Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 11 views

    2022 - d3 07 Hasalova Presentation

    Uploaded by

    Anoop
    This document describes an experimental validation study of a pyrolysis model for engineered wood products. Small-scale experiments were conducted involving a fiber cement panel exposed to heat from a propane burner to measure temperature, heat flux, and surface temperature. A CFD model was developed to simulate the experiments. The results show differences between experimental measurements and model predictions for temperature, heat flux, and surface temperature. Improvements to the experimental methods and model are recommended, including accounting for temperature-dependent material properties and 3D heat transfer effects.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    2022 - d3 07 Hasalova Presentation

    Uploaded by

    Anoop
    11 views15 pages
    This document describes an experimental validation study of a pyrolysis model for engineered wood products. Small-scale experiments were conducted involving a fiber cement panel exposed to heat from a propane burner to measure temperature, heat flux, and surface temperature. A CFD model was developed to simulate the experiments. The results show differences between experimental measurements and model predictions for temperature, heat flux, and surface temperature. Improvements to the experimental methods and model are recommended, including accounting for temperature-dependent material properties and 3D heat transfer effects.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    2022_d3-07-hasalova-presentation

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document describes an experimental validation study of a pyrolysis model for engineered wood products. Small-scale experiments were conducted involving a fiber cement panel exposed to heat from a propane burner to measure temperature, heat flux, and surface temperature. A CFD model was developed to simulate the experiments. The results show differences between experimental measurements and model predictions for temperature, heat flux, and surface temperature. Improvements to the experimental methods and model are recommended, including accounting for temperature-dependent material properties and 3D heat transfer effects.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    11 views15 pages

    2022 - d3 07 Hasalova Presentation

    Uploaded by

    Anoop
    This document describes an experimental validation study of a pyrolysis model for engineered wood products. Small-scale experiments were conducted involving a fiber cement panel exposed to heat from a propane burner to measure temperature, heat flux, and surface temperature. A CFD model was developed to simulate the experiments. The results show differences between experimental measurements and model predictions for temperature, heat flux, and surface temperature. Improvements to the experimental methods and model are recommended, including accounting for temperature-dependent material properties and 3D heat transfer effects.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 15

    INERT WALL THERMAL FEEDBACK

    VALIDATION STUDY
    Lucie Hasalová, Vojtěch Šálek, Petr Hejtmánek, Milan Jahoda

    Supported by the Ministry of Interior, Safety research programme of the Czech Republic
    2015 - 2020 (BV lll/1 - VS) under number VI20192022120
    Fire development modelling of engineered wood.
    Motivation – Fire spread modeling

     Engineered Wood Products (MDF, OSB, plywood, particleboard)


     CFD coupled to pyrolysis model
     Thermal decomposition properties
     Material properties
     Thermo-physical properties
     Optical properties
     Model dependent parameters

    12. - 14. 9. 2022 FEMTC 2022 2


    Pyrolysis model input parameters

     Micro-scale Calibration
    versus
    validation?
     Bench-scale

    12. - 14. 9. 2022 FEMTC 2022 3


    How to validate pyrolysis model of EWP?
    Vertical flame spread experiment
     2 × 1 meter board
     50 × 5 ×10 cm propane burner
    Wong, William Chiu-Kit. 2012. CFD Flame Spread Model
    Validation: Multi-Component Data Set Framework. : Worcester
    Polytechnic Institute

    Combustible wall fire model


     Turbulent buoyant fluid flow
     Gas phase kinetics
     Flame heat transfer
     Pyrolysis

    12. - 14. 9. 2022 FEMTC 2022 4


    Inert wall fire – thermal feedback to the wall
    Fiber cement panel
     2 × 1 meter
     12 mm thick
     Back side exposed

    12. - 14. 9. 2022 FEMTC 2022 5


    Measured quantities

    Gas phase quantities


     Temperature
     In the corner of the room Solid phase quantities
     Close to the panel  Surface temperature
     Net heat flux to the wall

    Mineral wool fiber


    insulation sheet

    12. - 14. 9. 2022 FEMTC 2022 6


    Repeatability and measurement uncertainty
    Temperature in the room Panel surface temperature
    25 °C 90 °C
    ± 2.5 °C ± 3.8 °C

    10 °C
    ± 2.5 °C
    Net heat flux
     Uncertainty of the heat flux gauge?
     Calibration accuracy is ± 3 % at full scale
     Non-linearity error 10 to 50 %
     Net heat flux not symmetrical along the center
    line

    12. - 14. 9. 2022 FEMTC 2022 7


    FDS model

    Exhaust vent

    Solid phase solver


    CELL_SIZE_FACTOR = 0.5
    STRETCH_FACTOR = 1

    Test room walls - inert

    Open boundary at
    three sides
    Fiber cement panel
     1 layer, 1 cell thick
     k, ρ, cp constant
     Backing exposed Burner

    12. - 14. 9. 2022 FEMTC 2022 8


    Grid resolution – 5 cases
    Brown, A., Bruns, M., Gollner, M., Hewson, J., Maragkos, G., Marshall, A., McDermott, R., Merci, B., Rogaume, T., Stoliarov, S.,
    Torero, J., Trouvé, A., Wang, Y., Weckman, E. (2018). Proceedings of the First Workshop Organized by the IAFSS Working
    Group on Measurement and Computation of Fire Phenomena (MaCFP), Fire Safety Journal, 101, 1-17.

     Grid resolution required to resolve boundary layer and wall gradients is in an order of 1 mm
     High resolution grid reduce numerical errors - the discrepancies between experimental data and
    computational results may be attributed to modeling errors

    Mesh Grid cell size in direction perpendicular to the Total number Number Simulation
    ID panel (number of cells in this direction) of cells of meshes time (s)

    1 mm 1mm (12) - 2mm (26) - 4mm (9) - 2cm (95) 65 902 500 80 10
    2 mm 2 mm (20) - 4 mm (10) - 8 mm (10) - 4cm (46) 22 222 800 36 40
    2 cm 1cm (20) - 2cm (10) - 10 cm (17) 804 084 11 600
    5 cm 1 cm (20) - 5 cm (38) 1 070 496 6 394
    10 cm 1 cm (20) - 10 cm (19) 637 812 6 585

    12. - 14. 9. 2022 FEMTC 2022 9


    Cold layer temperature

    Δ ~ 5 °C ~ 15 %

    12. - 14. 9. 2022 FEMTC 2022 10


    Hot layer temperature

    Δ ~ 10 °C ~ 12.5 %

    Δ ~ 20 °C ~ 20 %

    12. - 14. 9. 2022 FEMTC 2022 11


    Net heat flux to the wall

     Heat flux in the model is symmetrical along the panel center line
     Wrong boundary condition in the hood area
     Net heat flux to the cold versus hot wall

    12. - 14. 9. 2022 FEMTC 2022 12


    Panel surface temperature – center line

    T5

    T3

    T1

     Grid resolution
     Presence of moisture
     k, cp are temperature dependent
     1D heat transfer

    12. - 14. 9. 2022 FEMTC 2022 13


    Panel surface temperature - side line

    T6

    T4

    T2

     Unsymmetrical flow conditions


     Presence of moisture
     k, cp are temperature dependent
     1D heat transfer

    12. - 14. 9. 2022 FEMTC 2022 14


    Conclusions

    Experiments
     Evaluate the HFG uncertainty
     Measure velocity profile in the doors to the room

    Model
     Change boundary condition in the hood area
     Add temperature dependent k, cp
     Evaluate the „conductive losses“ upwards and to the side of the
    panel - 3D heat transfer.
     Get at least 200 seconds of the very fine grid resolution simulation

    12. - 14. 9. 2022 FEMTC 2022 15

    You might also like