuring VASPs do not unduly increase the money laundering and terrorism financing risks
within New Zealand, disproportionate to the positive impact they bring to New Zealand
society.

4. The major issue with current New Zealand regulation is tax settings.

5. IRD has classified cryptocurrency as property akin to gold for tax purposes, which has
negative ramifications for New Zealand taxpayers. The IRD position is that generally that
cryptocurrencies are property that don’t earn a return if simply held by the buyer, therefore
these assets were acquired for the intent resale for a profit and are taxable on disposal. This
is despite many cryptocurrency having utilities or substantial yield opportunities.

6. For investors and people accepting payment in cryptocurrency, the IRD’s position means
every trade is a taxable event with any “profit” from variations in the exchange rate between
the cryptocurrency and the New Zealand dollar being regarded as taxable income.

7. The application of GST to cryptocurrencies is particularly fraught. The IRD has stated "the
supply of a crypto asset could be an exempt financial service [i.e. an exempt supply for GST
purposes], subject to 15% GST, or a zero-rated supply to a non-resident" depending on "the
specific facts and features of the crypto asset and the residency of the buyer and seller". This
uncertainty affects the ability of businesses and individuals to use cryptocurrency and be

9
confident of complying with the law. The IRD admits “the current GST rules can be difficult to
apply or impractical to comply with.”

8. It also creates a double taxation problem: purchases of cryptocurrency can be subject to GST,
but any subsequent purchase made with the cryptocurrency can also be subject to GST.

9. If cryptocurrency was treated as a currency for GST purposes, this double taxation issue
would be removed. We understand that the draft tax bill clarifies that crypto assets will not
be subject to GST and that crypto assets will not be financial arrangements, both back dated
to 1 January 2009.

10. Recognising and correcting the issues created by GST on cryptocurrency is an excellent first
step, however further work needs to be done to understand and appropriately recognise
income tax on crypto assets.

11. Compliance costs for cryptocurrency users is expensive due to IRD’s tax position. A lack of
cryptocurrency tax compliance is likely to be due to a lack of awareness, an uncertainty of
the correct tax position, or simply “it’s too hard to comply”. The current position can make
calculating tax liabilities extremely difficult, and requires meticulous record keeping, which is
often not contemplated at the outset of any investment activity.

12. Cryptocurrencies are often simply reflections of other existing asset types (property, money,
financial products etc) the tax treatment of cryptocurrencies should not be homogenous
simply because these assets use a specific type of database technology. Tax should apply in
the same way it does to parallel assets to create a level playing field and to provide clarity to
enable better compliance with minimal change. In a similar way to how the FMA has aligned
guidance to the underlying asset rather than a technology specific approach.

13. Robust and clear tax legislation that puts cryptocurrencies on par with other assets would
assist with tax compliance and would also encourage investors away from property
investment as the traditional means of wealth accumulation.

9. WHAT OTHER COUNTRIES ARE DOING


1. Around the world, there is a race to create supportive regulatory regimes that help to
improve confidence in the cryptocurrency sector and increase investor confidence. The
current landscape is a patchwork with some jurisdictions still having antiquated legislation
while others have set the pace.

2. Examples of countries at the forefront of cryptocurrency legislation are Singapore, Estonia,


Switzerland and El Salvador.

3. Singapore’s Payment Service Act 2019 regulates payments and exchanges both in
cryptocurrency and also traditional payment services. It is a model piece of legislation that
creates a licencing system to regulate entities that facilitate the use of cryptocurrencies, to
boost consumer safety and confidence, and enabling the seamless use of cryptocurrency
with the same legitimacy as other payment services.

10
4. Estonia classifies cryptocurrencies as “value represented in digital form”. Accordingly, it does
not subject them to VAT. The Anti Money Laundering and Terrorism Finance Act 2017
introduced robust new regulations for cryptocurrency businesses operating in Estonia while
allowing for innovation, helping drive a booming local industry. The Estonian Government
mooted a form of national cryptocurrency, Estcoin, in 2017.

5. In June of this year, El Salvador became the first country in the world to pass a law making
Bitcoin legal tender for all purchases.

6. The Swiss regulator worked with the industry to develop new policy and classifications for
different kinds of digital assets as well as set in place guidelines for operating and licencing a
bank type service in the digital asset space.

10. CRYPTOCURRENCY’S ELECTRICITY USE


1. There is frequent criticism of the amount of electricity used by cryptocurrencies. However,
according to the University of Cambridge, the electricity used by Bitcoin amounts to 90TWh,
around 0.4% of total global electricity supply. This is less than the energy used by the global
gold mining industry (131TWh) and refrigerators in the United States alone (104TWh). An
estimated 39% of the electricity used is renewable, which is higher than the global average
for almost all activities and developed countries.

2. This electricity primarily arises from Bitcoin’s proof of work system, whereby miners
compete to earn Bitcoin by using vast amounts of computing power to solve a specific
problem to prove they are a real computer on the network and have a right to participate in
deciding the state of the ledger. Other cryptocurrencies designed after Bitcoin are far more
energy-efficient. For example, Cardano and Dogecoin, with a combined valuation of over
$100b, use 1/3000th and 1/14000th respectively of the energy per transaction that Bitcoin
requires and a negligible impact on global electricity demand. These networks use the same
kind of energy footprint as everyday web applications.

3. Cryptocurrency users are becoming more discerning about the issue of electricity usage,
particularly electricity generated from fossil fuels. For example, Tesla recently announced it
had purchased Bitcoin and would accept Bitcoin as payment but suspended that option over
concerns about the emissions those transaction would cause and is now examining more
environmentally friendly options.

4. A major challenge for converting to 100% renewable electricity is intermittency. The wind
doesn’t blow all the time, the sun doesn’t always shine, dry years constrain hydro generation
and production peaks don’t always match demand peaks.

5. Batteries provide one solution to this – storing generation when there is an excess and
releasing it then demand exceeds supply. Batteries are expensive, however, and store limited
amounts of energy.

6. Another approach is to ‘overbuild’ renewable generation, reducing the amount of time when
demand exceeds supply and the amount of expensive batteries needed, but creating more

11
period where supply exceeds demand. On its own, this goes against electricity generators’
interests as it increases the periods when spot prices for electricity are very low.
Cryptocurrency mining can improve the business case for this second option by scaling its
power demand to increase during periods where electricity supply exceeds other sources of
demand. This allows miners to take advantage of cheap electricity, while also resulting in a
higher price for generators than would otherwise be the case and avoiding the need for
generators to forego income by curtailing generation.

7. Unlike other suggestions for industrial activities that could scale production to make use of
periods of renewable electricity over-supply, like Green Hydrogen production,
cryptocurrency mining power demands can be adjusted instantaneously and don’t have large
capital inputs or delivery schedules that interfere with this scalability.

11. CRYPTOCURRENCIES CAN PREVENT MONEY LAUNDERING


1. Through using blockchain, cryptocurrencies ensure there is a permanent, unalterable
entirely public record of all transactions. This means that every trade can be traced through
to accounts and all the history of those accounts’ interactions with other assets and
transactions for all time.

2. Contrary to popular belief, cryptocurrency isn’t fully anonymous – users are identified
through a user number. In the same way you have a bank account number and it’s not
possible to determine who a person is from simply knowing their account number.
Sophisticated software already exists to uncover the semi-anonymous account numbers.
Know Your Customer and Anti-Money Laundering practices in the traditional finance sector
mean that money transfers into cryptocurrency can be traced and linked to cryptocurrency
holdings recorded in the blockchain.

3. In fact money laundering through cryptocurrency pales in comparison to money laundered in


the traditional financial system. Studies estimate US$1-2.8b is laundered through
cryptocurrencies, compared to US$800b-$2t laundered in total using cash and traditional
finance, according to the UN Office on Drugs and Crime.

4. Blockchain technology is inherently bad for laundering money because it creates a


permanent publicly searchable tamper proof record of all transactions and their linkages for
Regulators and LOE to access. Contrast to the existing financial system which is opaque and
often requires legal battles, warrants and negotiation with troublesome financial structures
and jurisdictions to uncover a money trail. Many companies are working to add digital
identity to blockchain transactions like local New Zealand companies Centrapass and Sphere,
allowing privacy preserving identity information to be linked to transactions. And since
VASPs like Easy Crypto and Dasset must comply with the AML/CFT Act, and accordingly
perform due diligence on all customers, they are able to work alongside blockchain analytics
companies, such as Elliptic and Chainalysis, and law enforcement, to trace and stop
fraudsters, scammers and criminals from successfully moving value within New Zealand or
around the world using public blockchains.

12
12. RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Cryptocurrency is here to stay and presents huge opportunities for New Zealand businesses
and investors. We have the following recommendations for policy makers:

● seek to understand from experts in the field the truth behind claims about the
environmental impact of some kinds of cryptocurrency networks. Also to acknowledge
that there are different types of algorithmic settlement for cryptocurrency which do not
use large amounts of power to achieve network consensus. That, like most technology
sectors, the industry is constantly innovating to mitigate its impacts.
● understand that cryptocurrency is a form of decentralised and immutable database
technology and there are many types of assets and applications that can exist on it. The
committee should seek to understand that cryptocurrency is not one single thing and as
such care is needed when implementing policies and regulation so as to not risk
damaging innovation in unintended ways.
● engage the services of experienced people in this industry to ensure that lack of
knowledge in a nuanced discussion is not an issue in terms of decision making.
● recognise and understand the work already undertaken by the Reserve Bank, FMA, DIA
and IRD who already have policies in place to guide the industry, taking the lead of the
FATF’s guidance on cryptocurrencies and VASPs. That the best solution is for these
agencies to continue to work with the industry to update and improve guidance as the
industry evolves.
● that the above Government agencies work together with the Ministry of Justice (MOJ)
and industry experts to determine if the regulatory settings for cryptocurrencies and
VASPs are appropriate to mitigate the financial, money laundering and terrorism
financing risks associated with cryptocurrencies, while still meeting the purposes of the
FMC Act (which includes promoting innovation and flexibility in the financial markets)
and the purposes of the AML/CFT Act. The timing of the Committee’s inquiry into
cryptocurrencies and the MOJ’s statutory review of the AML/CFT Act is fortunate.
● understand fully the market opportunity of cryptocurrency and blockchain architectures,
how fast innovation is happening globally and how Kiwi companies can create more
opportunities for investment, employment and innovation in New Zealand.
● understand that market innovation should determine technology winners and losers
rather than intervention from policy makers
● recognise that as an emerging technology sector there is a tendency for over sceptical
popular narratives, that this is a frequent feature of any new market innovation so it’s
important to understand any biases they may have due to these narratives and seek to
mitigate them.
● recognise that with any new technology there are incumbents who are being disrupted
and as such there are vested interests in creating ways to block competition.

13

You might also like