Anti-Fencing Law
Anti-Fencing Law
Anti-Fencing Law
Special Penal Laws are laws that punishes acts not defined and penalized by the Revised
Penal Code.
Under a special penal law, crimes are regarded as mala prohibita or the act is merely prohibited
by law. It means that the commission of an act or omission is already punishable under the
Special Penal Law. In addition, there are certain crimes defined under the Special Penal Laws
that is covered under the Katarungang Pambarangay. Notable of these laws are the Batas
Pambansa Blg. 22 and the PD 1612 or commonly known as the Fencing law.
Anti-Fencing Law
Fencing-refers to the crime of buying or transacting with stolen goods knowing or should have
known that they are proceeds of a crime.
Fencing – is “the act of any person who, with intent to gain for himself or for another, shall buy,
receive, possess, keep, acquire, conceal, sell or dispose of, or shall buy and sell, or in any other
manner deal in any article, item, object or anything of value which he knows, or should be
known to him, to have been derived from the proceeds of the crime of robbery or theft.” (P.D.
1612, Section 2[a])
Fence – includes “any person, firm, association corporation or partnership or other organization
who/which commits the act of fencing.” (P.D. 1612, Section 2[b])
Elements:
1) A crime of robbery or theft has been committed;
2) The accused, who is not a principal or accomplice in the commission of the crime of robbery
or theft, buys, receives, possesses, keeps, acquires, conceals, sells or disposes, or buys and
sells, or in any manner deals in any article, item, object or anything of value, which has been
derived from the proceeds of the said crime;
3) The accused knows or should have known that the said article, item , object or anything of
value has been derived from the proceeds of the crime of robbery or theft; and
4) There is on the part of the accused intent to gain for himself or for another.
Jurisprudence: (Estrella v. People, G.R. No. 212942, June 17, 2020, Per Inting, J.)
The law requires that the offender has knowledge or ought to have known that the things being
transacted were proceeds of the crime of robbery or theft. For clarity, the bare minimum
requirement is that the offender ought to have known – and thus actual knowledge is not
necessary.
Other laws in Special Penal Laws which are common crimes such as VAWC, Safe Space Acts
and Child abuse have a penalty which is beyond the coverage of Katarungan Pambarangay.
As a rule in Katarungang Pambarangay, when the law imposes a penalty that is not part of the
exceptions, the crime is under the Katarungang Pambarangay Proceedings.