Chapter 5 THE INTERNAL ENVIRONMENT ANALYSIS

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

CHAPTER 5:

THE INTERNAL ENVIRONMENT ANALYSIS

THE INTERNAL ENVIRONMENT


A strategic management analysis is conducted to provide companies with competitive
advantage. External environment scanning or analysis alone is not enough to achieve it. Strategic
managers must also consider the need to scan or analyze the internal environment of a company. An
internal environment analysis identifies a company's internal strategic factors, such as its strengths
and weaknesses, to enable it to exploit opportunities and avoid threats of the external environment.
The internal environment refers to the environment within a company. Its variables are not
within the control of the top management within a short-run period.

It consists of the following strategic elements:


1. Corporate culture
2. Organizational structure
3. Business resources

CORPORATE CULTURE

Every company has its own separate and distinct culture. Corporate culture refers to the
beliefs, values, practices and expectations of every member of a company on how the company
conducts itself. In short, it is a company's way of doing things. It defines corporate identity. Corporate
culture is developed, nurtured, and transmitted from one generation of employees to the next.
Corporate culture is one source for gaining a competitive advantage. It shapes the people
within a company to produce behavioral norms, provides them with a distinct identity and
belongingness and acts as a motivating factor to generate commitment among employees. Companies
that have effective corporate or organizational cultures have motivated and productive employees
resulting in less employee turnover. Effective corporate culture must be sustained.

ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
The pattern of the relationships among the members of a company is depicted in its
organizational structure. A company's organizational structure defines how tasks are to be performed,
how resources should be utilized, and how relationships among employees should be defined.
Every organizational structure has its own advantages and disadvantages. Strategic managers
must thoroughly assess and evaluate the structure that is most appropriate for a company to achieve its
goal effectively and efficiently. A well-defined organizational structure exhibits an effective flow of
information, a well-defined control and monitoring system, and a clearly patterned chain of command.

BUSINESS RESOURCES
Resources are assets owned or controlled by a company. They can be tangible or intangible assets.
Examples of tangible assets include land, processing plants, machinery, equipment, and inventory.
Intangible assets are patents, trademarks, processes, formulas, and computer program. Resources
also include humans, processes, technologies, knowledge and skills.
A resource alone, however, does not provide competitive advantage to a company. It must be a
strategic resource, and a company must have the capabilities to exploit it to gain competitive
advantage. A resource is considered strategic when the following attributes exist:
1. It can exploit opportunities.
2. It is not common among competitors.
3. It is difficult or costly to imitate or copy
4. There are no equivalent substitutes.
When a company does not have the capability or competency to exploit strategic resources,
competitive advantage can hardly be achieved.

CONDUCTING AN INTERNAL ENVIRONMENT ANALYSIS


Conducting an internal environment analysis is more complicated compared to that of an external
environment scanning for the following reasons:
1. An external environment analysis uses secondary data, while an internal scanning makes use
of primary data. Secondary data are readily available from the reports and publications of
government agencies and other organizations. Hence, gathering data for an external
environment analysis is not as burdensome compared to that of an internal environment
analysis.
2. An internal environment analysis evaluates the five strategic elements comprising the internal
environment separately, while an external environment analysis simultaneously scans the
different strategic factors.
3. An internal environment analysis includes an assessment of a company's competency to
exploit opportunities and gain competitive advantage.
Strategic managers adopt either the resource-based approach or the value chain analysis when
conducting an internal environment analysis. These strategic management tools are discussed in
Chapter 6

ANALYZING CORPORATE CULTURE

One of the best ways to assess corporate culture is to determine the present state of the
individual or employee, the group or functional unit, and the entirety of a company. This is usually
determined through one-on-one personal interviews with employees as individuals, team leaders and
corporate managers, as well as a survey instrument. The analysis of the internal audit will be supported
by the findings from personal interviews and survey questionnaires. The objective of the analysis is to
determine how corporate culture affects the formulation and adoption of proposed strategies. The range
of issues and concerns to be assessed and evaluated vary from business to business.

To conduct a corporate culture scanning, the following steps are to be performed:


1. Identify cultural values and core beliefs
2. Gather information about the employees' perception of company values and beliefs.
3. Rate company practices, values, and beliefs as perceived by the employees.
4. Integrate collected information from research and observation.
5. Describe the company's current culture, whether it can provide competitive advantage or not.
A template to assess corporate culture is shown in Table 5.1. The details regarding corporate
culture (Column A) and their elements (Column B) vary among companies. The perception of the
employees on corporate culture is statistically computed. It is preferable that the data collected shall be
quantitatively expressed to facilitate analysis and evaluation. They are sourced mainly from employee
surveys, either through interviews or with the use of questionnaires. These data will be collaborated
with the available records of a company.

Table 5.1 Corporate Culture Analysis Matrix

ANALYZING ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

The analysis of an organizational structure starts by evaluating the present organizational


chart. The chart reflects the arrangement of work groups, flow of communication and reporting, and
chain of command in a company. The objective of the analysis is to determine the structure that can
achieve the organizational goals effectively and efficiently. The analysis of an organizational structure is
easily conducted with the aid of an organizational audit.

When analyzing an organizational structure, the following steps are to be observed:

1. Assess the present business model and organizational structure.


2. Identify problems encountered recently with the present model and structure.
3. Examine the performance of different functional units.
4. Define possible measures to improve the structure.
A business model is an approach adopted by a company about the way it generates money in
the current business setting. It includes the customers, the products or services, the manner of
generating money, the measures adopted to sustain competitive advantage, and the manner and
channel of distributions.

There are several types of business models that a company may adopt to earn money. Some of
these models include the following:

1. Profit pyramid model


2. Advertising model
3. Customer solution model
4. Efficiency model
5. Entrepreneurial model

Strategic managers must determine the point in the value chain where the company earns
money so that the business model will function effectively.

The different functional areas of a business such as finance, operations, human resources,
marketing, and research and development must also be critically evaluated to determine the different
functional resources that must be exploited and identify different strategic issues

Table 5.2 Organizational Structure Analysis Matrix

ANALYZING BUSINESS RESOURCES


A resource must be a strategic factor for a company to gain competitive advantage. The
resources of a company can be grouped under the following categories:
1. Financial resources
2. Human resources
3. Physical resources
4. Technological resources
5. Organizational resources
The objective of the analysis is to determine which business resources contribute to the
attainment of competitive advantage with which a company obtains benefits. Competitive advantage
refers to a company's resources (e.g., valuable, rare, and not imitable) and its capability to obtain
benefits from them and to overcome competitive forces. When a company has a core competency - it
has the capability to exploit its resources at different functional levels to achieve competitive advantage.
Capability refers to the ability of a company to exploit its strategic resources. Competency is the
integration or coordination of cross-functional capabilities. A company will gain distinctive competency
when its core competency is superior over that of its rivals.
The VRIO framework, which was introduced by Jay Barney, an American professor in strategic
advantage. VRIO stands for value, rareness, imitability, and organization.
The following steps are undertaken when identifying the core and distinctive competencies of a
company:
1. Determine if the company has valuable resources or capabilities.
2. Scan if competitors have the capabilities to provide what customers consider valuable.
3. Assess if the company's resources or capabilities can be imitated.
4. Evaluate if the company is organized to exploit its resources and capture what customers
consider valuable.
5. Assess if the company has competitive advantage.
A team composed of functional managers, division chiefs, and supervisors is formed to
determine the core and distinctive competencies of a company. The most effective mechanism is
through a focus group discussion. The data collected from competitive intelligence become the basis
for evaluating competitors.
Table 5.3 Business Resources Analysis Matrix

Once a company identifies its core and distinctive competencies, it can easily identify its
strengths and weaknesses which are to be analyzed as well. However, only a company’s important
strengths and weaknesses shall be included in the list. The list shall have a maximum of 10 items.
Table 5.4 Strengths and Weaknesses Analysis Matrix

The following steps are to be followed when using the strengths and weaknesses analysis:
1. Identify the company's strengths and weaknesses.
2. Gather information and identify the possible reasons for their selections.
3. Assign a weight that will range from 0.0 to 1.0 to each identified strength and weakness based
on its importance and urgency to the company. The most important strength or weakness shall
receive the highest weight of 1.0, and the factor that is not important is designated as 0.0.
However, the total weight in all instances in Column D shall be equal to 1.0.
4. Rate how the company's management handles the identified strengths and weaknesses using a
particular scale. If a 5-point Likert scale is used, 5.0 is outstanding, 4.0 is above average, 3.0 is
average, 2.0 is below average, and 1.0 is poor.
5. Determine the weighted score by multiplying the assigned weight (Column D) by the rate given
(Column E). The total weighted score reflects the internal performance of the company in
responding to the needs of the industry. The average total score is 3.0 when using the 5-point
Likert scale. When the weighted score is relatively higher than 3.0, it means the company is
above average in terms of the strengths and weaknesses of the competitors in the industry.
6. Clearly define the company's strengths and weaknesses status. The strength/weakness index is
above average when the total weighted score is above 3.0, meaning the company is responding
favorably to the challenges of the external environment by effectively utilizing its strength in
exploiting its resources.

The first three strengths and weaknesses can be classified as the company's strategic factors
and will be used when making a SWOT analysis.

DEFINE A COMPANY'S CURRENT PROFITABILITY


The last stage in the evaluation of a company's internal environment is to define its present status in
terms of profitability and market share performance. The profitability performance issue does not only
consider whether a company is gaining or losing but also evaluates the level of profitability in terms of
the level of investment, investments realized by competitors, and the industry average.
Strategic managers also assess the ability of a company to sustain its profitability performance by
evaluating the different factors that contribute to the realization of profit. One important factor that
strategic managers must define is the current market share of a company compared to that of its
competitors. It is very important for a company to define its current profitability and market share
performance as a basis for strategy formulation in order to gain competitive advantage.

You might also like