Powered by AI

Chapter 10

According to Durkheim, "The major function of education is the

transmission of society's norms and values." Discuss.

Émile Durkheim, one of the founding fathers of sociology, indeed

held the view that one of the major functions of education is the
transmission of society’s norms and values. Here’s a discussion on
this perspective:

1. Transmission of Collective Memory: Durkheim believed

that education serves to instill and reinforce the collective
memory of a society. This collective memory, which
includes shared norms, values, and knowledge, is crucial for
the functioning of society.
2. Social Solidarity: By transmitting norms and values,
education helps to promote social solidarity. It fosters a
sense of shared identity and belonging, which Durkheim
saw as essential for social cohesion.
3. Socialization: Education is a key agent of socialization.
Through the educational process, individuals learn to
navigate the social world, understand their roles and
responsibilities, and conform to societal expectations.
4. Moral Education: For Durkheim, moral education was a
fundamental part of this process. He believed that schools
should serve as a microcosm of society, where students
learn to cooperate with those who are neither their kin nor
their friends, essentially preparing them for their future roles
in society.

However, it’s important to note that while Durkheim’s views on

education have been highly influential, they are not without
criticism. Some argue that this perspective overlooks the ways in
which education can also reproduce social inequalities. Others
suggest that it fails to account for individual agency and the
potential for resistance or change within the educational system.
 Powered by AI

Does collapse of functionalism and bankruptcy of Marxism

coincide with the rupture of modernity? Discuss

The question of whether the collapse of functionalism and the

bankruptcy of Marxism coincide with the rupture of modernity is a
complex one and can be seen from multiple perspectives.

Functionalism, a sociological perspective that interprets each part

of society in terms of how it contributes to the stability of the
whole society, faced criticism for its inability to explain social
change and conflict1. Its decline could be seen as part of the
rupture of modernity, which was characterized by a belief in
progress and a rational understanding of society.

Marxism, on the other hand, faced challenges due to the failure of

socialist experiments and criticisms of economic determinism1.
The perceived bankruptcy of Marxism could also be seen as
coinciding with the rupture of modernity, as it challenged the
capitalist systems that were a key feature of modern societies.

However, it’s important to note that these perspectives have not

disappeared entirely. Even if ‘rupturing of modernity’ is accepted,
‘post-modern thoughts’ are wide enough to ‘accommodate’ both
‘functionalism and Marxism’ in their 'modified forms’2.

In conclusion, while there may be some correlation between the

decline of these sociological theories and the rupture of modernity,
it’s not a straightforward relationship. The evolution of
sociological thought is influenced by a multitude of factors,
including but not limited to broader societal changes.
 Powered by AI

3. How does Marx view social conflict as an essential

element in social change?

Karl Marx, one of the principal architects of modern social

science, viewed social conflict as an essential element in
social change12. Here’s how he explained it:

1. Class Conflict: Marx believed that history was made

up of stages driven by class conflict1. He famously
wrote in The Communist Manifesto, “The history of all
hitherto existing society is the history of class
struggles”1. Class struggle pushed society from one
stage to the next, in a dialectical process1.

2. Means of Production and Relations of Production:

According to Marx, the way society is organized
depends on the current means of production and who
owns them1. The means of production include things
that are necessary to produce material goods, such as
land and natural resources1. They also include
technology, such as tools or machines, that people
use to produce things1.

3. Modes of Production: Together, the means of

production and the relations of production compose
a particular period’s mode of production1. Marx
distinguished different historical eras in terms of their
different modes of production1.

4. Conflict Theory: It is the theory that power struggles

and dynamics drive societal change3. Marx
concentrated on the conflict between the social
classes: those of the bourgeoisie and the proletariat3.
The power the bourgeoisie hold can be found in their
 Powered by AI

material resources, accumulated wealth, and social

status3.

In conclusion, Marx sees society evolving through stages.

He focuses on dialectical class conflict to control the means
of production as the driving force behind social evolution1.

4. Examine any two theories of social change in detail.

1. Evolutionary Theory: This theory is based on the

assumption that societies gradually change from simple
beginnings into even more complex forms1. Early
sociologists, beginning with Auguste Comte, believed that
human societies evolve in a unilinear way, meaning in
one line of development1. According to them, social
change meant progress toward something better1. They
saw change as positive and beneficial1. To them, the
evolutionary process implied that societies would
necessarily reach new and higher levels of civilization1.
Emile Durkheim identified the cause of societal evolution
as a society’s increasing moral density1. Durkheim
viewed societies as changing in the direction of greater
differentiation, interdependence, and formal control under
the pressure of increasing moral density1.
 Powered by AI

2. Conflict Theory: This theory maintains that society is

constantly in conflict over resources, and that conflict
drives social change234. For example, conflict theorists
might explain the civil rights movements of the 1960s by
studying how activists challenged the racially unequal
distribution of political power and economic resources2.
According to the conflict perspective, society is
constantly in conflict over resources, and that conflict
drives social change3. Conflict theory is a social theory
that discusses the ensuing conflict between the rich and
the poor in society to control scarce resources4. German
philosopher Karl Marx propounded it. As per the theory,
conflict exposes the inequalities prevalent in society and
thus becomes the agent of change4.

These theories provide different lenses through which we can

view and understand social change. The Evolutionary Theory
emphasizes gradual progression and development over time,
while the Conflict Theory focuses on societal struggle and
conflict as catalysts for change.

Critically examine the cultural theories of social change with

suitable examples

Cultural theories of social change emphasize the role of ideas,

beliefs, values, and symbols in driving social transformations123.
Here’s a critical examination of these theories:

1.Cultural Evolution: This theory is an evolutionary theory of

social change2. It follows from the definition of culture as
"information capable of affecting individuals’ behavior that they
acquire from other members of their species through teaching,
 Powered by AI

imitation and other forms of social transmission"2. Cultural

evolution suggests that societies evolve in a manner similar to
biological organisms, moving from simpler to more complex
forms over time4. For example, the transition from oral to
written cultures or from agrarian to industrial societies can be
seen as examples of cultural evolution4.

However, critics argue that cultural evolution can be

deterministic and overly simplistic4. It assumes a linear
progression of culture and doesn’t account for the complexities
and diversities of human societies4. Moreover, it often equates
change with progress, which can be a subjective interpretation 4.

1. Cultural Diffusion: This theory suggests that social

change occurs when cultural ideas and practices spread
from one group to another1. For instance, the spread of
democracy around the world can be seen as an example of
cultural diffusion.

Critics of this theory point out that it doesn’t explain why some
cultural traits spread while others do not1. It also tends to
overlook power dynamics in the process of cultural
transmission1.

2. Symbolic Interactionism: This perspective emphasizes

how changes in meanings and symbols can lead to social
change1. For example, the redefinition of the term
“marriage” to include same-sex couples has led to legal
and societal changes.

Critics argue that symbolic interactionism focuses too much on

micro-level interactions and overlooks larger social structures
and institutions1.

In conclusion, while cultural theories provide valuable insights into the role
of culture in social change, they also have limitations. They often struggle
to account for the complexities and diversities of human societies and may
overlook important factors such as power dynamics and structural
inequalities.
 Powered by AI

Do you think Talcott Parsons gave an adequate theory of social

change? Justify your answer.

Talcott Parsons, a structural functionalist, proposed a theory of

social change that is based on the concept of social systems as
complex entities with interrelated parts. According to Parsons,
these parts work together to maintain stability and order1. He
associated social change with evolution and proposed that social
change occurs when there is a need for adaptation or adjustment
in the social system to maintain equilibrium1.

Parsons’ theory of social change is centered around four

functional prerequisites: adaptation, goal attainment, integration,
and latency2. These prerequisites are necessary responses for the
existence and survival of any social system2. He believed that
social systems inherently possess the tendency to evolve and
integrate such processes and institutions as elements of the
system, which help in its self-maintenance2.

However, whether Parsons’ theory of social change is adequate

or not can be subjective and depends on one’s perspective. On
one hand, his theory provides a comprehensive framework for
understanding how societies maintain stability and order, and
how they adapt to changes. On the other hand, critics argue that
his theory is teleological in nature, meaning it explains the
existence of a process or institution in terms of the purpose it
fulfills2. This approach can be seen as deterministic and may not
account for the complexities and unpredictabilities inherent in
social change.

In conclusion, while Parsons’ theory offers valuable insights

into the processes of social change, it may not fully capture all
aspects of this complex phenomenon. Therefore, it’s important
to consider multiple theories and perspectives when studying
social change.
 Powered by AI

Criticize A.G. Frank's 'development of underdevelopment'.

A.G. Frank’s ‘development of underdevelopment’ or

‘dependency theory’ is a significant contribution to the field of
development studies. However, it has been subject to several
criticisms:

1. Exaggeration of Dependency: Critics argue that Frank’s

theory exaggerates the extent of dependency of
underdeveloped countries on developed ones1. They
suggest that this perspective overlooks the internal
factors within underdeveloped countries that may
contribute to their state of underdevelopment1.
2. Overemphasis on Economic Factors: The theory has
been criticized for focusing too much on economic factors
and not taking into consideration the country’s political,
social, cultural, and environmental factors that might be
contributing to underdevelopment12.
3. Neglect of Class Structures: Some critics point out that
Frank’s theory does not give enough importance to
specific relations of production and class structures3. They
argue that these elements can have significant impacts on
a country’s development or underdevelopment3.
4. Historical Accuracy: Critics have also questioned the
historical accuracy of Frank’s theory. They argue that the
‘metropolis-satellite’ relationship he describes may not
accurately reflect the historical realities of all regions and
periods1.
5. Deterministic Approach: Frank’s theory is often seen as
deterministic, suggesting that underdevelopment is an
inevitable outcome of a country’s participation in the
global capitalist system4. This perspective may
oversimplify the complex processes involved in
development and underdevelopment4.

In conclusion, while A.G. Frank’s ‘development of

underdevelopment’ provides valuable insights into global
economic dynamics, it may not fully account for the
multifaceted nature of development and underdevelopment.
 Powered by AI

Is the theory of cultural lag valid in present times? Discuss.

The theory of cultural lag, first introduced by W.F. Ogburn in

19221, suggests that a period of maladjustment occurs when the
non-material culture is struggling to adapt to new material
conditions2. This theory remains relevant in present times,
especially considering the rapid pace of technological
advancements3.

In today’s digital age, technological progress often outpaces

societal adaptation. For instance, the widespread availability of
computers and the internet has significantly impacted various
aspects of society, from the workplace to social interactions4.
However, societal norms, regulations, and attitudes often lag
behind these technological changes4.

Another example is the development of certain vaccines and

medical treatments. While these advancements are beneficial from
a scientific perspective, they have been opposed by individuals
over moral, ethical, and religious concerns4. This highlights the
gap that can exist between material advancements (in this case,
medical technology) and non-material culture (values and
beliefs)4.

However, it’s important to note that while the theory of cultural

lag provides a valuable framework for understanding these
challenges, it is not without limitations. It tends to focus on
technological determinism and may not fully account for other
factors that influence societal change2. Furthermore, it presupposes
that technology has independent effects on society at large2, which
may oversimplify the complex interplay between different aspects
of culture.

In conclusion, while the theory of cultural lag remains relevant in

understanding certain aspects of societal change in present times, it
should be complemented with other theories and perspectives for a
more comprehensive understanding3.
 Powered by AI

Critically examine the contribution of dependency theories in

understanding the present global scenario.

Dependency theories emerged in the 1950s and 1960s as a

response to modernization theories, which posited that
underdeveloped countries could achieve economic growth and
development by following the path of Western industrialized
nations1.

Dependency theories, on the other hand, argued that the global

economic system is structured in such a way that it perpetuates the
underdevelopment of poorer countries, while benefiting the
wealthier, more developed nations1.

One of the key contributions of dependency theories is their

emphasis on the historical and structural roots of global
inequality1.

Dependency theorists, such as Andre Gunder Frank and Immanuel

Wallerstein, argue that the global economic system has been
shaped by centuries of colonialism, imperialism, and unequal trade
relations1. This perspective highlights the importance of
understanding the historical processes that have led to the current
global division of labor1.

Another important contribution of dependency theories is their

focus on the role of international institutions and global
governance in perpetuating global inequalities1. Dependency
theorists argue that institutions such as the World Bank, the
International Monetary Fund (IMF), and the World Trade
Organization (WTO) often promote policies that favor the interests
of the wealthier nations, while exacerbating the vulnerabilities of
poorer countries1.

However, dependency theories have also faced several criticisms

and limitations. One of the main critiques is that they tend to
overemphasize the role of external factors in shaping
underdevelopment, while downplaying the importance of internal
dynamics1. Critics argue that this perspective can lead to a
deterministic and overly pessimistic view of the development
prospects of poorer countries1.

In conclusion, dependency theories have made significant

contributions to our understanding of the present global scenario
by highlighting the historical and structural roots of global
 Powered by AI

inequality and the role of international institutions in perpetuating

these disparities1. However, their limitations suggest that they
should be used in conjunction with other theories for a more
comprehensive understanding of global development.

. Examine the dialectical relation between tradition and modernity in the

study of social change.

The dialectical relationship between tradition and modernity is a

key concept in the study of social change. This relationship is
characterized by a constant interaction, conflict, and synthesis
between the old (tradition) and the new (modernity), leading to
continuous social transformation12.

Dhurjati Prasad Mukerji, one of the founding fathers of sociology

in India, argued that there is a dialectical relation between India’s
tradition and modernity12. He believed that traditions are central to
the understanding of Indian society12. The encounter of tradition
with modernization, which came to India during the British period,
created certain cultural contradictions, adaptations, and in some
cases situations of conflict12. This encounter resulted in two
consequences: conflict and synthesis1. Indian society, as D.P.
Mukerji envisages, is the result of the interaction between tradition
and modernity1.

This dialectical relationship can be seen in many aspects of

contemporary society. For instance, while modern technology has
transformed many aspects of life, traditional beliefs and practices
continue to shape people’s attitudes towards these changes3.
Similarly, while modern institutions such as democracy and
capitalism have become dominant, traditional forms of social
organization and economic activity continue to exist and influence
the functioning of these institutions4.
 Powered by AI

In conclusion, the dialectical relationship between tradition and

modernity provides a useful framework for understanding social
change. It highlights the complex interplay between continuity and
change, and between local cultures and global influences12.

Extra

Here are some examples of traditional beliefs and practices that

continue to shape society:

1. Communication and Interaction: Cultural customs and

traditions can influence how we greet each other, express
gratitude, or show respect1. Nonverbal signals such as eye
contact, body language, and tone of voice can have different
meanings and convey different messages in different
cultures1.
2. Personal and Professional Choices: Our cultural
background can shape our personal and professional
choices. It influences our ideas about success, happiness,
and the meaning of life and can affect our careers,
relationships, and lifestyles1.
3. Political and Ethical Views: Cultural values also shape our
political and ethical views, guiding our actions and
determining how we engage with the world1.
4. Religion: Religion is a significant cultural influence that
shapes people’s moral and ethical values, social norms, and
traditions1. Different religions have different beliefs,
practices, and rituals that influence society differently1.
5. Natural Resource Management: In some societies,
traditional cultural values and beliefs play a crucial role in
the sustainable management of natural resources2. For
instance, cultural norms and values such as totems, taboos,
traditional ceremonies, and the formation of old age group
committees as well as the role of the spirit mediums have an
impact on the conservation of natural resources2.
 Powered by AI

6. Health Beliefs: The beliefs and traditions of community

members can have a profound effect on the health of the
community3. Traditional beliefs regarding specific health
behaviors such as smoking can influence policy3.
7. Social Practices, Rituals, and Festive Events: These
involve a dazzling variety of forms: worship rites; rites of
passage; birth, wedding and funeral rituals; oaths of
allegiance; traditional legal systems; traditional games and
sports; kinship and ritual kinship ceremonies; settlement
patterns; culinary traditions; seasonal ceremonies; practices
specific to men or women only; hunting, fishing and
gathering practices4.

. Illustrate the conflicts and tensions experienced by societies

undergoing social change.

Societies undergoing social change often experience conflicts and

tensions. These can arise due to various factors:

1. Class-Based Struggles: Social change can lead to increased

awareness and mobilization around class-based issues1. This
can result in conflicts between different social classes,
particularly if the changes are perceived to benefit one class
at the expense of another1.
2. Gender Issues: Changes in societal norms and values can
lead to shifts in gender roles and expectations1. This can
cause tension between those who embrace these changes and
those who resist them1.
3. Racial and Ethnic Discrimination: Social change can also
bring to the forefront issues of racial and ethnic
discrimination1. Conflicts can arise when marginalized
groups challenge the status quo and demand equal rights and
opportunities1.
4. Resource Distribution: According to the conflict
perspective, society is constantly in conflict over resources,
and that conflict drives social change2. For example, civil
rights movements of the 1960s challenged the racially
unequal distribution of political power and economic
resources2.
 Powered by AI

5. Cultural Conflicts: Rapid social change can lead to tensions

between traditional cultural norms and new societal values 34.
This can result in conflicts within societies as different
groups struggle to reconcile their beliefs with the changing
social landscape34.
6. Resistance to Change: Some members of society may resist
social change, leading to conflict with those who support or
are driving the change34. This resistance can stem from fear
of the unknown, perceived threats to social status or identity,
or disagreement with the direction of change34.

In conclusion, conflicts and tensions are often an inherent part of

social change. They reflect the struggles within societies as they
adapt to new realities.

Write a short essay on the Latin American perspective on

'dependency'.

The Latin American perspective on ‘dependency’ is a significant

strand of political-economic thought that emerged out of the UN
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean
(ECLAC) shortly after World War II1. This perspective, also
known as dependency theory, sought to explain the persistent
levels of under-development in Latin America by situating
national economies within their global economic context1.

Notable scholars in this intellectual tradition include Raúl

Prebisch, Fernando Cardoso, and Andre Gunder Frank1. They
argued that under-development as experienced in Latin America
and elsewhere is the direct result of capital intervention, rather
than a condition of “lacking” development or investment1. The
processes that generate high-incomes in Western Europe and the
United States are those that maintain the rest of the world in a state
of dependency vis-à-vis wealth extraction1.

Dependency theory emerged as a response to modernization

theory, which posited that nations move linearly through
successive stages of growth1. In contrast, dependency theorists
argued that international capitalism developed such that some
 Powered by AI

countries secured dominant positions early on, and others,

including those in Latin America, Asia, and Africa, dependent
ones later on2.

In the neoliberal era, dependency theory’s key theoretical insight

— that global capital flows structure development and under-
development — remains highly relevant1. This perspective has had
a profound impact on our understanding of global economic
dynamics and continues to influence policy praxis and social
science research1.

In conclusion, the Latin American perspective on ‘dependency’

provides a critical lens through which to understand the global
economic system. It highlights the structural roots of global
inequality and challenges conventional narratives about economic
development1.

"Social change can be brought about through development". Illustrate from

the contemporary situation of India.

Social change through development is a key aspect of the

contemporary situation in India. The country has witnessed
significant social changes over the past few decades, largely driven
by economic development, technological advancements, and
policy reforms12.

1. Economic Development: Economic development has led to

the emergence of a middle class in India12. This has resulted
in changes in consumption patterns, lifestyle choices, and
aspirations, thereby driving social change12.
2. Technological Advancements: The advent of digital
technology and the internet has transformed various aspects
of Indian society1. It has democratized access to
information, fostered innovation, and created new avenues
for social interaction and participation1.
 Powered by AI

3. Policy Reforms: Government policies aimed at social

welfare and inclusive development have also brought about
significant social changes1. For instance, policies related to
education, health, and social security have contributed to
improvements in human development indicators1.
4. Infrastructure Development: Developments in physical
infrastructure such as transportation and communication
networks have facilitated mobility and connectivity, thereby
influencing social dynamics12.
5. Social Movements: Social movements advocating for
issues such as gender equality, environmental sustainability,
and human rights have also played a crucial role in driving
social change1.

In conclusion, development in various forms - economic,

technological, infrastructural, and policy-driven - has been a key
driver of social change in contemporary India12..

Feminist scholars argue that 'New media' is masculine and hence

reinforces structural hierarchies rather than reconfiguring them.
Comment.

Feminist scholars have indeed critiqued ‘New Media’ from a

gender perspective. They argue that while new media technologies
have the potential to democratize access to information and foster
innovation, they can also reinforce existing gender hierarchies12.

One of the key arguments is that new media, like many other
social institutions, is not gender-neutral1. It is shaped by the same
social, cultural, and economic forces that perpetuate gender
inequality in other areas of life1. For instance, men continue to
dominate the fields of technology and media, both in terms of
participation and decision-making1. This male dominance can
influence the design, content, and use of new media technologies
in ways that reflect and reinforce patriarchal norms1.
 Powered by AI

Moreover, feminist scholars argue that new media often

perpetuates harmful stereotypes and objectifies women2. For
example, women are often portrayed in a sexualized manner in
digital advertising and video games2. Such representations can
contribute to harmful attitudes and behaviors towards women2.

However, it’s important to note that new media also offers

opportunities for challenging gender hierarchies12. Women’s
movements have used social media platforms to raise awareness
about gender issues, mobilize support, and advocate for change12.
Furthermore, digital platforms provide spaces for women to
express their voices, share their experiences, and connect with
others12.

In conclusion, while new media can indeed reinforce structural

hierarchies, it also has the potential to challenge them. The key
lies in how these technologies are used and who gets to control
them12.

Technology has accelerated the process of development and dependency.

Discuss

Technology has indeed played a significant role in accelerating the

process of development and dependency in contemporary
societies123.

Development: Technology has been a key driver of economic

development, transforming industries, creating new markets, and
improving productivity1. For instance, advancements in digital
technology have revolutionized sectors such as communication,
business, government, travel, and agriculture2. The advent of the
Internet of Things (IoT) has led to significant improvements in
areas like energy usage and transportation1. Artificial Intelligence
(AI) is another promising development that could significantly
alter sectors like healthcare, finance, and transportation1.
 Powered by AI

Moreover, technology has also contributed to human development. It has

democratized access to information, fostered innovation, and created new avenues
for social interaction2. Digital technologies can support and accelerate the
achievement of Sustainable Development Goals – from ending extreme poverty to
reducing maternal and infant mortality, promoting sustainable farming and decent
work, and achieving universal literacy3.

Dependency: On the other hand, the rapid pace of technological change has also
led to increased dependency. This is evident in our reliance on the internet and
mobile technology for various aspects of our lives2. Such dependency can have
both positive and negative effects. On the positive side, it can enhance our ability
to make informed decisions and build relationships2. However, it can also lead to
issues such as shortened attention spans, privacy invasion, and cyberbullying 1.

Furthermore, the increasing use of automation and AI has sparked concerns about
job losses and widening income inequality1. These developments highlight how
technology can not only drive development but also create new forms of
dependency and inequality1.

In conclusion, while technology has undoubtedly accelerated

development in many ways, it has also increased our dependency
on these technologies. This dual role of technology underscores
the need for careful management and regulation to ensure that its
benefits are widely shared and its potential harms are mitigated123.

In sociology, development is a multidimensional concept that signifies

progress or positive change for people who desperately need it1. It is a
branch of sociology that aims to study the correlation between socio-cultural
circumstances and development2. It attempts to form a causal relationship
between different components of economic development and societal factors,
such as social, cultural, and political spheres2.

Examine the social dimensions of displacement induced by

development. (150 words)

Development-induced displacement refers to the forced relocation

of marginalized people for the sake of development1. This
displacement often leads to several social dimensions of hardship
for those affected1.
 Powered by AI

Firstly, it leads to financial and social insecurity as displaced

people face challenges adjusting to new environments2. They often
suffer from loss of traditional livelihood and environmental
destruction1.

Secondly, displacement severs social ties which are often crucial

for survival in indigenous communities3. The loss of these
networks can lead to isolation and a sense of dislocation3.

Thirdly, displacement can exacerbate socio-economic inequalities.

The costs of such projects are often borne by the poorest and most
marginalized members of society2.

Lastly, displacement has politico-cultural dynamics. It is operated

through laws, policies, and political processes that may not take
into account the rights and needs of the displaced communities4.

In conclusion, while development projects can bring benefits to

society, they also impose significant social costs on displaced
individuals and communities12.

"Social conflict is both a cause and a consequence of social

change." Explain

Social conflict is indeed both a cause and a consequence of social

change12345.

As a cause of social change, conflict arises when resources, status,

and power are unevenly distributed between groups in society3.
This inequality can lead to tension and conflict, which can drive
social change12. For instance, class struggles, racial and ethnic
discrimination, and gender issues can all spark social movements
that challenge the status quo and push for change12.

On the other hand, social conflict can also be a consequence of

social change12. As societies evolve, they often undergo shifts in
 Powered by AI

social structures, norms, and values. These changes can disrupt

existing power dynamics and economic systems, leading to
conflicts as different groups struggle to adapt to the new social
landscape12. For example, economic development can exacerbate
socio-economic inequalities, leading to conflicts between different
social classes12.

In conclusion, social conflict and social change are deeply

interconnected. Conflict can drive change by highlighting
inequalities and prompting action. At the same time, the process of
change can generate new conflicts as societies navigate the
challenges of adaptation and transformation12.

Explain the relevance of the idea of 'cultural lag' in understanding social change.

The concept of ‘cultural lag’, first introduced by W.F. Ogburn in

19221, is highly relevant in understanding social change. It refers
to the idea that changes in society’s material culture (technology,
infrastructure, etc.) tend to outpace changes in non-material culture
(values, beliefs, norms, etc.)12.

In the context of social change, cultural lag helps explain the

tensions and adaptations that occur when technological
advancements or other changes in material culture outpace
adjustments in societal norms and values12.

For instance, the advent of digital technology has transformed

various aspects of life, but societal norms and regulations often lag
behind these technological changes12.

Cultural lag also highlights potential social problems that can arise
from this discrepancy. For example, the introduction of new
agricultural techniques may conflict with existing property rights,
or the widespread use of digital technology may outpace the
development of privacy laws2.
 Powered by AI

In conclusion, the concept of cultural lag provides a valuable

framework for understanding the complexities of social change
and predicting future societal challenges123.

Here are some examples of cultural lag in contemporary society:

1. Changes in attitudes towards gender and sexual identity:

There has been a significant shift in attitudes towards
gender and sexual identity, but societal norms and laws
often lag behind these changes1.
2. Changes in attitudes towards marriage and
relationships: Attitudes towards marriage and relationships
have changed significantly, especially with the acceptance
of same-sex marriage and cohabitation. However, societal
norms and laws may take time to catch up with these
changes1.
3. Advancements in Medical Technology: The development
of new medical technologies such as stem cell research, in
vitro fertilization, and life support systems often outpaces
the development of ethical guidelines and societal
consensus on these practices23.
4. Education System: Most schools still follow a 9-month
school year, a system originally designed for an agrarian
society where children needed to be home working in the
fields during the summer2.
5. Digital Technology: The rapid advancement of digital
technology has transformed various aspects of life, but
societal norms, regulations, and attitudes often lag behind
these technological changes1.

In conclusion, cultural lag is evident in many aspects of

contemporary society, highlighting the tension between rapid
technological progress and slower-paced societal adaptation 123.
 Powered by AI

How do societies address the challenges posed by cultural lag?

Societies address the challenges posed by cultural lag in several

ways:

1. Policy and Legislation: Governments can enact laws and

regulations to manage the impacts of technological change
and ensure that it aligns with societal values12. For instance,
privacy laws have been updated in many countries to
address concerns related to digital technology12.
2. Education and Awareness: Societies can invest in
education and awareness programs to help individuals
understand and adapt to changes12. This includes digital
literacy programs, public discussions about ethical issues
related to technology, and initiatives to promote responsible
use of technology12.
3. Inclusive Innovation: Ensuring that the process of
technological innovation is inclusive can help mitigate
cultural lag12. This involves including diverse perspectives
in the design and implementation of new technologies, and
ensuring that the benefits of technological progress are
widely shared12.
4. Social Movements: Social movements can play a crucial
role in challenging outdated norms and advocating for
change12. They can raise awareness about the social
implications of technological change and push for
reforms12.

In conclusion, addressing the challenges posed by cultural lag

requires a multi-faceted approach that involves policy
interventions, education, inclusive innovation, and social
activism12.

Assess the role of mass media as an agent of social change.

Mass media plays a crucial role as an agent of social change. It has

the power to disseminate information, shape public opinion, and
influence societal norms and values1234.
 Powered by AI

1. Information Dissemination: Mass media provides a

continuous flow of information about our society and the
world1. It keeps the public informed about various spheres
of life, such as politics, economy, and society3.
2. Shaping Public Opinion: Mass media helps in forming
public opinion1. It can bring about changes in societal
attitudes and behaviors by highlighting certain issues and
promoting specific narratives1.
3. Influencing Norms and Values: The content and messages
conveyed by mass media can influence societal norms and
values1. For instance, it can challenge traditional gender
roles, promote tolerance and diversity, or advocate for
social justice1.
4. Mobilizing Political and Social Groups: Mass media can
mobilize political and social groups4. It helps them share
their political standpoints and interests with their supporters,
organize meetings, and hold political rallies5.
5. Digital Revolution: Mass media has brought a process of
digital revolution, changing society rapidly in various forms
like socio-cultural, psychological, economic, political, etc1.
It is an agent of social change1.

However, it’s important to note that the impact of mass media on

social change can be both positive and negative. While it can
promote awareness and understanding, it can also perpetuate
stereotypes and misinformation. Therefore, the role of mass media
in social change is a complex one that requires careful analysis1234.

Schooling does not ensure upward mobility of all members of the

society. Discuss with reference to class societies.

While schooling is often seen as a pathway to upward mobility, it

does not necessarily ensure this for all members of society,
particularly in class societies1234.

In class societies, access to quality education and the benefits it

can bring are often unevenly distributed12. Children from wealthier
families typically have access to better educational resources and
opportunities, which can lead to better outcomes later in life12.
 Powered by AI

On the other hand, children from poorer families often face

numerous barriers to education, such as lack of access to quality
schools, inadequate learning materials, and the need to work to
support their families12.

Moreover, even when individuals from lower classes do attain

high levels of education, they may still face barriers to upward
mobility3. For instance, they may lack the social networks and
cultural capital that can facilitate access to high-paying jobs3.
Additionally, systemic biases and discrimination can also limit
their opportunities for advancement3.

Furthermore, education itself can reproduce class

inequalities4. For example, schools often reward the cultural
capital of the middle and upper classes while devaluing the
cultural capital of working-class students4. This can reinforce class
hierarchies and limit the potential of education to serve as a
pathway to upward mobility4.

In conclusion, while schooling can provide opportunities for

upward mobility, it does not guarantee this for all individuals. The
impact of schooling on social mobility is significantly influenced
by the broader socio-economic context1234.

“Education is a major source of Social Mobility in contemporary

society”. Explain

Education is indeed a major source of social mobility in

contemporary society12345.

Social mobility refers to the ability of an individual or family to

move up or down the social and economic ladder within a
society12. Education plays a crucial role in this process by
providing individuals with the skills and knowledge they need to
improve their socio-economic status12.
 Powered by AI

Education enhances social mobility in several ways:

1. Skill Development: Education equips individuals with the

skills and qualifications needed for better-paying jobs, thus
enabling them to move up the social ladder12.
2. Equal Opportunities: Education can act as a great
democratizing force, cutting across the barriers of caste and
class1. If provided to everyone equally, education can
enable children from low-income families to move upwards
in both social and economic spheres1.
3. Social Networks: Schools and universities provide
opportunities for individuals to form social networks that
can be beneficial later in life, such as connections that can
lead to job opportunities3.
4. Civic Participation: Education also promotes civic
participation and awareness, which can lead to increased
social mobility4.

However, it’s important to note that while education has the

potential to enhance social mobility, it does not guarantee it5.
Factors such as the quality of education, socio-economic
background, and societal structures can influence the extent to
which education promotes social mobility5.

“Education helps in perpetuating social and economic

inequalities.” Critically examine the statement.

Education is often seen as a pathway to social mobility, providing

individuals with the skills and knowledge they need to improve
their socio-economic status12. However, it’s important to note that
the educational system can also perpetuate social and economic
inequalities123.

Access to quality education is often unevenly distributed, with

children from wealthier families typically having access to better
educational resources and opportunities12.

On the other hand, children from poorer families often face

numerous barriers to education, such as lack of access to quality
 Powered by AI

schools, inadequate learning materials, and the need to work to

support their families12.

Even when individuals from lower socio-economic backgrounds

do attain high levels of education, they may still face barriers to
upward mobility12. For instance, they may lack the social networks
and cultural capital that can facilitate access to high-paying jobs12.

Moreover, education itself can reproduce class inequalities3.

Schools often reward the cultural capital of the middle and upper
classes while devaluing the cultural capital of working-class
students3. This can reinforce class hierarchies and limit the
potential of education to serve as a pathway to upward mobility3.

In conclusion, while education has the potential to enhance social

mobility, it does not guarantee this for all individuals. The impact
of schooling on social mobility is significantly influenced by the
broader socio-economic context1243.

Education is often viewed as an agency of social change.

However, in reality it could also reinforce inequalities and
conservatism. Discuss

Education is indeed often viewed as an agency of social change,

providing individuals with the skills and knowledge they need to
improve their socio-economic status123. It can bring about changes
in societal attitudes and behaviors by highlighting certain issues
and promoting specific narratives123.

However, it’s important to note that the educational system can

also reinforce inequalities and conservatism124.

Access to quality education is often unevenly distributed, with

children from wealthier families typically having access to better
educational resources and opportunities12.
 Powered by AI

On the other hand, children from poorer families often face

numerous barriers to education, such as lack of access to quality
schools, inadequate learning materials, and the need to work to
support their families12.

Even when individuals from lower socio-economic backgrounds

do attain high levels of education, they may still face barriers to
upward mobility12. For instance, they may lack the social networks
and cultural capital that can facilitate access to high-paying jobs12.

Moreover, education itself can reproduce class inequalities4.

Schools often reward the cultural capital of the middle and upper
classes while devaluing the cultural capital of working-class
students4. This can reinforce class hierarchies and limit the
potential of education to serve as a pathway to upward mobility4.

In conclusion, while education has the potential to enhance social

mobility, it does not guarantee this for all individuals. The impact
of schooling on social mobility is significantly influenced by the
broader socio-economic context1234.

What are some examples of social and economic inequalities

perpetuated by the educational system?

The educational system can indeed perpetuate social and economic

inequalities in several ways12345:

1. Social Stratification: The selection of students in many

areas is based on social class and status1. This ranking
depends on the honor, prestige, wealth, and property held by
an individual or group in society1.
2. Gender Inequality: Inequality on the grounds of gender is
common even in today’s age1. Male teachers may be more
partial toward female learners while some female teachers
may be more partial toward male learners1.
 Powered by AI

3. Caste System: The caste system in public educational

institutions is based on the transmission of lifestyle,
hereditary, and endogamy that involves a hierarchy of
status, occupation, and customary social practice of
exclusion that revolves around purity1.
4. Family Background: The family background of the
learners also plays a critical role in their learning as teachers
who are familiar with the parents of the learners may give
them special treatment1.
5. Parental Income: The income of parents is a huge
determining factor when it comes to equality in education as
those with high income can enroll their kids in good schools
and they may also receive preferential treatment1.
6. Religion: Religious inequality is one of the most common
forms of inequality when it comes to admission to
educational institutions1.

In conclusion, while education has the potential to enhance social

mobility, it does not guarantee this for all individuals. The impact
of schooling on social mobility is significantly influenced by the
broader socio-economic context12345.

Discuss the issues of access and exclusion in higher education in

India.

Access to and exclusion from higher education in India are

significant issues influenced by various factors1234:

1. Enrollment: The Gross Enrollment Ratio (GER) in Higher

education in India is only 26.3%, which is quite low
compared to developed and other developing countries1.
The supply of higher education institutes is insufficient to
meet the growing demand in the country1.
2. Quality: Ensuring quality in higher education is a
challenge. Many colleges and universities in India are
unable to meet the minimum requirements laid down by the
UGC1.
 Powered by AI

3. Political Interference: Increasing interference of politicians

in the management of higher education jeopardizes the
autonomy of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs)1.
4. Poor Infrastructure and Facilities: Poor infrastructure is
another challenge to the higher education system of India,
particularly the institutes run by the public sector suffer
from poor physical facilities and infrastructure1.
5. Inadequate Research: There is inadequate focus on
research in higher education institutes1. There are
insufficient resources and facilities, as well as limited
numbers of quality faculty to advise students1.
6. Social Stratification: The selection of students in many
areas is based on social class and status3. This ranking
depends on the honor, prestige, wealth, and property held by
an individual or group in society3.
7. Gender Inequality: Inequality on the grounds of gender is
common even in today’s age3. Male teachers may be more
partial toward female learners while some female teachers
may be more partial toward male learners3.
8. Caste System: The caste system in public educational
institutions is based on the transmission of lifestyle,
hereditary, and endogamy that involves a hierarchy of
status, occupation, and customary social practice of
exclusion that revolves around purity4.
9. Family Background: The family background of the
learners also plays a critical role in their learning as teachers
who are familiar with the parents of the learners may give
them special treatment3.
10. Parental Income: The income of parents is a huge
determining factor when it comes to equality in education as
those with high income can enroll their kids in good schools
and they may also receive preferential treatment3.
11. Religion: Religious inequality is one of the most common
forms of inequality when it comes to admission to
educational institutions3.
 Powered by AI

Trace the trajectory of development perspectives on social

change.

The trajectory of development perspectives on social change

has evolved over time, with various sociological thinkers
contributing to the understanding of how societies transform
and progress1. These theories have shifted from a focus on
economic growth and modernization to a more
comprehensive understanding of social change that includes
culture, politics, and human agency1. Here are some key
perspectives:

1. Karl Marx: Historical Materialism and Class Struggle -

Marx’s theory posits that social change is driven by
economic factors and class struggle1. According to Marx,
societies progress through different stages of economic
development, leading to class struggle and eventually social
change1.
2. Max Weber: Social Action and Rationalization - Weber’s
theory emphasizes the role of ideas, values, and social
action in shaping societies1. Weber argued that social
change is driven by the process of rationalization, where
traditional values and beliefs are replaced by rational,
calculated actions1.
3. Emile Durkheim: Social Integration and Anomie -
Durkheim’s theory focuses on the role of social integration
and the balance between individualism and collective
norms1. Durkheim argued that societies evolve from
mechanical solidarity to organic solidarity. However, rapid
social change can lead to anomie, a state of normlessness
and disintegration1.
4. Talcott Parsons: Functionalism and Social Systems -
Parsons’ functionalist perspective emphasizes the role of
social systems and their need to maintain equilibrium1.
According to Parsons, societies are complex systems of
interrelated parts that must work together to maintain
stability and order1.

In conclusion, the trajectory of development perspectives on

social change has evolved from a focus on economic factors
and class struggle to a more comprehensive understanding
of the role of culture, social action, and social integration1.
 Powered by AI

Sociologists argue for democratization of science and

technology for inclusive development. Comment.

Sociologists argue that the democratization of science and

technology is crucial for inclusive development12. This
perspective posits that scientific and technological
advancements should be accessible to all sections of society,
not just a privileged few12.

Democratizing science and technology involves expanding

technological design to include diverse interests and
values3. It means ensuring that the benefits of scientific and
technological progress, such as job creation, skill
development, and poverty reduction, are shared widely12.

Inclusive development is about expanding human freedoms

and capabilities4. Science, technology, and innovation (STI)
can help overcome some of the main challenges of
development by expanding people’s choices, learning
capabilities, and opportunities4. However, this requires STI
policies that promote social inclusion4.

However, it’s important to note that the democratization of

science and technology is not an automatic process. It
requires deliberate policies and actions to ensure that
scientific and technological advancements are used in ways
that benefit all members of society4
 Powered by AI

There are several policies that promote the democratization

of science and technology:

1. Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy (STIP) in

India: This policy aims to bring about profound changes
through short-term, medium-term, and long-term mission
mode projects by building a nurtured ecosystem that
promotes research and innovation on the part of both
individuals and organizations1.
2. Scientific Policy Resolution (SPR 1958) in India: This
policy laid the foundation for science and technology in
India. It recognized that science and technology were
crucial for nation-building and national prosperity2.
3. Technology Policy Statement (TPS 1983) in India: This
policy focused primarily on meeting people’s aspiration
through technological development. The primary feature of
TPS 1983 was technological self-reliance through
promotion and development of indigenous technologies2.
4. Open Access Initiatives: Platforms like Google Scholar
promote the democratization of knowledge by providing
free access to scholarly literature3.

5. Digitization Efforts: Organizations like Open Library and

HathiTrust are working to digitize books and other
resources, making them accessible to a wider audience3.

In conclusion, these policies and initiatives aim to make

science and technology more accessible, inclusive, and
beneficial for all members of society123.

. Are traditional social institutions getting weakened as

agents of social change in the contemporary society?
Substantiate.

Traditional social institutions have historically been

significant agents of social change, shaping societal norms,
values, and structures12. However, in contemporary society,
the influence of these institutions appears to be
weakening34.
 Powered by AI

Several factors contribute to this trend.

Firstly, the rapid pace of technological change and

globalization has led to the emergence of new social
structures and patterns that challenge traditional norms12.
For instance, digital technology has transformed various
aspects of life, from communication and business to social
interactions12.

Secondly, societal attitudes and values are increasingly

shaped by individual experiences and choices rather than by
traditional institutions12. This shift towards individualism
has weakened the influence of traditional institutions on
social change12.

Thirdly, traditional institutions themselves are undergoing

significant changes due to internal and external pressures34.
These changes can weaken their ability to act as agents of
social change34.

In conclusion, while traditional social institutions continue

to play a role in shaping society, their influence as agents of
social change appears to be weakening in contemporary
society34.

Is humanity at the mercy of Nature, Science, and

Technology? Comment in the light of the pandemic
situation.

The relationship between humanity and the forces of nature,

science, and technology is complex and multifaceted.

Nature is a force that humanity has always been at the

mercy of. Natural disasters such as earthquakes, hurricanes,
and pandemics like COVID-19 remind us of our
vulnerability. However, humanity has also shown resilience
in the face of these challenges, adapting and finding ways to
survive and thrive.
 Powered by AI

Science is a tool that humanity uses to understand and

navigate the natural world. It provides us with the
knowledge to predict natural phenomena, develop
medicines to combat diseases, and create technologies that
improve our quality of life. However, it’s also a double-
edged sword. While it empowers us, our reliance on it also
makes us vulnerable to its limitations and uncertainties.

Technology, on the other hand, is a manifestation of our

scientific knowledge. It has the power to greatly enhance
our capabilities, allowing us to achieve feats that were once
thought impossible. But as with science, our dependence on
technology can also be a source of vulnerability.
Technological failures or misuse can have serious
consequences.

In the light of the pandemic situation, all three forces -

nature (the virus), science (medical research), and
technology (vaccines and communication tools) - have
played significant roles. The virus has posed an
unprecedented challenge, science has been our main
weapon in understanding and combating the virus, and
technology has enabled us to maintain social connections
and continue working during lockdowns.

So yes, in many ways, humanity is at the mercy of these

forces. But we also have the power to influence them
through our actions and decisions. It’s a delicate balance
that requires wisdom, foresight, and a respect for the
interconnectedness of all things.

Critically analyze the role of science and technology in

bringing about social change

Science and technology have played a pivotal role in

bringing about social change. Here’s a critical analysis of
their impact:

Positive Impacts:
 Powered by AI

1. Improved Communication: Technology has

revolutionized the way we communicate. The advent of the
internet, smartphones, and social media has made it easier
for people to stay connected, share information, and
mobilize for causes they care about.
2. Access to Information: The internet has democratized
access to information. People can now learn about almost
anything from the comfort of their homes. This has
empowered individuals and has had a profound impact on
education, politics, and culture.
3. Healthcare Advances: Science and technology have led to
significant advancements in healthcare. From the
development of new drugs and treatments to the use of
technology for diagnostics and telemedicine, these advances
have improved health outcomes and increased life
expectancy.

Negative Impacts:

1. Digital Divide: While technology has the potential to

democratize access to information, it can also exacerbate
inequalities. Those without access to technology are left
behind in a world that is increasingly digital.
2. Privacy Concerns: The proliferation of digital technologies
has raised serious concerns about privacy. Data collection
and surveillance have become pervasive, leading to debates
about the trade-offs between security and privacy.
3. Job Displacement: Technological advancements can lead
to job displacement. Automation and artificial intelligence
are replacing jobs in many industries, leading to concerns
about unemployment and economic inequality.

In conclusion, while science and technology have the

potential to bring about significant social change, it’s
important to navigate their development in a way that
maximizes benefits and minimizes harm. This requires
thoughtful policies, public discourse, and an emphasis on
ethics in science and technology.

How is the increasing use of technology changing the status

of women in Indian society?
 Powered by AI

The increasing use of technology is indeed bringing

significant changes to the status of women in Indian society.
Here are some key points:

1. Empowerment through Participation: Today, of the 5

million professionals in the IT sector in India, about 36%
are women1. Women’s participation in research and
development sectors has been increasing year by year1. This
increased participation in the workforce has led to economic
empowerment and an elevated social status for many
women.
2. Breaking Stereotypes: Women are making significant
contributions to science and technology, breaking
stereotypes in the process1. For instance, Dr Tessy Thomas,
also known as “The Missile Woman of India”, is a
prominent scientist at the Defence Research and
Development Organization (DRDO)1. Such examples are
inspiring more women to pursue careers in STEM (Science,
Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) fields.
3. Government Support: The Indian government’s policy
interventions have significantly encouraged women’s
participation in STEM fields1. This has helped bring about a
change in the face of women’s involvement in these fields1.
4. Challenges: Despite these positive changes, challenges
persist. The digital divide can exacerbate inequalities, with
those lacking access to technology being left behind2. There
are also concerns about privacy and data security with the
proliferation of digital technologies2.

In conclusion, while technology has played a significant

role in elevating the status of women in Indian society, it is
also important to address the challenges that come with it to
ensure that these benefits can be enjoyed by all.

Examine science and technology as agents of social change.

Science and technology are indeed powerful agents of social

change. They have the ability to transform societies in
profound ways. Here’s an examination of their role:

Science:

1. Medical Advances: Scientific research has led to numerous

medical breakthroughs, from antibiotics to vaccines,
improving health outcomes and increasing life expectancy.
 Powered by AI

This has resulted in significant demographic shifts and

changes in societal structures.
2. Environmental Awareness: Science has played a crucial
role in raising awareness about environmental issues, such
as climate change and biodiversity loss. This has led to
changes in attitudes and behaviors, and has influenced
policy-making at all levels.
3. Knowledge and Education: The scientific method
promotes critical thinking, problem-solving, and evidence-
based decision making. The spread of scientific literacy has
empowered individuals and communities, fostering a culture
of innovation and progress.

Technology:

1. Communication: Technological innovations like the

internet, social media, and smartphones have revolutionized
the way we communicate, making it possible to connect
with people around the world instantly. This has facilitated
the exchange of ideas, fostered global communities, and
transformed social dynamics.
2. Economic Impact: Technology has transformed
economies, creating new industries and job opportunities.
However, it can also lead to job displacement due to
automation, necessitating societal adaptations such as re-
skilling and changes in education systems.
3. Access to Information: Technology has democratized
access to information, empowering individuals with
knowledge. However, it also raises issues related to digital
divide and information overload.

In conclusion, while science and technology are powerful

drivers of social change, they also present new challenges
that societies must navigate. The impacts are not uniformly
positive or negative, but rather depend on how these tools
are used and governed.
Powered by AI