CONSUMER’S PURCHASING BEHAVIOUR FOR GREEN PACKAGING IN AN EMERGING MARKET.

PJAEE, 18(8) (2021)

CONSUMER’S PURCHASING BEHAVIOUR FOR GREEN PACKAGING

IN AN EMERGING MARKET.

Waqar Ahmad*, Dr. Sidra Ghazanfar*, Dr. Abdullah*, Dr. Muhammad Ibrahim*, Dr.
Muhammad Nazim*, Dr. Abid Hussain Nadeem*

*Department of Management Sciences, Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering and

Information Technology, Rahim Yar Khan. Pakistan.

Waqar Ahmad , Dr. Sidra Ghazanfar , Dr. Abdullah , Dr. Muhammad Ibrahim , Dr.
Muhammad Nazim , Dr. Abid Hussain Nadeem , Consumer’s Purchasing Behaviour
For Green Packaging In An Emerging Market. , Palarch’s Journal Of Archaeology Of
Egypt/Egyptology 18(8), 4792-4811. ISSN 1567-214x.

Keywords: Environmental concern on green packaging, Information of green

packaging, Interpersonal influence, Altruism, Attitude towards green packaging,
Purchase intention.

ABSTRACT
This research work makes available a complete explanation of the practice that helps in the
creation of attitude towards green packaging and how it creates a purchase intention by
containing the role individual’s information about green packaging by different resources, beside
with environmental concern on green packaging, personal influence and altruism. A total number
of215 questionnaires were acquired from market ofPakistani consumers and the data was
analysedbytakingexplanatory factor analysis other with structural equation modelling. The
outcomes of testsexplain that attitude towards green packaging play an essentialcharacter in
affecting purchase intention. Conclusionssuggested the implications for marketing executives
and forcommunitystrategy makers, alsodiscloseproductivepossibilities for more research.

1. INTRODUCTION
Nowadays Emerging market has pivotal character in the global economy. Developing business
marketsdescribed in various styles as like, prompt increasing consumption because of the
enhancement of resources, income of individual, revenues and demands of marketDe Koning,

4792
 CONSUMER’S PURCHASING BEHAVIOUR FOR GREEN PACKAGING IN AN EMERGING MARKET.
PJAEE, 18(8) (2021)

Crul, Wever, and Brezet (2015); (Hair Jr, Hult, Ringle, & Sarstedt, 2016). In emerging
Marketplaces most challenging thing for business sectors is, business industries or business
organizations redirecting institutionally different in overall situation;each is creating a numerous
set of challenges and opportunities. Researchers in the former decades have articulated the
manifoldimpact of establishments on firms and competition, with some customs forefrontofficial
and authorizedphases(Hall, 1986)(North, 1990) and(Williamson, 2000), although others are
concentratingfurther on casual and both social and cultural features as concern of consumer
concern for environment that comes in social activities.(DiMaggio & Powell, 1983; Meyer &
Rowan, 1977; Okhmatovskiy, 2010) described theorganizations as “physicallycreated constraints
that structure the economic, governmental and communal interaction”. Organizations social
interaction also look as what the organizations are actually doing for their (consumer) lives, as
consumers are giving them revenue and what they (firms) are doing for them, these days buyers
are alarmed about the environmental issues and society. How consumer and firmsare using their
resources to fulfill their responsibility for society and environment(Du, Bhattacharya, & Sen,
2010).

The puzzling stuff about the opinion of environment is that it describes dissimilar activities to
different people and places. It should explain the environmental responsibility of organization as
ecofriendly activities, which is not obligatory by regulation, such kind of stuff done by the
organization voluntarily for the society to give something back to society (Baron, 2009). There is
ascarcity of resources in community these days, the resources accessibility for human use has
become scarce (Zhang & Zhao, 2012). For firms first focus to is to packaging, as an example,
mostly product’s packaging are for single-use only, and gotdump after consumption of product,
and the product life cycle(Rink & Swan, 1979) of them are dumpy, so using large amount of
resources used up, in the same time, the ecological environment(Li & Wu, 2008) has also been
an exceptional threat of that.(R. Tang & Gavin, 2016).Wahlen, Heiskanen, and Aalto (2012)Said
that the achievement of presenting green packaging (the standard of individual living that reflects
a household’sStandards and approaches towards ecological or friendly environment) rest on the
accepting and approval of the segmented consumers. Use ofGreen packaging has two main
functions, first one is caring the atmosphere and other one is recycle the resources, it is not only a
package of general performance.

As claimed by (Nelson Barber, 2010), as society isincreasing more awareness and its concern of
the harmaffected materialto the atmosphere, nowatmospheric concerns of the businesses have
been recognized as an acutematter that packaging firms must struggle with existing situation, that
is also a challenging for organization to overcome this alarming and market of
competition(Juwaheer, Pudaruth, & Noyaux, 2012). The notion of being ecofriendly or green
environment will have aconsequence on almostsectionsin thecorporation, in start of products to
the consumptionother withfollowing todumping of the used goods by consumers(Prahalad &
Hamel, 1994). According to(Domnica, 2010), wrapping of goods deliberately chosenbiological;it
depends on the level of environment toxic waste. Moreover,(Morris, Hastak, & Mazis, 1995) all
have indicated that precise goodsassertions on goods,tags like; “ozone friendly”,
“biodegradable”, “eco-friendly”,as well as“biodegradable” are showed,pushersfacilitatedthe
firmsfor theinterconnection with the ecologicalpaybacksfor consumer by the help of product,
firms are offering. Packing is the one of thepivotal component among other components, as it is
known phrase “First Impression is the last impression”,it helps to provide the firms a

4793
 CONSUMER’S PURCHASING BEHAVIOUR FOR GREEN PACKAGING IN AN EMERGING MARKET.
PJAEE, 18(8) (2021)

realisticgain in the market,in marketnumerous buyer’s products and also withsmall number of
investment togive the good green package helps toinitiate the firms forweightyyields in sale of
their brandsas compared to marketing, presenting and creating image in consumer
mind(promotional activities)N Barber (2005); (Nelson Barber, 2010).

(Van Huylenbroek et al., 2009), in their examination, suggested a framework for individual
bases, where attitude of individual is intensely affected by worth of things, sentiment and faith
has connections to different other aspects (e.g., subjective norms), other with inresponsive
attitude straight forward effect the behavior of purchase intention. Theapproaches of
attitudeholds, both perceptive (the thinking in human mind) and emotional (feeling of individual)
components as précised by(Van Huylenbroek et al., 2009). Objective of research is to check the
impact of subjective norms; (information of green packaging, environmental concern,
interpersonal influence and altruism) on the attitude towards green packaging; and other one is to
enquire, how attitude towards green packaging influence the purchase intention.The Purpose to
drive this research work to add in the literature on influence of green packaging on the behavior
for purchase intention in developing frugality markets, and researches has givenlowconsideration
to this (R. Yadav & G. S. Pathak, 2016a). Also, the other objective of choosing this study
workisto expand the understanding of customer’sintentions to purchase goods in a developing
market. Individualinfluencescontaining informationof green packaging.Environmental concern,
situational context factors and personal influence, and altruism are those variables which are the
main attentions of this research work.Recipients of this studyarefirm’spractitioner, it will guide
to practitioner’s to plan foractontogrow up their business and publicorganizations that control the
environmental concern activities.Also, to find it out the buyers of products, their behavior for
purchasing the products, in this eracompetition, it will be useful or not for other developing
markets.

2. LITERATURE REVIEW
Green packaging, is also used to be called a “ecofriendly package”, is stated as ecofriendly
package, natural plants are used to produced packages, that can be recycled orCanbeuse again for
second time, be disposed to reprocessed and endorse sustainable development while doing all
process of life cycle, it is harmless to theatmospheremoreoverfor body of human and health of
livestock. Precisely, it can be said green packaging is afitwrapping that helps to keep the
environment green and also can reprocessed, re-used or degradation, dump and it does not affect
atmosphere and do not allow the pollution to come in beings and keep the pollution free
environment during thePLC(Zhang & Zhao, 2012).Ansar (2013)Discussed that as stated by
American Marketing Association online resource library that green packaging in market is the
product that promote ecological environment. As a social responsibility, presentation ofproducts,
it’s designed should be as, to reduce waste and protected toharmful reasonon the physical
environment or to enhance inclass of products and thisdeterminations done by firms to create,
endorse, boxing, and repossess units of products in a way, which is deliberated to biological
concerns. Purchase Intention of green packaging has been describe by(Y. S. Chen & Chang,
2012; Netemeyer, Andrews, & Burton, 2005)''the possibility, purchaser would consider or
choose thatspecific product ensuing from consumer’s environmental needs''. As consumer is
more attentive toward the development of activities to protect and safe the environment,
aspollution is affecting the nature and human, consumer ecologyis now become standardto stay
with green in all over the world(McIntosh, 1991). Consequently, buyers now

4794
 CONSUMER’S PURCHASING BEHAVIOUR FOR GREEN PACKAGING IN AN EMERGING MARKET.
PJAEE, 18(8) (2021)

anadditionallyenthusiastic to buyrecyclable products which are friendly to environment not

dangerous for environment (T. B. Chen & Chai, 2010).

The Theory of planned behaviour, according toAjzen (1991), is from postulated notion on
individualactions, is widely chosen in researches relatedto attitude of consumers and his
behaviour for different things, including the green packaging(Arvola et al., 2008).Thenotion of
TPB acclaims;behavioural interpretation roots through influence on the behaviour. In turn,
behavioural objective is build-up by different causes includes attitude of individualheaded for the
behaviour, individualsocietalstandard other withobservedbehaviourcontroller. Thoughts in mind
of person denotes to the action of person; his actions are favourable or unfavourable, subjective
norm reflects is resistance on personae to act on something or either not to respond,other with
perceived interactive has control on perceived the comfort or effort of performing the
behaviour”(Ajzen, 1991).Tarkiainen and Sundqvist (2005) Both haveconsidered aboutthe
objective, to purchase the green packaging in Pakistanbazaar by the support of TPB prototypical
to check the impacts of the subjective norm and attitude.

In the TPB, opinions create the informational foundation. Which is eventually defines the
behaviour. Now the thing is, though, this notion deals neither with quantity of gathered
information nor with the accuracy of gathered information. Dissimilar knowledge, the views in
the TPB may be not correct or false; they possibly willreveal ambitious thoughts or be prejudiced
in further means, and it may be able to be misleading of the data that is deliberated significant on
some specified behavioural territory. Still, these views are supposed to lead intents. Specially,
opinions about a person’s actions likely consequences are postulated to check attitudes toward
the behaviour (Purchase intention), about the hopes, expectation and behaviours of differentare
taken to learn aboutindividualnorms, and beliefs aboutpreventingfactors (control beliefs) are
supposed to learn the behavioural control. Attitudes and subjective norms, joined to
createobjectives which, with alliances analyses theperformance of the behaviour (Ajzen, Joyce,
Sheikh, Cote, & psychology, 2011).

Green packaging is denoted as a biological packaging or friendly environmental packaging.(T.

B. Chen & Chai, 2010; Pillai, 2016)describe that green packaging will prevent tocontaminate the
globe or condemnaccepted resources, and easily will reprocessed,can be recycle. These
areproducts that havefriendlier environment features or packing in decrease the impact on
atmosphere(Wasik). Further it described as green packagingdenotes to products that arecontains
the tactics in recycling, reduced packaging or using a smaller amountnoxious materials to
decrease the impact on the nature. As(Wasik) Research established that consumers are more
worried about everyday practices and life style’s impacting the atmosphere. The effect of
situational alertness is, the shoppers are translating their surroundingworry into
enthusiasticallychoosing products that are green and environment friendly(Martin & Simintiras,
1995). Awareness and interesttowards environmental issues by consumers called green or
ecological consumers(Soonthonsmai, 2001).These consumers generallypreparedapplications,
refusedcompanies and sellers and vigorously toencourage the firms for theprotection of the
planet(Fergus, 1991). Ottman (1992)Statedabout, saidthe buyers accept therecyclable packing of
products when their prioritiesare such as performance, quality, convenience, and affordability of
products meet. Consumerassumed that how a green packaginghelp the environment to solve
environmental harms.

4795
 CONSUMER’S PURCHASING BEHAVIOUR FOR GREEN PACKAGING IN AN EMERGING MARKET.
PJAEE, 18(8) (2021)

Having less information about the green packaging, how the uses and values of green
packagingforbid consumers in promising themselves to any purchase decisions. Allport
(1933)Described attitude as, “A psychological and unbiased state of willingness, which utilizes a
guiding, stimulus upon the person’s response to all situations and objects with which it is
associated”. AsZelezny and Schultz (2000) said, “approaches for environmental concern are
imbedded in anindividual’snotion of personalityother with the standardon those bases the
personidentifieshis selfas an essential part of the nature”. In consequent, attitude signifiesabout
theconsumer’s likeness and dislike(Blackwell, 2006) and consumers’ decisions of purchasing are
habituallydepended on consumer’s environmental concerns(Irland, 1993; Schwepker Jr &
Cornwell, 1991).

It’s anrecognition among scholars and green activists that despitebuyingbiologically green
goods, goods with reusablewrapping or appropriately disposing of non-biodegradable trash,
consumers are willing to take partconsiderably to increase the quality of the
atmosphere(Abdul‐Muhmin, 2007). Attitudeis the dynamicforcheckout the consumers’
willingness to investin green products(Tsen, Phang, Hasan, & Buncha, 2006). This situation
dictates that price of the product does not matter for consumers; consumer will be ready to
selectthe green packagingif buyer is pro-environment. Consumers are more willing to purchase
& concerned about recyclable products than any other environmental issue (Shah & Pillai, 2012).
Consumer’s self-involvement headed for the safety of the atmosphere may avert them from
engaging in ecofriendly activities such as recycling(Wiener & Sukhdial, 1990). According to
Tanner, Wölfing Kast, and Marketing (2003), green packaging affects the consumer
attitudepositivelytowards safety of environment. Individual norm is the emotion of ethical
responsibility of consumers. This is the strongest thing to motivate consumer for environment
concerns(Hopper, Nielson, & Behavior; P. C. Stern & Dietz, 1994; Vining & Ebreo, 1992). The
position,whereindividual feelsappreciative to reutilize is connected to conservation-related
attributes of product (Ebreo, Hershey, Vining, & Behavior, 1999).

This research recommended that ecofriendly activities may consider as morally demanding.
Consumer feels it his duty and obligated to take part in activities of safety of surroundings and to
protectsome degree of natural properties on the planet.Altruism is doing actions depending on
others’ without any mean and expectation of benefit from other side(Schwartz, 1977). Altruismis
an importantinterpreter of activities to protect the environmentandsafeguarding the environment
from harms(Nath, Nayak, & Goel, 2014; R. Yadav & G. S. Pathak, 2016b). Consumers whose
altruism is in high level are more careful about ecological welfares of their actions than the result
for their lives(Steg, Bolderdijk, Keizer, & Perlaviciute, 2014). Thus, these clusters of users of
green aresuperfluoussensible about the surroundings. Taking review of earlierstudy
work(Guéguen & Stefan, 2016; R. Yadav & G. S. Pathak, 2016b), the aftermathpresentthat
altruism has animportantimpact on purchasers’attitude towards purchase intentions.Normally, for
a specific consequence, the relational influence consists of working to induce or coax others.It
believes that social influence is a cause of an single person’s attitude(Bearden, Netemeyer, &
Teel, 1989; Cheah & Phau, 2011). SCT (Social cognitive theory)suggeststhat a consensual
directional association,happens amid ecological and personal individualities(Albert Bandura,
1977).

4796
 CONSUMER’S PURCHASING BEHAVIOUR FOR GREEN PACKAGING IN AN EMERGING MARKET.
PJAEE, 18(8) (2021)

Interpersonal influence, being a measure of this course, matures and stimulatesopinions and
approaches of individual. Furthermore, it stimulatesensitiveopinions and assistancein
communalencouragement(A Bandura, 1979). Family and friends are the source for consumer
about environmentally friendly packaging now further social media playing a vital role in
it.(Cheah & Phau, 2011; Lim, Yong, & Suryadi, 2014).Scholars have suggested that
aristocratsalso havea significant role in manipulating the interest of consumers in buying the
products(Kaur & Singh, 2007; Lee, 2010; Lueg & Finney, 2007; N. Singh, 2009).
Confirmationlikewiseoccursthat approach of consumers headed for pro-environmental packaging
goods is prejudiced by society’s rule and customs(R. Y. Chan & L. B. Lau, 2002; Lee, 2009).
(Cheah & Phau, 2011) have comprehensivelyconsideredthe influence of interpersonal influence
on buyers attitude, whereas(Khare, Parveen, & Mishra, 2012)observed that interpersonal
influence is confidentlylinked with attitude.

Various studies stated that product buyers contain positive attitude are extra push himself to
purchase green packaging which is eco-friendly, other with may effort as durable product
advocates for green packaging goods in his societal groups (Alwitt & Pitts, 1996; Kangis, 1992;
Martin, Simintiras, & Planning, 1995; Paladino & Ng, 2013; Varela-Candamio, Novo-Corti, &
García-Álvarez, 2018).Whereasassociating withWashington DCshoppers with their
Beijingcounterpart,(R. Y. Chan & L. B. J. J. o. i. c. m. Lau, 2002)examinedabout the Chinese
buyerspresented a weightyassociationbetween the attitude and behavioural intention to purchase
green packaging. In another research,(Chan & marketing, 2001)identified a significant relation
between the buyers’ attitude towards green packagingand purchase intention. In one
moreresearch work in India, (R. Yadav & G. S. J. J. o. C. P. Pathak, 2016) also took theory of
planned behaviour to get better understanding of green packaging purchase intention.

(A. Singh & Verma, 2017)stated that shoppers’positivegreen packaging attitude has significantly
positive effect on purchase intention for green packaging. Considering the above discussion
created hypothesis to testpositive relation between variables.So the hypotheses are;

H1: Information on green packaging has significantly positive effects on Attitude towards green
packaging.
H2: Environment concern on green packaging has significantly positive effects on Attitude
towards green packaging
H3: Interpersonal influence has significantly positive effects on Attitude towards green
packaging.
H4: Altruism has significantly positive effects on Attitude towards green packaging.
H5: Attitude towards green packaging has significantly positive effects on Purchase intention.

METHODOLOGY
Population can be defined as that it is the number of people in a geographic area. The researcher
selects to build the research on the Pakistan market. There is a bigger network of people to
contact regarding the research. Pakistani people have very large related cultural background and
generally much related behavior to other nations. Therefore, the effects of this research could be
somewhat comprehensive and be useful for marketers and health officials not only in Pakistan
and even in other Asian countries. This research leads to anassessment of buyersbuying safe
and/or green packaging. Google form-based method was taken for the collection of data. Method

4797
 CONSUMER’S PURCHASING BEHAVIOUR FOR GREEN PACKAGING IN AN EMERGING MARKET.
PJAEE, 18(8) (2021)

of this research work proved as an operative methodology to reading the consumer

behavior(Hoffmann et al., 2012; Nguyen, Wereley, & Shaegh, 2019). The audience of survey
was Pakistan’spopulations who had intentions for green packaging. Audience wasquestioned
screening queries (e.g., age, past green packaging purchase, understanding about green
packaging) and then the respondents are requested to willingly respond to the survey. The period
of survey was from November 2020 to February 2021. The method used is Nonprobability
sampling (convenient sampling) to conduct the examination (Blumberg, Cooper, & Schindler,
2014). For the duration, the survey, 215 responses received, all 215 were suitable for scrutiny
(100%). Forms of survey were measured by fittingness and facts completeness.

3.1 Measurement scale

The conceptual framework’s Variables are taken from diverse readings. Numerous variables
were used to meet the applied condition of studying the consumers of green packaging. 7-point
Likert scale used for each question. The questionnaire is distributed into dual sections: named as
section a, and section b. The “a” Section” contains personal information of audience who were
part of this research. Section “b” is intended to get respondents’ opinion headed for green
packaging. The questionnaire compiling was looking up by specialists in green packaging and
had an experimental survey of different numbersof consumers to regulate the information if it
needs. After doing all, the accomplished forms were moved to the audience. Variables and
buyerclusters are shown in Tables 01 plus02. Queries (or indicators) on altruism, personal
influence of green packaging were planned after accessingspecialists in the arena of green
packaging consumption. Questions on green packaging information and environmental concern
were approved fromPham, Nguyen, Phan, and Nguyen (2019); numerousqueries were arranged
to bump into the genuine situation. Attitude towards green packaging and purchase intention of
green packaging question were taken outas of(Pham et al., 2019) with discussion of professionals
in the area of study work.

3. RESULTS
In table 01, itdescribes basic statistics on respondent with in depth characteristics on gender, age,
education and profession.Using SPSS and Smart PLS software, Data has been analyzed.
Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was examine by SPSS software to check the correctness of
elements and instrument(Hair; Hair Jr et al., 2016). Smart PLS used in this test to measure levels
of impact factors. Smart PLS is a software that is use for data analysis, particular for use of
PLS(partial least squares) and other with SEM method(structured equation modeling), stated
byHair Jr et al. (2016). A significance benefit fortesting PLS-SEM is it has ability to testing
structure models with complex linear with significant reliability. Also, with PLS-SEM test, the
no need for data to meet the normal distributed regularity. The overall collected valuable data for
this research work were from 215 respondents that data met the required certainstandards of size
of sample. This study work suggests numerous new and other with accustomed indicators, after
that an EFA(exploratory factor analysis) test donefor confirmation of the soundness of
bothinfluences and index. For the study, researchertaken EFA test byselecting thePrincipal
componentfor extraction of factors and choosevarimaxfor rotation of factors. The Principal
component is amethod, use with no ordinarily spread data(Costello, Osborne, & evaluation,
2005)and the method ofvarimax rotation fits to the band of skewrotation, this method supports
thestunnedmere structured prejudice (Gorsuch, 2013). The tested results of analysis in Tables no
2 and table no 3 specify the rationality of factors with acceptable outer loadings, outer loading

4798
 CONSUMER’S PURCHASING BEHAVIOUR FOR GREEN PACKAGING IN AN EMERGING MARKET.
PJAEE, 18(8) (2021)

should be higher than 0.5 and the result shows the values are higher than 0.5; also the value of
Cronbach's alphas are greater than 0.7 of variable; KMO’s valueismore than 0.5; and result
showed theentirepull out variances are more than 50%Hair .

Table: 01

Representative Group Size Percentage (%)

Gender • Man • 89 • 41.4%
• Women • 126 • 58.6%
Age • Below 20 • 4 • 1.9%
• 20–29 • 90 • 41.9%
• 30–39 • 121 • 56.3%
• Over 40 • 0 • 0
Education • Master • 14 • 6.5%
• PhD • 90 • 41.9%
• Bachelor • 100 • 46.5%
• Other • 11 • 5.1%
Occupation • Student • 31 • 14.4%
• Public employee • 102 • 47.4%
• Private employee • 72 • 33.5%
• Other • 10 • 04.7%

The accustomed factors then also can use to test with the help of Smart PLS. The collected data
analysis took by use of PLS-SEM reflective mold(Aertsens, Mondelaers, & Van Huylenbroeck,
2009; Hair Jr et al., 2016). All discussed indicators aregiven in the Table 02,andhave outer
loadings valuesmore than 0.7 that dofulfillwants of statistical. Table 03 of testdisplays the
convergent validity besides reliability of hypotheses. Cronbach's alpha is anold-style for
reliability test; amalgamated reliability is generally practical in PLS-
SEMtechnique;AVE(Average Variance Extracted) is an imperative guide for measuring the data.
Collecteddata shows the reliability when the obtained value of Cronbach's alpha and Combined
Reliability values are above than the value 0.7 other with the tested value of AVE is greater than
value 0.5. Thus, collected data for this study work encounter the necessary reliabilityHair Jr et al.
(2016).
Though, further numerical measures fulfill the basic necessities, as mentionbelow:
• Bivariate validity is appropriate (see Table 04) that all diagonal values are greater than
cooperatively otherstandards in the analogous columns such as cross loadings (Fornell &
Larcker, 1981).
• VIF (Variance inflation factors) of concealed variables in Table no05 are lower than 5
(Hair). So, concluded that multi-collinearity is not arisen.
• Table no05 has the f2consequence of hypotheses. f2 value measures the significance of
checked hypotheses to clarifying selectedreliant hypothesesHair Jr, Sarstedt, Ringle, and
Gudergan (2017). Beginnings from the value 0.02, value 0.15 and 0.35 links to minor,
intermediate and great effects. As in Table no 05, the information on green packaging and
environmental concern causes minor impacts on attitude towards green packaging. Levels
of remaining relations in the model are at the intermediate level.

4799
 CONSUMER’S PURCHASING BEHAVIOUR FOR GREEN PACKAGING IN AN EMERGING MARKET.
PJAEE, 18(8) (2021)

Table 02: Constructs and indicators of the model

Constructs and indicators Mean Loading EFA Outer loading

Altruism (ALT) Cronbach’s alpha =0.880

• ALT1. • 4.833 • 0.837 • 0.914
• ALT2. • 4.795 • 0.833 • 0.892
• ALT3. • 4.823 • 0.876 • 0.887
Interpersonal influence (IP) Cronbach’s alpha
=0.922 • 5.200 • 0.845 • 0.894
• IP1. • 5.126 • 0.793 • 0.900
• IP2. • 5.088 • 0.805 • 0.902
• IP3. • 5.195 • 0.871 • 0.903
• IP4.
Information on Green Packaging Cronbach’s
alpha =0. 943 • 4.512 • 0.872 • 0.942
• IGP1. • 4.377 • 0.921 • 0.955
• IGP2. • 4.233 • 0.923 • 0.947
• IGP3. • 4.400 • 0.867 • 0.839
• IGP4.
Environmental concernCronbach’s alpha =0
.953 • 4.367 • 0.938 • 0.974
• EC1. • 4.312 • 0.934 • 0.970
• EC2. • 4.251 • 0.932 • 0.920
• EC3.
Attitude towards Green PackagingCronbach’s
alpha = .877 • 5.172 • 0.813 • 0.904
• ATGP1. • 5.088 • 0.815 • 0.814
• ATGP2. • 5.200 • 0.763 • 0.839
• ATGP3. • 5.125 • 0.778 • 0.858
• ATGP4.
Purchase intentionCronbach’s alpha = 0.936
• PI1. • 4.749 • 0.938 • 0.936
• PI2. • 4.726 • 0.934 • 0.930
• PI3. • 4.781 • 0.932 • 0.957

• Predictive relevance of dependent hypotheses in a perceptive model is given by

theQ2standards. When the tested value of Q2 is greater than the value zero, which
describe the path analysis has prognosticimportance for a nominated thoughtfulmediatise
dependent hypothesis(Hair Jr et al., 2017). In afore research model, two mediatize and
dependenthypotheses with Q2 values are above than the value zero including, attitude
towards green packaging (0.135) and purchasing intention (0.021), which indicate that
the framework of, in this research work, give a good expectation of tested two
hypothesis..

4800
 CONSUMER’S PURCHASING BEHAVIOUR FOR GREEN PACKAGING IN AN EMERGING MARKET.
PJAEE, 18(8) (2021)

• The exact fit test standard d_G(Dijkstra & Henseler, 2015) is use to assurance the fit
model. Thetestd_G of the measured model(Dijkstra & Henseler, 2015; from, -and-techn,
& -fit, 2020) is 0.361.

Figure 02:

The results are shown in the Figure no02, whichfounded from the investigational frame by the
use the technique ofthe bootstrapping in Smart PLS (Hair et al., 2017). This scrutinyallow to
ensure the paraphernalia of influencing elements on attitude for green packaging and purchase
intention for green packaging in the linear structure model. The value of R2 of a latent variable
in Figure 2 is the percentage of the reactive variable variation that is enlightened by impact
factors. R2 value of attitude towards green packaging (0.218) is quite good. Instead R2 value of
purchase intention of green packaging (0.051) is pretty low, but then again still meets the
expressive threshold (Hair et al., 2017). Figure 2 attests that information on green packaging,
environmental concern personal influence and altruism affect attitude towards green packaging
significantly in this study. Figure 2 also specifies that attitude towards green packaging cause
remarkable impacts on purchase intention of green packaging. In conclusion, analysis results
confirm hypotheses H1, H2, H3, H4, and H5. Table 6 shows the overall impact of variables, in
which perceived value of green packaging has the highest impact on purchase intention.

Table03: Construct Reliability and Validity

Cronbach's Alpha Composite Reliability Average Variance Extracted (AVE)

ALT 0.880 0.926 0.806
ATGP 0.877 0.915 0.730
EC 0.953 0.969 0.912
IGP 0.943 0.958 0.850
IP 0.922 0.944 0.809

4801
 CONSUMER’S PURCHASING BEHAVIOUR FOR GREEN PACKAGING IN AN EMERGING MARKET.
PJAEE, 18(8) (2021)

PI 0.936 0.959 0.885

Table 04: Discriminant validity

ALT ATGP EC IGP IP PI

ALT
ATGP 0.330
EC 0.029 0.122
IGP 0.108 0.115 0.470
IP 0.176 0.302 0.085 0.046
PI 0.073 0.177 0.053 0.026 0.142

Table 05:

Attitude towards green packaging Purchase Intention

VIF f2 VIF f2
ALT 1.043 0.150 1.178
ATGP 1.278 0.28
EC 1.269 0.022 1.296
IGP 1.277 0.021 1.302
IP 1.037 0.172 1.163
PI

Table 06: Overall impacts of factors in the model

Original Sample Standard Deviation T Statistics P

Sample (O) Mean (M) (STDEV) (|O/STDEV|) Value
s
ALT -> 0.326 0.325 0.081 4.024 0.000
ATGP
ATGP -> 0.142 0.142 0.099 1.432 0.000
PI
EC -> 0.147 0.144 0.077 1.908 0.002
ATGP
IGP -> 0.140 0.141 0.075 1.882 0.000
ATGP
IP -> 0.315 0.316 0.087 3.609 0.000
ATGP

Hypothesis tests;
Hypothesis 1: Hypothesis 1 was tested then the outcomes are shown in the given table below.
The model was considered suitable for evaluation, this can be seen from the goodness of fitness
statistics in general, P> Chi2 is equal to 0.000. The results showed that information of green

4802
 CONSUMER’S PURCHASING BEHAVIOUR FOR GREEN PACKAGING IN AN EMERGING MARKET.
PJAEE, 18(8) (2021)

packaging has a significant relationship with attitude towards green packaging. Individuals with
information of green packaging do not have significant impact on attitude toward green
packaging. The probability of significance is 0.000.

Hypothesis 2: Hypothesis 2 is estimated to determine the influence of environmental concern on

attitude toward the green packaging. Structural Equation Modeling is executed and its results are
presented in the given Table. It is found that environmental concern on attitude toward green
packaging; individuals having high environmental concern on attitude toward green packaging
impact on his behavior. The p-value of 0.002 identify the results as highly significant, overall,
these findings suggest that environmental concern on attitude toward green packaging have
significant impact. This result support the view of Tanner et al. (2003)

Hypothesis 3: Hypothesis 3 is assessed to scrutinize the affiliation between interpersonal

influence and the attitude towards green packaging. Results of structural equation modeling are
shown in the given table, where it is known that interpersonal influence affects attitude towards
green packaging at a significant p-value of 0.002. this result support the suggestion of Khare et
al. (2012).

Hypothesis 4: Hypothesis 4 was assessed to determine the connection between Altruism and the
attitude towards green packaging. The SEM results are presented in a table. The link between
Altruism and the attitude towards green packaging was got to be significant. Individuals, who
have altruism, can create the attitude towards the green packaging. A p-value of 0.000 identifies
an outcome of high significance. This result support the assessment of (Guéguen & Stefan, 2016;
R. Yadav & G. S. Pathak, 2016b).

Hypothesis 5: Hypothesis 5 was evaluated to determine the association between the variables
attitude towards green packaging and purchase intention of green packaging. SEM results are
shown in the table. The connection between the attitude towards green packaging and purchase
intention is significant as outcome shows. People, who have the positive attitude towards green
packaging, will create intention to purchase green packaging. A P-value of 0.000 identifies a
result of high significance, results support the opinion of Abdul‐Muhmin (2007) and Tsen et al.
(2006).

DISCUSSION
This paper scrutinized the attitude towards the green packaging and its impact on purchase
intentions for green packaging in a completemethod. Furthermore, an effort is made to get
complete understanding and empirically examineprevious circumstances of buyers’subjective
norms that sooner or later influence green behaviour.
Coming to the hypothesis, outcomesmake verified the influence of subjective norms
ofconsumer’s effectiveness on attitudes inpast studies(Jang, Kim, & Lee, 2015). Dependable
with the theory of planned behaviour and of value-belief-norm(Cho, Thyroff, Rapert, Park, &
Lee, 2013; P. J. J. o. s. i. Stern, 2000), shopperstrusting in their capability to
resolveecologicalglitches, displayed higher attitude for green packaging and there are the
possibilities forrepeated purchase of green packaging goods(Cho et al., 2013). Green firmsmust
should pull thebuyers and transformtheir opinion for green packaging, in which the pulled green
buyers play a role of preacher of green packaging. Green activities is supposed as difficult and

4803
 CONSUMER’S PURCHASING BEHAVIOUR FOR GREEN PACKAGING IN AN EMERGING MARKET.
PJAEE, 18(8) (2021)

time taking(Follows & Jobber, 2000), so consequently, state should providesupplementaryfunds

to encourageusers. Strategycreators should talk to the audience that also improvedinformation
and concern of buyers for green packaging other with standard of green packaging whichhelp to
the environment to be unpolluted(Leonidou, Leonidou, & Kvasova, 2010).
In past studies(Y. Tang, Wang, & Lu, 2014), itoriginated that environmental concern for green
packages influences attitudes towards green packaging positively. This is the reason;shopper
with environmental concern can be recognized, targeted and raisedfigure out a loyal for green
packaging consumer-base. In this decade it is illustrious that publicanxiety about environment is
imitated in arguments in social and political modificationsand it helps environmental protection.
Green packing oriented consumers can also benefit the brands attain strong brand uniqueness as
eco-friendly brands.
According toRios, Martinez, Moreno, and Soriano (2006), outcomesmake prominent that
information about the various environmental issues from different resources like media enhance
information about, can influence the attitude towards the green packaging among consumers.
Furthermore, administration should do advertisementrelated to increase the information for green
packaging, how it helps the environment. Consumersshould be conveyed a solidwordsbygiving
recycling services, seminars on eco-friendly, and by gratifyingpublic who go with green
decisions(Leonidou et al., 2010).Individual should realise his duty to choose green packaging
and take as standard to go with green packaging. Motivatingdrivers with the correctpassionate of
engagement strategies will confidentlydevelop the enthusiasm to assume green behaviourand
select the green packaging, it reflected through interpersonal influence and altruism(Follows &
Jobber, 2000). Some people take things to show others their status and some are generous and
want to give something to society with any intention to get back in return, it impacts the attitude
of individual.
Prominently, purchase intentions are significantly impacted by attitude towards green packaging.
Green marketers are directed to form awareness about green packaging consumption and its
impression on environment (Nittala, 2014). Information can be provided by tag on packaging
about green so that buyerscan effortlesslyrecognize green products. Either, the administration
should startcollaboratingwith consumers for packaging materials, which are environment
friendly.
In Whole, this researchdonates to the in existence literature by offering empirically testable
framework that is helpful to categorize and settle the role of information of green packaging,
environmental concerns, interpersonal influence and altruism on attitude green packaging and its
impact on purchase intention in the framework of developing economies. Also, it helps to draw
assessments between industrialized and unindustrialized economies as their concern for
environment.

CONCLUSION
The model ofstudies,thenumerous essential factors are impacting attitude towards green
packaging and the purchase intention in adeveloping market (Pakistan). A significant conclusion
of research is to approve, the procedure of information formation is indications to enhance the
knowledge, it helps to strengthens the attitudes (Zepeda & Deal, 2009). In case of this study,
information influence positively on awareness of green packaging and awareness strongly affects
attitude towards green packaging(Aertsens et al., 2009). In overall, buyersmust need to be
mindful of green packaging before buying it. Another outcome of the investigation of this study
is to check the minor impact on environmental concern that fit in with the consequences of some

4804
 CONSUMER’S PURCHASING BEHAVIOUR FOR GREEN PACKAGING IN AN EMERGING MARKET.
PJAEE, 18(8) (2021)

earlier studies ((Allison et al., 2016; Nedra, Sharma, Dakhli, & Entrepreneurship, 2015). This
conclusion, however, result supports the latestlearning fromAfshin et al. (2019)in green
packaging. The significant influence of environmental concern on the variable attitude toward
green packaging does accept a said ofBourn, Prescott, and nutrition (2002) that environment is
the concern of consumers, specifically in rising countries.The motive of this can be that in rising
economies, the environmental concern takes prominence. The study intentions to find the key
experiences that affect the environmental concern, which directly or indirectly push towards
green procuring, create the behavior of youth of Pakistan’s consumers. Inframework of the study,
a research model was planned for theeffective bondamong the factors affecting environmental
concern and green packaging purchase intention. The study’s results maintain the being of an
important connection between personal influence, environmental concern, and attitude elements.
The consequences of the finding showed; interpersonal influence hasconsiderablyeffects the
attitude of Pakistan’sbuyers. As Alike outcomes have been prior affirmed byCheah, Phau, and
Planning (2011)as buyer’s perspective Australia.Altruismconsiderablystimulithe attitude of
buyers towards green packaging, as stated by(R. Yadav & G. S. J. J. o. C. P. Pathak, 2016).
Environmental concernconsiderably affects thegreen purchasing behaviorof buyers. This
outcome approvesthe consequences of other researchers(Meneses, Palacio, & behavior, 2005; R.
Yadav & G. S. J. J. o. C. P. Pathak, 2016).Cheah et al. (2011)Also perceived about, theusers
withpositive environmental concern were more likely toexhibit purchasing intention of green
packaging. Adoption of environmentally aware product packaging strategies and giving
information and communicating may work and go long way in inciting pro-environmental
purchasing behavior ofconsumers. This study carriesnumeroussuggestions. Outcomes of this
studyadd totheory by modifying the results of information on attitude towards green packaging
in the knowledge theory (Ajzen et al., 2011). And, attitude towards green packaging, on the
facts, influencepurchase intention expressively.
Other withessential factis, studyconfirms abouta significant part of green packaging and the
significant character of environmental concern for attitude towards green packaging, thatlooks
alike usual in emerging economies. This study worklikewisedemonstrates managerial inferences.
The outcome on the role of information,environmental concern, interpersonal influence and
altruism that positively affects attitude towards green packaging, the result suggest to the expert
selling green packaging products, required a worthy marketing channels,tactics to enhance
further data and, thus as a result, enrich the consumers’ understanding and knowledge(Kallgren
& Wood, 1986) Furthermore, the issues of environment, which developedgradually essential in
emergingcountries, necessityshould be upraised in mandate to boostbuyers to buy green
packaging produces.

6.1 Limitations:
As like others studies, also in this research has some limitations. The first one is of the study the
responsive audience was single country Pakistan. Other regions may have dissimilar values for
green packaging activities(Park, Lee, & Kim, 2014). That is why; forthcoming searches focus on
green packaging practices thru countries for the betterassessment ofthe study. Additional, though
this research workemphasised the possiblereimbursements of green packaging however it lacks
of care the costs related with green packaging.
6.2 Recommendation:
Further, it was limited to questioner but in future researcher can take interviews, observe and
take questioner survey for more understanding and get more addition in literature.The research

4805
 CONSUMER’S PURCHASING BEHAVIOUR FOR GREEN PACKAGING IN AN EMERGING MARKET.
PJAEE, 18(8) (2021)

work was conducted on Pakistani sample. Future studies can use culture as a pivotalhypothesis
and recognize green attitudefrom culturalcoordinationperception. Moreover, study depends on
individualnorms and therefore withoutstandingcare this survey is taken because it has impact on
the research conclusions.

REFERENCES
Abdul‐Muhmin, A. G. (2007). Explaining consumers’ willingness to be environmentally
friendly. International journal of consumer studies, 31(3), 237-247.
Aertsens, J., Mondelaers, K., & Van Huylenbroeck, G. J. B. f. j. (2009). Differences in retail
strategies on the emerging organic market.
Afshin, A., Sur, P. J., Fay, K. A., Cornaby, L., Ferrara, G., Salama, J. S., . . . Abebe, Z. J. T. L.
(2019). Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis
for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. 393(10184), 1958-1972.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Orgnizational Behavior and Human Decision
Processes, 50, 179–211. In.
Ajzen, I., Joyce, N., Sheikh, S., Cote, N. G. J. B., & psychology, a. s. (2011). Knowledge and the
prediction of behavior: The role of information accuracy in the theory of planned
behavior. 33(2), 101-117.
Allison, J., Amako, K., Apostolakis, J., Arce, P., Asai, M., Aso, T., . . . Equipment, A. (2016).
Recent developments in Geant4. 835, 186-225.
Allport, G. W. (1933). 1. Attitudes. terminology, 219.
Alwitt, L. F., & Pitts, R. E. J. J. o. c. p. (1996). Predicting purchase intentions for an
environmentally sensitive product. 5(1), 49-64.
Ansar, N. (2013). Impact of green marketing on consumer purchase intention. Mediterranean
Journal of Social Sciences, 4(11), 650-650.
Arvola, A., Vassallo, M., Dean, M., Lampila, P., Saba, A., Lähteenmäki, L., & Shepherd, R. J.
A. (2008). Predicting intentions to purchase organic food: The role of affective and moral
attitudes in the Theory of Planned Behaviour. 50(2-3), 443-454.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological
review, 84(2), 191.
Bandura, A. (1979). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive theory,
Englewood Cliffs, NT. In: Prentice-Hall. Block.
Barber, N. (2005). Wine label design, information and bottle packaging: Influence on wine
buying behaviors. published master’s thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Barber, N. (2010). “Green” wine packaging: targeting environmental consumers. International
Journal of Wine Business Research.
Baron, D. P. (2009). A positive theory of moral management, social pressure, and corporate
social performance. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18(1), 7-43.
Bearden, W. O., Netemeyer, R. G., & Teel, J. E. (1989). Measurement of consumer susceptibility
to interpersonal influence. Journal of consumer research, 15(4), 473-481.
Blackwell, R. D., Miniard, P.W. and Engel, J.F. . (2006). Consumer behavior. Thomson
Learning, South Western, 10th edition,.
Blumberg, B., Cooper, D., & Schindler, P. (2014). EBOOK: Business Research Methods:
McGraw Hill.

4806
 CONSUMER’S PURCHASING BEHAVIOUR FOR GREEN PACKAGING IN AN EMERGING MARKET.
PJAEE, 18(8) (2021)

Bourn, D., Prescott, J. J. C. r. i. f. s., & nutrition. (2002). A comparison of the nutritional value,
sensory qualities, and food safety of organically and conventionally produced foods.
42(1), 1-34.
Chan, R. Y., & Lau, L. B. (2002). Explaining green purchasing behavior: A cross-cultural study
on American and Chinese consumers. Journal of international consumer marketing, 14(2-
3), 9-40.
Chan, R. Y., & Lau, L. B. J. J. o. i. c. m. (2002). Explaining green purchasing behavior: A cross-
cultural study on American and Chinese consumers. 14(2-3), 9-40.
Chan, R. Y. J. P., & marketing. (2001). Determinants of Chinese consumers' green purchase
behavior. 18(4), 389-413.
Cheah, I., & Phau, I. (2011). Attitudes towards environmentally friendly products: The influence
of ecoliteracy, interpersonal influence and value orientation. Marketing Intelligence &
Planning.
Cheah, I., Phau, I. J. M. I., & Planning. (2011). Attitudes towards environmentally friendly
products: The influence of ecoliteracy, interpersonal influence and value orientation.
Chen, T. B., & Chai, L. T. (2010). Attitude towards the environment and green products:
Consumers’ perspective. Management science and engineering, 4(2), 27-39.
Chen, Y. S., & Chang, C. H. (2012). Enhance green purchase intentions. Management Decision.
Cho, Y.-N., Thyroff, A., Rapert, M. I., Park, S.-Y., & Lee, H. J. J. J. o. B. R. (2013). To be or not
to be green: Exploring individualism and collectivism as antecedents of environmental
behavior. 66(8), 1052-1059.
Costello, A. B., Osborne, J. J. P. a., research,, & evaluation. (2005). Best practices in exploratory
factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. 10(1), 7.
De Koning, J. I. J. C., Crul, M. R. M., Wever, R., & Brezet, J. C. (2015). Sustainable
consumption in Vietnam: an explorative study among the urban middle class.
International journal of consumer studies, 39(6), 608-618.
Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. J. M. q. (2015). Consistent partial least squares path modeling.
39(2), 297-316.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and
collective rationality in organizational fields. American sociological review, 147-160.
Domnica, D. (2010). Review concerning the functions of packaging. Land Forces Academy
Review, 15(1), 44.
Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social
responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International journal of
management reviews, 12(1), 8-19.
Ebreo, A., Hershey, J., Vining, J. J. E., & Behavior. (1999). Reducing solid waste: Linking
recycling to environmentally responsible consumerism. 31(1), 107-135.
Fergus, J. (1991). Anticipating consumer trends. The greening of businesses.
Follows, S. B., & Jobber, D. J. E. j. o. M. (2000). Environmentally responsible purchase
behaviour: a test of a consumer model.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and
measurement error: Algebra and statistics. In: Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles,
CA.
from, M. f. S. G. R., -and-techn, h. w. s. p. c. d. e. i. a. i., & -fit, i. m. (2020). Smart PLS_Team.
Gorsuch, R. L. (2013). Exploratory Factor Analysis: Its Role in Item Analysis. In Emerging
Issues and Methods in Personality Assessment (pp. 318-347): Routledge.

4807
 CONSUMER’S PURCHASING BEHAVIOUR FOR GREEN PACKAGING IN AN EMERGING MARKET.
PJAEE, 18(8) (2021)

Guéguen, N., & Stefan, J. (2016). “Green altruism” short immersion in natural green
environments and helping behavior. Environment and behavior, 48(2), 324-342.
Hair, J. J. M. d. a. A. g. p. FJ, Black, WC, Babin, BJ, & Anderson, RE (2009).
Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares
structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): Sage publications.
Hair Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2017). Advanced issues in partial
least squares structural equation modeling: saGe publications.
Hall, P. A. (1986). Governing the economy: The politics of state intervention in Britain and
France.
Hoffmann, U., Truong, Q. A., Schoenfeld, D. A., Chou, E. T., Woodard, P. K., Nagurney, J. T., .
. . Weiner, S. G. J. N. E. J. o. M. (2012). Coronary CT angiography versus standard
evaluation in acute chest pain. 367(4), 299-308.
Hopper, J. R., Nielson, J. J. N. J. P. H. R. P. E., & Behavior. (1991). Recycling as 29. Hair, JF,
WC Black, BR Babin, RE Anderson and Altruistic Behavior: Normative and Behavioral
RL Tatham, 2006. Multivariate Data Analysis (6th Strategies to Expend Participation in a
Community edition). 30, 195-220.
Irland, L. C. (1993). Wood producers face green marketing era: Environmentally Sound
Products. Wood Technology, 120(2), 34-36.
Jang, Y. J., Kim, W. G., & Lee, H. Y. J. I. J. o. H. M. (2015). Coffee shop consumers’ emotional
attachment and loyalty to green stores: The moderating role of green consciousness. 44,
146-156.
Juwaheer, T. D., Pudaruth, S., & Noyaux, M. M. E. (2012). Analysing the impact of green
marketing strategies on consumer purchasing patterns in Mauritius. World Journal of
Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development.
Kallgren, C. A., & Wood, W. J. J. o. E. S. P. (1986). Access to attitude-relevant information in
memory as a determinant of attitude-behavior consistency. 22(4), 328-338.
Kangis, P. J. I. J. o. W. M. (1992). Concerns about green marketing.
Kaur, P., & Singh, R. (2007). Uncovering retail shopping motives of Indian youth. Young
Consumers.
Khare, A., Parveen, C., & Mishra, A. (2012). Influence of normative and informative values on
fashion clothing involvement of Indian women. Journal of Customer Behaviour, 11(1), 9-
32.
Lee, K. (2009). Gender differences in Hong Kong adolescent consumers' green purchasing
behavior. Journal of consumer marketing.
Lee, K. (2010). The green purchase behavior of Hong Kong young consumers: The role of peer
influence, local environmental involvement, and concrete environmental knowledge.
Journal of international consumer marketing, 23(1), 21-44.
Leonidou, L. C., Leonidou, C. N., & Kvasova, O. J. J. o. M. M. (2010). Antecedents and
outcomes of consumer environmentally friendly attitudes and behaviour. 26(13-14),
1319-1344.
Li, D.-P., & Wu, Z.-J. (2008). Impact of chemical fertilizers application on soil ecological
environment. Ying yong sheng tai xue bao= The journal of applied ecology, 19(5), 1158-
1165.
Lim, W. M., Yong, J. L. S., & Suryadi, K. (2014). Consumers’ perceived value and willingness
to purchase organic food. Journal of Global Marketing, 27(5), 298-307.

4808
 CONSUMER’S PURCHASING BEHAVIOUR FOR GREEN PACKAGING IN AN EMERGING MARKET.
PJAEE, 18(8) (2021)

Lueg, J. E., & Finney, R. Z. (2007). Interpersonal communication in the consumer socialization
process: scale development and validation. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice,
15(1), 25-39.
Martin, B., & Simintiras, A. C. (1995). The impact of green product lines on the environment:
does what they know affect how they feel? Marketing Intelligence & Planning.
Martin, B., Simintiras, A. C. J. M. I., & Planning. (1995). The impact of green product lines on
the environment: does what they know affect how they feel?
McIntosh, A. (1991). The impact of environmental-issues on marketing and politics in the 1990s.
Journal of the Market Research Society, 33(3), 205-217.
Meneses, G. D., Palacio, A. B. J. E., & behavior. (2005). Recycling behavior: a multidimensional
approach. 37(6), 837-860.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and
ceremony. American journal of sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
Morris, L. A., Hastak, M., & Mazis, M. B. (1995). Consumer comprehension of environmental
advertising and labeling claims. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 29(2), 328-350.
Nath, V., Nayak, N., & Goel, A. (2014). Green banking practices–A review. IMPACT:
International Journal of Research in Business Management (IMPACT: IJRBM) Vol, 2,
45-62.
Nedra, B.-A., Sharma, S., Dakhli, A. J. J. o. R. i. M., & Entrepreneurship. (2015). Perception and
motivation to purchase organic products in Mediterranean countries. 17(1), 67-90.
Netemeyer, R. G., Andrews, J. C., & Burton, S. (2005). Effects of antismoking advertising–
based beliefs on adult smokers’ consideration of quitting. American Journal of Public
Health, 95(6), 1062-1066.
Nguyen, N.-T., Wereley, S. T., & Shaegh, S. A. M. (2019). Fundamentals and applications of
microfluidics: Artech house.
Nittala, R. J. J. o. i. c. m. (2014). Green consumer behavior of the educated segment in India.
26(2), 138-152.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance: Cambridge
university press.
Okhmatovskiy, I. (2010). Performance implications of ties to the government and SOEs: A
political embeddedness perspective. Journal of management studies, 47(6), 1020-1047.
Ottman, J. (1992). Sometimes consumers will pay more to go green. Marketing news, 26(6), 16.
Paladino, A., & Ng, S. J. E. E. R. (2013). An examination of the influences on ‘green’mobile
phone purchases among young business students: an empirical analysis. 19(1), 118-145.
Park, J., Lee, H., & Kim, C. J. J. o. B. R. (2014). Corporate social responsibilities, consumer trust
and corporate reputation: South Korean consumers' perspectives. 67(3), 295-302.
Pham, T. H., Nguyen, T. N., Phan, T. T. H., & Nguyen, N. T. J. J. o. S. M. (2019). Evaluating
the purchase behaviour of organic food by young consumers in an emerging market
economy. 27(6), 540-556.
Pillai, P. (2016). A study on consumers’ perception towards eco-friendly products in
Ahmedabad. Management, 2395, 7492.
Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1994). Strategy as a field of study: Why search for a new
paradigm? Strategic management journal, 15(S2), 5-16.
Rink, D. R., & Swan, J. E. (1979). Product life cycle research: A literature review. Journal of
Business Research, 7(3), 219-242.

4809
 CONSUMER’S PURCHASING BEHAVIOUR FOR GREEN PACKAGING IN AN EMERGING MARKET.
PJAEE, 18(8) (2021)

Rios, F. J. M., Martinez, T. L., Moreno, F. F., & Soriano, P. C. J. J. o. c. m. (2006). Improving
attitudes toward brands with environmental associations: an experimental approach.
Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism1 Advances in experimental social
psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 221-279). In: Elsevier.
Schwepker Jr, C. H., & Cornwell, T. B. (1991). An examination of ecologically concerned
consumers and their intention to purchase ecologically packaged products. Journal of
Public Policy & Marketing, 10(2), 77-101.
Shah, R., & Pillai, P. (2012). Consumer’s environmental concern & its influence on their
purchase intention: SEM Approach. International Journal of Management, 2(1).
Singh, A., & Verma, P. J. J. o. c. p. (2017). Factors influencing Indian consumers' actual buying
behaviour towards organic food products. 167, 473-483.
Singh, N. (2009). Exploring socially responsible behaviour of Indian consumers: an empirical
investigation. Social Responsibility Journal.
Soonthonsmai, V. (2001). Predicting intention and behavior to purchase environmentally sound
or green products among Thai consumers: An application of the Theory of Reasoned
Action. Nova Southeastern University,
Steg, L., Bolderdijk, J. W., Keizer, K., & Perlaviciute, G. (2014). An integrated framework for
encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: The role of values, situational factors and
goals. Journal of Environmental psychology, 38, 104-115.
Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. J. J. o. s. i. (1994). The value basis of environmental concern. 50(3), 65-
84.
Stern, P. J. J. o. s. i. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior.
56(3), 407-424.
Tang, R., & Gavin, M. C. (2016). A classification of threats to traditional ecological knowledge
and conservation responses. Conservation and Society, 14(1), 57-70.
Tang, Y., Wang, X., & Lu, P. J. A.-P. J. o. B. A. (2014). Chinese consumer attitude and purchase
intent towards green products.
Tanner, C., Wölfing Kast, S. J. P., & Marketing. (2003). Promoting sustainable consumption:
Determinants of green purchases by Swiss consumers. 20(10), 883-902.
Tarkiainen, A., & Sundqvist, S. J. B. f. j. (2005). Subjective norms, attitudes and intentions of
Finnish consumers in buying organic food.
Tsen, C.-H., Phang, G., Hasan, H., & Buncha, M. R. (2006). Going green: A study of consumers’
willingness to pay for green products in Kota Kinabalu. International Journal of Business
and Society, 7(2), 40-54.
Van Huylenbroek, G., Mondelaers, K., Aertsens, J., Aertsens, J., Verbeke, W., Mondelaers, K.,
& Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2009). Personal determinants of organic food consumption: a
review. British food journal.
Varela-Candamio, L., Novo-Corti, I., & García-Álvarez, M. T. J. J. o. c. p. (2018). The
importance of environmental education in the determinants of green behavior: A meta-
analysis approach. 170, 1565-1578.
Vining, J., & Ebreo, A. J. J. o. a. s. p. (1992). Predicting recycling behavior from global and
specific environmental attitudes and changes in recycling opportunities 1. 22(20), 1580-
1607.
Wahlen, S., Heiskanen, E., & Aalto, K. (2012). Endorsing sustainable food consumption:
Prospects from public catering. Journal of Consumer Policy, 35(1), 7-21.
Wasik, J. F. (1996). Green marketing and management: A global perspective: Wiley.

4810
 CONSUMER’S PURCHASING BEHAVIOUR FOR GREEN PACKAGING IN AN EMERGING MARKET.
PJAEE, 18(8) (2021)

Wiener, J. L., & Sukhdial, A. (1990). Recycling of solid waste: directions for future research.
Paper presented at the AMA Summer Educators’ Conference Proceedings.
Williamson, O. E. (2000). The new institutional economics: taking stock, looking ahead. Journal
of economic literature, 38(3), 595-613.
Yadav, R., & Pathak, G. S. (2016a). Intention to purchase organic food among young consumers:
Evidences from a developing nation. Appetite, 96, 122-128.
Yadav, R., & Pathak, G. S. (2016b). Young consumers' intention towards buying green products
in a developing nation: Extending the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Cleaner
Production, 135, 732-739.
Yadav, R., & Pathak, G. S. J. J. o. C. P. (2016). Young consumers' intention towards buying
green products in a developing nation: Extending the theory of planned behavior. 135,
732-739.
Zelezny, L. C., & Schultz, P. W. (2000). Psychology of promoting environmentalism: Promoting
environmentalism. Journal of social issues, 56(3), 365-371.
Zepeda, L., & Deal, D. J. I. J. o. C. S. (2009). Organic and local food consumer behaviour:
Alphabet theory. 33(6), 697-705.
Zhang, G., & Zhao, Z. (2012). Green packaging management of logistics enterprises. Physics
Procedia, 24, 900-905.

4811