Analisis de PQ by LC-MS
Analisis de PQ by LC-MS
Analisis de PQ by LC-MS
Reproduction (photocopying) of editorial content of this journal is prohibited without publisher’s permission. 23
Wang.qxd:JATLynneTemplate 12/20/10 11:25 AM Page 2
24
Wang.qxd:JATLynneTemplate 12/20/10 11:25 AM Page 3
The LOD was determined as the lowest concentration of termined by analyzing 1 aliquot of each control over 10 ex-
drug where the calculated value exceeds ±20% of the theoret- tractions. The means of the quantitative results were calculated
ical concentration, but the peak is within ±2% of the calibra- for each concentration. The coefficient of variation (CV) was
tors’ retention time and 20% of the calibrator’s ion ratios. The also calculated, and it is defined as the percentage value of
LOQ is the lowest concentration that meets the described re- the standard deviation divided by the mean. This value must be
quirements with a calculated value within ±20% of the theo- less than 15% for the method to be considered validated per the
retical concentration. laboratory guidelines. The accuracy of the method was calcu-
Selectivity was determined by analyzing six separate sources lated as the percent difference between the theoretical con-
of negative blood for background noise and identifying matrix centration and experimental concentration. This value must be
interferences. Mean area measurements for the selected analyte less than 15% for the method to be considered validated per the
ions were generated and analyzed to establish that the matrices laboratory guidelines.
were free from interfering compounds. Ion suppression and extraction efficiency studies were per-
Five-point calibration curves were used to determine the formed by comparing the unextracted standards of PQ and the
linearity over a concentration range of 2.0–500 ng/mL. The internal standard to extracted blood samples with the com-
target compound and the internal standard peak-area ratios pounds added post- and pre-extraction. The study was per-
were plotted against the concentration, generating a repre- formed at three different concentrations within the linear
Parameter Value
* Five-point calibration curve; six extractions. Figure 2. MRM chromatograms of the decendents’ blood containing PQ and
† One aliquot of 3 different concentrations; 10 extractions.
‡ Five aliquots of three different concentrations; one extraction. internal standard.
Length of Blood Liver Lung Kidney Stomach Tissue Brain Bile Urine
Sex Age Survival (mg/L) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/L) (mg/L)
25
Wang.qxd:JATLynneTemplate 12/20/10 11:25 AM Page 4
range. The ion suppression was determined to be the signal loss The highly charged PQ is difficult to retain by standard re-
between the unextracted standards and samples where the versed-phase HPLC, however, and alternative approaches are
standards were added post-extraction. The recovery was cal- required. The most widely used are ion-pairing reagents and
culated from the difference between the samples where the highly aqueous conditions (18,19), but ion-pairing reagents
standards were added post-extraction (the ion suppression cause severe ion suppression, reduce the sensitivity, and in-
signal) versus pre-extraction. crease assay variability. For this paper, a hydrophilic-interaction
chromatography (HILIC) column was used. HILIC is a varia-
tion of normal-phase chromatography without the disadvan-
tages of using solvents that are not miscible in water; it could
Results retain highly polar, basic compounds that could not be re-
tained by reversed-phase chromatography. HILIC requires high
The assay proved to be linear with a mean correlation coef- volatility solvents for compound ionization by ESI-MS, which
ficient (n = 10) of 0.998 for PQ. The LOD and LOQ were cal- increases sensitivity compared to the highly aqueous mobile
culated to be 0.5 and 2.0 ng/mL, respectively. Three controls (5, phases used in reversed-phase chromatography. In this study,
50, and 400 ng/mL) within the established linear range were the sensitivity for PQ was increased by utilizing HILIC–ESI-MS
used for the remaining method validation, and the results are with a simple additive in the mobile phase.
References
Discussion 1. J.M. Douze, A.N. van Heyst, A. van Dijk, R.A. Maes, and
R.H. Drost. Paraquat poisoning in man. Arch. Toxicol. 34(2):
PQ is difficult to extract from aqueous matrices such as bi- 129–136 (1975).
ological specimens because it is a charged molecule that 2. P.J. Taylor, P. Salm, and P.I. Pillans. A detection scheme for
paraquat poisoning: validation and a five-year experience in Aus-
cannot be changed with pH adjustments. Solid-phase extrac- tralia. J. Anal. Toxicol. 25: 456–460 (2001).
tions (SPE) usually have been accomplished with the aid of an 3. S. Tsunenari, K. Yonemitsu, Y. Uchimura, and M. Kanda. The in-
ion-pairing reagent such as an alkyl sulfonic acid (20). Strong fluence of putrefactive changes on the determination of paraquat
cation exchange-based SPE methods that do not require ion- in autopsy materials. Forensic Sci. Int. 17: 51–56 (1981).
pairing reagents have been employed successfully for PQ, SPE 4. R.C. Baselt. Disposition of Toxic Drugs and Chemicals in Man, 8th
ed. Chemical Toxicology Institute, Foster City, CA, 2008, pp
using LC–ultraviolet detection (21); however, the strong salts 1185–1186.
used for the elution are difficult to remove, and the result is a 5. D. Fatori and W.M. Hunte. Radioimmunoassay for serum
suppression of the analyte signals and loss of sensitivity using paraquat. Clin. Chim. Acta 100: 81–90 (1980).
LC–MS analysis. 6. D.R. Jarvie, A.F.M. Fell, and J. Stewart. A rapid method for the
Because of the aforementioned problems, a weak cation ex- emergency analysis of paraquat in plasma using second derivative
spectroscopy. Clin. Chim. Acta 117: 153–165 (1981).
change carboxylic acid SPE column was employed. Carboxylic 7. C. Fuke, K. Ameno, S. Ameo, T. Kiriu, T. Shinohara, and K. Sogo.
acid has a pKa of 4.8. At a pH of 6.8 or higher, the carboxylic A rapid, simultaneous determination of paraquat and diquat in
acid will lose a hydrogen molecule, become negatively charged, serum and urine using second-derivative spectroscopy. J. Anal.
and trap the quaternary amine on the column, and PQ can then Toxicol. 16: 214–216 (1992).
be released by the addition of an acidic elution solvent. More 8. G.H. Draffen, R.A. Clare, D.L. Davies, G. Hawksworth, S. Murray,
and D.S. Davies. Quantitative determination of paraquat in
importantly, the ion suppression observed for the SPE was human plasma by gas chromatographic and mass spectrometric
minimal (< 25%) and affected both compounds equally, thus methods. J. Chromatogr. 139: 311–320 (1977).
ensuring accurate quantitative results. 9. P. Paixão, P. Costa, T. Bugalho, C. Fidalgo, and L.M. Pereira.
26
Wang.qxd:JATLynneTemplate 12/20/10 11:25 AM Page 5
Simple method for determination of paraquat in plasma and 16. S. Hara, N. Sasaki, D. Takase, S. Shiotsuka, K. Ogata, K. Fu-
serum of human patients by high-performance liquid chro- tagami, and K. Tamura. Rapid and sensitive HPLC method for the
matography. J. Chromatogr. B 775: 109–113 (2002). simultaneous determination of paraquat and diquat in human
10. N.B. Smith, S. Mathialagan, and K.E. Brooks. Simple solid-phase serum. Anal. Sci. 23: 523–526 (2007).
extraction of paraquat from plasma using cyanopropyl column. 17. M. Tomita, T. Okuyama, and Y. Nigo. Simultaneous determination
J. Anal. Toxicol. 17: 143–145 (1993). of paraquat and diquat in serum using capillary electrophoresis.
11. J.J. Miller, E. Sanders, and D. Webb. Measurement of paraquat in Biomed. Chromatogr. 6: 91–94 (1992).
serum by high performance liquid chromatography. J. Anal. Tox- 18. M.M. Ariffin and R.A. Anderson. LC/MS/MS analysis of quaternary
icol. 3: 1–3 (1979). ammonium drugs and herbicides in whole blood. J. Chromatogr.
12. K. Croes, F. Martens, and K. Desmet. Quantification of paraquat B 842(2): 91–97 (2006).
in serum by HPLC. J. Anal. Toxicol. 17: 310–312 (1993). 19. X.P. Lee, T. Kumazawa, M. Fujishiro, C. Hasegawa, T. Arinobu,
13. T. Nagata, K. Kudo, K. Kimura, and T. Imamura. Simultaneous de- H. Seno, A. Ishii, and K. Sato. Determination of paraquat and di-
termination of paraquat and diquat in human tissues by high per- quat in human body fluids by high-performance liquid chro-
formance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 617: 119–123 matography/tandem mass spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom. 39(10):
(1993). 1147–1152 (2004).
14. H.S. Lee, K. Kim, J.H. Kim, K.S. Do, and S.K. Lee. On-line sample 20. M.T. Corasaniti and G. Nistico. Determination of paraquat in rat
preparation of paraquat in human serum samples using high per- brain by high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr.
formance liquid chromatography with column switching. J. Chro- 643: 419–425 (1993).
matogr. B 716: 371–374 (1998). 21. Z.H. Wang, Y.A. Lee, J.B. Xing, J.Z. Zhang, and C.S. Zhang. De-
27