TISS
TISS
TISS
By submitting this assignment, you acknowledge that you have read and understood all the rules
as per the terms in the registration contract, in particular the assignment and assessment rules in
The IIE Assessment Strategy and Policy (IIE009), the intellectual integrity and plagiarism rules in
the Intellectual Integrity Policy (IIE023), as well as any rules and regulations published in the
student portal.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. No material may be copied from original sources, even if referenced correctly, unless it is a
direct quote indicated with quotation marks. No more than 10% of the assignment may
consist of direct quotes.
2. Make a copy of your assignment before handing it in.
3. Assignments must be typed unless otherwise specified.
4. All work must be adequately and correctly referenced.
5. Begin each section on a new page.
6. Follow all instructions on the assignment cover sheet.
7. This is an individual assignment.
Referencing Rubric
Providing evidence based on valid and referenced academic sources is a fundamental educational principle and the
cornerstone of high‐quality academic work. Hence, The IIE considers it essential to develop the referencing skills of our
students in our commitment to achieve high academic standards. Part of achieving these high standards is referencing in a
way that is consistent, technically correct and congruent. This is not plagiarism, which is handled differently.
Poor quality formatting in your referencing will result in a penalty of a maximum of ten percent being deducted from the
mark awarded, according to the following guidelines. Please note, however, that evidence of plagiarism in the form of
copied or uncited work (not referenced), absent reference lists, or exceptionally poor referencing, may result in action
being taken in accordance with The IIE’s Intellectual Integrity Policy (0023).
Markers are required to provide feedback to students by indicating (circling/underlining) the information that best
describes the student’s work.
Minor technical referencing errors: 5% deduction from the overall mark – the student’s work contains five or more errors
listed in the minor errors column in the table below.
Major technical referencing errors: 10% deduction from the overall mark – the student’s work contains five or more errors
listed in the major errors column in the table below.
If both minor and major errors are indicated, then 10% only (and not 5% or 15%) is deducted from the overall mark.
The examples provided below are not exhaustive but are provided to illustrate the error.
Required: Minor errors Major errors
Technically correct referencing style in technical correctness of referencing In technical correctness of referencing
style style
Deduct 5% from mark awarded Deduct 10% from mark awarded
Consistency Minor inconsistencies. Major inconsistencies.
The referencing style is generally Poor and inconsistent referencing style
The same referencing format has been consistent, but there are one or two used in‐text and/or in the bibliography/
used for all in‐text references and in the changes in the format of in‐text reference list.
bibliography/reference list. referencing and/or in the bibliography. Multiple formats for the same type of
For example, page numbers for direct referencing have been used.
quotes (in‐text) have been provided for For example, the format for direct quotes
one source, but not in another instance. (in‐text) and/or book chapters
Two book chapters (bibliography) have (bibliography/ reference list) is different
been referenced in the bibliography in two across multiple instances.
different formats.
Technical correctness Generally, technically correct with some Technically incorrect.
minor errors. The referencing format is incorrect.
Referencing format is technically correct The correct referencing format has been Concepts and ideas are typically
throughout the submission. consistently used, but there are one or referenced, but a reference is missing from
two errors. small sections of the work.
Concepts and ideas are typically Position of the references: references are
Position of the reference: a reference is referenced, but a reference is missing only given at the beginning or end of large
directly associated with every concept or from one small section of the work. sections of work.
idea. Position of the references: references are For example, incorrect author information
only given at the beginning or end of every is provided, no year of publication is
paragraph. provided, quotation marks and/or page
For example, quotation marks, page For example, the student has incorrectly numbers for direct quotes missing, page
numbers, years, etc. are applied correctly, presented direct quotes (in‐text) and/or numbers are provided for paraphrased
sources in the bibliography/reference list book chapters (bibliography/reference material, the incorrect punctuation is used
are correctly presented. list). (in‐text); the bibliography/reference list is
not in alphabetical order, the incorrect
format for a book chapter/journal article is
used, information is missing e.g. no place
of publication had been provided
(bibliography); repeated sources on the
reference list.
Congruence between in‐text referencing Generally, congruence between the in‐text A lack of congruence between the in‐text
and bibliography/reference list referencing and the bibliography/ referencing and the bibliography.
reference list with one or two errors. No relationship/several incongruencies
All sources are accurately reflected and There is largely a match between the between the in‐text referencing and the
are all accurately included in the sources presented in‐text and the bibliography/reference list.
bibliography/reference list. bibliography. For example, sources are included in‐text,
For example, a source appears in the text, but not in the bibliography and vice versa,
but not in the bibliography/reference list a link, rather than the actual reference is
or vice versa. provided in the bibliography.
In summary: the recording of references In summary, at least 80% of the sources In summary, at least 60% of the sources
is accurate and complete. are correctly reflected and included in a are incorrectly reflected and/or not
reference list. included in reference list.
Overall Feedback about the consistency, technical correctness and congruence between in‐text referencing and bibliography:
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Introduction
It is important that you are able to display both sound subject knowledge as well as the ability to
adequately apply it to scenarios you will encounter as an Intermediate Phase Social Sciences educator. As
these are critical components of this module, this Portfolio of Evidence is designed to critically assess
both.
This Portfolio of Evidence needs to be developed as you progress through this module. The questions in
this assignment all form part of a single Portfolio of Evidence (POE) to be submitted at the end of the
module.
1. This assessment structure is comprised of two (2) activities. In order to prepare you for these
activities, there will be two (2) compulsory ICE tasks that must be submitted for marking to your
lecturer as per their timeline. These need not be included in the POE. The aim of the 2
compulsory ICE tasks is to render additional support to you so that you can be able to complete
your Summative PoE effectively.
2. You will have 2 lecturer facilitated touch points which will be scheduled prior to the expected
completion of each POE activity as per pacer; this is an opportunity for you to receive
developmental feedback on your draft work before submitting the summative at the end of the
module.
NB: Failure to submit your final portfolio of evidence by the prescribed time and date (as per PAS)
will be treated as an absence from examination, and not as a late assignment. Please refer to the
IIE 009 Assessment Strategy and Policy (updated January 2015) for further details. The final
portfolio will be required to be submitted through Safe Assign.
Instructions
Please ensure that you complete each compulsory ICE task (submission date to be set by your
lecturer) prior to attempting the POE activity. You will then prepare a draft of the activity in
preparation for the lecturer facilitated touch point (date will appear in your Time Table).
Take note of the penalty for poor referencing.
Use the Rubrics at the end of the Activities to guide you.
Based on this content, describe why and how you could use source rich
opportunities to create an engaging Social Sciences classroom for this
content. Provide at least two examples of suitable sources to support your
discussion.
1.3 Choose a suitable assessment type to measure learning by the end of the (15)
taught lesson from the summary in 1.2, and write a short essay that
considers the following points:
A description of the chosen type of assessment.
An explanation of why you chose this particular type of assessment.
Substantiate how it would benefit teaching and learning in this context.
2.1 POE Task 2 comprises of four (4) 5‐mark questions. You are required to complete (20)
all 4 of these questions.
Below is an extract from the agenda of the Social Sciences Grade 4 ‐7 Orientation
held by Hyginus HN October, Curriculum Advisor: Social Sciences of the West Coast
Education District in Paarl in October 2015.
Your task is to find a suitable source to teach a topic from Food and Farming in
South Africa – WAYS OF FARMING for a Grade 4 Social Sciences lesson. When you
have found the source, you need to:
2.1.4 Explain how you would weave a writing activity into your lesson. (Remember (5)
to reference the researched source)
Rubric: Activity 1
1.1
/10
Explanation of Little or no A fair discussion on the A reasonably positioned A strong argument that A powerful
how SS understanding on the impact of teachers on case on how SS teachers describes how SS argument on
teachers can possibilities that a SS the SS curriculum but can impact positively on teachers can impact what SS teachers
impact teacher can have on lacks depth of thought the curriculum but does positively to the SS can do to
the teaching of SS in and understanding of not relate it to the curriculum. support its
IP. possibilities of the argument presented inclusion in the
teacher. above. curriculum with /10
reference to the
points made
above.
TOTAL
/20
1.2
1.3
ACTIVITY 2
2.1.1
Criteria Unsatisfactory Distinguished
0–1 2 Total
Full reference given for the source. Reference not given (0) Reference is given and is given in
OR compliance with Harvard Referencing
Reference is not given in compliance with System
Harvard Referencing System (1)
Explanation of how the source Explanation is not given or incomprehensibly Please note that a maximum of 1
was used in the original written (0) OR mark may be awarded for these
publication. Explanation is clear in describing where the criteria.
source was found (1)
Explanation of why the Explanation is not given or incomprehensibly Explanation is clear in describing why the
source was chosen. written (0) OR source was chosen. Rationale draws on
Explanation is unclear in describing why the relevant criteria for selection.
source was chosen. (1)
OR
Rationale draws on irrelevant criteria for
selection. (1)
TOTAL /5
2.1.2
2.1.3
2.1.4
2.2