1 s2.0 S0040609003015852 Main
1 s2.0 S0040609003015852 Main
1 s2.0 S0040609003015852 Main
Abstract
When dealing with conducting polymers it is important to control the growth to obtain the desired uniformity. With plasma-
enhanced chemical vapor deposition, highly uniform and pin-hole free thin films can be achieved by promoting the growth
processes in detriment of the nucleation processes. This can be done by different means: decreasing the power of the radio-
frequencies that generate the plasma so that less monomers are ionized or by using pulsed plasma CVD. Pyrrole and thiophene
are the monomers that have been used. The range of RF power used is from 4 to 10 W of continuous RF and pulsed RF (tons6
ms, toffs6 ms). Samples have been taken at different times over a period of an hour and have been examined by AFM. The
results show that the morphological characteristics of thin films obtained on the lower power are better than those obtained on
the higher power. It has been demonstrated that the layer growth of both conducting polymers can be controlled using pulsed
plasma.
䊚 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
0040-6090/04/$ - see front matter 䊚 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2003.11.149
L. Martin et al. / Thin Solid Films 451 – 452 (2004) 74–80 75
Fig. 1. AFM images, 5=5 mm2, of (a) PyrC (pyrrole polymerized under continuous plasma), (b) PyrP (pyrrole polymerized under pulsed
plasma), (c) ThioC (thiophene polymerized under continuous plasma) and (d) ThioP (thiophene polymerized under pulsed plasma). Plasma
conditions described in Table 1.
to reduce opening of aromatic rings w12x and heterocy- performed. Growth and nucleation of the resultant films
clic compounds w13,14x. have been studied with the help of AFM images.
For this reason we have studied the growth and
nucleation of conducting polymers thin films obtained 2. Experimental section
by plasma CVD because the understanding of the first
stages of layer formation allow us to control the final Plasma-polymerized films were prepared using pyr-
morphology of the film. PECVD of pyrrole and thio- role (Sigma, as supplied) and thiophene (Sigma, as
phene with RF ranging from 4 to 10 W has been supplied) by radio-frequency plasma polymerization.
and then the chamber was filled with monomer vapor 2.4. XPS
until the pressure reached the desired level. Ten minutes
later, when the pressure was stabilized, the power source The XPS analyses were performed using a Perkin
was turned on. The films were deposited onto cleaned Elmer PHI 5500 spectrometer. The operating conditions
and degreased glass slides. were as follows: the X-ray source wAl Ka (1486.6 eV)x
was operated at a power of 350 W. The spectrometer
2.2. Infrared spectroscopy was operated in the fixed analyzer transmission mode
at a pass energy of 23.50 eV and a take-off angle of
45 8. The base pressure in the sample chamber was
For IR studies, specimens were scraped from the glass
maintained below 5=10y9 Torr. Total spectral acquisi-
substrate and pelletized after mixing with KBr; these
tion times per sample were typically 10–15 min. Spec-
pellets were used to record IR spectra. For recording IR
tral analyses were carried out using MULTIPAK software
spectra a FTIR Nicolet Magna 560 was used.
for quantification and peak-fitting. The energy scale of
the spectra is corrected to the C–H (1s) at 285.0 eV.
2.3. AFM
3. Results
The surface morphology of the films has been studied
with a Nanoscope III (Digital Instruments, Santa Bar- 3.1. Deposition rate
bara, CA) equipment with an extended electronic mod-
ule. All images were collected on tapping mode and The deposition rate of the films has been calculated
treated with Nanoscope software. The images for the from thickness measurements done using the AFM
morphological studies had a scan size of 5=5 mm2. For technique onto scrapped films at different deposition
thickness measurements, images of a scan size of 10=10 times over a range between 30 s and 1 h (Fig. 1). For
mm2 were done onto scrapped films. all the samples, the power was maintained at 10 W (and
L. Martin et al. / Thin Solid Films 451 – 452 (2004) 74–80 77
Fig. 3. AFM images, 5=5 mm2, of ThioC (a) 5 min of deposition, (b) 10 min of deposition and (c) 15 min of deposition.
15 kHz for the pulsed plasma) and the monomer The effect of the use of pulsed plasma can be seen
pressure at 0.4 mbar. The results are summarized in first in the reduction of the roughness. Roughness
Table 1. measurements were performed on several images taken
The fact that pyrrole is more labile than thiophene from the same sample in order to assure homogeneity.
w15x explains its lower deposition rate. Most of the RF Comparing films obtained at 1 h of deposition, it can
power is used to break its bonds thus reducing the be seen that PPy films reduce their roughness from 4.85
reaction pathways that lead to polymerization. As it was to 2.99 nm and PTh shows even a greater reduction
expected, the use of pulsed plasma greatly decreases the from 5.52 to 1.84 nm. Although this reduction is
deposition rate. important, there is a second effect that has a greater
impact on the visual appearance of the films. The
3.2. Morphology
reduction in grain size combined with a narrower distri-
Regarding the images obtained with AFM (Fig. 1) it bution of grain size (Fig. 2) leads to obtain films with
can be concluded that pulsed plasma-polymerized films greater uniformity. In continuous plasma films the size
have better morphological characteristics. distribution is less uniform because the grain growth vs.
78 L. Martin et al. / Thin Solid Films 451 – 452 (2004) 74–80
Fig. 4. AFM images, 5=5 mm2, of ThioP (a) 5 min of deposition, (b) 10 min of deposition and (c) 15 min of deposition.
nuclei formation ratio is smaller than that in the pulsed monomer molecules is so intense that nuclei formation
plasma films. This affirmation is supported by the fact overcomes the layer growth. First, a single nucleus is
that the number of grains increases when pulsed plasma formed but soon after that an important number of new
is applied. In PyrC the average number of grains is 156 nuclei is formed. These initial nuclei start growing but
in front of 160 for PyrP. And this trend is even stronger before they can cover the exposed surface new nuclei
with thiophene films: ThioC having 114 grains and are formed above the polymer layer that has not been
ThioP 176. covered completely. On the other hand, in pulsed plasma,
To understand the mechanism, samples were taken at nuclei formation is not so fast and when the first nuclei
different times and examined by AFM. It was observed are formed there is enough time for them to grow and
that, in all the images taken from the continuous plasma cover the surface before a new nucleus deposits over
samples, an important number of grains was present this polymer layer and starts the formation of the second
(Fig. 3). In contrast, only some of the pulsed plasma layer. The flat images are indeed taken at the moment
samples presented grains and the others were extremely where a layer has been formed and no nucleus has been
flat (Fig. 4). In continuous plasma the ionization of the deposited to continue the deposition.
L. Martin et al. / Thin Solid Films 451 – 452 (2004) 74–80 79
w5x C.G. Wu, S.C. Chiang, C.H. Wu, Langmuir 18 (2002) w11x N.M. Mackie, D.G. Castner, E.R. Fisher, Langmuir 14 (1998)
7473–7481. 1227–1235.
w6x J.F. Kang, J.D. Perry, P. Tian, S.M. Kilbey, Langmuir 18 (2002) w12x M.A. Leich, N.M. Mackie, K.L. Williams, E.R. Fisher, Mac-
10196–10201. romolecules 31 (1998) 7618–7626.
w7x E. Smela, Langmuir 14 (1998) 2996–3002. w13x L.M.H. Groenewoud, G.H.M. Engbers, J.G.A. Terlingen, H.
w8x D. Sato, T. Suwa, M.A. Kakimoto, Y. Imai, J. Photopolym.
Wormeester, J. Feijen, Langmuir 16 (2000) 6278–6286.
Sci. Technol. 10 (1997) 149–150.
w9x X. Gong, L. Dai, A.W.H. Mau, H.J. Griesser, J. Polym. Sci., w14x L.M. Han, R.B. Timmons, D. Bogdal, J. Pielichowski, Chem.
Part A: Polym. Chem. 36 (1998) 633–643. Mater. 10 (1998) 1422–1429.
w10x M.E. Ryan, A.M. Hynes, S.H. Wheale, J.P.S. Badyal, C. w15x S. Borros, M.P. Diago, J. Esteve, N. Agullo, Mater. Res. Soc.
Hardacre, R.M. Ormerod, Chem. Mater. 8 (1996) 916–921. Symp. Proc. 725 (2002) 225–230.