Solution Manual For Essentials of Investments 11th by Bodie
Solution Manual For Essentials of Investments 11th by Bodie
Solution Manual For Essentials of Investments 11th by Bodie
CHAPTER SEVEN
CAPITAL ASSET PRICING AND ARBITRAGE PRICING
THEORY
CHAPTER OVERVIEW
This chapter first presents the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), an equilibrium pricing model
derived from a set of fairly restrictive assumptions delineated in the PPT. This model was
instrumental in the development of modern finance theory and several of its developers won the
Nobel Prize for Economics. The essential feature of the CAPM is that the portfolio tangent to the
Capital Market Line (CML) is the market portfolio of all risky assets. The chapter also presents
an empirical model, the well known Fama-French 3 factor model. Finally, the chapter discusses
the arbitrage pricing theory (APT).
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
After studying this chapter, the student should understand the concept and usage of the capital
asset pricing model (CAPM). Similarly the reader should to be able to construct and use the
Security Market Line. The student should also have a basic understanding of index models and
the Fama-French model. Readers should also understand the arbitrage pricing theory (APT) and
to be able to use this theory to identify mispriced securities. The student should also understand
the similarities and differences between the two main theories and the limitations of each.
CHAPTER OUTLINE
1. The Capital Asset Pricing Model
PPT 7-2 through PPT 7-12
The introduction of the CAPM starts with an overview of the importance of the model and the
assumptions that underlie it. The implications or conditions that will result from the CAPM are
provided. Once the major implications and conditions have been discussed, the Capital Market
Line can be examined. In discussing the CML, it is important to stress that any complete
portfolio on the CML will dominate all portfolios on the efficient frontier (other than the
tangency portfolio).
The resulting conclusion is that investors, regardless of their risk preferences, will combine the
market portfolio with the risk-free investment. Since the equilibrium conditions result in all
investors holding the same portfolio of risky investments, pricing of individual securities is
related to the risk that individual securities have when they are included in the market portfolio.
The relevant measure of risk is the covariance of returns on the individual securities with the
market portfolio.
Copyright © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent
of McGraw-Hill Education.
Chapter 07 - Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory
The Security Market Line (SML) graphically depicts the market price of risk. The beta for the
individual security is the [Cov (ri,rm)]/Var rm. The beta is the measure of the amount of
systematic risk a stock has, or equivalently the amount of risk a stock will have when it is put
into a well diversified portfolio. Thus, the product of the market wide price of risk (rm – rf) / m
times i is the premium for bearing risk; and the required return for a security that compensates
for its systematic risk is risk premium (described above) plus the risk-free rate. The SML can
also be used to illustrate a security’s alpha. Portfolio betas are simple weighted averages of the
component security betas and are easy to calculate.
Copyright © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent
of McGraw-Hill Education.
Chapter 07 - Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory
In the PPT the concept of adjusted betas is presented. The depth in which you choose to cover
this topic should depend on the background of your students. You may wish to spend some time
in class developing confidence intervals and discussing the notion of statistical significance. The
significance of the alpha and beta measures is an important item to be discussed in class if the
student’s preparation in statistics is adequate.
This is the motivation for the Fama-French model described in the next section. As an aside, we
can conclude that the CAPM is false based on the validity of its assumptions. Nevertheless the
concepts from the CAPM remain valid and very important -- in particular, investors should
diversify; only systematic risk matters; and a well-diversified portfolio can be suitable to a wide
range of investors with different risk tolerances.
A broker or planner will still wish to identify the best-performing set of risky investments,
chosen for maximum diversification at a target return level. This portfolio will be optimal for
investors with different risk tolerances. Asset allocation adjusts for risk tolerances. Some people
tend to equate the idea of efficient markets with the CAPM. We have to be careful with this
linkage however. If the CAPM assumptions and results are completely valid then the markets
would have to be, de facto, informationally efficient. However if the CAPM is false this only
says that our model of expected returns is wrong and it technically says nothing about
information efficiency.
Copyright © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent
of McGraw-Hill Education.