Durable Antifog Films From Layer-by-Layer Molecularly Blended Hydrophilic Polysaccharides
Durable Antifog Films From Layer-by-Layer Molecularly Blended Hydrophilic Polysaccharides
org/Langmuir
© 2010 American Chemical Society
Received September 19, 2010. Revised Manuscript Received November 10, 2010
Mechanically durable, long-lasting antifog coatings based on polysaccharides were developed using a layer-by-layer
See https://pubs.acs.org/sharingguidelines for options on how to legitimately share published articles.
(LBL) assembly process. The unique properties of these coatings are a result of a molecular-level blending of the
polysaccharides, with multilayers containing chitosan and carboxymethyl cellulose providing the best overall properties.
The antifog properties resulted from a strong interaction between the polar and H-bonding elements of the assembled
Downloaded via HS HAMM-LIPPSTADT on May 13, 2019 at 11:36:37 (UTC).
polymers and water molecules and the concomitant formation of thin films of water. Environmental scanning electron
microscopy (ESEM) studies confirmed that fogging coatings are decorated with light scattering, micrometer-sized
droplets of water whereas antifogging coatings remain droplet free. To improve the mechanical durability of the
multilayer films on substrates, the surface was modified via self-assembly of epoxy-functionalized silane molecules.
Cross-linking chemistry was then applied to improve the mechanical robustness of the LBL films on various surfaces.
These films were characterized using several techniques: optical profilometery (PL), spectroscopic ellipsometry (EL),
contact angle goniometry (CA), and atomic force microscopy (AFM). The antifog properties of the films were evaluated
by several tests under different environmental conditions. This work demonstrates that the unique water-adsorbing
properties of polysaccharides can be exploited to create permanent antifog properties, which may be useful for various
applications.
782 DOI: 10.1021/la103754a Published on Web 12/16/2010 Langmuir 2011, 27(2), 782–791
Nuraje et al. Article
reveal directly that these coatings are able to effectively spread An experimental description of this test was discussed in a
condensing water droplets into uniform sheets. The mechanical previous study.2 In test (b), for quick evaluation of the antifog
durability of the resultant coatings was further improved with easily performance of the coatings, a simple aspirating/breathing test
introduced surface modification and cross-linking chemistry. was conducted on the sample. The boiling test (c) was established
mimicking the European Standard test (EN168). In this test, an
2. Experimental Section Erlenmeyer flask containing boiling water was placed on top of
written letters. The written letters were observed through the other
2.1. Materials. The following materials were purchased from side of the film by the naked eye after the film was exposed to the
Sigma-Aldrich: carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) (Mw=250 000), steam of the Erlenmeyer flask. The visibility of the letter at the
low-molecular-weight chitosan (CHI, Mw = 50 000), glutaraldehyde bottom of the Erlenmeyer flask was evaluated for the degree of
(25% solution, Mw=100.12), poly(ethylene imine) (PEI) (branched, antifog. In the cold-fog test (d), the substrates coated with multi-
Mn =10 000, Mw =25 000), 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic layers were placed in a refrigerator (4 °C) for several hours and
acid monohydrate (MES), and sodium chloride. Poly(acrylic then placed in a humidity chamber (37 °C and 80% humidity) or
acid) (PAA) (25% aqueous solution, Mw = 90 000 g/mol) was on the top of a Erlenmeyer flask containing steaming water.
supplied by Polysciences (Warrington, PA). Gelest was the source 2.2.4. Cross-Linking of the Multilayers. The glass substrate
for (3-glycidoxypropyl)trimethoxysilane (GPTMS). Glass micro- was first sonicated in water for 5 min and cleaned in oxygen
scopy slides with 7.52.50.1 cm dimensions were obtained from plasma for 2 min at 120 mTorr or treated in a piranha solution for
VWR (Cat. No. 48300-047). Bare polycarbonate was provided by 30 min at 80 °C. The cleaned substrate was immediately incubated
Teijin-Kasei Corp. Thermo Scientific supplied 1-ethyl-3-(3-(di- with an anhydrous toluene solution of 1% (3-glycidoxypropyl)-
methylamino)propyl)carbodiimidehydrochloride (EDC) and N- trimethoxysilane overnight and then rinsed with pure toluene.
hydroxysulfosuccinimide (NHS). Asylum Research was the source Toluene can be replaced by other anhydrous organic solvents such
for AFM (MFP3D) and tips (AC240TS, AC200TS), which were as chloroform and hexane. All of the above experiments were
utilized to scratch the film using the nanolithography mode.15 A conducted in a dry glovebox. The dried substrate was immersed in
polishing cloth (DP-NAP) with adhesive backing was purchased a 0.01 M aqueous solution of branched PEI (pH=9) for at least
from STRUERS Inc. Our laboratory synthesized poly(acrylic 4 h and subsequently rinsed with water. Next, multilayers of CHI/
acid)-graft-poly(ethylene glycol) (PAA-g-PEG), following proce- CMC were assembled onto the PEI-modified substrate at pH=4.
dures in the literature.16,17 Deionized (DI) water was used in all The substrate with the assembled multilayer of CHI/CMC was
aqueous solutions and rinsing procedures. then immersed into a 0.05 M MES buffer (pH = 5), including
2.2. Methods. 2.2.1. Thin-Film Assembly. The LBL as- 200 mM EDC and 50 mM NHS,18 for 30 min and subsequently
sembly of polymer/polymer systems on glass and polycarbonate immersed into a 1X PBS buffer for 20 min. The cross-linked
slides was performed using a Stratosequence VI spin dipper multilayer of CHI/CMC on the glasslike substrate was then rinsed
(Nanostrata Inc.) controlled by StratoSmart v6.2 software. Dip- with water. The antifog coatings were not only chemically bonded
ping time for polymers was 10 min, followed by three rinses (one 2 between layers but also chemically bonded to the functiona-
min rinse followed by two 1 min rinses) using DI water of the same lized substrate surface. To further cross-link the multilayers, the
pH as the preceding polymer solution. The concentration of CHI coating was immersed in an aqueous solution of 2.5% glutar-
and CMC was 0.1 wt %. The pHs of the polymer solutions and aldehyde at pH=9 and 30 °C for 45 min. The substrate was then
rinsing water were adjusted with either 0.1 M HCI or 1 M NaOH. rinsed with DI water.
Glass substrates were degreased in a 3% solution of Micro90 2.2.5. Mechanical Properties. Mechanical integrity of the
under sonication for 20 min, and the substrates were subsequently films was evaluated by several methods, including the following:
sonicated in 1 M NaOH for another 20 min. Finally, the glass (a) ASTM D3363 pencil hardness test, (b) home-built rotary cloth
substrates were sonicated in deionized water (DI) water for 5 min abrasion test,7 (c) KIMWIPE test, (d) qualitative cloth-sponge
and blown dry with air. Polycarbonate substrates were pretreated rubbing test, (e) crosshatch adhesion test (i.e., Scotch tape test),
with oxygen plasma (PDC-32G, Harrick Scientific Products, Inc.) and (f) AFM nanolithography-controlled scratching test. In the
for 30 s at 400 mTorr on both sides before building the multilayers. pencil hardness test, the coated glass substrate was placed under
2.2.2. Characterization. Thickness measurements of assembled the tip of a pencil, and the pencil holder was moved in one direction.
multilayers on substrates were performed by a Tensor P16 surface The force applied to the pencil tip came from a 750 g static load.
profilometer (PL) using a 2 μm stylus tip and 2 mg stylus force. The scratched regions were evaluated by optical microscopy. In
The topographical image of the multilayer was collected using a the abrasion test, changes in optical transmittance of the film after
Nanscope IIIa, Dimension 3000 AFM microscope (Digital In- rotary wiping with a standardized cloth were correlated with
struments, Santa Barbara, CA) in the tapping mode. Variable- mechanical damage using experimental methods. Data analysis
angle spectroscopic ellipsometry (EL) was employed to measure protocols were explained in detail in the previous study.7 In the
the thickness and refractive index of the film on polycarbonate present study, we challenged the coatings with the maximum
substrates. Contact angle measurements were carried out with a available level of normal stress (100 kPa) in the abrasion testing.
VCA-2000 contact angle system (AST Products, Inc., Billerica, The cloth-sponge rubbing test included three different levels of
MA). Contact angle values were calculated from dynamic video challenges. The coating was first wetted with water or soap
files captured at 60 frames/s using the software VCA Optima XE solution (2% MICRO-90 solution from International Products
Version 1.90 provided by the manufacturer. Corp.) and rubbed with a cloth (ANTICON, Lot #5562) or a
2.2.3. Antifog Tests. Antifog properties were evaluated cellulose sponge under three different conditions. In the first test,
through four separate testing protocols: (a) humidity chamber the wet coating was rubbed with a wet sponge 10 times. In the
test, (b) aspiration test, (c) boiling test, and (d) cold-fog test. In test second test, the wet coating was rubbed with a wet cloth 10 times.
(a), the humidity within the chamber was controlled with an In the third test, the wet coating was rubbed with a dry cloth 10
ultrasonic humidification/ventilation system. A slide coated with times. The last test was considered to be the most rigorous test of
an antifog multilayer was evaluated by recording an image of the mechanical strength among the cloth-sponge tests. In the cross-
slide at 37 °C and 80% humidity in the chamber at various times. hatch adhesion test, 3M tape was first placed on the top of the film
for a couple of seconds and then removed from the film. The
(15) Nuraje, N.; Banerjee, I. A.; MacCuspie, R. I.; Yu, L.; Matsui, H. J. Am. damaged areas were evaluated. This technique shows the adhe-
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 8088–8089. sion degree of the film onto the substrate.
(16) Asatekin, A.; Kang, S.; Elimelech, M.; Mayes, A. M. J. Membr. Sci. 2007,
298, 136–146.
(17) Irvine, D. J.; Mayes, A. M.; Griffith, L. G. Biomacromolecules 2001, (18) Nuraje, N.; Mohammed, S.; Yang, L.; Matsui, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2, 85–94. 2009, 48, 2546–2548.
Figure 4. Humidity chamber tests of 10-bilayer films of chitosan/PAA-g-PEG (25% PEG) at 37 °C and 80% relative humidity for (A) 10 s
and (B) 20 s.
Thus, the typical polymer-paired, hydrophilic ionic groups pre- with the surface of the material. It has been suggested that
sent in electrostatically assembled multilayers are not sufficient to hydrophilic surfaces with advancing contact angles less than 40°
impart antifogging behavior; strong hydrogen-bonding groups, should exhibit antifog behavior.1,9
such as hydroxyl and/or ether groups, are also needed. To test this In recent work, however, we found that for nanoporous coat-
hypothesis, we assembled and tested multilayers containing ings contact angles less than about 7° were needed to achieve
chitosan and PAA molecules with different amounts of a como- acceptable antifog behavior.2 Thus, a clear correlation between
nomer containing poly(ethylene glycol) segments. PEG is non- the antifog capability of a coating and its water droplet advancing
ionic and is known for its ability to interact strongly with water contact angle does not always exist.
molecules.25 The advancing contact angles of the antifogging CHI/CMC
PEG-co-PAA copolymers were synthesized with an increasing and CHI/PAA-co-PEG (37%, 48%) multilayers were measured
amount of PEG content in the copolymer and assembled with to be between 20° and 40°. In a previous paper, the contact angle
chitosan into multilayers. Multilayers assembled from CHI/PAA reported for multilayers of HA/CHI24 was 25°. The advancing
and CHI/PAA-co-PEG (25%) did not exhibit antifog behavior contact angles of the fogging multilayers of PAH/SPS, PAH/
(Table 1 and Figure 4). However, when the PEG amount in the PAA, CHI/PAA, and CHI/PAA-g-PEG (25%) were in the range
copolymer reached about 37%, excellent antifog behavior was of 30°-90°. For all multilayers, including those that did not
observed (Table 1 and Figure 5). Likewise, multilayer films exhibit antifog properties, the receding contact angles were always
assembled with PAA copolymers containing 50% and 75% close to zero. For the most part, for these dense (not nanoporous)
PEG content exhibited excellent antifog performance. These multilayers, it appears that the general rule of needing a contact
results are consistent with the hypothesis that strong water- angle less than 40° to produce antifog behavior holds true. We do
interacting functional groups are needed in addition to ionic note, however, that exceptions to this rule were observed.
bonds to create a multilayer coating with antifogging capability. 3.4. Kinetics of Water Droplet Formation. It is generally
Hydrophilic polysaccharides and synthetic polymers rich in accepted that hydrophilic coatings inhibit fogging by preventing light-
alcohol groups and ethylene glycol units are known to exhibit the scattering water droplets from forming on a surface (Figure 6).
ability to imbibe large amounts of water and are often used in Water in this case spreads across the surface forming a “trans-
applications that exploit this effect.26,27 In addition, solid-state parent sheet”; hence, although water has condensed onto the
NMR and DSC studies11,12 of water interactions in cellulose and surface, its presence is not visually detectable. Experimental proof
poly(vinyl alcohol) blends have shown that water molecules form of this effect is oftentimes provided by a simple visual observation
hydrogen bonds with the hydroxyl, oxygen, and carboxyl groups of a substrate exposed to steaming water. In this experiment,
of the polysaccharide repeat unit. In the case of CMC, one rapid uniform wetting of the surface is taken as proof that water
repeating unit can form hydrogen bonds with five to nine water sheeting has occurred. To provide a more direct measurement of
molecules.12 water droplet formation on surfaces, we developed an in situ
One possible measure of the level of interaction of water with a ESEM technique that allows for the probing of a surface at a
material is the advancing contact angle a water droplet makes much higher resolution. Grosu et al.8 also studied fog-droplet
formation using optical microscopy and examined the relation-
€
(25) Ozdemir, C.; G€uner, A. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2006, 101, 203–216. ship between the size of fog droplets and contact angles.
(26) Mikolajczyk, T.; Woowska-Czapnik, D.; Bogun, M. J. Appl. Polym. Sci.
2008, 107, 1670–1677. ESEM measurements were made by exposing samples held at
(27) Dai, M.; Zheng, X.; Xu, X. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2009, 2009, 1–8. 15 °C to humidity levels between 90% and 95%. Images were
Figure 5. Humidity chamber tests of 10-bilayer films of chitosan/PAA-g-PEG (37% PEG) at 37 °C and 80% humidity for (A) 10 s and (B) 20 s.
Figure 6. Scheme illustrating antifog and fogging mechanisms on different polyelectrolyte films: (A) ESEM image of water droplets formed
on PAH/SPS film; (B) simple cartoon of water droplets on regular polyelectrolyte films such as PAH/SPS; (C) ESEM image of CHI/CMC 20-
bilayer antifog coating after exposure to 90% humidity (note the lack of discernible water droplets); (D) simple cartoon showing a water film
forming on antifog film; (E) water molecules interacting with dense polar groups on polysaccharide.
recorded after the introduction of humid air for half an hour. As were observed to form around defect areas. This underscores the
shown in Figure 7 (and movies in Figure S.1, Supporting importance of creating uniform, defect-free coatings for antifog
Information), no water droplets were observed to form on any applications.
multilayer films that exhibited excellent antifog properties. In In sharp contrast, water droplet formation was clearly ob-
these cases, samples remained free of detectable features throughout served on all multilayer films that were not antifogging (PAH/
the entire experiment. Sometimes, however, large water droplets SPS, PAH/PAA, CHI/PAA, etc.). The growth of water droplets
Figure 7. ESEM study of two different coatings at 15 °C and humidity 90%-95% after exposure for 15 s: (A) 80 bilayers of PAH/SPS
coating on glass; (B) magnified region of PAH/SPS coating; (C) 20 bilayers of CHI/PAA-co-PEG(37%) on glass; (D) magnified region of
CHI/PAA-co-PEG(37%) film.
of the silica nanoparticles with water.4 Thus, the CHI/CMC The films retained excellent optical properties, even after being
antifog films offer greater stability in those applications that require abraded for 60 min at this load. For a comparison, identical
prolonged exposure to warm, highly humid environments. abrasion tests were also conducted on bare polycarbonate sub-
Five different tests were performed to determine the mecha- strates, and the results are shown in Figure 10. Bare polycarbo-
nical durability of CHI/CMC multilayer films on glass substrates nate substrates are readily damaged by this testing protocol. The
as described in the Experimental Section. As-assembled CHI/ CHI/CMC films are mechanically more robust than as-prepared
CMC films with either 15 or 30 bilayers were tested. nanoparticle containing multilayers and bare polycarbonate
In the case of the KIMWIPE test, no visible scratches were systems.7 In the same abrasion test (100 kPa and 60 min
observed after testing. However, as-assembled films were easily duration), as-assembled nanoparticle multilayers lost more than
removed by rubbing with sponges and cloths soaked in a soap 4% transmittance. In contrast, the as-assembled polymer system
solution. In the pencil hardness test, all of the as-assembled CHI/ showed no loss of transmittance.
CMC films achieved a 1H pencil hardness, which is comparable to
a polymer like PMMA.28 Abrasion testing (Figure 10) revealed
that as-assembled CHI/CMC films on glass substrates exhibit no
loss in transmission after abrasion testing under a 100 kPa load.
Figure 11. Chemical modification scheme of glass substrate using self-assembly process involving epoxysilane and subsequent cross-linking
scheme for the multilayer.
Figure 12. AFM and SEM images of 20-bilayer as-assembled and cross-linked CHI/CMC films on a glass substrate. (A) AFM image of 20-
bilayer as-assembled CHI/CMC film. (B) AFM image of 20-bilayer cross-linked CHI/CMC film. (C) Side-view SEM image of 20-bilayer as-
assembled CHI/CMC film. (D) Side-view SEM image of 20-bilayer cross-linked CHI/CMC film.
Although the mechanical durability of as-assembled films may that the dense multilayer film had become nanoporous after
be sufficient for some applications, it is clearly not at the level cross-linking. Ellipsometry further confirmed the fact that
needed for more demanding environments. To enhance the cross-linking induced nanoporosity; the refractive index of the
mechanical robustness of the CHI/CMC antifog coatings, chem- as-assembled CHI/CMC multilayer is 1.54 and drops to 1.44 after
istry was introduced to improve both the adhesion of the coating cross-linking. Thus, the superhydrophilicity of the cross-linked
to the substrate and the mechanical durability of the multilayer CHI/CMC multilayer is a result of a nanoporous state, as was
(see Figure 11). In the former case, a glass substrate was first observed with nanoporous nanoparticle multilayer coatings.2
chemically modified by forming covalent bonds between an Cross-linked nanoporous (CMC/CHI)15.5 coatings on glass
epoxysilane compound (3-glycidoxypropyl)trimethoxysilane and substrates were evaluated by the mechanical tests previously
the hydroxyl groups on the substrate surface. Branched poly- mentioned. The KIMWIPE and wet cloth/sponge tests revealed
(ethylenimine) was then exposed to the epoxy-functionalized surface no visible scratches. The pencil hardness test indicated the film
for reaction between the epoxy groups and the amino groups of now had a pencil hardness approaching 4H, at which hardness the
the PEI. The net result is a surface replete with amino groups that coating exhibited some damage and delamination.
are covalently anchored onto the surface. Multilayers of CHI/ To mimic the pencil hardness test and better explore the
CMC were then assembled onto this surface starting with CMC. mechanical durability of the films on glass substrates, AFM
In the latter case, the CHI/CMC multilayers were cross-linked was utilized to apply scratches to the films in certain directions
postassembly with EDC/NHS chemistry, followed by reaction using the nanolithography mode at different forces. The CHI/
with glutaraldehyde. CMC films, including films with 12.5, 14.5, 16.5, and 30.5
Following this procedure, it was found that the cross-linked bilayers, with and without cross-linking were evaluated. The as-
multilayer films exhibited superhydrophilic wetting behavior and assembled films were readily damaged, even with a 400 nN force
retained their good antifog performance. The change from (Figure S.2); however, the cross-linked films showed no damage
hydrophilic to superhydrophilic wetting behavior after cross- even with a 3000 nN force (Figure S.2). Therefore, these results
linking suggested that significant morphological changes had were consistent with pencil and sponge-cloth rubbing test results.
been introduced by this chemistry. AFM and SEM images of From a sectional analysis of the non-cross-linked (CMC/CHI)14.5
the cross-linked and as-assembled CHI/CMC films (Figure 12) coatings, it can be seen that the depth of scratched areas of the film
revealed that surface roughness increased from 6 to 25 nm and was 23 nm at 1.5 μN and 12 nm at 1 μN. Because of the roughness
of the (CMC/CHI)14.5 films after cross-linking, it was difficult to
(28) Tsai, T.-Y.; Wen, C.-K.; Chuang, H.-J.; Lin, M.-J.; Ray, U. Polym. judge the exact depth of the scratch. On the basis of the average
Compos. 2008, 30, 1552–1561. results, it seems that the depth of the scratch was around 20 nm.
In order to further explore the mechanical enhancement of the water droplets observed in the fogging films. The long-lasting
cross-linked system, the adhesion of the multilayer film on glass antifog properties of these coatings open up new possibilities for
substrates before and after cross-linking was evaluated via a biomedical and optical devices that require easily applied and
crosshatch adhesion test (Scotch tape test). As-assembled films durable antifog coatings.
failed the Scotch tape test, whereas cross-linked films remained
intact after the test. Thus, chemically anchoring the multilayer to Acknowledgment. This work was supported partially by the
the glass surface dramatically improved adhesion. MRSEC Program of the National Science Foundation (DMR-
0819762 and DMR-0213282). The authors thank the Center for
4. Conclusions Materials Science and Engineering (CMSE) and the Institute for
Soldier Nanotechnologies (ISN) for use of the characterization
This work demonstrates that layer-by-layer assembled thin facilities. We also acknowledge the contribution of Dr. Junyoung
films rich in polysaccharides can exhibit excellent antifog proper- Kim and Mr. Girma Endale for helpful discussions and some
ties under a variety of environmental challenges. With suitable sample characterizations. The authors also thank Dr. Haipeng
surface and cross-linking chemistry, thin-film coatings with very Zheng of Essilor company for valuable input discussions.
good mechanical durability and adhesion can be realized. ESEM
studies provided direct evidence that the excellent antifog capabil- Supporting Information Available: ESEM movies, optical
ities of the polysaccharide-containing multilayers were associated images, and AFM images. This material is available free of
with the formation of water sheets as opposed to light-scattering charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.