Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 18 views

    Activity 5 WB SA Group 3 BSEd Science IV-3

    Uploaded by

    John Paul Sarmiento Latoja
    The rubric assesses ePortfolios on 5 criteria on a scale of 1 to 5: 1) Evidence (20%) - Shows PPST indicators for beginning teachers 2) Annotation (30%) - Descriptions and explanations of learning outcomes 3) Output (50%) - Ease of use, content, and creativity of presentation The assessor gave the ePortfolio a score of 5 or "Excellent" for meeting all criteria. They commented that the ePortfolio was beautiful and came from the heart of the students.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Activity 5 WB SA Group 3 BSEd Science IV-3

    Uploaded by

    John Paul Sarmiento Latoja
    18 views1 page
    The rubric assesses ePortfolios on 5 criteria on a scale of 1 to 5: 1) Evidence (20%) - Shows PPST indicators for beginning teachers 2) Annotation (30%) - Descriptions and explanations of learning outcomes 3) Output (50%) - Ease of use, content, and creativity of presentation The assessor gave the ePortfolio a score of 5 or "Excellent" for meeting all criteria. They commented that the ePortfolio was beautiful and came from the heart of the students.

    Original Description:

    Self-Assessment 4

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The rubric assesses ePortfolios on 5 criteria on a scale of 1 to 5: 1) Evidence (20%) - Shows PPST indicators for beginning teachers 2) Annotation (30%) - Descriptions and explanations of learning outcomes 3) Output (50%) - Ease of use, content, and creativity of presentation The assessor gave the ePortfolio a score of 5 or "Excellent" for meeting all criteria. They commented that the ePortfolio was beautiful and came from the heart of the students.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    18 views1 page

    Activity 5 WB SA Group 3 BSEd Science IV-3

    Uploaded by

    John Paul Sarmiento Latoja
    The rubric assesses ePortfolios on 5 criteria on a scale of 1 to 5: 1) Evidence (20%) - Shows PPST indicators for beginning teachers 2) Annotation (30%) - Descriptions and explanations of learning outcomes 3) Output (50%) - Ease of use, content, and creativity of presentation The assessor gave the ePortfolio a score of 5 or "Excellent" for meeting all criteria. They commented that the ePortfolio was beautiful and came from the heart of the students.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    Directions: Below is a rubric for assessing your ePortfolio.

    Assess the output by putting the score on the last column of the rubric opposite the stated criterion. Then write your comment about the
    ePortfolio that will justify the rating that you have given.
    Criteria/ Excellent Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Fair Poor
    Score
    Dimension 5 4 3 2 1
    Evidence shows only four Evidence shows only three Evidence shows only two (2) Evidence show at most one (1) of the 5
    Evidence Evidence shows more than four (4) PPST indicators for
    (4) PPST indicators for (3) PPST indicators for PPST indicators for beginning PPST indicators for beginning
    (20%) beginning Teacher
    beginning Teacher beginning Teacher Teacher. Teacher
    Annotation Satisfies ALL of the following indicators: Satisfies at least 80% of each of Satisfies at least 60% of each of Satisfies at least 40% of each of The description/ explanation for each 5
    (30%) the following indicators: the following indicators: the following indicators: achieved intended learning outcomes/
    1.Description/Explanation for each achieved intended learning 1.Description/Explanation for 1.Description/Explanation for 1.Description/Explanation for each PPST competency is not clearly stated, and
    outcomes/PPST competency is clearly stated. each achieved intended each achieved intended learning achieved intended learning unacceptable considering the evidence
    learning outcomes/PPST outcomes/PPST competency is outcomes/PPST competency is presented.
    competency is clearly stated. clearly stated. clearly stated.
    2.Explanation is acceptable considering the intended learning 2.Explanation is acceptable 2.Explanation is acceptable 2.Explanation is acceptable It contains more than 10 errors in
    outcomes/ PPST competency described and the evidence shown. considering the intended considering the intended considering the intended learning grammar, spelling and mechanics.
    learning outcomes/ PPST learning outcomes/ PPST outcomes/ PPST competency
    competency described and the competency described and the described and the evidence
    evidence shown. evidence shown. shown.
    3. Annotation is free from any error in grammar, spelling and 3. Annotation is free from any 3. Annotation is free from any 3.Annotation is free from any
    mechanics error in grammar, spelling and error in grammar, spelling and error in grammar, spelling and
    mechanics. mechanics. mechanics.

    Output Satisfies all the given indicators below: 5


    (50%) 1.The eportfolio content is easy to navigate such that it is
    connected to the home page.
    2.The the content of the entire ePortfolio including the evidences
    presented is easy to read, with appropriate font, graphics, text
    and color combination.
    3.The ePortfolio content shows knowledge and understanding
    acquired from the content and activities provided in the FS
    worksheets. Satisfies at least 3 or 4 of the
    Satisfies only 2 of the indicators Satisfies only 1of the indicators . Satisfies NONE of the indicators .
    indicators .
    4.The packaged ePortfolio shows creativity in ideas and
    presentation style.
    5.Every member of the group contributes in building the
    ePortfolio.
    6. The group reflection demonstrate a thorough understanding of
    the entire FS processes. The reflection is logically organized and
    structured, and explains the FS student’s own thinking and
    learning processes, as well as implications for future learning.

    Average Score 5
    Equivalent Excelent

    Group No. 3 Course/Yr. & Sec. BSEd Science IV-3

    Leader Latoja, John Paul S.


    Members Agbuya, Krizza Mae P.
    Cantor, Dhenzel S.
    Carza, Aljay C.
    De Vera, Crisanta R.
    Mosada, Jersey O.

    Comment:

    We believe that you will surely like our web blog for this activity because it is very beautiful and also comes from our heart while we are doing this.

    ame of Assessor: Latoja, John Paul S. Year & Section: (for student) BSEd Science IV-3
    Designation Students

    You might also like